Please wait a minute...
Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences)  2021, Vol. 47 Issue (2): 158-170    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2020.09.021
Horticulture     
Agronomic character identification and ornamental value evaluation of dwarf ornamental tomato germplasm resources
Zhongyan ZHANG(),Luwei HU,Jiawei CHEN,Zhujun ZHU,Biao ZHU()
College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China
Download: HTML   HTML (   PDF(2483KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

In order to screen out excellent dwarf ornamental tomato germplasm resources and breeding parents, improve the ornamental tomato breeding efficiency, 26 domestic and foreign dwarf ornamental tomato germplasm resources were used as experimental materials, and variation analysis, principal component analysis and cluster analysis were used to identify and evaluate 20 main agronomic traits; analytic hierarchy process was used to evaluate ornamental quality and select excellent germplasm resources with high ornamental value. The results showed that the genetic diversity of the main agronomic traits and ornamental value among the tested dwarf ornamental tomato germplasms were abundant. Among the 16 quantitative traits, fruit setting stage was weak variability trait, and other traits were medium variability, and there were no strong variability traits; the diversity index of the flower number per inflorescence was the lowest (1.00), and the soluble solid content was the largest (2.05). Among the four quality traits, the diversity index of leaf color was the smallest (0.96), and the fruit shape was the highest (1.63). The principal component analysis divided the main agronomic traits into four principal components, including the whole plant morphology factors, fruit and bunching factors, phenological factors, fruit color factors. The experimental materials were classified into three subgroups by systematic cluster analysis, which indicated that the agronomic characters of different groups had obvious specificity. In addition, the ornamental evaluation standard of ornamental tomato based on analytic hierarchy process was determined, and an evaluation model was constructed, in which the restriction layer of fruit morphology characteristics accounted for the largest weight in the restriction layer, and the ripe fruit color index layer occupied the largest weight in the index layer. The germplasm material numbered S1 with the highest ornamental value was screened out. The research results provide a theoretical basis for the application of excellent genetic resources and improving breeding parents of ornamental tomatoes.



Key wordsornamental tomato      germplasm resources      principal component analysis      cluster analysis      analytic hierarchy process     
Received: 02 September 2020      Published: 25 April 2021
CLC:  S 602.4  
Corresponding Authors: Biao ZHU     E-mail: 1175587419@qq.com;billzhu@zafu.edu.cn
Cite this article:

Zhongyan ZHANG,Luwei HU,Jiawei CHEN,Zhujun ZHU,Biao ZHU. Agronomic character identification and ornamental value evaluation of dwarf ornamental tomato germplasm resources. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2021, 47(2): 158-170.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2020.09.021     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/Y2021/V47/I2/158


矮生观赏番茄种质资源农艺性状鉴定及观赏性评价

为筛选优异的矮生观赏番茄种质资源及优良育种亲本,提高观赏番茄育种效率,以26份国内外矮生观赏番茄种质资源为试验材料,运用变异分析、主成分分析和聚类分析法对20个主要农艺性状进行鉴定与评价;并采用层次分析法对其观赏性进行评价,筛选出观赏价值高的优良种质资源。结果表明:供试矮生观赏番茄种质资源的主要农艺性状及观赏特性遗传变异丰富。在16个数量性状中,坐果期为弱变异性状,其他15个为中等变异性状,无强变异性状;单花序花数的多样性指数最小,为1.00,可溶性固形物含量的多样性指数最大,为2.05。4个质量性状中,叶色的多样性指数最小,为0.96,果形的多样性指数最大,为1.63。主成分分析将20个主要农艺性状简化为4个主成分,分别为整株形态因子、果实及成串因子、物候期因子和果实色泽因子。系统聚类分析将供试材料分为3大亚族,不同亚族间的农艺性状存在较明显的差异。此外,本试验确定了基于层次分析法的观赏番茄观赏性评价标准,并构建了评价模型,其中果实特征约束层在约束层中所占权重最大,成熟果色指标层在指标层中所占权重最大,最终筛选出观赏价值最高的种质材料S1。本研究结果为应用观赏番茄优异基因资源及改良育种亲本提供了一定的理论依据。


关键词: 观赏番茄,  种质资源,  主成分分析,  聚类分析,  层次分析法 

编号

No.

品种名

Variety name

主要特征

Main feature

S1水晶球 Crystal Ball直立、黄果 Erect, yellow fruit
S2泰格 Tiger蔓性、红底绿条花纹果 Vine, red background and green striped fruit
S3Fiaschetto半蔓性、红果 Hemivine, red fruit
S4Tumbling Tom Red半蔓性、红果 Hemivine, red fruit
S5布瑞特 Brett蔓性、红果 Vine, red fruit
S6Little Bing直立、红果 Erect, red fruit
S7小那不勒斯 Little Naples半蔓性、红果 Hemivine, red fruit
S8黄布什 Yellow Bush直立、黄果 Erect, yellow fruit
S9红布什 Red Bush直立、红果 Erect, red fruit
S10红鸟 Red Robin半蔓性、红果 Hemivine, red fruit
S11小西西里 Small Sicily直立、红果 Erect, red fruit
S12阳台红色 Balconi Red直立、红果 Erect, red fruit
S13倒立汤姆红色 Red Tom蔓性、红果 Vine, red fruit
S14倒立汤姆黄色 Yellow Tom半蔓性、黄果 Hemivine, yellow fruit
S15维尔玛 Vilma直立、红果 Erect, red fruit
S16Tomato ‘Window Box Yellow’直立、红果 Erect, red fruit
S17明珠 Pearl直立、黄果 Erect, yellow fruit
S18Bajaja直立、红果 Erect, red fruit
S19阳台黄色 Balconi Yellow直立、黄果 Erect, yellow fruit
S20Yellow Stuffer蔓性、黄果 Vine, yellow fruit
S21Sweet ‘n Neat Cherry Red’直立、黄果 Erect, yellow fruit
S22Sweet ‘n Neat Cherry Yellow’直立、黄果 Erect, yellow fruit
S23Peardrops直立、黄果 Erect, yellow fruit
S24Tumbler半蔓性、红果 Hemivine, red fruit
S25Busk蔓性、红果 Vine, red fruit
S26Cocktail半蔓性、黄果 Hemivine, yellow fruit
Table 1 Ornamental tomato materials used in this experiment
性状 Trait123456789

株型

Plant type

蔓性

Vine

半蔓性

Hemivine

直立

Erect

叶色

Leaf color

黄绿

Yellow green

浅绿

Light green

绿

Green

深绿

Deep green

成熟果色

Ripe fruit color

黄白

Yellow white

浅黄

Light yellow

Yellow

橘黄

Orange

绿

Green

粉红

Pink

Red

深红

Cardinal

红底绿条 Green strips with

red background

果形

Fruit shape

扁平

Flat

扁圆

Oblate

圆形

Round

高圆

High round

长圆

Oblong

卵圆

Oval

桃形

Peach shape

梨形

Pear shape

长梨形

Long pear shape

Table 2 Grouping of quality trait description for ornamental tomato germplasm resources
Fig. 1 Typical plant types of ornamental tomato germplasm resourcesA. Erect growth type; B. Vine growth type; C. Hemivine growth type.
Fig. 2 Typical ripe fruit color of ornamental tomato germplasm resourcesA. Red; B. Cardinal; C. Green strips with red background; D. Yellow.
层次 Level层次分析法模型AHP model

目标层A

Target layer A

观赏番茄观赏性综合评价A

Comprehensive evaluation of ornamental tomato A

约束层C

Constraint layer C

整株形态特征C1

Whole plant morphology

characteristics C1

叶特征C2

Leaf characteristics C2

花特征C3

Flower characteristics C3

果实特征C4

Fruit characteristics C4

标准层P

Standard layer P

株高P1

Plant height P1

株型P2

Plant type P2

第一花序节位P3

First inflorescence node P3

侧枝数P4

Number of side branches P4

叶色P5

Leaf color P5

叶片类型P6

Leaf type P6

叶缘裂刻P7

Leaf margin split P7

单花序长P8

Single inflorescence length P8

单花序果数P9

Fruit number per inflorescence P9

花色P10

Flower color P10

始花期P11

Flowering stage P11

成熟果色P12

Ripe fruit color P12

果形P13

Fruit shape P13

单果质量P14

Single fruit mass P14

裂果程度P15

Degree of fruit crack P15

方案层D

Scheme layer D

观赏番茄材料S1~S26的综合评价得分

Comprehensive evaluation score of ornamental tomato materials S1-S26

Table 3 Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for comprehensive evaluation of ornamental tomato germplasm resources
标度 Scale定义说明 Defined declaration

倒数因素

Reciprocal factor

同一层次的2个因素ab比较,得到判断标度Cab,则ba比较的判断标度值为1/Cab

Comparing two factors a and b at the same level to get the judgment scale Cab, then the judgment scale value for comparing b

and a is 1/Cab

1

同一层次的2个因素在进行比较时,2个因素有同等重要性,一个因素和另一个因素贡献程度相同

When comparing two factors at the same level, the two factors have the same importance, and one factor contributes the same degree to the other

3

同一层次的2个因素在进行比较时,一个因素比另一个因素稍微重要,2个因素在贡献程度上有轻微差异

When comparing two factors at the same level, one factor is slightly important, and there is a slight difference in the degree of

contribution of the two factors

5

同一层次的2个因素在进行比较时,一个因素比另一个因素明显重要,2个因素在贡献程度上有明显差异

When comparing two factors at the same level, one factor is obviously important, and there is a significant difference in the degree of contribution of the two factors

7

同一层次的2个因素在进行比较时,一个因素比另一个因素强烈重要,2个因素在贡献程度上有强烈差异

When comparing two factors at the same level, one factor is strong important, and there is a strong difference in the degree of

contribution of the two factors

9

同一层次的2个因素在进行比较时,一个因素比另一个因素极端重要,2个因素在贡献程度上有最大限度的差异

When comparing two factors at the same level, one factor is extremely important, and the two factors have the greatest differences in their contribution

2、4、6、8

为上述判断的标度之间所达到中值程度的标准

It is the standard of the median degree between the scales of the above judgments

Table 4 Principles and criteria for determining scales by analytic hierarchy process
n

1或2

1 or 2

345678910
IR00.580.901.121.241.321.411.451.49
Table 5 Average random consistency indicator IR
AC1C2C3C4

权重系数

Weight coefficient

C112110.272 2
C21/211/31/30.110 9
C31311/20.255 0
C413210.361 9
Table 6 A-Ci judgment matrix
C1P1P2P3P4

权重系数

Weight coefficient

P111320.341 6
P211330.383 2
P31/31/311/20.106 9
P41/21/3210.168 2
Table 7 C1-Pi judgment matrix
C2P5P6P7

权重系数

Weight coefficient

P511/330.258 3
P63150.637 0
P71/31/510.104 7
Table 8 C2-Pi judgment matrix
C3P8P9P10P11

权重系数

Weight coefficient

P811/221/20.193 6
P921310.356 4
P101/21/311/20.124 3
P1121210.325 7
Table 9 C3-Pi judgment matrix
C4P12P13P14P15

权重系数

Weight coefficient

P1212310.356 4
P131/21310.205 8
P141/31/311/30.098 2
P1511310.294 6
Table 10 C4-Pi judgment matrix

性状

Trait

整株形态特征C1

Whole plant

morphology

characteristics C1

叶特征C2

Leaf

characteristics C2

花特征C3

Flower

characteristics C3

果实特征C4

Fruit

characteristics C4

性状权重系数

Trait weight

coefficient

总占比 Total proportion0.272 20.110 90.255 00.361 91.000 0
株高 Plant height0.341 60.093 0
株型 Plant type0.383 20.104 3
第一花序节位 First inflorescence node0.106 90.029 1
侧枝数 Number of side branches0.168 20.045 8
叶色 Leaf color0.258 30.028 6
叶片类型 Leaf type0.637 00.070 6
叶缘裂刻 Leaf margin split0.104 70.011 6
单花序长 Single inflorescence length0.193 60.049 4
单花序果数 Fruit number per inflorescence0.356 40.090 9
花色 Flower color0.124 30.031 7
始花期 Flowering stage0.325 70.083 1
成熟果色 Ripe fruit color0.356 40.129 0
果形 Fruit shape0.250 80.090 8
单果质量 Single fruit mass0.098 20.035 5
裂果程度 Degree of fruit crack0.294 60.106 6
Table 11 Weight distribution value of character indicators at different levels of ornamental tomato germplasm resources

