Please wait a minute...
浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)  2020, Vol. 46 Issue (6): 748-758    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2020.04.171
资源利用与环境保护     
基于冬灌咸水的滨海重盐碱地植棉的施肥策略
杨莉琳(),于海英,侯建伟,朱向梅
铜仁学院农林工程与规划学院,贵州 铜仁 554300
Fertilization strategies for cotton planted in coastal severe saline-alkali soils based on irrigation with saline water in winter
Lilin YANG(),Haiying YU,Jianwei HOU,Xiangmei ZHU
College of Agroforestry Engineering and Planning, Tongren University, Tongren 554300, Guizhou, China
 全文: PDF(1366 KB)   HTML
摘要:

为探索利用滨海重盐碱地及咸水资源种植棉花的科学施肥技术,在河北低平原区的滨海重盐碱地开展为期4年的冬季灌溉咸水种植棉花的施肥技术定位试验研究,包括肥料剂型[控释(失)肥、传统肥]、施肥方式(一次性基施、基施+追施)和施肥量(高量、低量)。结果表明:抽取当地地下咸水冬季灌溉可使翌年春季棉花播种前土壤0~20 cm耕层盐分含量下降到2.0 g/kg以下,保障了棉花种子发芽和出苗。重盐碱地种植棉花首选含N-P-K及凹凸棒土的控失肥作为基肥一次性施用;如果选用传统肥料尿素与过磷酸钙,则应增施硫酸钾肥料,且所有肥料均作为基肥于播种前一次性施用;等氮量尿素作为基肥一次性施用比2次(基肥+追肥)施用对籽棉增产效果显著,花铃期追施尿素会引起棉花收获后土壤中无机N和盐分含量增加。重盐碱地施肥量过高会抑制棉花的营养生长进而降低籽棉产量。华北低平原滨海重盐碱地种植棉花的水肥技术为:播种前于冬季结冰期抽取当地地下咸水灌溉,灌溉量为100~180 mm,春季播种前一次性施用肥料的合理用量为N 169 kg/hm2,P2O5 65 kg/hm2,K2O 78 kg/hm2,肥料剂型宜首选控失肥;在该水肥技术下,重盐碱地的籽棉产量为3.0~3.2 t/hm2。本研究结果可为重盐碱地及其地下咸水资源的开发利用、耐盐适生棉花的节肥增产与绿色高效种植提供理论依据及技术支撑。

关键词: 凹凸棒土控失肥棉花咸水灌溉重盐碱地    
Abstract:

This study focused on exploring the optimal fertilization strategies for cotton planted in coastal severe saline-alkali soils based on irrigation with saline water in winter. A four-year positional experiment was conducted on cotton based on irrigating saline water in lower plain of Hebei, including fertilizer types (controlled-release/loss-control fertilizer and traditional fertilizer), fertilization modes (application once as base fertilizer, application twice as base and topdressing fertilizer, respectively) and fertilization rates (high and low amount). The results showed that the salinity of 0-20 cm soil depth was reduced to less than 2.0 g/kg during the sowing seasons in spring as a result of irrigating saline water, which ensured germination and emergence of cotton seeds. In terms of fertilizer type, the first choice for planting cotton was the loss-control fertilizer that containing N-P-K and attapulgite in the severe saline-alkali area, and applied once as base fertilizer. Whether the traditional fertilizer mix was used, the potassium sulfate fertilizer was necessary besides urea and superphosphate, and all fertilizers should be applied once as base fertilizer before sowing. Given equal amount of nitrogen, urea applications once as base fertilizer had a significant increase in cotton yield, compared with twice application as base and topdressing fertilizer. Moreover, the latter could result in risks of soil inorganic-N accumulation and saline content increase after harvest. Excessive fertilizer application inhibited cotton seedling and plant growth during the early growing stage, and then influenced cotton yield at last. So the fertilization strategies for cotton planted in coastal severe saline-alkali area in North China were as follows: during the winter freezing period before sowing, local underground salt water was extracted for irrigation, and the irrigation amount was 100-180 mm; the reasonable amount of fertilizer applied once before sowing in spring was 169 kg/hm2 N, 65 kg/hm2 P2O5, and 78 kg/hm2 K2O; and the fertilizer dosage form should be preferred to loss-control fertilizer. Under the optimal fertilization strategies, the seed cotton yield in the severe saline-alkali soils could reach to 3.0-3.2 t/hm2. The above results provide theoretical basis and technical support for the development and utilization of saline-alkali soils and its underground salt water resources, as well as fertilizer saving, yield increasing, and the green and efficient planting of salt-tolerant cotton.

