Please wait a minute...
工程设计学报  2017, Vol. 24 Issue (2): 134-140    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2017.02.002
设计理论与方法学     
单输入多输出耦合设计任务二阶段迭代模型研究
田启华, 汪涛, 杜义贤, 梅月媛
三峡大学 机械与动力学院, 湖北 宜昌 443002
Research on a two-stage iterative model of coupling design task with single input and multiple output
TIAN Qi-hua, WANG Tao, DU Yi-xian, MEI Yue-yuan
College of Mechanical and Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
 全文: PDF(1071 KB)   HTML
摘要:

产品开发过程中单输入多输出耦合设计任务间存在复杂的信息依赖关系。采用单阶段方法的任务执行方式时,因所执行的任务数量多并且需传递的信息量大,致使任务间存在的复杂信息关系难以被理清,从而导致任务执行过程中的方案分配不够合理,任务间的迭代返工次数过多,产品开发周期过长。针对这些问题,在深入分析单输入多输出耦合设计任务单阶段迭代模型的基础上,提出了一种任务迭代过程中的信息处理策略,并构建了一种单输入多输出耦合设计任务的二阶段迭代模型及其求解执行时间的数学模型。应用该数学模型,可以计算得到最佳二阶段设计任务分配方案。以某发动机开发项目为例,进行了该方法的应用分析。研究表明,采取二阶段迭代模型,任务迭代执行时间比单阶段短,并且通过合理分配在1,2两个阶段执行的任务,能够获得最短的二阶段任务迭代执行时间。该方法根据任务间不同的信息关系选择合适的任务迭代模型,能够有效缩短产品开发周期,可为产品设计人员在产品开发过程中选择合理的任务执行方式提供一定的理论参考。

关键词: 单输入多输出耦合设计任务分配方案二阶段迭代模型    
Abstract:

In the process of product development, there is a complex information-dependent relation between coupling design tasks with single input and multiple output. Because of the large amount of executed tasks and transmitted information, the complicated relationship between these tasks is hard to be sorted out by using the single-stage task execution method, which may lead to problems such as the unreasonable allocation of tasks in the process of task execution, excessive iteration rework times between tasks and too long product development cycle. To solve these problems, an information processing strategy for the task iteration was put forward, and a two-stage iteration model and the mathematical model of calculating task execution time were built based on the deep analysis of a single-stage iteration model for the coupling design task with single input and multiple output. The best two-stage task allocation scheme was obtained by working out this mathematical model. The effectiveness of this method was proved through the example of an engine development project. The results showed that the iterative execution time of tasks was shorter than single-stage by using the two-stage iteration model and the shortest iterative execution time of the two-stage iteration model could be obtained by reasonably assigning tasks into two phases. The method selects the appropriate task iterative model according to the different information relations between tasks, which can effectively shorten the product development cycle and provide some theoretical reference for product designers to choose reasonable task execution way in the process of product development.

Key words: single input and multiple output    coupling design    task allocation scheme    two-stage iterative model
收稿日期: 2016-09-16 出版日期: 2017-04-28
CLC:  TB472  
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51475265)

作者简介: 田启华(1962-),男,湖北宜昌人,教授,博士,从事机械设计及理论、CAD/CAE/CAM等研究,E-mail:tqh@ctgu.edu.cn,http://orcid.org//0000-0002-6084-6687
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
田启华
汪涛
杜义贤
梅月媛

引用本文:

田启华, 汪涛, 杜义贤, 梅月媛. 单输入多输出耦合设计任务二阶段迭代模型研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2017, 24(2): 134-140.

TIAN Qi-hua, WANG Tao, DU Yi-xian, MEI Yue-yuan. Research on a two-stage iterative model of coupling design task with single input and multiple output[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2017, 24(2): 134-140.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2017.02.002        https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/Y2017/V24/I2/134

