|
|
Comparative in vitro Study of the biological activity and chemical composition extracts of Helicteres isora L. obtained by water and subcritical water extraction |
Zohreh Didar |
Department of Food Science and Technology, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur, Iran |
|
|
Abstract
Objectives: Subcritical water extraction technique is considered as an environmentally extraction
technique. The aim of this study was to compare the different characteristics of water extract and
subcritical water extract of Helicteres isora L.
Materials and Methods: Water extraction was performed under the following conditions: 25°C,
24 h, and solid-to-water ratio 1:30. Subcritical water extract was carried out under specific conditions
(pressure = 10 bar, temperature = 160°C, solid-to-water ratio = 1: 30, time = 30 min). Chemical
composition analysis was performed using GC–Mass chromatography. Anti-biofilm activity in the
terms of anti-attach and removal of biofilm were assessed using the ELISA reader method and
reading absorbance at 570 nm. Anti-microbial activity against Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus
aureus, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and Bacillus subtilis was investigated by measurement of
inhibitory zone diameter. Anti-enzymatic and antioxidant properties were also assessed.
Results: The results of GC–Mass analysis showed some components extracted in subcritical
method which were absent in water extract such as octadecanoic acid, hexadecanoic acid, and
berberin. Antioxidant activity of the two tested extracts revealed that subcritical water extract
had more antioxidant capacity than water extract (P ≤ 0.05). The two tested extracts exhibited
anti-enzymatic activity against polyphenol oxidase enzyme with better performance of subcritical
water extract. Anti-biofilm activity of the two extracts implies that, in the case of preventing biofilm
formation, both extracts had similar efficiency but in the removal of biofilm, subcritical water
extract showed better performance. Both extracts had anti-microbial activity against B. cereus,
S. aureus, S. saprophyticus, and B. subtilis with better performance of subcritical water extract.
Anti-enzymatic assay also showed similar results.
Conclusions: Subcritical water extract of H. isora showed more antioxidant activity as well as antibiofilm,
anti-bacterial, and anti-enzymatic activity rather than ordinary water extract.
|
Published: 19 March 2020
|
Corresponding Authors:
Department of Food Science and Technology, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University, Neyshabur, Iran
E-mail: z_didar57@yahoo.com
|
不同火索麻提取物(常规水提与亚临界水提)的生物活性及化学成分的体外比较研究
目的:亚临界水萃取技术是一种环境萃取技术。本研究旨在比较火索麻水提物和亚临界水提物的不同特性。
材料和方法:水提取在以下条件下进行:25℃、24 h、固水比1:30。亚临界水萃取在特定条件下进行(压力=10bar,温度=160°C,固水比=1:30,时间=30min)。化学成分分析采用气相色谱-质谱法。采用酶联免疫吸附测定仪(ELISA)和570nm的读数吸光度法,从抗附着和去除生物膜的角度评估了抗生物膜的活性。通过抑菌圈直径的测定,研究了蜡样芽孢杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、腐生葡萄球菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的抗菌活性。抗酶活性和抗氧化性能也进行了评估。
结果:气相色谱-质谱联用分析表明,水提物中不含十八烷酸、十六烷酸、小檗碱等成分。亚临界水提取物的抗氧化能力强于水提取物(P<0.05)。两种提取物均表现出抗多酚氧化酶活性,亚临界水提取物表现出较好的抗酶活性。两种提取物的抗生物膜活性表明,在防止生物膜形成的情况下,两种提取物的生物膜去除率相似,但亚临界水提取物对生物膜的去除效果较好。两种提取物对蜡样芽胞杆菌、金黄色芽胞杆菌、腐生芽胞杆菌和枯草芽胞杆菌均有抗菌活性,亚临界水提取物的抑菌效果较好。抗酶活性试验也显示了类似的结果。
结论:与普通水提物相比,亚临界水提物具有更强的抗氧化活性和抗生物膜、抗菌、抗酶活性。
关键词:
火索麻,
亚临界水,
抗生物膜,
抗氧化剂,
抗菌
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|