Comparison of speech intelligibility in spherical spaces of
specularly and diffusely reflecting boundaries
ZHANG Honghu1,2, ZHANG San-ming1
1. Institute of Architectural Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
The performance of diffusely reflecting boundary to improve the speech intelligibility in spherical spaces was quantitatively explored. The research was limited within geometrical acoustics. Omnidirectional point source was set at the sphere center, which is a typical position to cause sound focusing easily in a sphere. The boundary sound absorption coefficient was uniformly distributed. By calculating the sound impulse responses and related parameters, comparisons were made between the sound fields under two boundary reflecting patterns in spheres. Analytical and acoustical radiosity methods were used for the cases of the two types of boundary respectively. Clarity (C50) was adopted as the objective parameter to assess the speech intelligibility. The results showed that C50 is low with specularly reflecting boundary, and diffusely reflecting boundary generally enhances C50, especially in the sound focusing area near the sphere center. However, the improvement caused by the boundary reflection pattern may be still inferior to that caused by room shape.
[1] CARROLL M M, CHIEN C F. Decay of reverberant sound in a spherical enclosure [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977, 62(6): 14421446.
[2] CARROLL M M, MILES R N. Steadystate sound in an enclosure with diffusely reflecting boundary [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978, 64(5): 14241428.
[3] NOSAL E M, HODGSON M, ASHDOWN I. Improved algorithms and methods for room soundfield prediction by acoustical radiosity in arbitrary polyhedral rooms [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004, 116(2): 970980.
[4] BRADLEY J S. Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1986, 80(3): 837845.
[5] ISO/FDIS 9921, Ergonomics—assessment of speech communication [S]. 2002.
[6] ZAGAR L E. The use of the image source method for modeling room acoustics [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1983, 74(6): 1914.