浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月30日 星期五   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2023, Vol. 53 Issue (8): 101-110    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2023.04.138
主题栏目:宋学研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
唐宋时期官衔的兴起
周佳
浙江大学 历史学院,浙江 杭州 310058
The Rise of Official Titles in the Tang and Song Dynasties
Zhou Jia
School of History, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

全文: PDF (968 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 官衔起于唐,兴于宋,沿用至清。与官名相比,官衔更强调整体性、连续性。其产生的历史条件至唐宋方齐备成熟,主要包括:全国官员人事任免统一收归中央;官员个人品阶连续不断,不会因职位中断而清零;由各种综合要素累积而成的资历,成为职位除授的统一标准。唐宋时期,官员署衔必须严格以朝廷授官文书为准。当时差遣日渐增多,入衔与否即一种差遣任务的称呼能否成为固定官衔,成为经常被讨论的问题。与唐代相比,宋代新增差遣入衔流程较快,入衔后也会随时调整官衔文字,这导致宋代官衔繁复冗杂,又反映出宋代官制灵活务实的特点。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
周佳
关键词 唐宋官衔资历差遣    
Abstract:The term “official title” was adopted during the Tang Dynasty for the first time and was widely used during the Song Dynasty. The emergence of this historical phenomenon is not accidental, which has not been, however, given due attention in the academia. This paper discusses the meaning of the term “official title” and the reasons for its emergence in the Tang and Song Dynasties.The earliest explanation of the term “official title” in historical records comes from the book Fengshi Wenjian Ji written by Feng Yan in the Tang Dynasty. Feng Yan had lived in the middle and late Tang Dynasty. He recorded the emergence of “official title” as a new phenomenon of his days.“Official title” has twofold connotations. The first is the continuity of the new official names and old official names. When the central government grants official titles, the new official names must be in connection with the old ones without interruption. The second is for the control on the part of the central government over the appointment and removal of officials throughout the country.There are three main historical conditions for the emergence of “official titles”. First of all, the central government centralized the appointment and removal of officials throughout the country. Only the central government had the power to grant official titles, and all the power of officials came directly from the central authority. Therefore, the awarding and receiving of official titles had a bipartite significance: the central government, through granting official titles, recognizing the identity and power of officials and an official by accepting his official title showing his recognition and obedience to the central government. Secondly, officials had a bureaucratic rank that pertained to himself and would not be lost upon the interruption of the post. Thirdly, qualifications acquired through background, years of official service, service experience and merits became the most important criteria for the assignment of the posts.It was not until the Tang Dynasty that all the above conditions appeared, and were recognized and accepted. By the Song Dynasty, they had become the principles generally accepted by the officialdom. As a result,“being an official” no longer merely meant someone working for the government, but a social status that was almost never lost once acquired.Official titles are a condensed reflection of historical changes. Since the Tang and Song Dynasties, no matter when and where an official was, his “official titles” should be written in accordance with the official certificate issued by the central government. The number of words could not be increased or decreased, and the ranking order could not be changed.In the Tang and Song Dynasties, the number of dispatch duties increased. Whether a certain dispatch duty could be a permanent official title became a subject of frequent discussion of the time. For the imperial court, whether a special dispatch duty should become part of an official title mainly depended on whether it had the necessity of long-term existence. For officials, if their dispatch duties became their official titles, their service experience on this dispatch duty can then be recorded and counted as seniority, hence giving momentum to future promotions.The Tang Dynasty needed dispatch duties to cope with the ever-changing sociopolitical circumstances but was unwilling to institutionalize these dispatch posts. Compared with the Tang Dynasty, the Song Dynasty was faster in the process of the creation of new posts or titles. Later, the imperial court would adjust the diction of official titles at any time as the situation changed. On the one hand, official titles in the Song Dynasty were numerous and complicated. On the other hand, the bureaucratic system of the Song Dynasty was flexible and pragmatic, and it adjusted itself quickly in the face of social changes.
Key wordsthe Tang and Song Dynasties    official title    qualifications    dispatch duty   
收稿日期: 2023-04-13     
基金资助:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目
作者简介: 周佳(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2194-0232),女,浙江大学历史学院副教授,浙江大学宋学研究中心兼职教师,历史学博士,主要从事宋史、职官科举制度研究;
引用本文:   
周佳. 唐宋时期官衔的兴起[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 53(8): 101-110. Zhou Jia. The Rise of Official Titles in the Tang and Song Dynasties. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2023, 53(8): 101-110.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2023.04.138     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2023/V53/I8/101
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn