Please wait a minute...
Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences)  2019, Vol. 45 Issue (3): 325-331    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2018.07.261
Resource utilization & environmental protection     
Effects of digested pig slurry application on agronomic trait, yield and forage quality of indica rice
Fuyin HOU1(),Yingjiang CHEN1,Zhiqing YANG1(),Chongfu JIN1,Kai SHI1,Changkuan CHEN1,Gongneng FENG2,Hongshan LI2
1. Yancheng Engineering & Technology Research Center of Animal Husbandry Equipment, Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yancheng 224002, Jiangsu, China
2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Biochemistry and Biotechnology of Sea Spreads, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, Jiangsu, China
Download: HTML   HTML (   PDF(796KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

In order to promote ecological breeding and reasonable utilization of digested pig slurry from large-scale biogas project, we designed 14 treatments (N1-N14) to explore the effects of biogas slurry application on agronomic trait, yield and forage quality of indica rice. The results showed that: 1) The overall growth, yield and quality were better than no nitrogen fertilizer treatment within the range of biogas slurry applied amount (N 40%-480%); and compared with the conventional chemical fertilizer treatment (N2), except that the plant height of N3 treatment and tiller number of N4 treatment were both significantly lower, the plant height, tiller number and effective panicle number in other biogas slurry applied treatments changed no significance (P>0.05), presented the trend of increasing first and then decreasing. 2) Compared with the N2 treatment, with the increase of biogas slurry applied amount, the rice yield of N5 and N8 treatments increased by 9.5% (P>0.05) and 8.9% (P>0.05), respectively. As for the aboveground biomass, N8 and N9 treatments increased by 21.4% (P<0.05) and 5.4% (P>0.05), respectively. The thousand seed mass of N6-N9 treatments indicated an increasing trend with N7 treatment significantly increasing by 11.3% (P<0.05). However, when the biogas slurry applied amount was above N10 (816 t/hm2), the yield of indica rice decreased, even lower than that of N2 treatment. 3) The protein contents of unpolished rice in N5-N14 treatments were higher than that of N1, with the treatments of N7-N14 markedly higher (P<0.05). The amylose contents of unpolished rice in N3-N14 decreased to a certain extent compared with the N2. All in all, application of proper biogas slurry is more conducive to the growth of indica rice than conventional chemical fertilizers in this test. Besides, biogas slurry can effectively improve the yield and forage quality of indica rice when the application amount of biogas slurry is 612 t/hm2 (N8).



Key wordsdigested pig slurry      indica rice      agronomic trait      yield      forage quality     
Received: 26 July 2018      Published: 25 June 2019
CLC:  S 511.21  
  S 141.2  
Corresponding Authors: Zhiqing YANG     E-mail: houfuyin2008@126.com;yangzhiq88@126.com
Cite this article:

Fuyin HOU,Yingjiang CHEN,Zhiqing YANG,Chongfu JIN,Kai SHI,Changkuan CHEN,Gongneng FENG,Hongshan LI. Effects of digested pig slurry application on agronomic trait, yield and forage quality of indica rice. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(3): 325-331.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2018.07.261     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/Y2019/V45/I3/325


猪粪沼液对籼稻农艺性状、产量和饲用品质的影响

为推进生态养殖及粪尿发酵沼液合理资源化利用,试验设置了14个不同处理组(N1~N14),探索了其对籼稻农艺性状、产量和饲用品质的影响。结果表明:1)在本试验沼液施用量(N 40%~480%)范围内,籼稻总体长势、产量和品质都优于无氮施肥处理时;与常规施肥(N2)相比,除N3株高和N4分蘖数显著降低外,其他沼液施肥组株高、分蘖数和有效穗数均变化不显著(P>0.05)。2)随着沼液施用量的增加,与N2相比,N5和N8处理组稻谷增产效果较好,分别增加了9.5%(P>0.05)和8.9%(P>0.05);就地上部生物量而言,N8和N9分别增加了21.4%(P<0.05)和5.4%(P>0.05);N6~N9各处理组千粒质量有增加趋势,其中N7增加了11.3%(P<0.05);但当沼液超过N10处理(816 t/hm2)施用量时,籼稻产量出现下降趋势,甚至低于常规施肥组(N2)。3)N5~N14各处理组籼稻糙米蛋白质含量都高于N1组,其中N7~N14处理组显著升高(P<0.05);而各处理组糙米直链淀粉含量与N2组相比有一定程度的减少。总体而言,在本试验条件下适量沼液施用比常规施肥更有利于籼稻的生长,当沼液控制在N8处理(612 t/hm2)施用量时,可有效提高籼稻产量和饲用品质。


关键词: 猪粪沼液,  籼稻,  农艺性状,  产量,  饲用品质 

指标

Index

pH

w(腐殖酸)

Humic acid/%

w(有机质)

Organic matter/%

w(全氮)

Total nitrogen/%

w(氨氮)

Ammonium

nitrogen/‰

w(全磷)

Total phosphorus/%

w(全钾)

Total potassium/%

沼液

Biogas slurry

7.54 0.23 0.25 0.12 0.96 0.01 0.04
Table 1 Physical and chemical properties of digested pig slurry from large-scale biogas project
处理Treatment

基肥

Basic fertilizer

分蘖肥

Tillering fertilizer

穗肥

Panicle fertilizer

施用总量与比例

Total applied amount and percentage

ABSA/L ABSA/L ABSA/L TABSA/L NPCFA/%
N1 0 0 0 0 0
N2 0 0 0 0 0
N3 48.8 42.7 30.5 122 40
N4 97.6 85.4 61.0 244 80
N5 146.4 128.1 91.5 366 120
N6 195.2 170.8 122.0 488 160
N7 244.0 213.5 152.5 610 200
N8 292.8 256.2 183.0 732 240
N9 341.6 298.9 213.5 854 280
N10 390.4 341.6 244.0 976 320
N11 439.2 384.3 274.5 1 098 360
N12 488.0 427.0 305.0 1 220 400
N13 536.8 469.7 335.5 1 342 440
N14 585.6 512.4 366.0 1 464 480
Table 2 Experimental design of biogas slurry application on indica rice

