Horticulture |
|
|
|
|
Agronomic character identification and ornamental value evaluation of dwarf ornamental tomato germplasm resources |
Zhongyan ZHANG(),Luwei HU,Jiawei CHEN,Zhujun ZHU,Biao ZHU() |
College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to screen out excellent dwarf ornamental tomato germplasm resources and breeding parents, improve the ornamental tomato breeding efficiency, 26 domestic and foreign dwarf ornamental tomato germplasm resources were used as experimental materials, and variation analysis, principal component analysis and cluster analysis were used to identify and evaluate 20 main agronomic traits; analytic hierarchy process was used to evaluate ornamental quality and select excellent germplasm resources with high ornamental value. The results showed that the genetic diversity of the main agronomic traits and ornamental value among the tested dwarf ornamental tomato germplasms were abundant. Among the 16 quantitative traits, fruit setting stage was weak variability trait, and other traits were medium variability, and there were no strong variability traits; the diversity index of the flower number per inflorescence was the lowest (1.00), and the soluble solid content was the largest (2.05). Among the four quality traits, the diversity index of leaf color was the smallest (0.96), and the fruit shape was the highest (1.63). The principal component analysis divided the main agronomic traits into four principal components, including the whole plant morphology factors, fruit and bunching factors, phenological factors, fruit color factors. The experimental materials were classified into three subgroups by systematic cluster analysis, which indicated that the agronomic characters of different groups had obvious specificity. In addition, the ornamental evaluation standard of ornamental tomato based on analytic hierarchy process was determined, and an evaluation model was constructed, in which the restriction layer of fruit morphology characteristics accounted for the largest weight in the restriction layer, and the ripe fruit color index layer occupied the largest weight in the index layer. The germplasm material numbered S1 with the highest ornamental value was screened out. The research results provide a theoretical basis for the application of excellent genetic resources and improving breeding parents of ornamental tomatoes.
|
Received: 02 September 2020
Published: 25 April 2021
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Biao ZHU
E-mail: 1175587419@qq.com;billzhu@zafu.edu.cn
|
矮生观赏番茄种质资源农艺性状鉴定及观赏性评价
为筛选优异的矮生观赏番茄种质资源及优良育种亲本,提高观赏番茄育种效率,以26份国内外矮生观赏番茄种质资源为试验材料,运用变异分析、主成分分析和聚类分析法对20个主要农艺性状进行鉴定与评价;并采用层次分析法对其观赏性进行评价,筛选出观赏价值高的优良种质资源。结果表明:供试矮生观赏番茄种质资源的主要农艺性状及观赏特性遗传变异丰富。在16个数量性状中,坐果期为弱变异性状,其他15个为中等变异性状,无强变异性状;单花序花数的多样性指数最小,为1.00,可溶性固形物含量的多样性指数最大,为2.05。4个质量性状中,叶色的多样性指数最小,为0.96,果形的多样性指数最大,为1.63。主成分分析将20个主要农艺性状简化为4个主成分,分别为整株形态因子、果实及成串因子、物候期因子和果实色泽因子。系统聚类分析将供试材料分为3大亚族,不同亚族间的农艺性状存在较明显的差异。此外,本试验确定了基于层次分析法的观赏番茄观赏性评价标准,并构建了评价模型,其中果实特征约束层在约束层中所占权重最大,成熟果色指标层在指标层中所占权重最大,最终筛选出观赏价值最高的种质材料S1。本研究结果为应用观赏番茄优异基因资源及改良育种亲本提供了一定的理论依据。
关键词:
观赏番茄,
种质资源,
主成分分析,
聚类分析,
层次分析法
|
|
[1] |
徐鹤林,李景富.中国番茄.北京:中国农业出版社,2007:41-60. XU H L, LI J F. Chinese Tomato. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007:41-60. (in Chinese)
|
|
|
[2] |
王云梅,谢兴武,黄修芬,等.凉山地区观赏番茄引种筛选试验.农业科技通讯,2020(6):195-200. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2020.06.066 WANG Y M, XIE X W, HUANG X F, et al. Introduction and selection test of ornamental tomato in Liangshan area. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(6):195-200. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2020.06.066
|
|
|
[3] |
AHMED M, ANJUM M A, HUSSAIN S, et al. Biodiversity in indigenous germplasm of Pyrus from Pakistan based on phenotypical and morphological traits. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 2017,59(1):19-27. DOI:10.1007/s10341-016-0291-9
doi: 10.1007/s10341-016-0291-9
|
|
|
[4] |
PENG Y S, WANG G B, CAO F L, et al. Collection and evaluation of thirty-seven pomegranate germplasm resources. Applied Biological Chemistry, 2020,63:15. DOI:10.1186/s13765-020-00497-y
doi: 10.1186/s13765-020-00497-y
|
|
|
[5] |
