Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)  2016, Vol. 42 Issue (1): 47-52    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2015.07.312
农业科学     
低温寡日照条件下不同类型杂交稻品种的生态适应性
李敏, 罗德强, 江学海, 周维佳, 姬广梅, 王学鸿, 李树杏
贵州省水稻研究所,贵阳550006
Ecological adaptability of rice cultivars with different types under the low temperature and weak sunshine condition
LI Min, LUO Deqiang, JIANG  Xuehai, ZHOU Weijia, GI Guangmei, WANG Xuehong, LI Shuxing
(Rice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550006,  China)
 全文: PDF(466 KB)   HTML (
摘要: 探讨杂交水稻品种的生态适应性,为超高产杂交水稻品种合理选用提供依据。在低温寡日照生态区,以生态适应型品种(筑优606和黔优108)及生态敏感型品种(Y两优2号和Y两优302)为试验材料,比较研究了2种类型水稻品种的产量形成、氮素吸收与利用、根系特性的差异。结果表明:与生态适应型品种相比,生态敏感型品种的产量平均降低了13.8%,其中结实率和千粒质量分别降低了9.9%和15.5%;较生态适应型品种,生态敏感型品种在分蘖中期、抽穗期和成熟期的氮素积累量分别降低18.8%、10.8%和14.5%,氮肥吸收利用率降低了17.9%,生态敏感型品种在抽穗期的茎叶含氮量呈降低趋势,成熟期的茎叶含氮量及比例均呈增加趋势,氮素转运量和氮素转运率分别降低了24.6%和19.4%;生态敏感型水稻品种在抽穗抽穗期和成熟期根系伤流强度分别降低了8.8%和21.6%。籽粒库容充实差是低温寡日照地区杂交水稻品种适应性的主要产量特征,而生育中后期氮素营养积累少、转运率不高是影响产量的重要生理原因。
Abstract: In addition to the genetic cultivar characteristic and cultivation strategy, the environmental condition is considered as another important factor affecting grain yield in rice. Previous studies were carried out on yield formation of rice under the low temperature and weak sunshine condition, however, the ecological adaptability such as yield formation, nitrogen accumulation and utilization of different thermos-photoperiod sensitive rice cultivars to the low temperature and weak sunshine is still obscure, as well as the response mechanism. The main objective of this study was to determine the ecological adaptability of different rice cultivars under the low temperature and weak sunshine condition in the middle and late growth duration. Field experiments were conducted in 2013 and 2014 in Guiyang which was regarded as the representative eco-site with low temperature and weak sunshine, 35 rice genotypes including released cultivars and potential rice combinations were used as tested materials, and two ecology-adaptive cultivars (Zhuyou606 and Qianyou108) and two ecology-sensitive cultivars (Y Liangyou2 and Y Liangyou302) were selected out as the tested materials to study the differences in grain yield and yield formation, nitrogen accumulation and distribution, root characteristics. The results showed that:  When values were averaged across cultivars and years, compared with ecology-adaptive cultivars, ecology-sensitive cultivars obtained a lower grain yield by 13.8%, which was mainly caused by a 9.9% lower filled grain ratio and 15.5% lower 1 000-grain mass.  In comparison with ecology-adaptive cultivars, ecology-sensitive cultivars achieved 18.8%, 10.8%, 14.5% lower nitrogen accumulation amount at the mid-tillering (critical stage of productive tillering), heading, maturity stage, respectively, resulting in 17.9% lower nitrogen recovery efficiency (RE). Furthermore, a higher nitrogen accumulation amount in stem-leaves at heading stage and a lower nitrogen accumulation amount in stem-leaves at maturity stage were found in ecology-sensitive cultivars, relative to ecology-adaptive cultivars, and the nitrogen translocation amount from stems and leaves to panicle achieved 3.41 kg/667m2, which was 24.6% lower than that in ecology-adaptive cultivars,the nitrogen translocation ratio from stems and leaves to panicle achieved 38.55%,which was 19.4% lower than that in ecology-adaptive cultivars.   The root bleeding intensity of ecology-adaptive cultivars achieved 20.2 kg/(h·667m2)  at heading stage and 4.55 kg/(h·667 m2) at maturity stage, which were 8.8% and 21.6% lower than that in ecology-adaptive cultivars, respectively. Accordingto the results, a strategy to increase the grain yield of ecology-adaptive cultivars is suggested: keeping a higher filled grain ratio and a higher 1 000-grain mass, which is able to be accomplished by increasing nitrogen accumulation during the growth period from heading to maturity. Moreover, these methods such as cultivating strong roots and improving root activity are helpful to increase the amount of nitrogen absorption.
出版日期: 2016-01-20
CLC:  S 511  
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
李敏
罗德强
江学海
周维佳
姬广梅
王学鸿
李树杏