处理

Treatment

株高

Plant height/cm

分蘖数

Tiller number

有效穗数

Effective panicle number

N1 95.89±3.32d 5.33±0.71f 6.33±0.71d
N2 104.70±3.42ab 8.00±1.66abcd 8.67±1.50abcd
N3 97.79±3.39cd 7.33±1.87bcde 8.44±2.24bcd
N4 103.21±6.72ab 6.11±1.97ef 6.78±2.05cd
N5 101.66±3.84bc 7.44±1.94abcde 8.44±2.56bcd
N6 105.71±4.53ab 9.00±1.66ab 8.56±1.59bcd
N7 105.03±5.21ab 7.78±1.20abcde 8.67±2.35abcd
N8 101.23±4.45bc 6.78±1.64def 9.11±2.85abc
N9 107.60±4.18a 7.67±1.12abcde 8.22±3.31bcd
N10 107.99±3.45a 7.44±0.88abcde 10.67±2.06ab
N11 106.14±5.57ab 8.33±1.58abcd 10.56±3.32ab
N12 105.27±5.52ab 9.11±1.62a 11.22±3.35a
N13 104.49±5.82ab 8.67±1.73abc 10.00±2.65ab
N14 104.04±3.56ab 7.22±1.56cde 8.11±2.03bcd
Table 3 Effects of biogas slurry application on agronomic traits of indica rice
Fig. 1 Effect of biogas slurry application on the yield of indica rice
Fig. 2 Effect of biogas slurry application on the aboveground biomass of indica rice
Fig. 3 Effect of biogas slurry application on the thousand seed mass of indica rice
Fig. 4 Effect of biogas slurry application on the protein content of indica rice
Fig.5 Effect of biogas slurry application on the amylose content of indica rice
[1]   魏玉明,钱振波,吕伟,等 .沼气工程技术对规模化猪场饲养环境和猪生长发育的影响.畜牧兽医杂志,2016,35(3):48-52.
WEI Y M , QIAN Z B , Lü W , et al . Effect of biogas technology on breeding environment and pig growth development in large-scale pig farms. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2016,35(3):48-52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]   PU C J , LIU H , DING G C , et al . Impact of direct application of biogas slurry and residue in fields: in situ analysis of antibiotic resistance genes from pig manure to fields. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2018,344(3):441-449.
[3]   宋成芳,单胜道,张妙仙,等 .畜禽养殖废弃物沼液的浓缩及其成分.农业工程学报,2011,27(12):256-259.
SONG C F , SHAN S D , ZHANG M X , et al . Concentration and determination of composition of biogas slurry. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011,27(12):256-259. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]   沈其林,单胜道,周健驹,等 .猪粪发酵沼液成分测定与分析.中国沼气,2014,32(3):83-86.
SHEN Q L , SHAN S D , ZHOU J J , et al . Determination and analysis of compositions in biogas slurry produced by swine manure digestion. China Biogas, 2014,32(3):83-86. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]   毛晓月,伍钧,孟晓霞,等 .连续3年定位施用沼液对水稻产量和品质的影响.华北农学报,2016,31(3):218-224.
MAO X Y , WU J , MENG X X , et al . Effects of three-year continuous application of digested biogas slurry on yield and quality of rice. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2016,31(3):218-224. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]   张璘玮,伍钧,杨刚,等 .猪粪沼液连续定位施用对油菜产量及菜籽品质的影响.农业环境科学学报,2014,33(3):562-568.
ZHANG L W , WU J , YANG G , et al . Effects of continuous applications of digested pig biogas slurry on Brassica napus yields and rapeseed quality. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2014,33(3):562-568. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]   黄继川,徐培智,彭智平,等 .基于稻田土壤肥力及生物学活性的沼液适宜用量研究.植物营养与肥料学报,2016,22(2):362-371.
HUANG J C , XU P Z , PENG Z P , et al . Biogas slurry use amount for suitable soil nutrition and biodiversity in paddy soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016,22(2):362-371. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]   孙国峰,郑建初,陈留根,等 .猪粪沼液施用后土壤理化性状及水稻产量初步研究.中国稻米,2013,19(4):74-76,79.
SUN G F , ZHENG J C , CHEN L G , et al . Preliminary study of the soil physical and chemical properties and rice yield after biogas pig slurry application. Chinese Rice, 2013,19(4):74-76,79. (in Chinese)
[9]   唐微,伍钧,孙百晔,等 .沼液不同施用量对水稻产量及稻米品质的影响.农业环境科学学报,2010,29(12):2268-2273.
TANG W , WU J , SUN B Y , et al . Effects of application amounts of biogas slurry on yield and quality of rice. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2010,29(12):2268-2273. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]   侯云鹏,韩立国,孔丽丽,等 .不同施氮水平下水稻的养分吸收、转运及土壤氮平衡.植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(4):836-845.
HOU Y P , HAN L G , KONG L L , et al . Nutrient absorption, translocation in rice and soil nitrogen equilibrium under different nitrogen application doses. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015,21(4):836-845. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]   刘彦伶,来庆,徐旱增,等 .不同氮肥类型对黄泥田双季稻产量及氮素利用的影响.浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2013,39(4):403-412.
LIU Y L , LAI Q , XU H Z , et al . Effect of different types of nitrogen fertilizers on grain yield and nitrogen utilization of double-cropping rice in yellow clayey soil. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2013,39(4):403-412. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]   张进,张妙仙,单胜道,等 .沼液对水稻生长产量及其重金属含量的影响.农业环境科学学报,2009,28(10):2005-2009.
ZHANG J , ZHANG M X , SHAN S D , et al . Growth status, grain yield and heavy metals content of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by biogas slurry application. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009,28(10):2005-2009. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]   SORENSEN P , AMATO M . Remineralisation and residual effects of N after application of pig slurry to soil. European Journal of Agronomy, 2002,16(2):81-95.
[14]   GERICKE D , BORNEMANN L , KAGE H , et al . Modelling ammonia losses after field application of biogas slurry in energy crop rotations. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2012,223(1):29-47.
[15]   王文博,陈长青,仇忠启,等 .不同沼液施灌量对水稻生长及土壤氮磷平衡的影响.作物杂志,2014(3):85-91.
WANG W B , CHEN C Q , QIU Z Q , et al . Effects of application amounts of biogas slurry on rice growth and the balance of nitrogen, phosphorus in soil system. Crops, 2014(3):85-91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]   黄继川,彭智平,徐培智,等 .沼液稻田消解对水稻生产、土壤肥力及环境安全的影响.广东农业科学,2016,43(10):69-76.
