Please wait a minute...
工程设计学报  2026, Vol. 33 Issue (3): 408-417    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2026.05.171
可靠性与保质设计     
基于深度学习的车辆轮毂测试速度控制研究
王海龙(),宴聪(),梁杰
广东工业大学 机电工程学院,广东 广州 510006
Research on speed control for vehicle wheel hub testing based on deep learning
Hailong WANG(),Cong YAN(),Jie LIANG
School of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
 全文: PDF(3219 KB)   HTML
摘要:

随着汽车行业向智能化加速转型,轮毂作为车辆的核心安全部件,对检测精度与效率的要求不断提升,现有轮毂检测方法已无法满足高效、高精度的自动化检测需求。针对现有轮毂检测方法存在的成本高、效率低和精度不足等缺陷,提出了一种结合卷积神经网络(convolutional neural network, CNN)、双向长短期记忆网络(bidirectional long short-term memory, BiLSTM)和注意力机制(attention mechanism, AM)的混合深度学习模型(CNN-BiLSTM-AM),并通过构建车辆纵向控制模型完成速度跟踪,实现高效、高精度的轮毂自动检测。该模型在采用BiLSTM对数据进行建模时,利用CNN抑制噪声以解决BiLSTM对噪声敏感的问题,同时引入AM聚焦关键信息以避免简单模型中关键特征易丢失的问题,从而提高预测精度。仿真结果显示,与传统的RNN(recurrent neural network,循环神经网络)、LSTM、GRU(gated recurrent unit,门控循环单元)等模型相比,CNN-BiLSTM-AM模型在整体预测任务中的决定系数R2平均提升了3.17%,MAE(mean absolute error,平均绝对误差)平均降低了29.76%。台架试验结果表明,所提出的方法可有效完成轮毂性能检测,在实现高精度速度跟踪的同时提高了检测效率,这可为车辆轮毂的自动化检测提供高效的解决方案。

关键词: 轮毂检测混合深度学习模型纵向控制模型台架试验速度跟踪    
Abstract:

With the accelerated intelligent transformation of the automotive industry, the wheel hubs, as the core safety components of vehicles, have increasingly higher requirements for detection accuracy and efficiency. However, the existing wheel hub detection methods are longer able to meet the demands for efficient and high-precision automatic detection. To address the shortcomings of high cost, low efficiency, and insufficient accuracy in existing wheel hub detection methods, a hybrid deep learning model (CNN-BiLSTM-AM) combining convolutional neural network (CNN), bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), and attention mechanism (AM) was proposed. A vehicle longitudinal control model was constructed to realize speed tracking, thereby achieving efficient and high-precision automatic wheel hub detection. When using BiLSTM for data modeling, this model employed CNN to suppress noise to solve the noise sensitivity defect of BiLSTM, and introduced AM to focus on critical information to avoid the issue of losing key features in simple models, thereby improving prediction accuracy. Simulation results showed that compared with traditional RNN (recurrent neural network), LSTM, GRU (gated recurrent unit), the CNN-BiLSTM-AM model achieved an average improvement of 3.17% in determination coefficient R2 and an average reduction of 29.76% in MAE (mean absolute error) in the overall prediction task. Bench test results indicated that the proposed method could effectively complete wheel hub performance detection, achieving high-precision speed tracking while improving detection efficiency. This method provides an efficient solution for the automatic detection of vehicle wheel hubs.

Key words: wheel hub detection    hybrid deep learning model    longitudinal control model    bench test    speed tracking
收稿日期: 2025-08-18 出版日期: 2026-06-27
CLC:  TP 183  
基金资助: 广东省自然科学基金资助项目(2021A1515011839)
通讯作者: 宴聪     E-mail: wanghl@gdut.edu.cn;2112301005@mail2.gdut.edu.cn
作者简介: 王海龙(1982—),男,高级实验师,博士,从事工业自动化、机械自动化控制研究,E-mail: wanghl@gdut.edu.cn,https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-8614
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
王海龙
宴聪
梁杰

引用本文:

王海龙,宴聪,梁杰. 基于深度学习的车辆轮毂测试速度控制研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2026, 33(3): 408-417.

Hailong WANG,Cong YAN,Jie LIANG. Research on speed control for vehicle wheel hub testing based on deep learning[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2026, 33(3): 408-417.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2026.05.171        https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/Y2026/V33/I3/408

图1  待检测车辆轮毂
图2  驱动/制动机械腿机构简图
图3  深度学习模型构建流程
图4  CNN-BiLSTM-AM模型结构
图5  LSTM内部结构
图6  多头注意力机制结构
参数数值
时间步长100
卷积核数量1
CNN步长1
CNN层数1
CNN输出维度128
BiLSTM层数2
BiLSTM隐藏单元数128
单次训练样本个数128
学习率0.001
训练轮数200
损失函数阈值0.018
过拟合容忍度30
表1  CNN-BiLSTM-AM模型超参数设置
图7  CNN-BiLSTM-AM模型训练流程
模型R2EMAE/百分点
CNN-AM0.873 44.024
CNN-BiLSTM0.948 22.111
BiLSTM-AM0.949 22.049
CNN-BiLSTM-AM0.953 71.919
表2  消融实验中驱动开度预测结果
模型R2EMAE/百分点
CNN-AM0.260 99.644
BiLSTM-AM0.810 13.370
CNN-BiLSTM0.892 72.651
CNN-BiLSTM-AM0.966 60.923
表3  消融实验中制动开度预测结果
图8  基于不同模型的驱动开度预测结果对比
图9  基于不同模型的制动开度预测结果对比
模型R2EMAE/百分点
LSTM0.945 02.094
GRU0.949 02.077
BiLSTM0.950 62.011
RNN0.951 72.007
CNN-BiLSTM-AM0.953 71.919
表4  驱动开度预测结果评价指标
模型R2EMAE/百分点
RNN0.840 73.158
BiLSTM0.885 12.504
GRU0.939 81.680
LSTM0.944 71.602
CNN-BiLSTM-AM0.966 61.923
表5  制动开度预测结果评价指标
图10  车辆轮毂检测平台
图11  实际车速与目标车速对比
图12  车辆速度跟踪误差
  
[1] ZHU W T, MIAO J, HU J B, et al. Vehicle detection in driving simulation using extreme learning machine[J]. Neurocomputing, 2014, 128: 160-165.
[2] 张煜焜, 赵早君, 蒋琦峰, 等. 橡胶改性酚醛树脂基摩擦片性能研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2025, 32(4): 569-578.
ZHANG Y K, ZHAO Z J, JIANG Q F, et al. Research on performance of rubber modified phenolic resin matrix friction plates[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2025, 32(4): 569-578.
[3] SHELTON P H, WADLEY H N G. A high temperature engine materials test facility[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2024, 95(4): 045119.
[4] 徐玉梁, 刘为, 王振, 等. 发动机振动对排气歧管低周疲劳寿命影响研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2018, 25(3): 330-337.
XU Y L, LIU W, WANG Z, et al. Study on the effect of engine vibration on low cycle fatigue life of exhaust manifold[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2018, 25(3): 330-337.
[5] SOLAZZI L, MAZZONI A, CIMA M. Development of an innovative test machine for tyre, wheel and suspension systems for automotive and industrial vehicles[J]. U. Porto Journal of Engineering, 2023, 9(3): 102-120.
[6] 王恒, 孙小明, 邵彦, 等. 基于试验台架的轮胎测温系统研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2018, 25(5): 590-596.
WANG H, SUN X M, SHAO Y, et al. Research on tire temperature measurement system based on test bench[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2018, 25(5): 590-596.
[7] GAO Y K, HAN J P, FANG J G, et al. Programmed load spectrum for fatigue bench test of a vehicle body[J]. SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing, 2016, 9(3): 605-613.
[8] ZHANG J P, YANG H, ZHANG K P, et al. Tracking control for high-speed train with coupler constraints[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024, 25(10): 14654-14668.
[9] CHEN S P, XIONG G M, CHEN H Y, et al. MPC-based path tracking with PID speed control for high-speed autonomous vehicles considering time-optimal travel[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(12): 3702-3720.
[10] MA Y, DUAN P, SUN Y S, et al. Equalization of lithium-ion battery pack based on fuzzy logic control in electric vehicle[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2018, 65(8): 6762-6771.
[11] CHOI A, AHN H, CHUNG Y, et al. Sliding mode control for sensorless speed tracking of PMSM with whale optimization algorithm and extended Kalman filter[J]. Machines, 2023, 11(9): 851.
[12] LI Y T, FAN C, QIN H F, et al. Deep reinforcement learning-based feature extraction and encoding for finger-vein verification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2025, 9(1): 522-536.
[13] VACHEVA G, STANEV R, HINOV N. Physical model of an electric vehicle for research of dynamic operating modes[C]//2017 15th International Conference on Electrical Machines, Drives and Power Systems. Sofia, Jun. 1-3, 2017.
[14] FENG S S, HANG Y, WANG J, et al. Vehicle speed tracking in bench test based on DDPG[C]//2022 6th CAA International Conference on Vehicular Control and Intelligence. Nanjing, Oct. 28-30, 2022.
[15] CHENG Y T, LI X J. A compute-intensive service migration strategy based on deep reinforcement learning algorithm[C]//2020 IEEE 4th Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference. Chongqing, Jun. 12-14, 2020.
[16] TRASK A W. Grokking deep learning[M]. New York: Manning Publications, 2019.
[17] SHANTAL M, OTHMAN Z, BAKAR A ABU. A novel approach for data feature weighting using correlation coefficients and Min-Max normalization[J]. Symmetry, 2023, 15(12): 2185.
[18] LU W J, LI J Z, WANG J Y, et al. A CNN-BiLSTM-AM method for stock price prediction[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2021, 33(10): 4741-4753.
[19] 王开松, 魏一鸣, 唐威, 等. 基于CNN-LSTM-Attention模型的湿喷台车泵送系统堵管故障预测方法[J]. 工程设计学报, 2025, 32(6): 759-768.
WANG K S, WEI Y M, TANG W, et al. Fault prediction method of pipeline blockage in wet spray trolley pumping system based on CNN-LSTM-Attention model[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2025, 32(6): 759-768.
[20] 宋彦, 汪小中, 赵磊, 等. 基于近红外光谱技术的眉茶拼配比例预测方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(2): 307-315.
SONG Y, WANG X Z, ZHAO L, et al. Predicting the blending ratio of Mee Tea based on near infrared spectroscopy[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(2): 307-315.
[21] 闫政旭, 秦超, 宋刚. 基于Pearson特征选择的随机森林模型股票价格预测[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(15): 286-296.
YAN Z X, QIN C, SONG G. Random forest model stock price prediction based on Pearson feature selection[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2021, 57(15): 286-296.
No related articles found!