我国近海不同地理群体龙头鱼耳石形态分析

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2020.08.211

浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）

2021, Vol. 47

Issue (3): 380-388 DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2020.08.211

动物科学与动物医学

我国近海不同地理群体龙头鱼耳石形态分析

郭泽豪(

),杨天燕(

),王莹莹,钟家伟,邓强强,孙伟艺

浙江海洋大学水产学院，浙江舟山 316022

Morphological analysis of otolith among different Bombay duck (Harpodon nehereus) populations in China offshore

Zehao GUO(

),Tianyan YANG(

),Yingying WANG,Jiawei ZHONG,Qiangqiang DENG,Weiyi SUN

School of Fishery, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316022, Zhejiang, China

全文: PDF(1663 KB) HTML

摘要：

为比较龙头鱼不同地理群体间耳石形态差异，对其矢耳石几何中心到基叶的距离（A₁）、几何中心到腹侧的距离（A₂）、几何中心到背侧的距离（A₃）、几何中心到主间沟的距离（A₄）和几何中心到次间沟的距离（A₅）共5个测量指标进行配对t检验。结果表明，龙头鱼左、右矢耳石的5个测量指标的显著性水平P＞0.05，即不存在显著性差异。A₁～A₅、矢耳石长轴长（L）和短轴长（H）共7个测量指标均值的第1主成分累积贡献率为93.114％，椭圆率（X₁）和辐形比（X₂）2个形态指标均值的第1主成分累积贡献率为99.950％。单因素方差分析结果表明，椭圆率可作为区别舟山群体与其他几个群体的主要特征。聚类分析结果显示，东海南部和南海群体聚为一支，随后与三门和舟山群体聚类；海口群体位于聚类树的最外层，与其他群体关系较远。7个群体的平均综合判别正确率为80.63％，其中，舟山群体判别正确率最高（89.29%），宁德群体最低（71.43%）。上述结果说明，耳石形态指标的多元统计分析可作为龙头鱼群体鉴别的依据之一。

关键词： 龙头鱼; 矢耳石; 形态特征; 群体鉴别

Abstract:

In order to compare the morphological differences of otoliths among different Harpodon nehereus populations, five measurement indexes of sagittal otoliths including distance from geometric center to rostrum (A₁), distance from geometric center to veutro (A₂), distance from geometric center to dorsal (A₃), distance from geometric center to excisural notch (A₄) and distance from geometric center to excisural minor notch (A₅) were examined by paired t-test. The results showed that the P values were greater than 0.05, indicating no significant differences between left and right otoliths. The cumulative contribution rates of the first principal component (PC1) in seven measurement indexes, including A₁-A₅, major axis length (L) and minor axis length (H), and the ellipticity (X₁) and radial ratio (X₂) were 93.114% and 99.950%, respectively. The results of one-way analysis of variance showed that the ellipticity could be used as the main feature to distinguish Zhoushan population from the others. The hierarchical clustering tree demonstrated that the specimens from the southern East China Sea and the South China Sea first gathered together into one branch, and then followed by Sanmen and Zhoushan populations. Haikou population was located at the outermost of the clustering tree and separated apart from other populations. The average discriminant accuracy rate was 80.63%, of which Zhoushan population was the highest (89.29%), while Ningde population was the lowest (71.43%). The above results suggest that the multivariate statistical analysis of morphological characteristics of otolith could be used as the basis for population identification of H. nehereus.