Key words: attapulgite    loss-control fertilizer    cotton    irrigation with saline water    severe saline-alkali soil
收稿日期: 2020-04-17 出版日期: 2020-12-31
CLC:  S 147.2  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(31270521);贵州省教育厅创新群体重大项目(黔教合KY字〔2016〕053号);贵州省科技计划(黔科合基础〔2019〕1312);铜仁学院博士基金(trxyDH1525);铜仁学院农业生态创新研究团队项目(CXTD(2020-10)
通讯作者: 杨莉琳     E-mail: yangllin@sjziam.ac.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
杨莉琳
于海英
侯建伟
朱向梅

引用本文:

杨莉琳,于海英,侯建伟,朱向梅. 基于冬灌咸水的滨海重盐碱地植棉的施肥策略[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 46(6): 748-758.

Lilin YANG,Haiying YU,Jianwei HOU,Xiangmei ZHU. Fertilization strategies for cotton planted in coastal severe saline-alkali soils based on irrigation with saline water in winter. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2020, 46(6): 748-758.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2020.04.171        http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/Y2020/V46/I6/748

土层

Soil layer/cm

pH

电导率

Electrical

conductivity/(dS/m)

w(有机质)

Organic matter

content/(g/kg)

w(全氮)

Total N

content/(g/kg)

w(硝态氮)

NO3-N

content/(mg/kg)

w(有效磷)

Available P

content/(mg/kg)

w(速效钾)

Available K

content/(mg/kg)

0~308.740.587.610.664.087.0186.8
>30~608.521.348.140.563.446.9164.7
>60~908.581.298.200.600.2612.7227.6
表1  棉花播种前土壤的基本理化性状

年份

Year

处理

Treatment

肥料剂型

Fertilizer type

施肥方式

Fertilization mode

施肥量 Fertilization rate/(kg/hm2)
NP2O5K2O
2010LNPC控释肥+磷肥一次性基施225900
LNPU-1尿素+磷肥一次性基施225900
LNPU-2尿素+磷肥尿素基∶追比1∶2225900
HNPC控释肥+磷肥一次性基施3001400
HNPU-1尿素+磷肥一次性基施3001400
HNPU-2尿素+磷肥尿素基∶追比1∶23001400
2011LNPC控释肥+磷肥一次性基施180800
LNPU-1尿素+磷肥一次性基施180800
LNPU-2尿素+磷肥尿素基∶追比1∶2180800
HNPC控释肥+磷肥一次性基施225900
HNPU-1尿素+磷肥一次性基施225900
HNPU-2尿素+磷肥尿素基∶追比1∶2225900
2013LNPC控失肥一次性基施913542
LNPU-1尿素+磷钾肥一次性基施913542
LNPU-2尿素+磷钾肥尿素基∶追比1∶2913542
HNPC控失肥一次性基施1696578
HNPU-1尿素+磷钾肥一次性基施1696578
HNPU-2尿素+磷钾肥尿素基∶追比1∶21696578
表2  2010—2013年棉花施肥剂型、方式及施肥量试验设计方案
图1  棉花试验地施肥小区布设排列各符号表示的含义详见表2。

