Articles |
|
|
|
|
Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole |
Jian Liu, Jian-zhong Shentu, Li-hua Wu, Jing Dou, Qi-yang Xu, Hui-li Zhou, Guo-lan Wu, Ming-zhu Huang, Xing-jiang Hu, Jun-chun Chen |
State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Infectious Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China; Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to comply with the requirements for a drug listed in China, the study was developed to compare the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole (OPZ) in healthy Chinese subjects. A total of 32 volunteers participated in the study. Plasma concentrations were analyzed by nonstereospecific liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method. After administration of a single 40-mg dose of the two OPZ formulations, the comparative bioavailability was assessed by calculating individual AUC0‒t (the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration), AUC0‒∞ (the area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity), Cmax (the maximum observed concentration), and Tpeak (the time to Cmax) values of OPZ, 5-hydroxyomeprazole (OH-OPZ), and omeprazole sulfone (OPZ-SFN), respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of AUC0‒t, AUC0‒∞, and Cmax were 85.4%‒99.0%/88.8%‒98.6%/87.6%‒99.4%, 85.5%‒99.2%/89.0%‒98.6%/88.5%‒101.3%, and 72.3%‒87.6%/79.6%‒91.1%/88.4%‒99.1% for OPZ/OH-OPZ/OPZ-SFN, respectively, and Tpeak values did not differ significantly. In this study, the test formulation of OPZ in fasting healthy Chinese male volunteers met the Chinese bioequivalance standard to the reference formulation based on AUC, Cmax, and Tpeak.
|
Received: 22 August 2011
Published: 04 May 2012
|
|
|
Cite this article:
Jian Liu, Jian-zhong Shentu, Li-hua Wu, Jing Dou, Qi-yang Xu, Hui-li Zhou, Guo-lan Wu, Ming-zhu Huang, Xing-jiang Hu, Jun-chun Chen. Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2012, 13(5): 348-355.
URL:
http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/zjus-b/10.1631/jzus.B1100272 OR http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/zjus-b/Y2012/V13/I5/348
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|