Key words: Harpodon nehereus sagittal otolith morphological characteristics population identification

收稿日期: 2020-08-21 出版日期: 2021-06-25

CLC:

S 917

基金资助: 浙江省属高校基本科研业务费项目(2019J00024);浙江省教育厅一般科研项目(Y201942611);国家级大学生创新创业训练计划(201910340011);浙江省大学生科技创新活动计划暨新苗人才计划(2019R411013);浙江海洋大学2019年度大学生创新训练计划(XJ2019010)

通讯作者: 杨天燕 E-mail: 1195767935@qq.com;hellojelly1130@163.com

作者简介: 郭泽豪（https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7308-3060），E-mail：1195767935@qq.com

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	郭泽豪
	杨天燕
	王莹莹
	钟家伟
	邓强强
	孙伟艺

引用本文:

郭泽豪,杨天燕,王莹莹,钟家伟,邓强强,孙伟艺. 我国近海不同地理群体龙头鱼耳石形态分析[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2021, 47(3): 380-388.

Zehao GUO,Tianyan YANG,Yingying WANG,Jiawei ZHONG,Qiangqiang DENG,Weiyi SUN. Morphological analysis of otolith among different Bombay duck (Harpodon nehereus) populations in China offshore. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2021, 47(3): 380-388.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2020.08.211 或 http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/CN/Y2021/V47/I3/380

表1 龙头鱼样本的信息

图1 龙头鱼矢耳石的形态

表2 龙头鱼左、右矢耳石的比较（以三门群体为例）

图2 矢耳石测量指标与体长间的关系

表3 矢耳石主成分分析中测量指标的载荷系数及贡献率

表4 矢耳石主成分分析中形态指标的载荷系数及贡献率

图3 龙头鱼主成分分析的散点图图中缩写符号所代表的含义详见表1。

表5 矢耳石形态指标的单因素方差分析结果

图4 7个龙头鱼群体的聚类分析图图中缩写符号所代表的含义详见表1。

表6 不同群体龙头鱼的判别分析结果

1	陈大刚,张美昭.中国海洋鱼类.山东,青岛:中国海洋大学出版社,2015:416-418. CHEN D G, ZHANG M Z. Marine Fishes of China. Qingdao, Shandong: China Ocean University Press, 2015:416-418. (in Chinese)
2	BOLZ G R, SECOR D H, DEAN J M, et al. Manual for otolith removal and preparation for microstructural examination. Copeia, 1992,85(2):599-600.
3	张治国,王卫民.鱼类耳石研究综述.湛江海洋大学学报,2001,21(4):77-83. ZHANG Z G, WANG W M. Review on fish otolith. Journal of Zhanjiang Ocean University, 2001,21(4):77-83. (in Chinese with English abstract)
4	何文平.鱼类耳石形态研究进展.安徽农业科学,2012,40(30):14760-14762. HE W P. Review of fish otolith morphology research. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2012,40(30):14760-14762. (in Chinese with English abstract)
5	叶振江,孟晓梦,高天翔,等.两种花鲈(Lateolabrax sp.)耳石形态的地理变异.海洋与湖沼,2007,38(4):356-360. YE Z J, MENG X M, GAO T X, et al. The geographical differentiation in otolith morphology of sea bass: Lateolabrax japonicus and L. maculates. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2007,38(4):356-360. (in Chinese with English abstract)
6	HE T, CHENG J, QIN J G, et al. Comparative analysis of otolith morphology in three species of Scomber. Ichthyological Research, 2018,65(2):192-201. DOI:10.1007/s10228-017-0605-4 doi: 10.1007/s10228-017-0605-4
7	方华华,宋林,高天翔.不同群体江鳕耳石形态的差异性分析.海洋湖沼通报,2015,147(4):33-39. FANG H H, SONG L, GAO T X. Morphological comparison in the otolith of borbot (Lota lota) from different communities. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 2015,147(4):33-39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
8	徐胜勇,张辉,潘晓哲,等.许氏平鲉群体耳石形态学比较.中国海洋大学学报,2012,42(11):54-61. DOI:10.1007/s11783-011-0280-z XU S Y, ZHANG H, PAN X Z, et al. Morphological comparison of the otolith of Sebastes schlegelii populations. Periodical of Ocean University of China, 2012,42(11):54-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.1007/s11783-011-0280-z
9	杜肖,韩志强,徐衡,等.东海龙头鱼矢耳石形态特征研究.浙江海洋学院学报(自然科学版),2014,33(1):1-5. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-830X.2014.01.001 DU X, HAN Z Q, XU H, et al. Study on otolith morphology of Harpodon nehereus in the East China Sea. Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University (Natural Science), 2014,33(1):1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-830X.2014.01.001
10	叶振江.中国海洋鱼类耳石形态学分析及应用研究.山东,青岛:中国海洋大学,2010:10-11. YE Z J. Study on otolith shape, taxonomy and application for fishes in China sea. Qingdao, Shandong: Ocean University of China, 2010:10-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
11	GEORGE D, MALLERY P. IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. New York, USA: Routledge, 2016.
12	ASSIS C A. The lagenar otoliths of teleosts: their morphology and its application in species identification, phylogeny and systematics. Journal of Fish Biology, 2003,62(6):1268-1295. DOI:10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00106.x doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00106.x
13	MATHUR S, JAIN S, VARMA M. Fish otoliths and their significance in taxonomy. Journal of Experimental Zoology India, 2014,17(2):407-410.
14	SVANB?CK R, EKL?V P. Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity: causes of morphological and dietary variation in Eurasian perch. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2006,8(1):37-49. DOI:10.1007/s10682-005-4731-5 doi: 10.1007/s10682-005-4731-5
15	BERNATCHEZ L. On the maintenance of genetic variation and adaptation to environmental change: considerations from population genomics in fishes. Journal of Fish Biology, 2016,89(6):2519-2556. DOI:10.1111/jfb.13145 doi: 10.1111/jfb.13145
16	CAMPANA S E, CASSELMAN J M. Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1993,50(5):1062-1083. DOI:0.1139/f93-123 doi: 0.1139/f93-123
17	张凤侠,刘岩,张秀梅.西南大西洋拉氏南美南极鱼耳石形态的多样性.中国水产科学,2014,1(3):581-592. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1118.2014.00581 ZHANG F X, LIU Y, ZHANG X M. Morphological diversity of sagittae of Patagonotothen ramsayi in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2014,21(3):581-592. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1118.2014.00581
18	MILLE T, MAHE K, VILLANUEVA M C, et al. Sagittal otolith morphogenesis asymmetry in marine fishes. Journal of Fish Biology, 2015,87(3):646-663. DOI:10.1111/jfb.12746 doi: 10.1111/jfb.12746