处理

Treatment

w(土壤盐分) Soil saline content/(g/kg)LSD

出苗率

Rate of seedling emergence/%

0~10 cm>10~20 cm>20~40 cm>40~60 cm>60~80 cm

灌前(冬季)

Before irrigation in winter

60.08.712.213.013.6

灌后(春季)

After irrigation in spring

1.71.92.93.73.80.89***82.2

未灌(春季)

Non-irrigation in spring

7.716.017.919.019.20
表3  冬灌咸水对试验田土壤盐分含量及棉花出苗率的影响

日期

Date

处理Treatment

株高Plant

height/

cm

茎粗

Stem

perimeter/

mm

果枝数

Sympodial

number

果枝铃

Sympodial

boll

果枝蕾

Sympodial

bud

果枝花

Sympodial

flower

叶枝数Monopodial

number

叶枝蕾

Monopodial

bud

叶枝花

Monopodial

flower

叶枝铃

Monopodial

boll

2011-07-15LNPC62.210.68.01.114.61.02.97.41.00.0
LNPU-164.011.68.70.916.30.92.26.00.00.0
LNPU-259.210.68.20.616.00.81.75.11.00.0
HNPC57.611.2a7.90.313.11.02.84.21.00.0
HNPU-155.410.4ab7.40.312.40.93.03.71.00.0
HNPU-243.39.7b7.40.412.01.02.03.00.00.0
R**##****nsns**
M#**nsnsns*ns
R×Mns##*nsnsnsns
2011-08-20LNPC73.613.18.6c9.40.0b0.02.70.20.03.2
LNPU-171.714.09.4b10.41.6a0.22.20.60.24.1
LNPU-268.912.610.1a8.60.6ab0.02.00.40.03.3
HNPC67.813.89.410.71.71.6a2.22.8a0.23.4
HNPU-165.312.59.68.90.80.3b3.00.0b0.14.4
HNPU-260.911.89.38.70.20.2b2.40.4b0.33.1
R**nsnsnsns**ns*ns
Mnsnsnsnsns*ns**ns
R×Mnsnsnsnsns**ns**ns
2013-07-25LNPCNRNR7.91.79.3ab1.3a2.8a1.00.00.0
LNPU-1NRNR7.70.610.2a0.9b2.3b2.00.20.0
LNPU-2NRNR7.72.07.8b1.4a2.2b0.70.10.0
HNPCNRNR8.60.711.8ab1.0b2.9a1.40.00.0
HNPU-1NRNR9.00.612.3a0.8b3.1a0.22.40.1
HNPU-2NRNR8.71.28.2bc2.1a2.4ab0.70.00.0
R***#***ns***ns
Mnsns****ns
R×Mnsns***ns
2013-09-14LNPCNRNR10.110.0abNRNRNR1.5bNR1.6
LNPU-1NRNR8.57.0bNRNRNR1.6bNR1.1
LNPU-2NRNR9.18.5abNRNRNR1.9abNR0.9
HNPCNRNR8.511.1aNRNRNR3.0aNR1.7
HNPU-1NRNR8.710.7abNRNRNR3.1aNR1.2
HNPU-2NRNR9.011.3aNRNRNR2.9abNR1.0
Rns***ns
Mns**ns
R×Mns**ns
表4  花铃期与吐絮期棉花植株性状调查(单株)

养分

Nutrient

处理

Treatment

Root

主茎

Main stem

果枝

Sympodial

叶枝

Monopodial

果枝叶

Sympodial leaf

叶枝叶

Monopodial leaf

铃位叶

Boll leaf

NLNPC0.79b0.88b1.032.552.332.56a2.41b
LNPU-10.79b0.95a1.122.532.442.46ab2.45b
LNPU-20.86a0.94a1.082.542.642.30b2.52a
HNPC0.85a0.93a1.16a2.552.742.79a2.50a
HNPU-10.80c0.90ab1.13ab2.502.822.63ab2.22c
HNPU-20.82b0.86b1.02b2.482.662.58b2.37b
R#*nsns******
M**##nsns****
R×M*****nsnsns***
PLNPC0.22a0.15a0.15b0.17ab0.260.330.33a
LNPU-10.14b0.13b0.17b0.19a0.280.320.31a
LNPU-20.24a0.15a0.20a0.15b0.270.310.20b
HNPC0.24a0.160.150.13a0.280.310.37a
HNPU-10.20b0.150.150.16a0.330.320.32b
HNPU-20.22ab0.140.160.10b0.270.300.35ab
R#ns***nsns***
M******#nsns**
R×M***ns**nsns**
KLNPC1.28a1.53c3.20b2.23c1.702.22a2.43b
LNPU-11.00b2.14a3.15b2.38b1.971.89b2.71a
LNPU-21.43a1.89b3.40a2.85a1.892.04a2.41b
HNPC1.17b1.57a2.66b1.891.712.072.29b
HNPU-11.20ab1.34c3.03a1.931.462.032.29b
HNPU-21.24a1.42b3.16a1.881.741.942.50a
Rns*********nsns**
M***ns******nsns*
R×M**********nsns**
表5  收获期棉花植株各器官的养分含量 (%)
图2  2010—2013年不同施肥处理下收获的籽棉产量*表示高肥组与低肥组间在P<0.05水平差异有统计学意义。短栅上不同小写字母表示不同施肥处理间在P<0.05水平差异有统计学意义;未标字母者表示不同施肥处理间在P<0.05水平差异无统计学意义。
图3  2011与2013年不同施肥处理下棉花采摘后土壤硝态氮(NO3--N)与铵态氮(NH4+-N)含量*表示高肥组与低肥组间在P<0.05水平差异有统计学意义。短栅上不同小写字母表示不同施肥处理间在P<0.05水平差异有统计学意义;未标字母者表示不同施肥处理间在P<0.05水平差异无统计学意义。
图4  2011与2013年不同施肥处理下籽棉采摘后土壤盐分含量及电导率#表示高肥组与低肥组间在P<0.1水平差异有统计学意义。短栅上未标字母者表示不同施肥处理间在P<0.05水平差异无统计学意义。
1 郭凯,张秀梅,李向军,等.冬季咸水结冰灌溉对滨海盐碱地的改良效果研究.资源科学,2010,32(3):431-435.
GUO K, ZHANG X M, LI X J, et al. Effect of freezing saline water irrigation in winter on the reclamation of coastal saline soil. Resources Science, 2010,32(3):431-435. (in Chinese with English abstract)
2 CHEN W P, HOU Z N, WU L S, et al. Effects of salinity and nitrogen on cotton growth in arid environment. Plant & Soil, 2010,326:61-73. DOI:10.1007/s11104-008-9881-0
doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9881-0
3 MITCHELL J P, SHENNAN C, SINGER M J, et al. Impacts of gypsum and winter cover crops on soil physical properties and crop productivity when irrigated with saline water. Agricultural Water Management, 2000,45(1):55-71. DOI:10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00070-0
doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00070-0
4 MORENO F, CABRERA F, FENáNDEZ-BOYB E, et al. Irrigation with saline water in the reclaimed marsh soils of southwest Spain impact on soil properties and cotton and sugar beet crops. Agricultural Water Management, 2001,48(2):133-150. DOI:10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00120-7
doi: 10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00120-7
5 WANG X B, ZHAO Q S, HU Y J, et al. An alternative water source and combined agronomic practices for cotton irrigation in coastal saline soils. Irrigation Science, 2012,30(3):221-232. DOI:10.1007/s00271-011-0277-1
doi: 10.1007/s00271-011-0277-1
6 宋兴虎,TUFAIL A W, BIANGKHAM S,等.氮肥用量及其后效对棉花产量和生物质累积动态的影响.棉花学报,2018,30(2):145-154. DOI:10.11963/1002-7807.sxhygz.20180315
SONG X H, TUFAIL A W, BIANGKHAM S, et al. Nitrogen fertilizer and its residual effect on cotton yield and biomass accumulation. Cotton Science, 2018,30(2):145-154. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11963/1002-7807.sxhygz.2018
