Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(工学版)
水利工程、土木工程     
3种非淹没双体丁坝作用尺度划分准则及比较
曹晓萌, 顾正华
浙江大学 建筑工程学院 浙江 杭州 310058
Three classification criteria and their comparison impact scale between double non-submerged spur dikes
CAO Xiao-meng, GU Zheng-hua
College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
 全文: PDF(3150 KB)   HTML
摘要:

为了研究丁坝群对河流系统的作用,通过对不同间距下非淹没双体丁坝流场的比较分析,提出基于大尺度涡不相重叠、基于双丁坝断面流速分布相似和基于下游丁坝断面流速分布恢复的3种非淹没双体丁坝作用尺度划分准则,并对3种准则的优缺点及适用范围进行分析.在此基础上,分别运用3种划分准则对同一工况下非淹没双体丁坝的间距阈值进行计算,计算结果与恢复段长度的经验值进行对比,结果表明基于双丁坝断面流速分布相似和基于下游丁坝断面流速分布恢复准则的计算结果相近且均在经验范围之内,基于大尺度涡不相重叠准则的计算结果偏小,但计算简单,可结合丁坝回流区长度计算公式用于对丁坝群作用尺度进行初步估算.

Abstract:

In order to investigate the impact of spur dike group acting on river system, three classification criteria of impact scale of non-submerged double spur dikes were presented according to the comparison of non-submerged double spur dikes’ flow field under different dike spacing, which were respectively based on large-scale vortexes nonoverlapping, the cross-section velocity of double spur dikes similarly distributing and the cross-section velocity of downstream dike recovering. Meanwhile, their advantages, disadvantages and application scopes were analyzed. On this basis, three criteria were applied to calculate the threshold of dike spacing under a same condition. The comparison between the calculation results and empirical value of the length of recovery segment shows that the calculation values based on the cross-section velocity of double spur dikes similarly distributing and the cross-section velocity of downstream dike recovering are similar and both in the empirical range, while the value based on large-scale vortexes nonoverlapping is smaller than empirical value but simple to calculate, and it can be used to preliminarily estimate the impact scale of spur dikes through combining with the length formula of spur dike back-flow zone.

出版日期: 2015-02-01
:  TV 863  
基金资助:

长江科学院开放研究基金资助项目(CKWV2012322/KY);国家自然科学基金资助项目(50909085);浙江省水利厅科技计划项目(RC1106);金华市科学技术研究计划项目(2012-3-003,2013-3-027)

通讯作者: 顾正华,男,副教授     E-mail: WISE@zju.edu.cn
作者简介: 曹晓萌(1987—),女,博士生,从事工程水力学、流体力学及水文水资源方面的研究. E-mail: uumengmeng@126.com
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

曹晓萌, 顾正华. 3种非淹没双体丁坝作用尺度划分准则及比较[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2015.02.002.

CAO Xiao-meng, GU Zheng-hua. Three classification criteria and their comparison impact scale between double non-submerged spur dikes. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY (ENGINEERING SCIENCE), 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2015.02.002.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2015.02.002        http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2015/V49/I2/200