19	WANG Y J, YE Z J, LIU Q, et al. Stock discrimination of spottedtail goby (Synechogobius ommaturus) in the Yellow Sea by analysis of otolith shape. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2011,29(1):192-198. DOI:10.1007/s00343-011-9087-9 doi: 10
20	杨林林,姜亚洲,林昱,等.象山港蓝点马鲛繁殖群体的耳石形态分析.海洋渔业,2018,40(1):10-18. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2490.2018.01.002 YANG L L, JIANG Y Z, LIN Y, et al. On sagittal otolith morphology for reproductive population of Scomberomorus niphonius in the Xiangshan Bay. Marine Fisheries, 2018,40(1):10-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2490.2018.01.002
21	CAPOCCIONI F, COSTA C, AGUZZI J, et al. Ontogenetic and environmental effects on otolith shape variability in three Mediterranean European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) local stocks. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2011,397(1):1-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jembe.2010.11.011 doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2010.11.011
22	REBAYA M, FALEH A BEN, ALLAYA H, et al. Otolith shape discrimination of Liza ramada (Actinopterygii: Mugiliformes: Mugilidae) from marine and estuarine populations in Tunisia. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 2017,47(1):13-21. DOI:10.3750/AIEP/02006 doi: 10.3750/AIEP/02006
23	于鑫,曹亮,南鸥,等.基于矢耳石形态分析的凤鲚(Coilia mystus)群体识别研究.海洋与湖沼,2013,44(3):768-774. DOI:10.11693/hyhz201303035035 YU X, CAO L, NAN O, et al. Stock identification of Coilia mystus using otolith shape analysis. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 2013,44(3):768-774. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11693/hyhz201303035035
24	CARDINALE M, DOERING-ARJES P, KASTOWSKY M, et al. Effects of sex, stock, and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2004,61(2):158-167. DOI:10.1139/f03-151 doi: 10.1139/f03-151
25	FORSBERG J E, NEAL P R. Estimating sex of Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis): using Fourier shape analysis of otoliths. Technical Reports (IPHC), 1993,110:75-83.
26	郭易佳,杨天燕,孟玮,等.基于线粒体Cyt b基因的龙头鱼群体遗传结构分析.水生生物学报,2019,43(5):945-952. DOI:10.7541/2019.112 GUO Y J, YANG T Y, MENG W, et al. The genetic structure of the Bombay duck (harpadon nehereus) based on mitochondrial Cyt b gene. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2019,43(5):945-952. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.7541/2019.112
27	姜涛,郑朝臣,黄洪辉,等.基于地标点法的九龙江口和珠江口凤鲚和七丝鲚耳石形态学特征比较.南方水产科学,2018,14(6):10-16. DOI:10.12131/20180097 JIANG T, ZHENG C C, HUANG H H, et al. Landmark-based morphometric comparison of otolith for Coilia mystus and C. grayii from Pearl River estuary and Jiulong River estuary. South China Fisheries Science, 2018,14(6):10-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.12131/20180097
28	CAMPANA S E, GAGNé J A, MCLAREN J W. Elemental fingerprinting of fish otoliths using ID-ICPMS. Marine Ecology-Progress Series, 1995,122:115-120. DOI:10.3354/meps122115 doi: 10.3354/meps122115
29	陈希镇,曹慧珍.判别分析和SPSS的使用.科学技术与工程,2008,8(13):3567-3571, 3574. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2008.13.035 CHEN X Z, CAO H Z. Discriminant analysis and application of SPSS. Science Technology and Engineering, 2008,8(13):3567-3571, 3574. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2008.13.035
30	李龙,徐胜勇,张辉,等.中日褐菖鲉群体耳石形态学比较分析.集美大学学报(自然科学版),2014,19(4):247-252. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-7405.2014.04.002 LI L, XU S Y, ZHANG H, et al. Otolith morphological study of Sebastiscus marmoratus among populations in China and Japan. Journal of Jimei University (Natural Science), 2014,19(4):247-252. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7405.2014.04.002
31	方华华,高天翔.耳石形态在斑尾复鰕虎鱼群体鉴别中的研究.中国农学通报,2012,28(29):92-97. FANG H H, GAO T X. The population discrimination of Synechogbius ommaturus using otolith morphology. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012,28(29):92-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)

[1]	祝银,朱剑,李子孟,王姮,尤炬炬,刘琴. 厚壳贻贝中铬的形态特征及六价铬的转化规律[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2020, 46(3): 369-375.
[2]	余心杰, 吴雄飞, 沈伟良. 基于计算机视觉的岱衢族大黄鱼选育群体外形特征模式识别方法[J]. 浙江大学学报（农业与生命科学版）, 2018, 44(4): 490-498.
[3]	. 山西省小麦孢囊线虫的形态学和分子特征分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2012, 38(5): 566-574.
[4]	张静, 邓仕槐, 郭航, 沈飞, 古维刚, 李元伟. 聚类分析在神经元形态特征分类中的应用[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2011, 37(5): 493-500.
[5]	赵雷,郭恺,洪文英,郑经武. 浙江省蔬菜上2种根结线虫的形态学鉴定[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2010, 36(6): 623-629.
[6]	蒋淑丽　王学德. 5个棉花纤维突变体的胚珠形态特征与农艺性状研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2001, 27(3): 285-289.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed