Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
J4  2010, Vol. 44 Issue (1): 160-165    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2010.01.029
土木与建筑工程     
考虑腐蚀的埋地灰口铸铁管失效预测及可靠度分析
邵煜,张土乔,俞亭超
（浙江大学 土木工程学系,浙江 杭州 310058）
Failure prediction and reliability analysis of buried grey cast iron water mains considering corrosion
SHAO Yu, ZHANG Tu-qiao, YU Ting-chao
(Department of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)
 全文: PDF 
摘要：

针对早期埋设的灰口铸铁管存在的破损频繁、漏失严重等影响输配水安全问题,通过管土相互作用模型得到管道应力,应用腐蚀模型预测管道腐蚀深度,进而评估管道的剩余强度,结合失效准则得到管道失效预测模型,并运用蒙特卡罗方法对管道可靠度进行分析.计算模型充分考虑了管道腐蚀、各种外部荷载以及参数的不确定性对管道失效的影响.计算结果表明,在通常荷载作用下仅考虑管道受力,管道不会失效,腐蚀是导致管道失效的重要因素；管道安全因子的概率密度分布曲线呈对数正态分布；当使用时间为20～50 a时管道失效风险较大,在使用时间超过80 a之后,管道失效风险变小且呈现出略有下降的趋势；由于渗漏或不均匀沉降引起的管道基础局部流失在腐蚀深度超过一定值时对管道失效概率的影响较大.
关键词： 管土相互作用;  腐蚀;  剩余强度;  灰口铸铁管;  失效预测;  可靠度    
Abstract:

To resolve the serious breakage and leakage problems for the grey cast iron water mains buried in the early years in the water-supply system, pipe stresses were firstly calculated based on the pipe soil interaction model, and the corrosion depth was predicted by the corrosion model. Then, the residual strength associated with corrosion was evaluated, and a failure prediction model was given by using the failure criterion for the cast iron. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were used to perform the probabilistic analysis. The given model fully considers the influences of corrosion, external loads and uncertainties on the pipe failure. Results show that the pipes will not be failed when only considering the external loads. The corrosion is one of the very important factors contributing to the pipe failure. The probability density distribution of the safety factor of the pipe appears a lognormal distribution. The hazard of the pipe failure is large in 20-50 years, and it becomes small after 80 years and decreases with the time. The influence on the failure probability is large for considering soil bedding lost induced by the breakage or uneven settlement when the corrosion depth reaches a certain depth．
Key words: pipe soil interaction    corrosion    residual strength    grey cast iron pipe    failure prediction    reliability
出版日期: 2010-02-04
:  TU 991.36  
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金资助项目（50708091）；教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目(NCET-04-0525)；国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项资助项目（2008ZX07425-008） .
通讯作者: 张土乔,男,教授,博导.     E-mail: ztq@civil.zju.edu.cn
作者简介: 邵煜(1979-),男，浙江新昌人，博士，主要从事市政工程埋地管道相关研究.
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章　　
邵煜
张土乔
俞亭超

引用本文:

邵煜, 张土乔, 俞亭超. 考虑腐蚀的埋地灰口铸铁管失效预测及可靠度分析[J]. J4, 2010, 44(1): 160-165.

SHAO Yu, ZHANG Cha-Jiao, SHU Ting-Chao. Failure prediction and reliability analysis of buried grey cast iron water mains considering corrosion. J4, 2010, 44(1): 160-165.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2010.01.029    或    http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/eng/CN/Y2010/V44/I1/160

