浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年6月24日 星期二   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
栏目 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
龟井南冥《春秋左传考义》的注释方法及其学术史意义
毛振华
Annotation Method and Its Academic History Significance of Chunki’u Tso Chuan Kaoyi Written by Kamei Nammyeong
Mao Zhenhua

全文: PDF (1354 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 《春秋左传考义》是日本江户时期龟井南冥对《春秋》经文及传文中存疑的语句进行精心注解的一部重要著作。龟井南冥善于实证研究,注重义理探析和语气照应,对无法精准训释的内容或并存诸家之说以备案,或存疑不考以阙疑,从而保证了注释的客观公正;他以批评杜预注为出发点,指陈杜预注失误、失考、失于详、取臆说、强为之解等,并逐一辨证,或补充杜预说,或立新说;他在材料的使用上强调可据性、可靠性,注重广泛寻求类似的语例和事例,尤为注重从《春秋》经传中寻求相似的例子加以比勘进而得出结论。《春秋左传考义》有力地扭转了江户时代日本学者研治汉学局限于宋明理学的风尚,标志着日本汉学研究方法由宋学向汉学的转变,在《左传》学史上具有重要的地位和影响。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
毛振华
关键词 龟井南冥日本汉学《春秋左传考义》注释方法批评杜预注学术史地位    
Abstract:Chunki’u Tso Chuan Kaoyi is an important book of annotations written by Kamei Nammyeong in the Edo period of Japan. In this book, Kamei focused on annotating the ambiguous text of Tso Chuan. Kamei was good at empirical research, and paid close attention to the interpretation of content, argumentation and semantic associations. For what couldn’t be interpreted accurately, Kamei offered various annotations by different scholars for reference, or left the questions open. Such remarks as "Du’s interpretation seems invalid", " It seems better than Du’s interpretation", "Whether Du’s interpretation is better or not is uncertain", "Du’s interpretation is probably wrong", "Perhaps that’s not the case", and "Du’s interpretation seems better" show his doubts on some notes, but he himself did not give conclusive remarks. This attitude is cautious and scientific, and ensures the objectivity and fairness of the annotation. Kamei Nammyeong criticized various mistakes in Du Yu’s interpretations-mistakes resulting from Du’s inadequate study of Tso Chuan’s context and lack of a thorough analysis of the words and sentences, neglects resulting from the arbitrary use of materials and from the misunderstanding of pronunciation, connotation and rules of diction. He criticized Yu for his subjective and groundless interpretations and far-fetched personal views. Kamei’s revisions and supplements to Du’s interpretations are multi-angled and multi-dimensional. His exploitation and innovative use of the available materials and his original interpretations and elaborations on relevant documents show Kamei’s solid skills in textual research and unique academic insight. Influenced by Ogyu Sorai’s research method, Kamei Nammyeong inherited and developed the Puxue tradition of the Han Dynasty. He not only cited original examples from Chunki’u, but also the linguistic examples before the Western Han Dynasty to correct Du Yu’s interpretations. Meanwhile, he stressed the availability and reliability of the materials. Expressions such as “No clear citation”, “The source cited is unknown”, “Not sure whether the citation exists”, “No citation”, etc. are frequently used to question Du Yu. In order to recover the original features of Tso Chuan study, Kamei illustrated his research and analysis with concrete examples. Consequently, Kamei laid the foundation of Tso Chuan study in Japan by combining textual research with content, argumentation and semantic associations. It is remarkable that Kamei was intact from Ogyu Sorai’s thoughts such as “the recognition of the words of ancient Chinese should come first,” “the Six Classics can be talked about”. Kamei regarded the materials of and after the Western Han Dynasty as something important as those before Han. He adopted what was adoptable, and refuted what was refutable, which was obviously a big step forward from Ogyu’s academic views. Kamei’s way of annotating had a profound impact on the academic atmosphere in the early Edo period, which has been dominated by Neo-Confucianism in the Song and Ming dynasties when Yili was emphasized but textual research was underestimated. Furthermore, Kamei’s way of annotating broke through the academic limitations of Japanese sinology, to the periods after Song dynasty. The prominent achievement of Kamei’s textual research made the Tso Chuan studies in the Edo period more scientific. His research method and the academic value of his work also have great influence upon Tso chuan zuan kao written by Kamei Akiyo and Tso shih hui ki’an written by Tzu ti’en ku’ang hung. The systematic analysis of Chunki’u Tso Chuan Kaoyi in its ways of annotation and use of materials, bring out its unique academic value. and its important position and significance in the Tso Chuan studies in Japan.
Key words Kamei Nammyeong    Chunki’u Tso chuan Kaoyi    annotation method    criticize    Du Yu’s interpretation    significance in academic history   
    
引用本文:   
毛振华. 龟井南冥《春秋左传考义》的注释方法及其学术史意义[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2016, 2(6): 16-. Mao Zhenhua. Annotation Method and Its Academic History Significance of Chunki’u Tso Chuan Kaoyi Written by Kamei Nammyeong. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2016, 2(6): 16-.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2016/V2/I6/16
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn