Please wait a minute...
Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition)  2023, Vol. 50 Issue (2): 249-260    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2023.02.014
Urban Science     
Perception of destination visual image and the ground-sky transition mechanism based on the perspective of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in Tibet
Xiliang CHEN1(),Gang LI1,2(),Yue YU1,Feng XU1,Ying HE3,Jiachen YANG1
1.College of Urban and Environmental Sciences,Northwest University,Xi'an 710127,China
2.Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity,Northwest University,Xi'an 710127,China
3.School of Tourism,Lanzhou University of Arts and Science,Lanzhou 730010,China
Download: HTML( 2 )   PDF(3543KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

With the rapid development of consumer-grade unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs ), aerial photographs from UAVs become a new source of data for destination image research, and provide support for the observation perspective from the ground to the sky. Taking Tibet as the research object, this study used UAV aerial photos, text profiles and location coordinates in the forum "SkyPixel", based on the "cognitive-emotion" model in destination image perception theory, applied computer vision analysis, social network analysis, computer text sentiment analysis and GIS spatial analysis to explore the perception of destination image in Tibet from the perspective of UAVs. The research results show that: The natural landscape accounts for the largest proportion of all visual cognitive images, and the majestic mountains and magnificent water features are the most prominent visual scenes of Tibet from the perspective of UAVs. The text profile of the photo is dominated by positive emotions, and the number of positive descriptions is far more than neutral and negative emotions. Negative emotions mainly come from the impact of difficult environments on shooting and self-driving. The overall image of Tibet is reflected in the magnificent plateau scenery and unique Tibetan architecture, specifically in four aspects: "magnificent mountains and rivers", "holy waters", "plateau idyll" and "Tibetan architecture", and the overall image perception is positive. The spatial distribution of the visual image reveals a pattern of "One core and multi-segment areas" distributed in "east-west direction". Finally, this study explored the ground-sky transition mechanism of Tibet destination visual image from four aspects: UAV photographer, UAV equipment, UAV perspective, destination visual marketing and construction, and put forward optimization suggestions for Tibet destination image construction based on the characteristics of environmental resources and UAVs.



Key wordsdestination image      unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)      visual analysis      text analysis      Tibet     
Received: 07 February 2022      Published: 21 March 2023
CLC:  F 590  
Corresponding Authors: Gang LI     E-mail: 635991388@qq.com;lig@nwu.edu.cn
Cite this article:

Xiliang CHEN,Gang LI,Yue YU,Feng XU,Ying HE,Jiachen YANG. Perception of destination visual image and the ground-sky transition mechanism based on the perspective of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in Tibet. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2023, 50(2): 249-260.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/sci/EN/Y2023/V50/I2/249


无人机视角下西藏目的地视觉形象感知及其地-空转换机制

随着消费级无人机的快速发展,无人机航拍照片逐渐成为目的地形象研究的新型资料来源,并为观察视角从地面转向空中提供支撑。以西藏自治区为案例地,以论坛“天空之城”中无人机航拍照片、文本简介和位置坐标为数据,基于目的地形象感知理论中的“认知—情感”模型,运用计算机视觉分析、计算机文本情感分析、社会网络分析和GIS空间分析等方法对无人机视角下西藏目的地形象感知进行探索。研究发现,自然景观在所有视觉认知形象中占比最大,雄伟的山脉和壮阔的水景是无人机视角下西藏最突出的视觉认知形象;照片文本简介以积极情感为主,其数量远多于中性情感和消极情感,消极情感主要来自恶劣的环境对拍摄和自驾造成的影响;西藏整体形象体现在壮丽的高原风光和独特的藏式建筑,具体包含“雄壮山川”“圣洁水域”“高原牧歌”和“藏地建筑”4个元素,整体形象感知正向积极。视觉形象空间分布整体呈现“东—西”方向分布的“一核多片”格局。最后从无人机摄影者、无人机设备、无人机视角和目的地视觉营销与建设四方面探索西藏目的地视觉形象地-空转换机制,并基于环境资源和无人机特点为西藏目的地形象建设提出了优化建议。


关键词: 目的地形象,  无人机,  视觉分析,  文本分析,  西藏自治区 
Fig.1 Research framework destination visual image perception from the perspective of UAV

关键词词频

比重/

%

关键词词频

比重/

%

1outdoor1 1078.6726slope710.56
2mountain9157.1627grazing700.55
3nature8606.7328wave700.55
4water7005.4829sheep680.53
5man4723.7030overlooking660.52
6snow4393.4431bird650.51
7covered3632.8432group590.46
8grass3442.6933people540.42
9standing3152.4734desert510.40
10large3032.3735track510.40
11hill2892.2636hillside490.38
12field2501.9637walking470.37
13beach2471.9338air450.35
14green2241.7539dirt450.35
15rock1931.5140grassy430.34
16clouds1881.4741sand380.30
17rocky1671.3142river360.28
18valley1531.2043sunset360.28
19blue1421.1144waterfall360.28
20boat1230.9645sandy290.23
21body1230.9646shore280.22
22canyon1150.9047old270.21
23lake1100.8648tree260.20
24cloudy820.6449building240.19
25small720.5650herd240.19
Table 1 Keyword statistics for visual image perception of Tibet destinations (top 50)
维度占比%词量关键词
自然景观52.5123mountain, nature, water, snow, hill, field, beach, rock, clouds, valley, canyon, lake, slope, wave, desert, hillside, air, dirt, sand, river, sunset, waterfall, shore
形容词30.412outdoor, covered, standing, large, green, rocky, blue, cloudy, small, grassy, sandy, old
人物及活动8.686man, body, overlooking, group, people, walking
动植物6.316grass, grazing, sheep, bird, tree, herd
人文景观2.093boat, track, building
Table 2 Perception dimension of Tibet destination visual image
Fig.2 Text sentiment evaluation pattern of destination photos in Tibet
Fig.3 Destination visual image relationship network in Tibet
Fig.4 Overall image elements of Tibet destination from the perspective of UAV
Fig.5 The spatial distribution of visual image in Tibet
Fig. 6 The ground-sky transition mechanism of Tibet destination visual image
[1]   NIKJOO A, BAKHSHI H. The presence of tourists and residents in shared travel photos[J]. Tourism Management, 2019, 70: 89-98. DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.005
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.005
[2]   邓宁, 钟栎娜, 李宏. 基于UGC图片元数据的目的地形象感知: 以北京为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(1): 53-62. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2018. 01.010
DENG N, ZHONG L N, LI H. Perception of travel destination image based on user-generated photograph metadata: The case of Beijing[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2018, 33(1): 53-62. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006. 2018.01.010
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006. 2018.01.010
[3]   李萍, 陈田, 王甫园, 等. 基于文本挖掘的城市旅游社区形象感知研究: 以北京市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(6): 1106-1122. DOI:10.11821/dlyj201706009
LI P, CHEN T, WANG F Y, et al. Urban tourism community image perception and differentiation based on online comments: A case study of Beijing[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(6): 1106-1122. DOI:10.11821/dlyj201706009
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201706009
[4]   李婷, 武刚, 梁丽芳, 等. 基于网络评论的五台山旅游目的地游后形象感知研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2021, 35(8): 192-198. DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2021.232
LI T, WU G, LIANG L F, et al. Post-visit image perception of Mount Wutai tourism destination based on online comments[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2021, 35(8): 192-198. DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2021.232
doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2021.232
[5]   陆利军, 廖小平. 基于UGC数据的南岳衡山旅游目的地形象感知研究[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(12): 221-229. DOI:10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.12.025
LU L J, LIAO X P. Research on image perception of tourism destination based on UGC data:A case study of South Mount Heng[J]. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(12): 221-229. DOI:10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl. 2019.12.025
doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl. 2019.12.025
[6]   DENG N, LI X R. Feeling a destination through the “right” photos: A machine learning model for DMOs' photo selection[J]. Tourism Management, 2018, 65: 267-278. DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2017. 09.010
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017. 09.010
[7]   BALOMENOU N, GARROD B, GEORGIADOU A. Making sense of tourists' photographs using canonical variate analysis[J]. Tourism Management, 2017, 61: 173-179. DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2017. 02.010
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017. 02.010
[8]   王敏, 江荣灏, 朱竑. 人文地理学的“视觉”研究进展与启示[J]. 人文地理, 2017, 32(3): 10-19. DOI:10. 13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.03.002
