Please wait a minute...
J4  2009, Vol. 43 Issue (5): 884-889    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2009.05.019
动力与机械工程     
基于信息框架的设计师认知策略划分及应用
刘征,孙守迁,潘云鹤
(浙江大学 现代工业设计研究所,浙江 杭州 310027)
Information framework based designers' cognitive strategies classification and its application
LIU Zheng, SUN Shou-qian, PAN Yun-he
(Modern Industrial Design Institution, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China)
 全文: PDF(1366 KB)   HTML
摘要:

为了理解工业设计领域中设计活动的特征,提出利用信息框架概念划分设计认知策略的方法.基于系统输入、输出原理,采用信息要求的实验方法,对产品设计前期形成的信息内容范畴、数量和草图方案进行分析,建立包含5种设计信息类型的框架,将设计师处理设计问题的信息加工方式分为信息框架、非信息框架和准信息框架3种.通过比较这3种认知策略各自的特征,深入分析创新活动在设计信息加工方面的一般规律.该划分方法减少了设计活动分类、时间、设计对象类型因素对区分认知策略的影响,更为普遍地反映了认知策略的特征,并在设计教育实践中得到了应用和验证.

Abstract:

A classifying method of design strategies based on information frameworks was developed to understand the characteristics of cognitive activities in industrial  designs. The information content, information amount and sketches in the design prophase were analyzed by the system input&output theory and the information requirement  experiment method, and a framework which including five kinds of design information was built. Then the information processing methods in the designing process were categorized  into three kinds: information framework, non-information framework and semi-information framework. The information processing rule of innovation activities could be analyzed by  comparing these cognition strategies’ characteristics. This classification method reflects the cognition strategies more generally, thus can reduce the influence of activities  classing, time and design objects. The research result was applied and tested in the design education and practice.

出版日期: 2009-11-18
:  TB472  
基金资助:

 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(60533080).

通讯作者: 孙守迁,男,教授,博导.     E-mail: ssqq@zju.edu.cn
作者简介: 刘征(1978-),男,山东平度人,博士生,主要从事产品设计过程、设计认知和设计知识等的研究 .
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

刘征, 孙守迁, 潘云鹤. 基于信息框架的设计师认知策略划分及应用[J]. J4, 2009, 43(5): 884-889.

LIU Zheng, SUN Shou-qian, PAN Yun-he. Information framework based designers' cognitive strategies classification and its application. J4, 2009, 43(5): 884-889.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2009.05.019        http://www.zjujournals.com/eng/CN/Y2009/V43/I5/884

[1] CROSS N. Science and design methodology: a review [J]. Research in Engineering Design, 1993, 5(2): 6369.
[2] LAWSON B. Cognitive strategies in architectural design ergonomics [J]. Ergonomics, 1979, 22(1): 5968.
[3] DORST K, CROSS N. Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem solution [J]. Design Studies, 2001, 22(5): 425437.
[4] KRUGER C. Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes [J]. Design Studies, 2006, 27(5): 527548.
[5] COYNE R. Wicked problems revisited [J]. Design Studies, 2004, 26(1): 517.
[6] 西蒙. 人工科学—— 复杂性面面观[M]. 上海:上海科技教育出版社, 2004: 510.
[7] KHURANA A, ROSENTHAL S R. Towards holistic ‘front-end in new product development [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1998, 15(1): 5774.
[8] GERWIN D, TARONDEAU J C. Case studies of computer integrated manufacturing systems: a view of uncertainty and innovation processes [J]. Journal of Operations Management,  1982, 2(2): 8799.
[9] BONNARDEL N. Towards understanding and supporting creativity in design: analogies in a constrained cognitive environment [J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2000, 13(7/8):  505513.
[10] CROSS N. Expertise in design: an overview [J]. Design Studies, 2004, 25(5): 427441.
[11] NORMAN D A. Emotional design—why we love or hate everyday things [M]. New York: Basic Books, 2004.
[12] VAN AKEN J E. Valid knowledge for the professional design of large and complex design processes [J]. Design Studies, 2005, 26(4): 379404.
[13] MACMILLAN S, ROAD C, AUSTIN S, et al. Development and verification of a generic framework for conceptual design [J]. Design Studies, 2001, 22(2): 169191.

No related articles found!