Please wait a minute...
Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences)  2021, Vol. 47 Issue (5): 577-588    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2020.11.261
Food sciences     
Effect of different clay materials made boccaro teapots on Oolong tea infusion quality
Xuan LI1(),Eunhye KIM1,Yingbin SHEN2,Xiao ZHANG2,Youying TU1,Puming HE1()
1.Department of Tea Science, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2.Yixing Zhongchao Liyong Zisha Pottery Co. , Ltd. , Wuxi 214221, Jiangsu, China
Download: HTML   HTML (   PDF(1392KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

The main chemical compositions of Oolong tea infusions brewed in three different clay materials (red clay, purple clay and Duan clay) made boccaro teapots were investigated and compared. Aroma components in the tea infusion were determined using headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and their differences were compared through visual pattern recognition based on principal component analysis (PCA). The sensory evaluation was used to score the aroma, tea taste and infusion color. The results showed that the flavoring compound contents and water extraction of infusion brewed in the boccaro teapots were higher than those in the control group (beaker). The contents of water extraction were red clay pot>purple clay pot>Duan clay pot>control group. Fresh and sweet substances such as amino acids and soluble sugar’s contents were relatively higher in the red clay pot. Substances which taste heavy, strong and bitter, such as tea polyphenols and caffeine’s contents were higher in the purple clay pot. There were more kinds of aroma components in boccaro teapots, including nerolidol, indole, linalool and its oxide, β-ionone and some other components with pleasant flower flavors. The proportions of different aroma components were significantly different from each other. The results of PCA showed that the comprehensive scores from high to low were red clay pot>purple clay pot>Duan clay pot>control group. The red clay pot group was the best in enriching the aroma components with flower and fresh flavors. The results of sensory evaluation showed that the boccaro teapots could affect the Oolong tea in aroma, taste and infusion color. The comprehensive scores of sensory evaluation were red clay pot>purple clay pot>Duan clay pot.



Key wordsOolong tea      boccaro teapot      principal component analysis      volatile aroma components      flavoring components     
Received: 26 November 2020      Published: 27 October 2021
CLC:  S 571.1  
Corresponding Authors: Puming HE     E-mail: 21816062@zju.edu.cn;pmhe@zju.edu.cn
Cite this article:

Xuan LI,Eunhye KIM,Yingbin SHEN,Xiao ZHANG,Youying TU,Puming HE. Effect of different clay materials made boccaro teapots on Oolong tea infusion quality. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2021, 47(5): 577-588.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2020.11.261     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/Y2021/V47/I5/577


不同泥料紫砂壶对乌龙茶茶汤品质的影响

为了对不同泥料(红泥、紫泥、段泥)紫砂壶冲泡的乌龙茶茶汤中的主要呈味物质进行研究,采用顶空液相微萃取(headspace liquid-phase microextraction, HS-LPME)结合气相色谱-质谱联用(gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, GC-MS)技术分析其挥发性香气成分差异,通过主成分分析(principal component analysis, PCA)识别不同泥料紫砂壶在冲泡乌龙茶方面的差异,并进行感官审评分析。结果表明:和对照组(烧杯)茶汤相比,用紫砂壶冲泡出的茶汤中的水浸出物及各种呈味物质含量较高,且不同泥料紫砂壶之间有一定的差别。茶汤中水浸出物总量从高到低依次为红泥壶、紫泥壶、段泥壶和对照组,红泥壶增强了茶汤“鲜甜”的滋味特征,该滋味特征物质如氨基酸和可溶性糖在红泥壶冲泡的茶汤中含量较高;紫泥壶增强了茶汤“苦涩”的滋味特征,该滋味特征物质如茶多酚和咖啡碱在紫泥壶冲泡的茶汤中含量最高。和对照组茶汤相比,用紫砂壶冲泡出的茶汤香气种类增多,重要香气成分如橙花叔醇、吲哚、芳樟醇及其氧化物、β-紫罗酮等的含量增加,不同香气物质之间的比例都有较大的差异。主成分分析表明,综合得分从高到低依次为红泥壶、紫泥壶、段泥壶、对照组,其中红泥壶对乌龙茶的花香、清香的香气特征增益效果最强。结合感官审评可知,用紫砂壶冲泡清香型铁观音对茶汤的香气、滋味和汤色均有一定的影响,感官审评综合得分从高到低依次为红泥壶、紫泥壶、段泥壶组。


关键词: 乌龙茶,  紫砂壶,  主成分分析,  挥发性香气成分,  呈味物质 

理化指标

Physicochemical index

t/min

烧杯

Beaker (CK)

红泥壶

Red clay pot

紫泥壶

Purple clay pot

段泥壶

Duan clay pot

水浸出物

Water extraction

12.04±0.36c3.96±0.29a3.99±0.41a3.30±0.42b
34.77±0.22b5.90±0.44a5.81±0.02a6.16±0.74a
53.29±1.06b6.35±0.80a6.25±0.31a6.34±0.73a
累计 Total10.10±0.55b16.21±0.48a16.05±0.44a15.80±0.53a

茶多酚

Tea polyphenol

10.56±0.04b0.64±0.03b0.67±0.04a0.54±0.03b
31.09±0.06b1.24±0.00a1.18±0.03a1.21±0.09a
51.15±0.10c1.40±0.08b1.60±0.07a1.63±0.05a
累计 Total2.80±0.06c3.28±0.13b3.45±0.24a3.38±0.33a

咖啡碱

Caffeine

10.15±0.00a0.21±0.02a0.17±0.02a0.22±0.02a
30.46±0.12b0.79±0.12a1.25±0.33a1.16±0.47a
50.42±0.09c0.57±0.03b1.03±0.21a0.84±0.21a
累计 Total1.03±0.07c1.57±0.06b2.45±0.19a2.22±0.23a

氨基酸

Amino acid

10.34±0.01a0.34±0.01a0.35±0.01a0.35±0.00a
30.50±0.01b0.51±0.01b0.50±0.04b0.65±0.01a
50.41±0.02c0.65±0.01a0.53±0.02b0.54±0.01b
累计 Total1.25±0.01c1.50±0.02a1.38±0.06b1.54±0.09a

可溶性糖

Soluble sugar

10.26±0.02c0.39±0.01b0.38±0.00b0.40±0.00a
30.78±0.04c0.96±0.16a0.89±0.04b1.10±0.06a
51.26±0.09b1.40±0.07a1.37±0.02a1.43±0.08a
累计 Total2.30±0.05c2.75±0.08a2.64±0.07b2.94±0.09a
Table 1 Flavoring component contents in infusion in different clay materials made bocarro teapots
Fig. 1 Number of aroma components detected in brewing Tieguanyin tea by different clay materials made boccaro teapotsDifferent lowercase letters above bars indicate significant differences at the 0.05 probability level.

编号

No.

香气成分

Aroma component

烧杯

Beaker (CK)

红泥壶

Red clay pot

紫泥壶

Purple clay pot

段泥壶

Duan clay pot

总计 Total97.57901.97369.02411.40
1EE)-2,4-庚二烯醛 (E, E)-2, 4-heptadienal3.95
2苯乙醛 Phenylacetaldehyde3.549.046.394.73
3EE)-3,5-辛二烯-2-酮 (E, E)-3, 5-octadiene-2-one1.724.372.691.79
43,5-辛二烯-2-酮 3, 5-octadiene-2-one2.480.991.01
5芳樟醇 Linalool3.018.996.843.75
6脱氢芳樟醇 Dehydrolinalool2.938.395.42
7苯乙醇 Phenylethanol0.804.241.861.53
8苯甲腈 Benzonitrile1.256.322.732.20
9水杨酸甲酯 Methyl salicylate1.900.73
10α-松油醇 α-terpineol1.075.152.671.61
11正癸醛 Decanal1.220.911.15
12β-环柠檬醛 β-cyclic citral9.393.73
13香叶醇 Geraniol1.217.673.392.18
141-丁烯基环己烷 1-butenyl cyclohexane4.181.101.12
15吲哚 Indole38.12267.6093.3179.29
162-硝基乙基苯 2-nitroethylbenzene1.8817.155.794.86
17

2-甲基-3-羟基-2,2,4-三甲基戊酯丙酸

2-methyl-3-hydroxy-2, 2, 4-trimethylpentylpropionate

5.002.442.94
18β-大马酮 β-damascarone6.10
19茉莉酮 Jasmone3.0827.648.526.65
20α-紫罗兰酮 α-ionone1.1410.303.703.11
21β-苯基乙基丁酸酯 β-phenylethyl butyrate3.351.091.03
22异丁香酚 Isoeugenol7.832.361.58
23香叶基丙酮 Geranyl acetone0.846.891.922.12
24反式-β-紫罗兰酮 trans-β-ionone6.9836.8112.36
25茉莉内酯 Jasminolactone11.62125.8933.1124.70
26

四氢-6-戊基-2H-吡喃-2-酮

Tetrahydro-6-pentyl-2H-pyran-2-one

0.722.68
272,4-二叔丁基苯酚 2, 4-di-tert-butylphenol14.684.08
28二氢猕猴桃内酯 Dihydrokiwi lactone1.7720.544.94
29橙花叔醇 Nerolidol10.59174.9056.4655.89
30

2,2,4-三甲基-1,3-戊二醇二异丁酸酯

2, 2, 4-trimethyl-1, 3-pentanediol diisobutyrate

20.3344.58
31雪松醇 Cedarol6.7018.1868.57
32茉莉酸甲酯 Methyl jasmonate1.4813.42
33肉豆蔻醇 Myristyl alcohol2.503.116.92
34苯甲酸苄酯 Benzyl benzoate2.32
35邻苯二甲酸二异丁酯 Diisobutyl phthalate2.0039.3324.2332.31
36棕榈醇 Palmitol18.804.347.98
37邻苯二甲酸二丁酯 Dibutyl phthalate1.8231.6119.4326.43
38棕榈酸 Palmitic acid13.88
Table 2 Contents of aroma components detected in brewing Tieguanyin tea by different clay materials made boccaro teapots
Fig. 2 Contents of aroma compounds detected in brewing Tieguanyin tea by different clay materials made boccaro teapots
Fig. 3 Heat map of standardized values of aroma components in each groupPlease see the Table 2 for the names of aroma components corresponding to No. 1-38.
Fig. 4 PCA of aroma components in each groupPlease see the Table 2 for the names of aroma components corresponding to No. 1-38.

组别

Group

主成分1

PC1

主成分2

PC2

主成分3

PC3

综合得分

Overall

score

烧杯

Beaker (CK)

-0.819 80-1.033 51-0.714 00-0.850 88

红泥壶

Red clay pot

1.447 58-0.181 81-0.348 491.063 32

紫泥壶

Purple clay

pot

-0.180 90-0.154 011.481 07-0.081 69

段泥壶

Duan clay pot

-0.446 891.369 34-0.418 58-0.130 75
Table 3 Scores of principal component (PC) in each group

参量

Parameter

标准审

评杯碗

CK1

红泥壶

Red

clay pot

紫泥壶

Purple

clay pot

段泥壶

Duan

clay pot

综合评分*

Comprehensive

score*

90.75±0.0191.45±0.0191.03±0.0189.90±0.02

香气

Aroma

91.61±0.0192.54±0.0191.52±0.0089.91±0.02

汤色

Infusion color

90.53±0.0190.52±0.0291.69±0.0191.14±0.00

滋味

Taste

90.00±0.0090.82±0.0190.21±0.0189.27±0.03
Table 4 Sensory assessment of Tieguanyin infusion
[1]   董青华.基于国际标准的乌龙茶理化成分研究.福州:福建农林大学,2010.
DONG Q H. Studies on chemical constituents of Oolong tea quality based on the international standard.Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]   蔡烈伟,许勇泉,周炎花,等.不同产区乌龙茶感官品质与茶汤化学成分分析.福建茶叶,2016,38(11):17-19. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-2291.2016.11.012
CAI L W, XU Y Q, ZHOU Y H, et al. Analysis of sensory quality and chemical components of Oolong tea in different producing areas. Tea in Fujian, 2016,38(11):17-19. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2291.2016.11.012
[3]   黄建安,施兆鹏,施英,等.乌龙茶“岩韵”与“音韵”的感官体验及化学特性.湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2003,29(2):134-136. DOI:10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2003.02.015
HUANG J A, SHI Z P, SHI Y, et al. Study on sense experience and chemical characteristics of Yanyun and Yinyun in Oolong tea. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2003,29(2):123-136. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2003.02.015
[4]   杨意成,梁月荣.乌龙茶花香形成机理的研究.茶叶,2008,34(1):10-14. DOI:JournalArticle/5aebae1bc095d709440c58d3
YANG Y C, LIANG Y R. Mechanisms of aromatic volatiles formation in Oolong tea. Journal of Tea, 2008,34(1):10-14. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: JournalArticle/5aebae1bc095d709440c58d3
[5]   刘敏,胡成芸,陆绎玮,等.普洱茶香气成分研究进展.中国茶叶加工,2013(2):38-41. DOI:10.15905/j.cnki.33-1157/ts.2013.02.004
LIU M, HU C Y, LU Y W, et al. Research progress in aroma constituents of Puer tea. China Tea Processing, 2013(2):38-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.15905/j.cnki.33-1157/ts.2013.02.004
[6]   宛晓春.茶叶生物化学.3版.北京:中国农业出版社, 2003.
WAN X C. Tea Biochemistry. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003.
[7]   刘洋,胡军,李海民,等.乌龙茶香气成分研究进展.安徽农业科学,2009,37(33):16333-16336.
LIU Y, HU J, LI H M, et al. Research progress on the aromatic components in Oolong tea. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2009,37(33):16333-16336. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]   吕世懂,吴远双,姜玉芳,等.不同产区乌龙茶香气特征及差异分析.食品科学,2014,35(2):146-153. DOI:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201402027
Lü S D, WU Y S, JIANG Y F, et al. Comparative analysis of aroma characteristics of Oolong tea from different geographical regions. Food Science, 2014,35(2):146-153. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7506/spkx
[9]   庞妮.紫砂壶泥料的烧制特性.陶瓷科学与艺术,2014,48(2):87. DOI:10.13212/j.cnki.csa.2014.02.032
PANG N. Firing characteristics of purple clay pot. Ceramics Science & Art, 2014,48(2):87. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13212/j.cnki.csa.2014.02.032
[10]   LIAO Z H, CHEN Y J, TZEN J, et al. Effect of teapot materials on the chemical composition of Oolong tea infusions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2018,98(2):751-757. DOI:10.1001/jsfa.8522
doi: 10.1001/jsfa.8522
[11]   江夏,吴隽,张茂林,等.宜兴紫砂泥料性能研究.江苏陶瓷,2011,44(3):20-23. DOI:10.16860/j.cnki.32-1251/tq.2011.03.008
JIANG X, WU J, ZHANG M L, et al. Study on material properties of purple pottery clay in Yixing. Jiangsu Ceramics, 2011,44(3):20-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16860/j.cnki.32-1251/tq.2011.03.008
[12]   张颖彬,于良子,鲁成银,等.乌龙茶紫砂壶冲泡法研究.中国茶叶,2016,38(5):35-37. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3150.2016.05.008
ZHANG Y B, YU L Z, LU C Y, et al. Study on the method of brewing Oolong tea in boccaro teapot. China Tea, 2016,38(5):35-37. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3150.2016.05.008
[13]   全国茶叶标准化技术委员会.乌龙茶 第6部分:单丛:GB/T30357.6—2017.北京:中国标准出版社,2017.
National Technical Committee339on Tea of Standardization Administration of China. Oolong Tea-Part 6: Dancong: GB/T 30357.6—2017. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2017. (in Chinese)
[14]   全国茶叶标准化技术委员会.茶 水浸出物测定:GB/T 8305—2013.北京:中国标准出版社,2013. DOI:10.1002/palo.v28.3
National Technical Committee339on Tea of Standardization Administration of China. Tea-Determination of Water Extracts Content: GB/T 8305—2013. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2013. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.1002/palo.v28.3
[15]   全国茶叶标准化技术委员会.茶叶中茶多酚和儿茶素类含量的检测方法:GB/T 8313—2018.北京:中国标准出版社,2018. DOI:10.31389/book1
National Technical Committee339on Tea of Standardization Administration of China. Determination of Total Polyphenols and Catechins Content in Tea: GB/T 8313—2018. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2018. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.31389/book1
[16]   全国茶叶标准化技术委员会.茶游离氨基酸总量的测定:GB/T 83142013.北京:中国标准出版社,2013. DOI:10.1787/comms_outlook-2013-table82-en
National Technical Committee339on Tea of Standardization Administration of China. Tea-Determination of Free Amino Acid Content: GB/T 8314—2013. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2013. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.1787/comms_outlook-2013-table82-en
[17]   黄意欢.茶学实验技术.北京:中国农业出版社,1997:115-136. DOI:10.1023/a:1002901706875
HUANG Y H. Experimental Techniques of Tea Science. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1997:115-136. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.1023/a:1002901706875
[18]   张正竹.茶叶生物化学实验教程.北京:中国农业出版社,2009:39-41. DOI:10.3724/sp.j.1011.2008.01305
ZHANG Z Z. Experimental Course of Tea Biochemistry. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009:39-41. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1011.2008.01305
[19]   FENG Y Z, CAI Y, SUN-WATERHOUSE D X, et al. Approaches of aroma extraction dilution analysis (AEDA) for headspace solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-olfactometry (HS-SPME-GC-O): altering sample amount, diluting the sample or adjusting split ratio. Food Chemistry, 2015,187(15):44-52. DOI:10.1016/j.food
chem.2015.03.138
doi: 10.1016/j.food
[20]   窦宏亮,李春美,顾海峰,等.采用HS-SPME/GC-MS/GC-Olfactometry/RI对绿茶和绿茶鲜汁饮料香气的比较分析.茶叶科学,2007,27(1):51-60. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2007.01.008
DOU H L, LI C M, GU H F, et al. Comparative analysis on aromatic components of green tea and fresh green tea beverage using HS-SPME/GC-MS/GC-Olfactometry/RI methods. Journal of Tea Science, 2007,27(1):51-60. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2007.01.008
[21]   苗爱清,吕海鹏,孙世利,等.乌龙茶香气的HS-SPME-GC-MS/GC-O研究.茶叶科学,2010,30():583-587. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2010.z1.015
MIAO A Q, Lü H P, SUN S L, et al. Aroma components of Oolong tea by HS-SPME-GC-MS and GC-O. Journal of Tea Science, 2010,30():583-587. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2010.z1.015
[22]   ZHANG K, YAO L. The anxiolytic effect of Juniperus virginiana L. essential oil and determination of its active constituents. Physiology & Behavior, 2018,189:50-58. DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.01.004
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.01.004
[23]   施兆鹏.茶叶审评与检验.4版.北京:中国农业出版社,2010:116-118. DOI:10.5152/tjg.2021.20293
SHI Z P. Tea Evaluation and Inspection. 4th ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2010:116-118. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.5152/tjg.2021.20293
[24]   蒲晓亚,袁毅君,王廷璞,等.茶叶的主要呈味物质综述.天水师范学院学报,2011,31(2):40-44. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1351.2011.02.013
PU X Y, YUAN Y J, WANG T P, et al. The review on the main sapidity materials of tea. Journal of Tianshui Normal University, 2011,31(2):40-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1351.2011.02.013
[25]   程焕,贺玮,赵镭,等.红茶与绿茶感官品质与其化学组分的相关性.农业工程学报,2012,28():375-380. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.z1.063
CHEN H, HE W, ZHAO L, et al. Correlation between sensory attributes and chemical components of black and green tea. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012,28():375-380. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.z1.063
[26]   宋加艳,何加兴,欧伊伶,等.碧香早夏季鲜叶加工乌龙茶过程中品质成分动态变化.现代食品科技,2021,37(2):238-248. DOI:10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2021.2.0688
SONG J Y, HE J X, OU Y L, et al. Dynamic changes in quality and composition of Oolong tea made with fresh Bixiangzao summer tea leaves during processing. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2021,37(2):238-248. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2021.2.0688
[27]   YIN J F, ZHANG Y N, DU Q Z, et al. Effect of Ca2+ concentration on the tastes from the main chemicals in green tea infusions. Food Research International, 2014,62:941-946. DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.05.016
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.05.016
[28]   陶冬冰,高雪,张旋,等.不同冲泡条件对六安瓜片茶汤滋味的影响.食品工业,2020,41(6):214-218.
TAO D B, GAO X, ZHANG X, et al. The influence of different brewing condition on the flavour of Lu’an Guapian tea soup. The Food Industry, 2020,41(6):214-218. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]   SHEIBANI E, DUNCAN S E, KUHN D D, et al. SDE and SPME analysis of flavor compounds in Jin Xuan Oolong tea. Journal of Food Science, 2016,81(2):C348-C358. DOI:10.1111/1750-3841.13203
doi: 10
[30]   陈林,林清霞,张应根,等.不同风味类型铁观音乌龙茶香气组成化学模式识别研究.茶叶科学,2018,38(3):253-262. DOI:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2018.03.005
CHEN L, LIN Q X, ZHANG Y G, et al. Aroma profiling of Tieguanyin Oolong tea with different flavor characteristics based on chemical pattern recognition. Journal of Tea Science, 2018,38(3):253-262. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2018.03.005
[31]   嵇伟彬,刘盼盼,许勇泉,等.几种乌龙茶香气成分比较研究.茶叶科学,2016,36(5):523-530. DOI:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2016.05.011
JI W B, LIU P P, XU Y Q, et al. Comparative study of the aroma components of several Oolong teas. Journal of Tea Science, 2016,36(5):523-530. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2016.05.011
[32]   汤杰.浅谈紫砂壶的朴素美.江苏陶瓷,2006,39():6. DOI:10.1080/00397910600781216
TANG J. The simple beauty of purple clay pot. Jiangsu Ceramics, 2006,39():6. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.1080/00397910600781216
[1] Zhongyan ZHANG,Luwei HU,Jiawei CHEN,Zhujun ZHU,Biao ZHU. Agronomic character identification and ornamental value evaluation of dwarf ornamental tomato germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2021, 47(2): 158-170.
[2] Senjie ZHOU,Chuangsheng HUANG,Chunlin LI,Shuying GONG,Haowei GUO,Yilin TONG,Fangyuan FAN. Aroma compositions and comparison of their related components of Longjing tea with different aroma types[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2021, 47(2): 203-211.
[3] Qiang ZHOU,Mengjia LIU,Baoshan ZHANG,Changgui LEI,Yuzhu MENG. Combined effect of cinnamon essential oil-chitosan coating and modified atmosphere packaging on the quality of chilled meat[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(6): 723-735.
[4] ZHAI Rongrong, YU Peng, YE Shenghai, WANG Junmei, WU Mingguo, LIN Jianrong, ZHU Guofu, ZHANG Xiaoming. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of low nitrogen tolerance of Zhejiang photosensitive japonica rice cultivars[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(5): 565-.
[5] Su Wenhao, Liu Guishan*, He Jianguo, Wang Songlei, He Xiaoguang, Wang Wei, Wu Longguo . Detection of external defects on potatoes by hyperspectral imaging technology and image processing method.[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2014, 40(2): 188-196.
[6] WU Yifei1, YAO Xiaohong1, SUN Hong2, WANG Xin1, TANG Jiangwu1. Optimization of solidstate fermentation conditions of rapeseed meal using response surface analysis combined with principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2012, 38(4): 490-496.
[7] FENG Lei,ZHANG Derong, CHEN Shuangshuang,FENG Bin, XIE Chuanqi,CHEN Youyuan,HE Yong. Early detection of gray mold on eggplant leaves using hyperspectral imaging technique.[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2012, 38(3): 311-317.
[8] TANG Jiang-wu,SUN Hong,YAO Xiao-hong,WU Yi-fei,WANG Xin. Fate,dissemination of Bacillus subtilis spores in gastrointestinal tract of broiler chicken and its effect onintestinal flora and digestive enzyme activities[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2011, 37(3): 319-325.
[9] ZOU Wei,FANG Hui,ZHOU Kang-yun,BAO Yi-dan,HE Yong. Identification of rapeseed varieties based on hyperspectral imagery[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2011, 37(2): 175-180.
[10] . Phenotypic variation and relationships among sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) sub-core collections[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2004, 30(1): 10-16.