WANG M, JIANG R H, ZHU H. A review and revelation of the study of visual in human geography[J]. Human Geography, 2017, 32(3): 10-19. DOI:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.03.002
doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.03.002
[9]   范梦余, 张辉, 陈怡宁. 内蒙古视觉旅游形象的时空感知研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(10): 194-200. DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2020.288
FAN M Y, ZHANG H, CHEN Y N. Spatiotemporal analysis of visual tourism images in Inner Mongolia from the perspective of tourists[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(10): 194-200. DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2020.288
doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2020.288
[10]   ZHAO Z, ZHU M M, HAO X F. Share the gaze: Representation of destination image on the Chinese social platform Wechat moments[J]. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2018, 35(6): 726-739. DOI:10.1080/10548408.2018.1432449
doi: 10.1080/10548408.2018.1432449
[11]   邓宁, 刘耀芳, 牛宇, 等. 不同来源地旅游者对北京目的地形象感知差异:基于深度学习的Flickr图片分析[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(3): 416-429. DOI:10. 18402/resci.2019.03.01
DENG N, LIU Y F, NIU Y, et al. Different perceptions of Beijing's destination images from tourists: An analysis of Flickr photos based on deep learning method[J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(3): 416-429. DOI:10.18402/resci.2019.03.01
doi: 10.18402/resci.2019.03.01
[12]   HUNT J D. Image as a factor in tourism development[J]. Journal of Travel Research, 1975, 13(3): 1-7. DOI:10.1177/004728757501300301
doi: 10.1177/004728757501300301
[13]   袁超, 孔翔, 李鲁奇, 等. 基于游客用户生成内容数据的传统村落形象感知:以徽州呈坎村为例[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(8): 203-211. DOI:10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.08.025
YUAN C, KONG X, LI L Q, et al. Traditional village image perception research based on tourist UGC data: A case of Chengkan village[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(8): 203-211. DOI:10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.08.025
doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.08.025
[14]   BALOGLU S, MCCLEARY K W. A model of destination image formation[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1999, 26(4): 868-897. DOI:10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00030-4
doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00030-4
[15]   徐小波, 赵磊, 刘滨谊, 等. 中国旅游城市形象感知特征与分异[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(7): 1367-1379. DOI:10.11821/dlyj201507016
XU X B, ZHAO L, LIU B Y, et al. Study on perceived image of Chinese tourist cities[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(7): 1367-1379. DOI:10.11821/dlyj201507016
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201507016
[16]   王盼盼, 严艳, 陈悦悦, 等. 基于跨文化视角的旅游地视觉表征差异分析:以中美游客镜头下的西藏为例[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2018, 45(2): 242-250, 260. DOI:10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2018. 02.015
WANG P P, YAN Y, CHEN Y Y, et al. The differences in visual representation of tourism destination based on cross-cultural perspective: A case of Tibet through the camera lenses of Chinese and American tourists[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2018, 45(2): 242-250, 260. DOI:10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2018. 02.015
doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9497.2018. 02.015
[17]   陈曦亮, 李钢, 徐锋, 等. 基于无人机航拍照片的西安城市形象感知研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(9): 1600-1612. DOI:10.8306/dlkxjz.2021.09.014
CHEN X L, LI G, XU F, et al. City image perception of Xi'an based on unmanned aerial vehicle photography photos[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(9): 1600-1612. DOI:10.8306/dlkxjz.2021. 09.014
doi: 10.8306/dlkxjz.2021. 09.014
[18]   CHEN X L, LI G, YANG L, et al. Profiling unmanned aerial vehicle photography tourists[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2020, 23(14): 1705-1710. DOI:10.1080/13683500.2019.1653832
doi: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1653832
[19]   GERMEN M. Alternative cityscape visualisation: Drone shooting as a new dimension in urban photography[C]//Electronic Visualisation and the Arts. London: BCS Learning & Development Ltd, 2016. DOI:10.14236/ewic/EVA2016.31
doi: 10.14236/ewic/EVA2016.31
[20]   KULLMANN K. The drone's eye: Applications and implications for landscape architecture[J]. Landscape Research, 2018, 43(7): 906-921. DOI:10.1080/01426397.2017.1386777
doi: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1386777