7 MIN W, GUO H J, ZHOU G W, et al. Soil salinity, leaching, and cotton growth as affected by saline water drip irrigation and N fertigation. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B: Soil & Plant Science, 2016,66(6):489-501. DOI:10.1080/09064710.2016.1181199
doi: 10.1080/09064710.2016.1181199
8 孙凯宁,于君宝,王克安,等.不同肥料类型对滨海盐碱地棉花生长及肥料利用率的影响.中国农学通报,2015,31(15):91-96. DOI:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14120073
SUN K N, YU J B, WANG K A, et al. Effect of different fertilizer types on cotton growth and fertilizer utilization in coastal saline soil. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015,31(15):91-96. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14120073
9 辛承松,卢合全,李振怀,等.滨海盐碱地棉花的营养特征与施肥策略//中国农学会棉花分会2017年年会暨第九次会员代表大会论文汇编.郑州:[出版社不详],2017:130-133.
XIN C S, LU H Q, LI Z H, et al. Nutritive characteristics and tactics of applying fertilizer for cotton in coastal saline soil//China Society of Cotton Sci-Tech Proceedings of 2017 Annual Meeting of CSCS. Zhengzhou: [s. n.], 2017:130-133. (in Chinese)
10 孙克君,毛小云,卢其明,等.几种控释(失)氮肥减少氨挥发的效果及影响因素研究.应用生态学报,2004,15(12):2347-2350.
SUN K J, MAO X Y, LU Q M, et al. Mitigation effect of several controlled-release N fertilizers on ammonia volatilization and related affecting factors. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004,15(12):2347-2350. (in Chinese with English abstract)
11 张国霞.海冰水灌溉下不同施肥模式对棉田土壤水-盐-养分变化的影响.北京:首都师范大学,2011:47-48.
ZHANG G X. Effects of different fertilization modes on soil water-salt-nutrients in cotton field under the irrigation of sea ice water. Beijing: Capital Normal University, 2011:47-48. (in Chinese with English abstract)
12 刘庆花,崔德杰,李旭霖,等.滨海盐碱地棉花生产管理措施分析:以东营市为例//山东省棉花学会第六次代表大会暨学术讨论会论文汇编.济南:山东省科学技术协会,2013:167-173.
LIU Q H, CUI D J, LI X L, et al. Analysis on management measure of cotton planting production in coastal saline soil//Compilation of the Sixth Congress and Symposium of Shandong Cotton Society. Jinan: Shandong Association for Science and Technology, 2013:167-173. (in Chinese with English abstract)
13 张秀梅,郭凯,谢志霞,等.冬季咸水结冰灌溉下滨海重盐碱地土壤水盐动态及对棉花出苗和产量的影响.中国生态农业学报,2012,20(10):1310-1314. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.01310
ZHANG X M, GUO K, XIE Z X, et al. Effect of frozen saline water irrigation in winter on soil salt and water dynamics, germination and yield of cotton in coastal soils. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012,20(10):1310-1314. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2012.01310
14 中国科学院遗传与发育生物学研究所.滨海重盐碱地种植棉花的方法:CN201110231188.7. 2012-11-28
Chinese Academy of Sciences. Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology. Method for planting cotton in coastal saline soil: CN201110231188.7. 2012-11-28. (in Chinese)
15 杨莉琳.磷肥在潮褐土中动态转化及其影响因素的研究.中国生态农业学报,2001,9(3):77-78.
YANG L L. Study on the transformation of applied P and its influence factors in meadow-cinnamon soil. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2001,9(3):77-78. (in Chinese with English abstract)
16 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析.3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2007:264-270.
BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007:264-270. (in Chinese)