[1] DUAN J G, HE L, FU X D, et al. Mean flow and turbulence around experimental spur dike [J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2009, 32: 1717-1725.
[2] MAYERLE R, WANG S S Y, TORO F M. Verification of a 3-Dimensional numerical-model simulation of the flow in the vicinity of spur dikes [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1995, 33(2): 243-256.
[3] 陈稚聪,黑鹏飞,丁翔.丁坝回流分区机理及回流尺度流量试验研究[J].水科学进展,2008, 19(5): 613-617.
CHEN Zhi-cong, HEI Peng-fei, DING Xiang. Division and flow scale investigation of circulation zone around spur dike [J]. Advance in Water Science, 2008, 19(5): 613-617.
[4] 应强,焦志斌.丁坝水力学[M].北京:海洋出版社, 2004: 1213, 24.
[5] CUI Z F, ZHANG, X F. Flow and sediment simulation around spur dike with free surface using 3-D turbulent model [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2006, 18(3) S: 237-244.
[6] AZINFAR H, KELLS J A. Backwater prediction due to the blockage caused by a single, submerged spur dike in an open channel [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 134: 1153-1157.
[7] 李国斌,韩信,傅津先.非淹没丁坝下游回流长度及最大回流宽度研究[J].泥沙研究,2001,3: 68-73.
LI Guo-bin, HAN Xin, FU, Jin-xian. Study on the flow structure downstream of non-submerged spur dike [J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2001, 3: 68-73.
[8] 黑鹏飞.丁坝回流区水流特性的实验研究[D].北京:清华大学,2009: 40-53.
HEI Peng-fei. Experimental study on the flow structure downstream of the spur dike [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2009: 40-53.
[9] KUHNLER A, JIA Y, ALONSO C V. Measured and simulated flow near a submerged spur dike[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 134(7): 916-924.
[10] 常福田.丁坝间距和壅水的研究[J].河海科技进展,1993, 13(1): 69-73.
CHANG Fu-tian. Research on spur dike spacing and backwater [J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Hohai, 1993, 13(1): 69-73.
[11] AZINFAR H, KELLS J A. Flow resistance due to a single spur dike in an open channel [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2009, 47(6): 755-763.
[12] 常福田,丰玮.丁坝群合理间距的试验研究[J].河海大学学报,1992, 20(4): 7-14.
CHANG Fu-tian, FENG Wei. Experiment at investigation of reasonable spacing among spur dikes [J]. Journal of Hohai University, 1992, 20(4): 7-14.
[13] 高先刚,刘焕芳,华根福,等.双丁坝合理间距的试验研究[J].石河子大学学报:自然科学版, 2010, 28(5): 614-617.
GAO Xian-gang, LIU Huan-fang, Hua Gen-fu, et al. Rational spacing characters of double permeable spur [J]. Journal of Shihezi University: Natural Science, 2010, 28(5): 614-617.
[14] TOMINAGA A, MATSUMOTO D. Diverse riverbed figuration by using skew spur-dike groups [C]∥ Proceedings of the International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics-River Flow 2006. Lisbon: Taylor and Francis/Balkema. 2006: 683-691.
[15] OHMOTO T, HIRAKAWA R, KOREEDA N. Effects of water surface oscillation on turbulent flow in an open channel with a series of spur dikes [C]∥ Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods. Estes Park: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2002: 141-150.
[16] 赵连白.淹没丁坝群水力计算的试验研究[J].水科学进展,1994,5(3): 221-228.
ZHAO Lian-bai. Experimental study on hydraulic calculation for serial submerged spur dikes [J]. Advance in Water Science, 1994, 5(3): 221-228.
[17] PINTER N, JEMBERE A A, REMO J W F, et al. Cumulative impacts of river engineering, Mississippi and lower Missouri Rivers [J]. River Research and Applications, 2010, 26: 546-571.
[18] 李振青,廖小永.涉河工程群对防洪的累积影响研究[J].水利水运工程学报,2011, 4: 121-125.
LI Zhen-qing, LIAO Xiao-yong. The cumulative impact of river construction projects on flood control [J]. Journal of Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2011, 4: 121-125.
[19] 汪鹏.岸线开发利用对河道防洪影响的初步研究[D].武汉:长江科学院,2008: 20-29.
WANG Peng. Primary research on impact of bank lines-developing projection flooding preventing [D]. Wuhan: Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2008: 2029.
[20] 张细兵,卢金友,蔺秋生.长江中下游岸线利用对防洪累积影响初步研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2011, 20(9): 1138-1142.
ZHANG Xi-bing, LU Jin-you, LIN Qiu-sheng. Preliminary study on accumulated influence of the bankline use on flood control in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2011, 20(9): 1138-1142.
[21] CAO X M, GU Z H, TANG H W. Study on spacing threshold of non-submerged spur dikes with alternate layout [J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013: 18.
[22] 徐晓东.非淹没正交双体丁坝的水流特性及作用尺度研究[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2013.
XU Xiao-dong. Study on flow characteristics and impact scale of non-submerged orthogonal double spur dikes [D],Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2013.
[23] 应强.淹没丁坝附近的水流流态[J].河海大学学报,1995, 23(4): 62-68.
YING Qiang. Flow pattern near the submerged spur dike [J]. Journal of Hohai University, 1995, 23(4): 62-68.
[1] 孙志林,於刚节,许丹,马国淇. 正态曲面丁坝三维水流数值模拟[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2016, 50(7): 1247-1251.