[21]   XIANG Z. From digitization to the age of acceleration: On information technology and tourism[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2018, 25: 147-150. DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2017.11.023
doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2017.11.023
[22]   HAY B. Drone tourism: A study of the current and potential use of drones in hospitality and tourism[C]// SCERRI M, HUI L K. The Changing Landscape of Tourism and Hspitality: The Impact of Emerging Markets and Emerging Destinations. Sydney: Blue Mountains International Hotel Management School, 2016: 49-68.
[23]   STANKOV U, KENNELL J, MORRISON A M, et al. The view from above: The relevance of shared aerial drone videos for destination marketing[J]. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2019, 36(7): 808-822. DOI:10.1080/10548408.2019. 1575787
doi: 10.1080/10548408.2019. 1575787
[24]   李德仁, 李明. 无人机遥感系统的研究进展与应用前景[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2014, 39(5): 505-513. DOI:10.13203/j.whugis20140045
LI D R, LI M. Research advance and application prospect of unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing system[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2014, 39(5): 505-513. DOI:10.13203/j.whugis20140045
doi: 10.13203/j.whugis20140045
[25]   杨存建, 李何超, 许光洪, 等. 基于大疆无人机遥感的农村居民点建筑密度与容积率的测算[J]. 山地学报, 2019, 37(1): 144-150. DOI:10.16089/j.cnki. 1008-2786.000408
YANG C J, LI H C, XU G H, et al. A measure to the building density and floor area ratio of rural settlements based on Dajiang unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing[J]. Mountain Research, 2019, 37(1): 144-150. DOI:10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786. 000408
doi: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786. 000408
[26]   余忠迪, 李辉, 巴芳, 等. 基于消费者级无人机的城市三维建模[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2018, 30(2): 67-72. DOI:10.6046/gtzyyg.2018.02.09
YU Z D, LI H, BA F, et al. 3D city model construction based on a consumer-grade UAV[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 2018, 30(2): 67-72. DOI:10.6046/gtzyyg.2018.02.09
doi: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2018.02.09
[27]   曾凡洋, 李长辉, 宋杨, 等. 微型无人机在违法用地与违法建设动态监测中的应用[J]. 测绘通报, 2017(S1): 152-154, 168. DOI:10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2017.0640
ZENG F Y, LI C H, SONG Y, et al. Application of micro UAV in dynamic monitoring of the illegal use of land and illegal construction[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2017(S1): 152-154, 168. 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2017.0640
doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2017.0640
[28]   陈雪, 张宏磊, 徐一帆, 等. 旅游研究中的图像研究进展与展望[J]. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(3): 127-140. DOI:10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2021.03.015
CHEN X, ZHANG H L, XU Y F, et al. Progress and prospect on photo research in tourism research[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2021, 36(3): 127-140. DOI:10. 19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2021.03.015
doi: 10. 19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2021.03.015
[29]   STEPCHENKOVA S, ZHAN F Z. Visual destination images of Peru: Comparative content analysis of DMO and user-generated photography[J]. Tourism Management, 2013, 36: 590-601. DOI:10. 1016/j.tourman.2012.08.006
doi: 10. 1016/j.tourman.2012.08.006
[30]   张坤, 李春林, 张津沂. 基于图片大数据的入境游客感知和行为演变研究:以北京市为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(8): 61-70. DOI:10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2020.08.012
ZHANG K, LI C L, ZHANG J Y. A study on the spatio-temporal evolution of inbound tourists' perceptions and behaviors based on big pictorial data: The case of Beijing[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(8): 61-70. DOI:10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006. 2020.08.012
doi: 10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006. 2020.08.012
[31]   JANŠA T, WATTANACHAROENSIL W, KOLAR T. Computer supported analysis of Thailand's imagery on Pinterest[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2020, 23(15): 1833-1839. DOI:10.1080/13683500.2019. 1631761
doi: 10.1080/13683500.2019. 1631761
[32]   王满四, 周翔, 张延平. 从产品导向到服务导向-传统制造企业的战略更新:基于大疆创新科技有限公司的案例研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2018(11): 107-121. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2018.11.011