17 MIN W, GUO H J, HU Z Q, et al. Cotton growth and the fate of N fertilizer as affected by saline water irrigation and N fertigation in a drip-irrigated field. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica: Section B, Soil & Plant Science, 2017,67(8):712-722. DOI:10.1080/09064710.2017.1338309
doi: 10.1080/09064710.2017.1338309
18 孙强生,张民,苏秋红,等.控释肥在盆栽棉花上的肥效研究.水土保持学报,2006,20(6):133-136. DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2006.06.032
SUN Q S, ZHANG M, SU Q H, et al. Effects of controlled release compound fertilizers on growth of potted cotton. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006,20(6):133-136. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2006.06.032
19 胡伟,张炎,胡国智,等.控释尿素与普通尿素对棉花生长、养分吸收和产量的影响.新疆农业科学,2010,47(7):1402-1405. DOI:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2010.07.024
HU W, ZHANG Y, HU G Z, et al. Effects of controlled released urea and common urea on growth, nutrient absorption and yield of cotton. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010,47(7):1402-1405. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2010.07.024
20 姜娟,赵斌,王永欢.不同施肥方法对缓释尿素的肥效及氮素利用率的影响.土壤通报,2006,37(5):916-919.
JIANG J, ZHAO B, WANG Y H. Application methods influence on the nitrogen utilization efficiency of controlled release urea. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2006,37(5):916-919. (in Chinese with English abstract)
21 许德威,周庆祺,汤玉玮,等.棉花合理施用氮肥及其生理指标的研究初报.中国农业科学,1991,24(1):42-46.
XU D W, ZHOU Q Q, TANG Y W, et al. Studies on the adequate application of nitrogen fertilizer and its physiological index in cotton plant. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1991,24(1):42-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] Elmon CHINDUDZI,苏帮荣,郭伊,钟镇涛,Jane MAKONI,祝水金,陈进红. Heat tolerance evaluation of transgenic cotton germplasms with insect resistance and herbicide tolerance[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(6): 647-656.
[2] 王汐妍,裘波音,刘玉姣,徐晓建,苏文,祝水金,陈进红. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐性棉花幼苗生长与生理及无机离子器官分布的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 43(3): 273-280.
[3] 孙晓婷, 鹿秀云, 张敬泽, 祝水金. 浙江棉花黄萎病菌致病型菌株的鉴定及高温抑制病害的表征分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(6): 671-678.
[4] 余恩, 蔡芸菲, 赵茹冰, 陈进红, 祝水金. 2个转基因抗虫杂交棉Bt蛋白含量的时空表达特性研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(1): 17-22.
[5] 王安可, 何秋伶, 潘晶晶, 孙英超, 祝水金, 陈进红*. 农杆菌介导的VgDGAT1a基因棉花茎尖转化体系优化研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2013, 39(3): 253-260.
[6] 赵亦静, 倪密, 诺林, 王学德*. 人工合成抗菌肽对棉花黄萎病菌的抑菌效果[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2013, 39(1): 11-.
[7] 吴玉香 高燕会 祝水金等. 4个栽培棉种间四元杂种的SSR分子标记鉴定[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2007, 33(1): 56-60.
[8] 吴元奇  龚乐春  周兆华  房卫平  胡秉民. 棉花黄萎病菌与品种的互作研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2003, 29(1): 71-75.
[9] 王学德  赵向前. 不育系花器含糖量对三系杂交棉制种产量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2002, 28(2): 119-122.
[10] 蒋淑丽  王学德. 棉花纤维突变体胚珠发育过程中主要生化物质的积累特征[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2002, 28(1): 16-21.
[11] 宋凤鸣  葛秀春  郑重. 枯萎病菌侵染后棉苗体内谷胱甘肽含量的变化及其与抗病性的关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2001, 27(6): 615-618.
[12] 蒋淑丽  王学德. 5个棉花纤维突变体的胚珠形态特征与农艺性状研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2001, 27(3): 285-289.