性状

Trait

分值 Score
54321

株高

Plant height/cm

<2020~<3535~50>50
株型 Plant type直立 Erect半蔓性 Hemivine蔓性 Vine

第一花序节位

First inflorescence

node

5678>8

侧枝数

Number of side

branches

>15>10~155~10<5
叶色 Leaf color绿 Green浅绿 Light green黄绿 Yellow green深绿 Dark green

叶片类型

Leaf type

薯叶型

Potato leaf

普通叶型

Ordinary leaf

复宽叶型

Compound broad leaf

复细叶型

Compound thin

leaf

叶缘裂刻

Leaf margin split

Deep

Medium

Shallow

None

单花序长

Single inflorescence

length/cm

>2015~2010~<155~<10<5

单花序果数

Fruit number per

inflorescence

>2015~2010~<155~<10<5
花色 Flower color橘黄 Orange黄 Yellow浅黄 Light yellow

始花期

Flowering stage/d

>2520~2515~<2010~<15<10

成熟果色

Ripe fruit color

红底绿条、粉红、浅黄

Green strips with red back- ground, pink, light yellow

红、黄

Red, yellow

黄白、深红、橘黄

Yellow white, cardinal,

orange

绿

Green

果形

Fruit shape

桃形

Peach shape

卵圆、圆形、高圆、长圆

Oval, round, high round,

long round

梨形、长梨形

Pear shape, long pear

shape

扁平、扁圆

Flat, oblate

单果质量

Single fruit mass/g

<1010~20>20~30>30~40>40

裂果程度

Degree of fruit

crack

None

轻度

Mild

中度

Moderate

重度

Severe

Table 12 Grading criteria for character indicators at different levels

性状

Trait

平均值

Average value

标准差

Standard

deviation

最大值

Maximum

最小值

Minimum

极差

Range

变异系数

Coefficient

of variation

多样性指数

Diversity

index

始花期 Flowering stage/d27.238.0340.0015.0025.000.291.93
坐果期 Fruit setting stage/d45.153.9356.0039.0017.000.091.92

第一花序节位

First inflorescence node

7.081.259.604.804.800.181.96
茎粗 Stem thickness/cm10.931.5114.197.546.650.141.88
株高 Plant height/cm54.8728.13142.3020.90121.400.511.70
侧枝数 Number of side branches7.152.3311.802.809.000.332.02
最大叶长 Maximum leaf length/cm28.278.7858.2019.2838.920.311.80
最大叶宽 Maximum leaf width/cm23.567.2944.4215.3429.080.311.79

单花序花数

Flower number per inflorescence

10.528.6149.205.4043.800.821.00

单花序长

Single inflorescence length/cm

10.985.3125.765.8819.880.481.55

单花序果数

Fruit number per inflorescence

6.424.1022.003.0019.000.641.21

果实横径

Fruit transverse diameter/cm

34.8111.1672.8625.0947.770.321.42

果实纵径

Fruit longitudinal diameter/cm

33.7810.0259.3124.3334.980.301.43
单果质量 Single fruit mass/g26.5026.36126.069.46116.600.991.49

可溶性固形物含量

Soluble solid content/%

5.740.917.503.803.700.162.05
饱和度 Saturation/%44.197.2764.0025.4738.530.161.92
Table 13 Descriptive analysis of quantitative traits of ornamental tomato germplasm resources

性状

Trait

分布频率 Distribution frequency

多样性指数

Diversity index

123456789
株型 Plant type0.190.270.541.00
叶色 Leaf color0.000.150.270.580.96
成熟果色 Ripe fruit color0.000.000.200.160.000.080.160.360.041.61
果形 Fruit shape0.040.280.200.320.040.040.080.000.001.63
Table 14 Distribution frequency and diversity index of quality traits for ornamental tomato germplasm resources
Fig. 3 Gravel diagram

主成分

Principal

component

特征值

Eigen value

方差贡献率

Variance

contribution

rate/%

累积方差贡献率

Cumulative

variance

contribution rate/%

15.66328.31628.316
23.98419.92148.237
32.24511.22659.463
41.7728.86068.323
51.4447.22175.544
61.3436.71685.259
Table 15 Explanation for total variables based on principal component analysis

性状

Trait

主成分 Principal component
1234

单花序长

Single inflorescence length

0.883
株高 Plant height0.855
最大叶宽 Maximum leaf width0.807

最大叶长

Maximum leaf length

0.769
果形 Fruit shape-0.509
坐果期 Fruit setting stage0.606
株型 Plant type-0.597

第一花序节位

First inflorescence node

0.576
始花期 Flowering stage0.445

果实横径

Fruit transverse diameter

0.903
单果质量 Single fruit mass0.852

果实纵径

Fruit longitudinal diameter

0.762
叶色 Leaf color0.617

单花序果数

Fruit number per inflorescence

-0.598

单花序花数

Flower number per

inflorescence

-0.505
茎粗 Stem thickness0.494
成熟果色 Ripe fruit color0.701

侧枝数

Number of side branches

0.585
饱和度 Saturation-0.498

可溶性固形物含量

Soluble solid content

-0.382
Table 16 Principal component load matrix for each trait
Fig. 4 Cluster tree diagram of 26 ornamental tomato germplasm resources

编号

No.

得分

Score

分类等级Classification

level

编号

No.

