Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(理学版)  2017, Vol. 44 Issue (5): 623-630    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2017.05.019
旅游学     
基于网络文本的西溪湿地公园旅游体验要素结构特征分析
敬峰瑞1,2, 孙虎1, 龙冬平2
1. 陕西师范大学 地理科学与旅游学院, 陕西 西安 710119;
2. 中山大学 地理科学与规划学院 综合地理信息研究中心, 广东 广州 510275
Tourist experience elements structure characteristics analysis of Xixi National Wetland Park based on web text
JING Fengrui1,2, SUN Hu1, LONG Dongping2
1. School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China;
2. Center of Integrated Geographic Information Analysis, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yatsen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
 全文: PDF(993 KB)   HTML  
摘要: 将网络文本应用于旅游体验要素结构特征分析的研究还较少.以西溪国家湿地公园为例,携程网的游客点评为文本资料来源,利用内容分析法对点评文本进行旅游体验要素编码及要素评价等级评定,整理出西溪湿地公园的旅游体验要素结构和旅游体验质量评价数据集.在此基础上,运用SNA、IPA等手段深入分析了其结构特征.SNA分析结果显示:该旅游体验结构的整体协调性程度较高;湿地自然景观风貌是结构中最核心的要素;整体结构分化为2个有统计学意义和2个无统计学意义的子群结构等.IPA分析结果显示,各旅游体验要素的表现性得分普遍较高,体现游客的旅游体验评价较高.重要性得分差异较大,表明游客对于旅游体验各要素的感知重要程度存在差异.据此,对西溪国家湿地公园的可持续发展提出了相关建议.
关键词: 网络文本西溪湿地公园旅游体验社会网络分析    
Abstract: There are few researches on tourism experience elements structure analysis based on web text. We chose Xixi National Wetland Park as empirical object and selected tourists' comments on Ctrip as text data sources. Based on the coded tourism experience elements and the evaluated grades of the comment text with the method of textual analysis, we established tourism experience element structure and tourism experience evaluation data sets. In detail, we analyzed the structure characteristics by means of social network analysis (SNA) and IPA analysis. The SNA results showed that the structure had a high degree of coordination. The wetland natural landscape was the most core element of perception. The structure was divided into two statistical significant subgroups and two statistical in significant subgroups. The IPA results showed that the performance scores of most elements were high, which showed that tourists had a high evaluation on Xixi national wetland park. The importance scores of elements were remarkable different, which showed that tourists had different importance perceptions to these tourism experience elements. Finally, we provided related recommendations for the sustainable development of Xixi National Wetland Park.
Key words: web text    Xixi National Wetland Park    tourist experience    social network analysis
收稿日期: 2016-09-26 出版日期: 2017-05-01
CLC:  F592.7  
通讯作者: 孙虎,ORCID:http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-182X,E-mail:kycjh6@snnu.edu.cn.     E-mail: kycjh6@snnu.edu.cn
作者简介: 敬峰瑞(1992-),ORCID:http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3195-4037,男,硕士研究生,主要从事区域开发与环境治理研究,E-mail:jingfengruiforever@yahoo.com.
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
敬峰瑞
孙虎
龙冬平

引用本文:

敬峰瑞, 孙虎, 龙冬平. 基于网络文本的西溪湿地公园旅游体验要素结构特征分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2017, 44(5): 623-630.

JING Fengrui, SUN Hu, LONG Dongping. Tourist experience elements structure characteristics analysis of Xixi National Wetland Park based on web text. Journal of ZheJIang University(Science Edition), 2017, 44(5): 623-630.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2017.05.019        https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/CN/Y2017/V44/I5/623