引用本文:

李敏, 罗德强, 江学海, 周维佳, 姬广梅, 王学鸿, 李树杏. 低温寡日照条件下不同类型杂交稻品种的生态适应性[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(1): 47-52.

LI Min, LUO Deqiang, JIANG Xuehai, ZHOU Weijia, GI Guangmei, WANG Xuehong, LI Shuxing . Ecological adaptability of rice cultivars with different types under the low temperature and weak sunshine condition. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(1): 47-52.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2015.07.312        http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/Y2016/V42/I1/47

[1] 蒲石林,邓飞,胡慧,钟晓媛,王丽,李武,李书先,廖爽,任万军. 杂交稻不同机插穴距及苗数配置对干物质生产与产量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(1): 21-30.
[2] 代邹,余华清,郭长春,马均,李娜,杨志远,徐徽,孙永健. 外源Na2SeO3和Na2SiO3对不同水稻拔节期镉吸收和积累的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 43(4): 441-450.
[3] 代邹, 王春雨, 李娜, 蒋明金, 严奉君, 徐徽, 孙永健, 马均. 硒对不同水稻幼苗镉胁迫的缓解作用及其对矿质营养的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(6): 720-730.
[4] 翟荣荣,余鹏,叶胜海,王俊梅,吴明国,林建荣,朱国富,张小明. 浙江省晚粳稻耐低氮品种的筛选和评价[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(5): 565-.
[5] 兰艳, 黄鹏, 江谷驰弘, 雷小波, 丁春邦, 李天. 成都平原稻作区施氮量和栽插密度对粳稻D46产量及品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(1): 63-73.
[6] 许光利, 刘佳, 梁成刚, 汪燕, 丁春邦, 李天. 灌浆结实期弱光对水稻籽粒氮代谢酶及蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(1): 53-62.
[7] 叶欣怡, 赵杏, 王小鹏, 钟一铭, 杨京平. 土壤亚铁、镉对水稻2种抗氧化酶和植株富集镉量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(1): 89-98.
[8] 张晓梅,丁艳锋,张巫军,吴晓然,李刚华. 西南稻区水稻产量的时空变化[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(6): 695-702.
[9] 吕腾飞,周伟,李应洪,张绍文,李玥,孙永健,马均. 杂交中籼稻长秧龄移栽的分蘖成穗特性[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(6): 659-672.
[10] 蒋明金, 马均, 孙永健, 严奉君, 徐徽, 杨志远, 孙加威. 播种量和氮肥运筹对直播杂交稻光合生产力及氮素利用的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(5): 516-526.
[11] 赵敏, 钟晓媛, 田青兰, 刘波, 孙红, 胡慧, 杨云洁, 任万军. 育秧环境与秧龄对杂交籼稻秧苗生长及机插质量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(5): 537-546.
[12] 夏冰,赵杨,魏颖娟,黄敏,敖和军,邹应斌. 不同种植地点超级杂交稻产量及氮磷钾吸收积累特点[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(5): 547-557.
[13] 童杰鹏,童川,王艳,任三娟,沈圣泉. 水稻低纤维突变体LCM527-1性状鉴定、遗传分析与基因定位[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(03): 261-268.
[14] 吕腾飞,周伟,孙永健,朱懿,严奉君,杨志远,马均. 不同秧龄和氮肥运筹对杂交籼稻株型的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 41(2): 169-178.
[15] 何俊俊, 杨京平*, 杨虎, 赵杏, 叶欣怡. 光照及氮素水平对水稻冠层叶片SPAD值动态变化的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2014, 40(5): 495-504.