An Interpretation of the Knowledge Society from the Perspective of the Materialist Conception of History
Yao Mingming1,2, Li Xinxin1
1.School of Marxism, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China 2.Research Center for Marxism Theory Innovation and Communication, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
Abstract：This article offers a comprehensive analysis of the knowledge society from three interconnected dimensions: conceptual clarification, operational mechanisms, and developmental effects. Conceptually, a knowledge society is constituted by three foundational elements: knowledge workers, knowledge resources, and knowledge productive forces. Its intrinsic characteristics—teleology and regularity, abstraction and concreteness, necessity and contingency—remain firmly situated within the analytical horizon of Marxist theory. Mechanistically, the article demonstrates that the operational logic of the knowledge society is governed by the essential laws of the Materialist Conception of History. Its systemic functioning hinges on the dialectical interplay of its core elements: the subject-object relationship between knowledge workers and knowledge resources; the relations of production between knowledge workers and knowledge productive forces; and the transformative relation between knowledge resources and knowledge productive forces. In terms of developmental effects, the knowledge society represents a salient stage-specific tendency in contemporary social evolution. It engenders far-reaching transformations in material production and social life, yet simultaneously faces challenges such as technological alienation, erosion of subjectivity, and institutional lag. While existing theoretical researches on the Knowledge Society provides useful insights for China’s ongoing development, substantial theoretical space for further elaboration remains.The theoretical contribution of this study lies in its deployment of the Materialist Conception of History as a primary analytical lens to conduct an in-depth analysis of the constitutive elements, operating logic, and developmental implications of the knowledge society. This approach not only elucidates the knowledge society as a salient transitional feature in the trajectory of modern social formations but also extends the three elements theory of productive forces in the Materialist Conception of History by foregrounding the triadic structure of knowledge workers, knowledge resources, and knowledge productive forces, thereby enriching Marxist accounts of social development and productive-force evolution. Practically, anchored in the concrete conditions of China’s shift from high-speed to high-quality development, this study offers conceptual and strategic guidance for harnessing the opportunities and addressing the risks posed by the emerging knowledge society—particularly those associated with technological alienation—and thus contributes to the broader exploration of the Chinese path to modernization.The article’s innovations can be summarized in three aspects. First, at the level of theoretical architecture, it moves beyond conventional understandings of the three essential elements of the productive forces by expanding the connotation of the Materialist Conception of History through the categories of knowledge workers, knowledge resources, and knowledge productive forces, and by reaffirming that the knowledge society does not transcend but rather unfolds within the Marxist analytical framework, thereby laying a solid theoretical foundation. Second, methodologically, it establishes a tripartite analytical model—“conceptual determination-operational mechanisms-developmental effects”—which clarifies the essential attributes of each core element, explicates their dialectical relations, and identifies both transformative impacts and latent challenges, thereby overcoming the limitations of one-dimensional analyses. Third, in terms of research orientation, the analysis of the knowledge society’s elements, characteristics, and mechanisms is grounded in the Materialist Conception of History and closely integrated with the practical agenda of socialism with Chinese characteristics, thereby formulating practical insights for China in navigating the opportunities and risks of the knowledge society and enabling a precise alignment between theoretical reflection and China’s developmental imperatives. Future research may further refine the analysis of operational mechanisms by incorporating complexity theory, and may broaden the analytical horizon to include perspectives such as genetic epistemology or emergent issues arising from the ongoing evolution of the knowledge society.
姚明明, 李欣欣. 知识社会的唯物史观阐释[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2026, 56(2): 74-83.
Yao Mingming, Li Xinxin. An Interpretation of the Knowledge Society from the Perspective of the Materialist Conception of History. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2026, 56(2): 74-83.
2026, Vol. 56 
