Please wait a minute...
FITEE
Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng.  2013, Vol. 14 Issue (9): 663-681    DOI: 10.1631/jzus.C1300013
    
A review of interoperability assessment models
Reza Rezaei, Thiam-kian Chiew, Sai-peck Lee
Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
Download:   PDF(0KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  Interoperability is the ability of systems to provide services to and accept services from other systems, and to use the services exchanged so as to operate together in a more effective manner. The fact that interoperability can be improved means that the metrics for measuring interoperability can be defined. For the purpose of measuring the interoperability between systems, an interoperability assessment model is required. This paper deals with the existing interoperability assessment models. A comparative analysis among these models is provided to evaluate the similarities and differences in their philosophy and implementation. The analysis yields a set of recommendations for any party that is open to the idea of creating or improving an interoperability assessment model.

Key words： Interoperability      Assessment      Measurement     
Received: 10 January 2013      Published: 05 September 2013
CLC:  TP301  
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Reza Rezaei
Thiam-kian Chiew
Sai-peck Lee
Cite this article:

Reza Rezaei, Thiam-kian Chiew, Sai-peck Lee. A review of interoperability assessment models. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2013, 14(9): 663-681.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/fitee/10.1631/jzus.C1300013     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/fitee/Y2013/V14/I9/663


A review of interoperability assessment models

Interoperability is the ability of systems to provide services to and accept services from other systems, and to use the services exchanged so as to operate together in a more effective manner. The fact that interoperability can be improved means that the metrics for measuring interoperability can be defined. For the purpose of measuring the interoperability between systems, an interoperability assessment model is required. This paper deals with the existing interoperability assessment models. A comparative analysis among these models is provided to evaluate the similarities and differences in their philosophy and implementation. The analysis yields a set of recommendations for any party that is open to the idea of creating or improving an interoperability assessment model.

关键词： Interoperability,  Assessment,  Measurement 
[1] Jian Wu, Ting-ting Zhou, Bo Yuan, Li-qiang Wang. A digital moiré fringe method for displacement sensors[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(9): 946-953.
[2] Yin Zhao, Hong-guang Xu, Qin-yu Zhang. An analysis in metal barcode label design for reference[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(2): 173-184.
[3] Mehdi Ahmadi Jirdehi, Reza Hemmati, Vahid Abbasi, Hedayat Saboori. A multi-functional dynamic state estimator for error validation: measurement and parameter errors and sudden load changes[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(11): 1218-1227.
[4] Yong Ding, Nan Li, Yang Zhao, Kai Huang. Image quality assessment method based on nonlinear feature extraction in kernel space[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(10): 1008-1017.
[5] Jia Tang, Li-qiang Wang, Bo Yuan, Hong Jiang, Qi-ming Zhu. Design and calibration of a new high-definition three-dimensional laparoscopic system[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2015, 16(1): 79-84.
[6] Wei-dong Zhu, Biao Mei, Guo-rui Yan, Ying-lin Ke. Development of a monocular vision system for robotic drilling[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(8): 593-606.
[7] Jie Chen, Can-jun Yang, Jens Hofschulte, Wan-li Jiang, Cha Zhang. A robust optical/inertial data fusion system for motion tracking of the robot manipulator[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(7): 574-583.
[8] Ya-tao Zhang, Cheng-yu Liu, Shou-shui Wei, Chang-zhi Wei, Fei-fei Liu. ECG quality assessment based on a kernel support vector machine and genetic algorithm with a feature matrix[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(7): 564-573.
[9] Tong-yang Jiang, Mei-qin Liu, Xie Wang, Sen-lin Zhang. An efficient measurement-driven sequential Monte Carlo multi-Bernoulli filter for multi-target filtering[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(6): 445-457.
[10] Juan J. Cuadrado-Gallego, Alain Abran, Pablo Rodriguez-Soria, Miguel A. Lara. An experimental study on the conversion between IFPUG and UCP functional size measurement units[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(3): 161-173.
[11] Xiao-bo Li, Yong-lin Lei, Hans Vangheluwe, Wei-ping Wang, Qun Li. A multi-paradigm decision modeling framework for combat system effectiveness measurement based on domain-specific modeling[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2013, 14(5): 311-331.
[12] Jian-ping Yu, Wen Wang, Ke-qing Lu, De-qing Mei, Zi-chen Chen. A planar capacitive sensor for 2D long-range displacement measurement[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2013, 14(4): 252-257.
[13] Sahar Moghimi, Mohammad Hossein Miran Baygi, Giti Torkaman, Ehsanollah Kabir, Ali Mahloojifar, Narges Armanfard. Studying pressure sores through illuminant invariant assessment of digital color images[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2010, 11(8): 598-606.
[14] Chao Li, Xiao-hui Zheng, Xing Meng, Li Wang, Chun-xiao Xing. A methodology for measuring the preservation durability of digital formats[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2010, 11(11): 872-881.