[1] 刘滨谊,魏怡.国家湿地公园规划设计的关键问题及对策——以江阴市国家湿地公园概念规划为例[J].风景园林,2006(4):8-13. LIU B Y, WEI Y. Strategies and key issues to the planning and design of national wetland park-A case study in the conceptual planning of Jiangyin National Wetland Park[J]. Landscape Architecture,2006(4):8-13.
[2] 韩李荃,胡海波,鲁小珍,等.基于"三元论"的湿地公园规划——以南京八卦洲湿地公园总体规划为例[J].林业科技开发,2013,27(4):125-129. HAN L Q, HU H B, LU X Z, et al. Wetland Park Planning based on the Trialistic theory-As the example of overall design of Baguazhou Wetland Park in Nanjing[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology,2013,27(4):125-129.
[3] 吴后建,黄琰,但新球,等.国家湿地公园建设成效评价指标体系及其应用——以湖南千龙湖国家湿地公园为例[J].湿地科学,2014(5):638-645. WU H J, HUANG Y, DAN X Q, et al. System of evaluation indicators of construction effect of National Wetland Park and its application-A case of Qianlong Lake National Wetland Park in Hunan Province[J]. Wetland Science,2014(5):638-645.
[4] 刘红玉,李兆富,李玉凤,等.基于生态约束与支撑作用的国家湿地公园生态可持续评估指标研究[J].资源科学,2015,37(4):805-814. LIU H Y, LI Z F, LI Y F, et al. Evaluation of sustainable capacity of national wetland park ecological analysis based on constraint and support function[J]. Resources Science,2015,37(4):805-814.
[5] 崔丽娟,张曼胤,李伟,等.国家湿地公园管理评估研究[J].北京林业大学学报.2009,31(5):102-107. CUI L J, ZHANG M Y, LI W, et al. Management and assessment of national wetland parks[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2009,31(5):102-107.
[6] 潘丽丽,马扬梅.基于拥挤感知的西溪国家湿地公园游客心理容量研究[J].湿地科学,2014(5):662-668. PAN L L, MA Y M. Psychological capacity of tourist in Xixi National Wetland Park based on crowding perception[J]. Wetland Science,2014(5):662-668.
[7] 敬峰瑞,孙虎.基于游客视角的城市湿地公园游憩体验价值评价——以西安灞桥湿地公园为例[J].陕西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2016,44(3):110-117. JING F R, SUN H. Evaluation of the recreation experience value of urban wetland parks from a visitor perspective:A case of Baqiao Wetland Park in Xi'an City[J]. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2016,44(3):110-117.
[8] 魏遐,潘益听.湿地公园游客体验价值量表的开发方法——以杭州西溪湿地公园为例[J].地理研究,2012,31(6):1121-1131. WEI X, PAN Y T. Methodological study on development of value scale for tourists' experience in wetland parks:A case of Xixi Wetland Park in Hangzhou City[J]. Geographical Research,2012,31(6):1211-1131.
[9] COHEN E. A phenomenology of tourist experiences[J]. Sociology,1979,13(2):179-201.
[10] RYAN C. Recreational Tourism:A Social Science Perspective[M]. Oxford:Routledge,1991.
[11] OBENOUR W, PATTERSON M, PEDERSEN P, et al. Conceptualization of a meaning-based research approach for tourism service experiences[J]. Tourism Management,2006,27(1):34-41.
[12] BIGNÉ J E, ANDREU L, GNOTH J. The theme park experience:An analysis of pleasure, arousal and satisfaction[J]. Tourism Management,2005,26(6):833-844.
[13] QUAN S, WANG N. Towards a structural model of the tourist experience:An illustration from food experiences in tourism[J]. Tourism Management,2004,25(3):297-305.
[14] 谢彦君.旅游体验研究[M].北京:中国旅游出版社,2010. XIE Y J. Research on the Tourism Experience[M]. Beijing:China Travel and Tourism Press,2010.
[15] 李晓琴.旅游体验影响因素与动态模型的建立[J].桂林旅游高等专科学校学报,2006,17(5):609-611. LI X Q. Tourism experience factors and foundation of dynamic model[J]. Journal of Guilin Institute of Tourism,2006,17(5):609-611.
[16] 郑聪辉.旅游景区游客旅游体验影响因素研究——以杭州西湖景区为例[D].杭州:浙江大学,2006. ZHEN C H. Research on the Influencing Factors of the Tourist Experience within the Tourist Attractions:A Case Study of West Lake Scenic Area in Hangzhou City[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2006.
[17] 王媛,许鑫,冯学钢,等.基于文本挖掘的古镇旅游形象感知研究——以朱家角为例[J].旅游科学,2013,27(5):86-95. WANG Y, XU X, FENG X G, et al. Research on tourists' perceived image of ancient town using web text mining methods:A case study of Zhujiajiao[J]. Tourism Science,2013,27(5):86-95.
[18] 苗学玲,保继刚."众乐乐":旅游虚拟社区"结伴旅行"之质性研究[J].旅游学刊,2007,22(8):48-54. MIAO X L, BAO J G. Grounded theory of non-standardized grou
[1] 赵国超,吴佩一,虞晓芬. 智慧社区运营的主体识别与社会网络分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2022, 49(3): 384-390.
[2] 陈万隆, 冯友建. 基于铁路客运视角的长三角区域网络结构研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2021, 48(5): 606-616.
[3] 陈晨, 陈志钢. 旅游者商业化符号感知与体验真实性研究——以西安回民街为例[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2021, 48(2): 249-260.
[4] 任珮瑶, 赵振斌, 赵青阳, 禇玉杰. 基于游客留言内容分析的古镇旅游体验研究——以丽江束河古镇为例[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2017, 44(3): 354-362.
[5] 林文辉, 毛峰, 何虹, 赵文彪, 欧阳娟, 刘婷, 张登荣. 杭州市景点旅游流空间网络分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2016, 43(4): 458-464.
[6] 吴潘, 吴晋峰, 周芳如, 李佳丽. 目的地内部旅游交通通达性评价方法研究——以西安为例[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2016, 43(3): 345-356.