余莉,葛平珍,王昭礼,等.籽粒型芸豆品种主要农艺性状的主成分分析和聚类分析.农业科技通讯,2019(6):143-149. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2019.06.048 YU L,GE P Z,WANG Z L, et al. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis of main agronomic characters of grain type kidney bean varieties. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(6):143-149. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2019.06.048
|
|
|
[6] |
李四立.多元统计方法及其应用.武汉:武汉大学,2018. LI S L. Multielement statistical methods and their applications. Wuhan:Wuhan University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
|
|
|
[7] |
AMJAD M, AMEEN N, MURTAZA B, et al. A comparative analysis of salinity and nickel tolerance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2019,50(18):2294-2308. DOI:10.1080/00103624.2019.1659298
doi: 10.1080/00103624.2019.1659298
|
|
|
[8] |
DIMOVA D, KRASTEVA L. Evaluation of a large-fruited determinate tomato collection using cluster analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). Acta Horticulturae, 2007,729(729):85-88. DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.729.11
doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.729.11
|
|
|
[9] |
MADDEN L, PENNYPACKER S P. Principal component analysis of tomato early blight epidemics. Journal of Phytopathology, 1979,95(4):364-369.
|
|
|
[10] |
吴超群.基于AHP法的26个扶桑品种观赏性评价.现代园艺,2015(19):10-12. DOI:10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2015.19.004 WU C Q. Evaluation of ornamental quality of 26 hibiscus species based on AHP method. Xiandai Horticulture, 2015(19):10-12. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2015.19.004
|
|
|
[11] |
王佳敏,刘敏,郭咏梅,等.AHP法和灰色关联法在观赏辣椒果实外观品质评价中的应用.山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,39(1):73-78. DOI:10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.201809015 WANG J M, LIU M, GUO Y M, et al. Application of the combined tactic of AHP and gray relation analysis in the evaluation of ornamental pepper fruit appearance quality. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Nature Science Edition), 2019,39(1):73-78. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.201809015
|
|
|
[12] |
谢兴武,王云梅,付立会,等.观赏水果番茄品种筛选试验.农业科技通讯,2016(8):135-138. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2016.08.044 XIE X W, WANG Y M, FU L H, et al. Selection test of ornamental fruit tomato varieties. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016(8):135-138. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2016.08.044
|
|
|
[13] |
李锡香.番茄种质资源描述规范和数据标准.北京:中国农业出版社,2006:8-68. LI X X. Descriptors and Data Standard for Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006:8-68. (in Chinese)
|
|
|
[14] |
王晨静,陆国权,赵习武,等.观赏甘薯的观赏性综合评价.江苏农业科学,2015,43(2):176-178. DOI:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2015.02.057 WANG C J, LU G Q, ZHAO X W, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of ornamental sweet potatoes. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015,43(2):176-178. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2015.02.057
|
|
|
[15] |
陈贤,池涛,杨德.AHP法在番茄果实商品性状评价上的应用分析.西南农业学报,2008,21(2):432-435. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2008.02.040 CHEN X, CHI T, YANG D. Application of AHP on the synthetic evaluation to the trade traits of the tomato fruits. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2008,21(2):432-435. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2008.02.040
|
|
|
[16] |
杨川.峨边黑竹沟景区野生观赏植物资源调查及其观赏性评价研究.四川,雅安:四川农业大学,2015. YANG C. Study on the investigation and evaluation of the wild ornamental plant resource from Heizhugou scenic spot in Ebian. Ya’an, Sichuan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
|
|
|
[17] |
张春花,刀丽平,李恒,等.攀枝花金丝梅观赏性的综合评价.四川林业科技,2018,39(5):110-113. DOI:10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2018.05.025 ZHANG C H, DAO L P, LI H, et al. The comprehensive evaluation on the ornamental nature of the Hypericum patulum Thunb. ex Murray in Panzhihua. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2018,39(5):110-113. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2018.05.025
|
|
|
[18] |
刘兴跃,文才臻,代色平.5种观赏植物在广州地区引种适应性与观赏性评价.广东园林,2018,40(3):69-73. LIU X Y, WEN C Z, DAI S P. Evaluation on adaptability and ornamental characteristics of five ornamental plants introduced in Guangzhou. Guangdong Landscape Architecture, 2018,40(3):69-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
|
|
|
[19] |
金含阳.沈阳市居住区宿根花卉观赏性评价研究.沈阳:沈阳建筑大学,2018:21-50. JIN H Y. Ornamental evaluation of perennial flowers in residential areas in shenyang. Shenyang: Shenyang Jianzhu University, 2018:21-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
|
|
|
[20] |
李伟.昆明主城区花卉植物的观赏性及适应性研究.昆明:云南大学,2017:62-85. LI W. Ornamental and adaptability of flower plants in main urban areas of Kunming: a case study of land plants. Kunming: Yunnan University, 2017:62-85. (in Chinese with English abstract)
|
|
|
[21] |
李云洲,闫见敏,须文,等.番茄种质资源主要植物学性状的遗传多样性及相关性.贵州农业科学,2019,47(2):68-74. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2019.02.017 LI Y Z, YAN J M, XU W, et al. Genetic diversity and correlation analysis of main botanical traits in tomato germplasm resources. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2019,47(2):68-74. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2019.02.017
|
|
|
[22] |
徐睿,张雅楠,林子翔,等.观赏辣椒种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性关联分析.浙江农业学报,2018,30(11):1886-1892. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.11.11 XU R, ZHANG Y N, LIN Z X, et al. Analysis in agronomic characters of ornamental pepper germplasm resources. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018,30(11):1886-1892. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.11.11
|
|
|
[23] |
李宁,王飞,姚明华,等.国内外辣椒种质资源表型性状多样性及相关性分析.辣椒杂志,2015,13(1):8-13. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4542.2015.01.002 LI N, WANG F, YAO M H, et al. Genetic diversity and correlation analysis of phenotype traits in Capsicum spp. germplasms from China and abroad. Journal of China Capsicum, 2015,13(1):8-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4542.2015.01.002
|
|
|
[24] |
芮文婧,张倩男,王晓敏,等.47份大果番茄种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性.江苏农业科学,2017,45(12):92-95. DOI:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.12.024 RUI W J, ZHANG Q N, WANG X M, et al. Genetic diversity of phenotypic traits in 47 large-fruit tomato germplasm resources. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017,45(12):92-95. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.12.024
|
|
|
[25] |
张静,常培培,梁燕,等.樱桃番茄主要品质性状的主成分分析与综合评价.北方园艺,2014(21):1-7. ZHANG J, CHANG P P, LIANG Y, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of quality traits in cherry tomato. Northern Horticulture, 2014(21):1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
|
|
|
[26] |
欧巧明,崔文娟,叶春雷,等.油用紫苏种质主要农艺性状及品质特征鉴定与评价.核农学报,2018,32(9):1721-1739. DOI:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.09.1721 OU Q M, CUI W J, YE C L, et al. Identification and evaluation of agronomic and quality traits of oil Perilla frutescens germplasms. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018,32(9):1721-1739. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.09.1721
|
|
|
[27] |
刘胤,陈涛,张静,等.中国樱桃地方种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析.园艺学报,2016,43(11):2119-2132. DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0092 LIU Y, CHEN T, ZHANG J, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of Chinese cherry landraces (Prunus pseudocerasus) based on phenotypic traits. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2016,43(11):2119-2132. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0092
|
|
|
[28] |
王镭,张英杰,张京伟,等.53个月季品种资源分析及观赏性综合评价.分子植物育种,2019,17(15):5154-5162. DOI:10.13271/j.mpb.017.005154 WANG L, ZHANG Y J, ZHANG J W, et al. Analysis of variety resources and comprehensive evaluation of ornamental value in 53 Chinese rose. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019,17(15):5154-5162. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.017.005154
|
|
|
[29] |
王炜勇,俞少华,詹书侠,等.彩叶凤梨种质资源观赏性评价.分子植物育种,2017,15(4):1506-1514. DOI:10.13271/j.mpb.015.001506 WANG W Y, YU S H, ZHAN S X, et al. Evaluation of ornamental characteristics of Neoreglia germplasm resources. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2017,15(4):1506-1514. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.015.001506
|
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|