Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
土木工程     
简支梁桥拱型桥面连续构造的受力性能
王岗1,2, 谢旭1, 王城泉1, 申永刚1
1.浙江大学 土木工程学系,浙江 杭州 310058;2.浙江建设职业技术学院 城市建设工程系,浙江 杭州 311231
Mechanical performance of arch-type continuous slab-deck on simply-supported girder bridge
WANG Gang1,2, XIE Xu1, WANG Cheng-quan1, SHEN Yong-gang1
1. Department of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; 2. Department of Urban Construction, Zhejiang College of Construction, Hangzhou 311231, China
 全文: PDF(1979 KB)   HTML
摘要:

针对国内简支梁桥桥面连续混凝土开裂的现状,建立有限元模型分析桥面连续构造的破坏机理.分析结果表明:造成桥面连续混凝土开裂的主要原因是简支梁的纵向位移、转动及不均匀沉降引起的内力,直接作用于混凝土或通过纵向连接钢筋传递至混凝土,为了改变内力的传递方式,解决桥面连续混凝土的开裂问题,根据拱型结构拱脚受拉使拱顶产生正弯矩的受力特点,提出一种新型的拱型桥面连续装置.为了验证该装置的有效性,制作了拱型桥面连续和传统型桥面连续的模型并进行了设计荷载下的受力试验.试验对比结果及有限元计算表明:拱型桥面连续装置对混凝土的拉力有较好的分散作用,大大减小了桥面连续混凝土的纵桥向拉应力,有效地改善了桥面连续混凝土的开裂损伤.

Abstract:

 Focusing on the concrete cracking of the continuous slab-deck (CSD) on simply-supported girder bridges in China, a finite element model (FEM) of the CSD was established to analyze the damage mechanism. The analysis results show that the concrete cracking is mainly caused by the loading of longitudinal displacement, rotational deformation and uneven settlement of girders altogether, directly or through the longitudinal rebar. Therefore, to prevent the concrete from cracking, an arch-type CSD with the property that the tension loaded at arch feet would exert positive moment on the arch top was designed. The field comparison tests of an existing CSD and an arch-type CSD were conducted to verify the effectiveness of the new structure. The test and FEM results show that the longitudinal tensile stress of concrete on the arch-type CSD can be well scattered and significantly reduced by the arch structure, thus avoid the damage of the CSD.

出版日期: 2015-04-01
:  U 448.27  
基金资助:

浙江省交通厅纵向课题资助项目(2009H37);浙江省科技创新团队资助项目(2010R50037).

通讯作者: 申永刚,男,博士.     E-mail: sygdesign@zju.edu.cn
作者简介: 王岗(1976—),男,博士生,从事桥梁结构研究.E-mail: elong2001@zju.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

王岗, 谢旭, 王城泉, 申永刚. 简支梁桥拱型桥面连续构造的受力性能[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2014.06.012.

WANG Gang, XIE Xu, WANG Cheng-quan, SHEN Yong-gang. Mechanical performance of arch-type continuous slab-deck on simply-supported girder bridge. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2014.06.012.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2014.06.012        http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2014/V48/I6/1049

[1] 苏龙,杨絮,胡章立.空心板桥病害剖析及桥面连续结构整治对策[J].公路交通技术,2011(2): 100-103.
SU Long, YANG Xu, HU Zhang-li. Analysis for diseases of hollow slab bridges and remediation countermeasures for continuous structures on deck[J]. Technology of Highway and Transport, 2011(2): 100-103.
[2] 王虎,胡长顺,王秉纲.简支梁桥梁端处桥面连续铺装层结构计算分析[J].西安公路交通大学学报,2000,20(4): l3.
WANG Hu, HU Chang-shun, WANG Bing-gang. Calculating analysis for the warpage and stress of deck pavement at tip position of assembly simple beam bridge[J]. Journal of Xi’an Highway University, 2000,20(4): 13.
[3] 姚辉.钢筋砼简支梁桥面连续伸缩缝早期损坏及预防[J].宁波大学学报: 理工版,2005,18(2): 261-263.
YAO Hui. Causes of premature damage of continuous control joints on deck of reinforced concrete bridge with moveable girders and preventive measures[J]. Journal of Ningbo University: NSEE, 2005,18(2): 261-263.
[4] 刘丽芬.混凝土简支梁桥面部分连续新型构造研究[D]. 西安:长安大学,2006: 16-21.
LIU Li-fen. Research on a new simple-continuous structure of the simple-supported bridge[D]. Xi’an: Chang’an University, 2006: 16-21.
[5] 潘志炎,茅兆祥, 刘敏,等.简支梁桥面连续构造的有限元分析与改进[J].公路交通科技,2010,27(4): 89-94.
PAN Zhi-yan, MAO Zhao-xiang, LIU Min, et al. Finite element analysis and improvement of continuous slab-deck of simple supported beam bridge[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2010,27(4): 89-94.
[6] 何畅,向中富.简支梁桥面连续构造的空间仿真分析[J].重庆交通学院学报,2005,24(1): 915.
HE Chang, XIANG Zhong-fu. The space simulation analysis of simply-supported girder bridges with continuous slab decks[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2005,24(1): 915.
[7] OKEIL A M,ELSAFTY Adel. Partial continuity in bridge girders with jointless decks[J]. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 2005,10(4): 229-238.
[8] WING K M, KOWALSKY M J. Behavior, analysis, and design of an instrumented link slab bridge[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2005,10(3): 331-334.
[9] ALEXANDER A, CLIFFORD L, JIM A, et al. Eliminating deck joints using debonded link slabs: research and field tests in Ontario[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013(18): 768-778.
[10] ABE T, KIDA T. The fatigue durability study on blind expansion joint using continuous fiber sheet[C]∥Proceedings of 5th Symposium on Decks of Highway Bridges. Osaka: JSCE ,2006.
[11] FUJSHIRO M, SUDA K, NAGATA Y. Jointless prestressed concrete viaduct using ECC[M]∥ Walraven & Stoelhorst. Tailor Made Concrete Structures. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2008: 379-383.
[12] LI V C, FISCHER G, KIM Y, et al. Durable link slabs for jointless bridge decks based on strain-hardening cementitious composites[R]. Michigan: Michigan Department of Transportation, 2003.
[13] KIM Y Y, FISCHER G, LI V C, et al. Performance of bridge deck link slab designed with ductile engineered cementitious composite[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2004: 101(6): 792-801.
[14] LEPECH M, LI V C. Design and field demonstration of ECC link slabs for jointless bridge decks[C]∥Proceedings of CONMAT-5. Vancouver, BC: [s.n.], 2005.
[15] KEOLEIAN G A, KENDALL Alissa, DETTLING J E,et al. Life cycle modeling of concrete bridge design: comparison of engineered cementitious composite link slabs and conventional steel expansion joints[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2005,11(1): 51-60.
[16] 中华人民共和国国家标准.混凝土结构设计规范(GB50010-2011)[S].北京: 中国建筑工业出版社,2011.

[1] 黄海燕,谢旭,吴冬雁,王荣富,王渊. 预应力混凝土部分斜拉桥的阻尼特性[J]. J4, 2012, 46(5): 804-810.
[2] 谢旭, 李季隆, 赵俊亮, 张鹤, 山下幹夫. 基于遗传算法的车辆参数识别方法[J]. J4, 2010, 44(9): 1818-1824.
[3] 谢旭, 吴冬雁, 王建峰, 等. 伸缩缝车辆冲击引起的钢箱梁桥振动特性[J]. J4, 2009, 43(10): 1923-1930.