[1] 张广军, 唐敦兵, 戴胜. 基于公理化设计矩阵与设计结构矩阵集成的研究[J]. 机械设计与研究,2008, 24(5): 15-18. ZHANG Guang-jun, TANG Dun-bing, DAI Sheng. Product design based on the co-evolution of axiomatic design matrix and design structure matrix[J]. Machine Design & Research,2008,24(5): 15-18.
[2] MOUSTAFA E,HESHAM K A. A dynamic programming algorithm for days-off scheduling with sequence dependent labor costs[J]. Journal of Scheduling,2008,11(2): 85-93.
[3] 张金标. 一种改进的产品设计耦合活动迭代模型[J].山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(2): 37-41. ZHANG Jin-biao. An improved iteration model for coupled activities in product design[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science),2008,38(2): 37-41.
[4] 贾军, 张卓. 复杂产品研发时间和研发团队交流优化模型及其应用研究[J]. 中国机械工程,2013,24(15):2030-2035. JIA Jun, ZHANG Zhuo. Research on optimized model of development cycle and R & D team communication strategies and its application to complex product[J]. China Mechanical Engineering,2013,24(15):2030-2035.
[5] 刘伟, 曹国忠, 郭德斌, 等. 基于多元仿生的快速响应设计研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2015, 22(1): 1-10. LIU Wei, CAO Guo-zhong, GUO De-bin, et al. Research on rapid response design based on multiple bionic[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design,2015,22(1): 1-10.
[6] 陈卫明,陈庭贵,肖人彬. 动态环境下基于混合迭代的耦合集求解方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统,2010,16(2): 271-309. CHEN Wei-ming,CHEN Ting-gui, XIAO Ren-bin. Coupled sets solving method based on hybrid iteration under dynamic environment[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2010, 16(2): 271-309.
[7] KRISHNAN V, EPPINGER S D, WHITNEY D E. Accelerating product development by the exchange of preliminary product design information[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1995, 117(4): 491-498.
[8] AMARESH C, THOMAS P B. A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design[J]. Design Studies, 2001, 22(6): 493-517.
[9] 邢乐斌, 李君. 基于设计迭代的耦合任务动态分配策略研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2012, 48(23): 219-223. XING Le-bin, LI Jun. Dynamic assignment of coupled tasks based on design iteration[J]. Computer Engineering and Application, 2012, 48(23): 219-223.
[10] 包北方, 杨育, 李斐, 等. 产品定制协同开发任务分解模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2014, 20(7): 1537-1545. BAO Bei-fang, YANG Yu, LI Fei, et al. Decomposition model in product customization collaborative development task[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2014, 20(7): 1537-1545.
[11] 徐亮亮, 唐敦兵, 朱仁淼, 等. 设计需求与方案求解协同演化模型的形式化表达[J]. 工程设计学报, 2011, 18(1): 17-22. XU Liang-liang, TANG Dun-bing, ZHU Ren-miao, et al. Formalization of co-evolution model of design requirement and solution solving[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2011, 18(1): 17-22.
[12] 徐晓刚, 刘伟, 刘达斌, 等. 产品开发中的设计迭代及其解耦策略[J]. 组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2001,38(9): 29-31. XU Xiao-gang, LIU Wei, LIU Da-bin, et al. Design iteration and de-coupling method[J]. Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique, 2011, 38(9): 29-31.
[13] 包北方, 杨育, 李雷霆,等. 产品定制协同开发任务分配多目标优化[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2014, 20(4): 739-746. BAO Bei-fang, YANG Yu, LI Lei-ting, et al. Multi-objective optimization for task allocation of product customization collaborative development[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems,2014, 20(4):739-746.
[14] YANG W,ZHANG W,WANG Y,et al. Ontology-based multi-perspective task decomposition to support composite manufacturing service discovery[J]. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Application,2011, 5(7): 290-296.
[15] 黄瑾, 金海, 谢夏, 等. 网格系统中的层次化资源分配与任务调度[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(10): 51-54. HUANG Jin, JIN Hai, XIE Xia, et al. Hierarchical resource allocation and task scheduling in grid environments[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition),2006, 34 (10): 51-54.
[16] 郭希娟, 李墨华. 基于多准则的动态任务分配算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2008, 28(10): 2507-2509. GUO Xi-juan, LI Mo-hua. Dynamic task assigment algoritum based on multi-criteria[J]. Computer Application, 2008, 28(10): 2507-2509.
[17] 叶菁,谢丽聪. 基于遗传算法的网格资源分配与调度研究[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2010, 17(10): 4-7. YE Jing, XIE Li-cong. Research on task allocation and scheduling in grid based on genetic algorithm[J]. Computer and Modernization, 2010, 17(10): 4-7.
[18] 苏财茂, 柯映林. 面向协同设计的任务规划与解耦策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2006, 12(1): 21-26. SU Cai-mao, KE Ying-lin. Task planning and decoupling strategy for collaborative design[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2006,12 (1):21-26.
[1] 李兆波, 陶庆, 康金胜, 孙文磊, 张开拓, 王寿栋. 基于动作捕捉技术的人体上肢运动舒适性评价[J]. 工程设计学报, 2018, 25(3): 338-345,359.
[2] 霍笑, 孙文磊, 陶庆, 康金胜, 李兆波, 王寿栋. 基于坐姿分析的座椅舒适度测试与评价[J]. 工程设计学报, 2017, 24(3): 286-294.
[3] 潘伟杰, 范灵秀, 吕健. 面向多维意象的产品设计方案评估研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2017, 24(3): 250-255,302.
[4] 伍琴, 吕健, 潘伟杰, 刘丹. 基于案例的文化创意产品设计方法研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2017, 24(2): 121-133.
[5] 金颖磊, 潘伟杰, 吕健, 刘征宏. 基于可拓语义分析的文化创意产品设计方法研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2017, 24(1): 27-33.
[6] 程幼明, 李富昌, 龚本刚, 吴英. 基于基因遗传的定制化产品资源重用策略及其选择[J]. 工程设计学报, 2016, 23(5): 401-408,436.
[7] 田启华, 汪巍巍, 杜义贤, 董群梅, 文小勇. 并行产品设计人员学习与交流能力对下游活动影响的研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2016, 23(5): 424-430.
[8] 张俊磊, 曹国忠, 邢锡金. 物质-场情景分解法在工业设计中的应用研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2016, 23(4): 316-321.
[9] 苏建宁, 陈肖, 张书涛, 张新新. 基于进化算法的产品造型创新设计方法研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2016, 23(2): 136-142.
[10] 邢锡金, 曹国忠, 刘伟, 吴中富. 基于Matrix 2003与效应的产品工业设计创新方法研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2016, 23(1): 14-21.