HUANG J C , PENG Z P , XU P Z , et al . Effects of paddy field disposal of biogas slurry on rice production, soil fertility and environmental safety. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2016,43(10):69-76. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]   邵文奇,纪力,孙春梅,等 .不同沼液施用量对水稻生长、产量及重金属含量的影响.浙江农业学报,2017,29(12):1963-1969.
[18]   SHAO W Q , JI L , SUN C M , et al . Effects of application rate of biogas slurry on growth, grain yield and heavy metals contents of rice. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017,29(12):1963-1969. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]   姜丽娜,王强,李艾芬,等 .休闲稻田消解沼液生态效应及其对水稻安全生产影响研究.农业环境科学学报,2011,30(12):2483-2490.
JIANG L N , WANG Q , LI A F , et al . The ecological effects of fallow paddy field disposal biogas slurry and its impact on the following rice safety production. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011,30(12):2483-2490. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]   姜丽娜,王强,陈丁江,等 .沼液稻田消解对水稻生产、土壤与环境安全影响研究.农业环境科学学报,2011,30(7):1328-1336.
JIANG L N , WANG Q , CHEN D J , et al . Effects of paddy field disposal of biogas slurry on the rice production, soil quality and environmental safety. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011,30(7):1328-1336. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]   STANLEY O P B , WILSON L T , MEDLET J C , et al . Nitrogen utilization efficiency: relationships with grain yield, grain protein and yield-related traits in rice. Agronomy Journal, 2006,98(1):168-176.
[22]   伍钧,王静雯,张磷玮,等 .沼液对玉米产量及品质的影响.核农学报,2014,28(5):905-911.
WU J , WANG J W , ZHANG L W , et al . Effects of biogas slurry on yield and quality of maize. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2014,28(5):905-911. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] Lai WEI,Mingyan YU,Nannan QIN,Chongping HUANG,Ying XIE,Wenbo SUN,Liehong WU,Weizhong WANG,Guoxin WANG. Effects of agro-photovoltaic integrating system on field illumination and sweet potato growth[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(3): 288-295.
[2] Gangshuan BAI,Wei GENG,Dengfeng HE. Effects of super absorbent polymer with different application rates on soil characteristics and flue-cured tobacco growth in Qinba mountain area[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(3): 343-354.
[3] Changchun GUO,Qiao ZHANG,Yongjian SUN,Yunxia WU,Hui XU,Yan HE,Zhiyuan YANG,Peng MA,Zhiyun PENG,Jun MA. Comparison of stem lodging resistance characteristics and differences of indica hybrid rice cultivars with different yield levels in precision direct seeding[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(2): 143-156.
[4] JIANG Jingjing, CHANG Xiaoxiao, HU Xiaohui. Effects of nitrogen supply level on nutrient absorption, distribution and yield of cucumber grown in substrate bag culture system[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2018, 44(6): 678-686.
[5] XIANG Jie, WANG Fuqiang, GUO Baoguang, WANG Qinggang, YU Chengqun, SHEN Zhenxi, SHAO Xiaoming. Effects of mixtures and intercropping of common vetch and oat in valley area of Tibet on the yield and quality[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2018, 44(5): 555-564.
[6] WANG Guiyue, ZHAO Fucheng, HAN Hailiang, BAO Fei, TAN Heping, YU Qiying. Analysis of yield, quality and resistance of fresh maize cultivars in Zhejiang Province and corresponding breeding objectives[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2018, 44(3): 343-355.
[7] PU Shilin, DENG Fei, HU Hui, ZHONG Xiaoyuan, WANG Li, LI Wu, LI Shuxian, LIAO Shuang, REN Wanjun. Effects of different hill spacings and seedling numbers per hill on dry matter production and yield of machine-transplanting hybrid rice[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2018, 44(1): 21-30.
[8] PANG Ting, SHUAI Peng, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, FU Zhidan, YANG Wenyu, YONG Taiwen. Effects of different nodulation varieties and row spacings on nodule growth, dry matter accumulation and distribution of relay strip intercropping soybean[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2017, 43(4): 451-461.
[9] LI Yan, LIN Feng, LI Lulu, XU Haiming. Comprehensive evaluation on the stability, adaptability and location for waxy maize varieties in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2017, 43(3): 281-288.
[10] WEI Changhui, LIU Yajun, YE Xiuxiang, LI Yue, MA Kun. Effects of intercropping potato with maize on soil and crop.[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2017, 43(1): 54-64.
[11] ZHOU Xuan, DING Junshan, WU Lianghuan, LU Ruohui, YANG Guobiao, WANG Xu. Effects of compound fertilizers by different processes on yield and yield quality of pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.)[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(5): 626-.
[12] LAN Yan, HUANG Peng, JIANG Guchihong, LEI Xiaobo, DING Chunbang, LI Tian. Effect of nitrogen application and planting density on grain yield and quality of japonica rice cultivar D46 in the planting area of Chengdu plain[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(1): 63-73.
[13] LI Min, LUO Deqiang, JIANG Xuehai, ZHOU Weijia, GI Guangmei, WANG Xuehong, LI Shuxing . Ecological adaptability of rice cultivars with different types under the low temperature and weak sunshine condition[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(1): 47-52.
[14] Yang Shimin, Yang Zhiyuan, Sun Yongjian, Ma Jun. Effects of nitrogen management on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of two hybrid rice varieties with different panicle masses.[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2015, 41(6): 685-694.
[15] Zhang Xiaomei, Ding Yanfeng, Zhang Wujun, Wu Xiaoran, Li Ganghua. Spatial and temporal variation of rice yield in rice region of Southwest China.[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2015, 41(6): 695-702.