［1］ 王直民. 交通荷载作用下埋地管道的力学性状研究［D］. 杭州：浙江大学, 2006: 1-5．
WANG Zhi-min. Study on mechanical behaviors of buried pipelines under traffic loads ［D］. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2006: 1-5．
［2］ RAJANI B, MAKAR J, MCDONALD S, et al. Investigation of grey cast iron water mains to develop a methodology for estimating service life ［R］. Denver: AwwaRF, 2000．
［3］ AHAMMED M, MELCHERS R E. Probabilistic analysis of underground pipelines subject to combined stresses and corrosion ［J］. Engineering Structures, 1997, 19(12): 988994．
［4］ SADIQ R, RAJANI B, KLEINER Y. Probabilistic risk analysis of corrosion associated failures in cast iron water mains ［J］. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2004, 86(1): 1-10．
［5］ RAJANI B, TESFAMARIAM S. Estimating time to failure of cast-iron water mains under uncertainties ［J］. Water Management, 2007, 160(2): 83-88．
［6］ 俞树荣,李建华,李淑欣,等. 埋地管道腐蚀剩余寿命预测概率模型［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(6): 11-15．
YU Shu-rong, LI Jian-hua, LI Shu-xin, et al. Probability model for the prediction of corrosion remaining life of underground pipelines ［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2008, 18(6): 11-15．
［7］ SPANGLER M G. Pipeline crossing under railroads and highways ［J］. Journal of AWWA, 1964，56(12): 1029-1046．
［8］ 邵煜. 埋地管道的失效机理及其可靠性研究［D］. 杭州：浙江大学, 2008: 16-48．
SHAO Yu. Study on the failure mechanism and reliability valuation of buried pipelines ［D］. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2008: 16-48．
［9］ ROSSUM J R. Prediction of pitting rates in ferrous metals from soil parameters ［J］. Journal of AWWA, 1969, 61(6): 305-310．
［10］ SHEIKH A K, BOAH J K, HANSEN D A. Statistical modeling of pitting corrosion and pipeline reliability ［J］. Corrosion, 1990, 46(3): 190-197．
［11］ 赵国藩,金伟良,贡金鑫. 结构可靠度理论［M］. 北京：中国建筑工业出版社, 2000: 79-98．
［12］ BURMASTER D E, HULL D A. Using lognormal distributions and lognormal probability plots in probabilistic risk assessments ［J］. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 1996, 3(2): 235-255.
[1] 杨继虎, 孙志坚, 袁瑞峰, 黄浩, 陈天宇, 胡亚才. 电厂氟塑钢空预器的传热与积灰性能研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(3): 577-583.
[2] 温小栋, 蔡煜梁, 赵莉, 冯蕾. 凝灰岩机制砂混凝土抗低温硫酸盐侵蚀性[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2017, 51(3): 532-537.
[3] 肖新辉,鲁乃唯, 刘扬. 随机车流下公路钢桥疲劳可靠度分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(9): 1777-1783.
[4] 鲁乃唯, 罗媛, 汪勤用, Noori Mohammad. 车载下大跨度桥梁动力可靠度评估[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(12): 2328-2335.
[5] 周永刚,李培,敖翔,赵虹. 基于燃烧均匀性的对冲燃烧锅炉高温腐蚀抑制[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(9): 1768-1775.
[6] 刘扬,鲁乃唯,蒋友宝. 结构体系可靠度分析的改进支持向量回归[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(9): 1692-1699.
[7] 赖雄鸣, 张勇, 王成, 言兰, 缑锦. 基于OELM重构极限状态函数的可靠度计算方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(4): 692-698.
[8] 肖南,万洁. 考虑应力松弛的张力结构症状可靠度分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2014, 48(7): 1195-1201.
[9] 董康, 周昊, 杨玉, 王凌力, 岑可法. 二次风风量对旋流燃烧器气固流动特性的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2014, 48(12): 2162-2171.
[10] 余春江,王准,龚彬,骆仲泱. 生物质锅炉钢材在氯化钾接触条件下腐蚀特性[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2014, 48(11): 2046-2052.
[11] 肖南, 王海, 陈华鹏, 张飞林. 大气腐蚀下网架结构症状可靠度及寿命预测[J]. J4, 2013, 47(8): 1373-1378.
[12] 姬永生, 王志龙, 徐从宇, 周敏, 赵稳. 混凝土中钢筋腐蚀过程的极化曲线分析[J]. J4, 2012, 46(8): 1457-1464.
[13] 田浩, 金小平, 陈艾荣. 基于概率的钢筋混凝土桥梁加固措施影响分析[J]. J4, 2012, 46(6): 1097-1106.
[14] 孙晓燕, 潘宏, 王海龙, 王建秀. 大气环境下服役公路梁桥结构时变可靠度分析[J]. J4, 2012, 46(4): 643-649.
[15] 孙晓燕,董伟伟,王海龙,王捷. 考虑生命周期碳补偿成本的桥梁维修优化决策[J]. J4, 2012, 46(11): 2013-2019.