|
|
|
| Paradigm Shift of Marxist Aesthetics and Its Methodological Enlightenment |
| He Xinyu |
| School of Humanities & Communication, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The theoretical paradigm of Marxist aesthetics represents a global aesthetic framework that diverges from the romantic aesthetic tradition, rejecting Eurocentrism as its foundational principle. This paradigm embodies profound theoretical aspirations and practical significance within the field of aesthetic studies. Throughout its historical development, Marxist aesthetics has undergone several pivotal paradigm shifts along a linear historical trajectory, while simultaneously demonstrating spatial and formal intersections across different geographical contexts. In the context of rapid modernization and globalization, these paradigm shifts have manifested in diverse aspects, particularly in aesthetic modernity and fundamental aesthetic propositions. Notably, Chinese Marxist aesthetics has emerged as a significant component, contributing to the formation of a complex problematics within the broader domain of Marxist aesthetic theory. This evolution reflects both the theoretical depth and practical relevance of Marxist aesthetics in addressing contemporary aesthetic challenges.Building upon this theoretical foundation, this article systematically investigates three pivotal theoretical paradigms in the historical evolution of Marxist aesthetics: the historical materialist approach to literature and art, the anthropological paradigm shift, and the paradigm shift centered on aesthetic ideology. Although these elements do not encompass the complete spectrum of theoretical paradigms in Marxist aesthetics, they represent significant paradigm shifts that emerged within specific historical contexts. These developments not only inherit but also advance the Marxist aesthetic tradition, demonstrating its dynamic and evolving nature. For the development of Chinese Marxist aesthetics, this study provides significant methodological insights, particularly in offering an aesthetic-historical perspective for interpreting the Marxist aesthetic discourse system.Different from Western aesthetics, which excels in abstract speculation and metaphysical theoretical discourse, Chinese Marxist aesthetics unfolds in tandem with the practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The distinctive features of Chinese Marxist aesthetics lie in its pronounced practical orientation and empirical approach, stemming from the integration of Marxist fundamental theories with Chinese aesthetic experiences and artistic practices. Consequently, the formation of the aesthetic paradigm in China has progressed concurrently with the practical development of socialism with Chinese characteristics. To reflect on the Chinese Marxist aesthetic paradigm within the contemporary cultural context, it is imperative to examine its unique contributions from a global aesthetic perspective, while integrating China’s rich aesthetic experiences and theoretical perspectives into the historical process of globalization.In conclusion, Marxist aesthetics has demonstrated the potential for a more rational and promising future for humanity. It is poised to play an increasingly significant role in guiding values within contemporary and future societal development. In the context of China’ pursuit of socialism with Chinese characteristics, Chinese Marxist aesthetics embodies both the orientation and historical imperatives for a better world. Within this framework, the Chinese Marxist aesthetic paradigm represents an advanced aesthetic form that is globally oriented and future-focused.
|
|
Received: 12 April 2024
|
|
|
|
1 美］托马斯·库恩：《科学革命的结构》，张卜天译，北京：北京大学出版社，2022年。
2 意］吉奥乔·阿甘本：《万物的签名：论方法》，尉光吉译，北京：中央编译出版社，2017年。
3 Hemingway A.， Marxism and The History of Art： From William Morris to the New Left， London： Pluto Press， 2006.
4 德］马克思、恩格斯：《马克思恩格斯文集》第10卷，中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林作编译局译，北京：人民出版社，2009年。
5 匈］格奥尔格·卢卡奇：《审美特性》（修订版），徐恒醇译，北京：中央编译出版社，2025年。
6 Gandesha S. & Hartle J.， Aesthetic Marx， London： Bloomsbury Academic， 2017.
7 英］特里·伊格尔顿：《历史中的政治、哲学、爱欲》，马海良译，北京：中国社会科学出版社，1999年。
8 Guyer P.， A History of Modern Aesthetics， Cambridge： Cambridge University Press， 2014.
9 苏］A. 齐斯：《马克思主义美学的基础》，彭吉象译，北京：中国文联出版公司，1985年。
10 德］马克思、恩格斯：《马克思恩格斯文集》第9卷，中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局译，北京：人民出版社，2009年。
11 俄］普列汉诺夫：《没有地址的信》，见《普列汉诺夫：美学论文集》，曹保华译，北京：人民出版社，1983年，第307-447页。
12 王杰：《历史与价值的悖论——特里·伊格尔顿的美学理论》，《马克思主义美学研究》1998年第1期，第380-392页。
13 法］路易·阿尔都塞：《一封论艺术的信》，见陆梅林选编：《西方马克思主义美学文选》，南宁：漓江出版社，1988年，第519-525页。
14 德］汉斯·科赫：《马克思主义和美学》，佟景韩译，南宁：漓江出版社，1985年。
15 刘纲纪：《马克思主义美学研究与阐释的三种基本形态》，见《刘纲纪文集》，武汉：武汉大学出版社，2009年，第372-387页。
16 刘康：《马克思主义与美学：中国马克思主义美学家和他们的西方同行》，北京：北京大学出版社，2012年。
17 王杰、尹庆红：《人文学者应该关心人类的未来——王杰教授访谈录》，《学术月刊》2011年第7期，第155-160页。
18 宣言：《中国没有辜负社会主义》，《人民日报》2021年6月8日，第1版。
19 荷］范丹姆：《审美人类学：视野与方法》，李修建、向丽译，北京：中国文联出版社，2015年。
20 苏］乔·米·弗里德连杰尔：《马克思恩格斯和文学问题》，郭值京、雪原、程代熙等译，陆梅林校，上海：上海译文出版社，1984年。 |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 55 