WANG M S, ZHOU X, ZHANG Y P. From product dominant logic to service dominant logic-strategic renewal of traditional manufacturing corporation: A case study on DJI innovations[J]. China Soft Science, 2018(11): 107-121. DOI:10. 3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2018.11.011
doi: 10. 3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2018.11.011
[33]   DEL S A. Microsoft Computer Vision APIs Distilled[M]. Berkeley: Springer, 2018: 1-4. DOI:10. 1007/978-1-4842-3342-9_1
doi: 10. 1007/978-1-4842-3342-9_1
[34]   DALE R. Text analytics APIs, part 1: The bigger players[J]. Natural Language Engineering, 2018, 24(2): 317-324. DOI:10.1017/S1351324918000013
doi: 10.1017/S1351324918000013
[35]   BASTIAN M, HEYMANN S, JACOMY M. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks[C]// Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, San Jose:ICWSM, 2009:361-362. doi:10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
[36]   SILVERMAN B W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis[M]. New York: Routledge, 2018. doi:10.1201/9781315140919
doi: 10.1201/9781315140919
[37]   DENG N, LIU J Y, DAI Y, et al. Different cultures, different photos: A comparison of Shanghai's pictorial destination image between East and West[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2019, 30: 182-192. DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2019.02.016
doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2019.02.016
[38]   BLONDEL V D, GUILLAUME J L, LAMBIOTTE R, et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008, 2008(10): P10008. DOI:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
[39]   JACOMY M, VENTURINI T, HEYMANN S, et al. ForceAtlas 2: A continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(6): e98679. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
[40]   URRY J, LARSEN J. The Tourist Gaze 3.0[M]. London: Sage Publications, 2011. doi:10.4135/9781446251904
doi: 10.4135/9781446251904
[41]   张高军, 杨双梦, 柯景怡, 等. OGC和TGC照片中的目的地形象分异与合和:试论旅游形象的线上传播链[J]. 旅游学刊, 2020, 35(12): 52-62. DOI:10. 19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2020.12.010
ZHANG G J, YANG S M, KE J Y, et al. Differentiation and similarity of destination images in OGC and TGC photos: Outline of the online communication chain of destination image[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(12): 52-62. DOI:10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2020.12.010
doi: 10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2020.12.010
[1] Ruiqi YU,Yuhua LIU,Xilong SHEN,Ruyu ZHAI,Xiang ZHANG,Zhiguang ZHOU. Representation learning driven multiple graph sampling[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2022, 49(3): 271-279.
[2] JIANG Yang. Virtual deep seismic sounding method and it’s application in Tibet[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2020, 47(2): 218-222.
[3] ZHAO Zhe, ZHANG Tianye, HUANG Yanhao, ZHENG Wenting, CHEN Wei. Simulation-based visual analysis of power grid operation mode[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2020, 47(1): 36-44.
[4] SHEN Ziwei, TIAN Rongxiang, ZHANG Chao. A study on the interaction between ground-air temperature differences over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and sea surface-air temperature differences over the Indian Ocean[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2018, 45(5): 576-588.
[5] ZHANG Li, QIU Xiaoyu, LUO Jian. New recorded species of orchidaceae in Tibet Autonomous Region, China[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2018, 45(5): 647-650.
[6] ZHANG Li, LUO Jian. Newly recorded of spermatophyte from Tibet Autonomous Region,China[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2018, 45(4): 506-508,520.
[7] WU Baoqing, WU Jinfeng, ZHOU Fangru, YANG Chunhua. The clarity of tourism destination image and it's evaluation index: A case study on Xi'an tourism image[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2018, 45(3): 379-390.
[8] WANG Panpan, YAN Yan, CHEN Yueyue, WU Qiao. The differences in visual representation of tourism destination based on cross-cultural perspective-A case of Tibet through the camera lenses of Chinese and American tourists[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2018, 45(2): 242-250,260.
[9] TIAN Rongxiang, KANG Yuxiang, ZHANG Wenbin, XI Feng, ZHANG Chao. The role of solar radiation and atmospheric circulation in the seasonal temperature changes of Qinghai-Tibet plateau[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2017, 44(1): 84-96.
[10] LUO Jian, ZHAO Fangyu, LAN Xiaozhong. Two newly recorded genera of orchidaceae from Tibet Autonomous Region,China[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2016, 43(4): 502-504.