得分

Score

分类等级Classification

level

S13.748 2S143.399 9
S23.212 7S153.492 4
S33.085 9S163.250 9
S43.047 8S172.995 5
S52.924 8S183.086 7
S63.675 0S193.233 2
S73.665 7S202.927 5
S83.649 5S213.638 0
S93.429 9S223.590 3
S103.305 6S233.523 6
S113.663 2S243.303 7
S123.520 5S253.338 2
S133.110 4S263.601 2
Table 17 Comprehensive scores and classification levels of 26 ornamental tomato germplasm resources
Fig. 5 Images of S1 germplasm during growth stagesA. Flowering stage; B. Initial fruit stage; C. Ripe fruit stage.
[1]   徐鹤林,李景富.中国番茄.北京:中国农业出版社,2007:41-60.
XU H L, LI J F. Chinese Tomato. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007:41-60. (in Chinese)
[2]   王云梅,谢兴武,黄修芬,等.凉山地区观赏番茄引种筛选试验.农业科技通讯,2020(6):195-200. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2020.06.066
WANG Y M, XIE X W, HUANG X F, et al. Introduction and selection test of ornamental tomato in Liangshan area. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020(6):195-200. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2020.06.066
[3]   AHMED M, ANJUM M A, HUSSAIN S, et al. Biodiversity in indigenous germplasm of Pyrus from Pakistan based on phenotypical and morphological traits. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 2017,59(1):19-27. DOI:10.1007/s10341-016-0291-9
doi: 10.1007/s10341-016-0291-9
[4]   PENG Y S, WANG G B, CAO F L, et al. Collection and evaluation of thirty-seven pomegranate germplasm resources. Applied Biological Chemistry, 2020,63:15. DOI:10.1186/s13765-020-00497-y
doi: 10.1186/s13765-020-00497-y
[5]   余莉,葛平珍,王昭礼,等.籽粒型芸豆品种主要农艺性状的主成分分析和聚类分析.农业科技通讯,2019(6):143-149. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2019.06.048
YU L,GE P Z,WANG Z L, et al. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis of main agronomic characters of grain type kidney bean varieties. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(6):143-149. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2019.06.048
[6]   李四立.多元统计方法及其应用.武汉:武汉大学,2018.
LI S L. Multielement statistical methods and their applications. Wuhan:Wuhan University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]   AMJAD M, AMEEN N, MURTAZA B, et al. A comparative analysis of salinity and nickel tolerance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2019,50(18):2294-2308. DOI:10.1080/00103624.2019.1659298
doi: 10.1080/00103624.2019.1659298
[8]   DIMOVA D, KRASTEVA L. Evaluation of a large-fruited determinate tomato collection using cluster analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). Acta Horticulturae, 2007,729(729):85-88. DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.729.11
doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.729.11
[9]   MADDEN L, PENNYPACKER S P. Principal component analysis of tomato early blight epidemics. Journal of Phytopathology, 1979,95(4):364-369.
[10]   吴超群.基于AHP法的26个扶桑品种观赏性评价.现代园艺,2015(19):10-12. DOI:10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2015.19.004
WU C Q. Evaluation of ornamental quality of 26 hibiscus species based on AHP method. Xiandai Horticulture, 2015(19):10-12. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2015.19.004
[11]   王佳敏,刘敏,郭咏梅,等.AHP法和灰色关联法在观赏辣椒果实外观品质评价中的应用.山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,39(1):73-78. DOI:10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.201809015
WANG J M, LIU M, GUO Y M, et al. Application of the combined tactic of AHP and gray relation analysis in the evaluation of ornamental pepper fruit appearance quality. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Nature Science Edition), 2019,39(1):73-78. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13842/j.cnki.issn1671-8151.201809015
[12]   谢兴武,王云梅,付立会,等.观赏水果番茄品种筛选试验.农业科技通讯,2016(8):135-138. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2016.08.044
XIE X W, WANG Y M, FU L H, et al. Selection test of ornamental fruit tomato varieties. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016(8):135-138. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2016.08.044
[13]   李锡香.番茄种质资源描述规范和数据标准.北京:中国农业出版社,2006:8-68.
LI X X. Descriptors and Data Standard for Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006:8-68. (in Chinese)
[14]   王晨静,陆国权,赵习武,等.观赏甘薯的观赏性综合评价.江苏农业科学,2015,43(2):176-178. DOI:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2015.02.057
WANG C J, LU G Q, ZHAO X W, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of ornamental sweet potatoes. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015,43(2):176-178. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2015.02.057
[15]   陈贤,池涛,杨德.AHP法在番茄果实商品性状评价上的应用分析.西南农业学报,2008,21(2):432-435. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2008.02.040
CHEN X, CHI T, YANG D. Application of AHP on the synthetic evaluation to the trade traits of the tomato fruits. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2008,21(2):432-435. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2008.02.040
[16]   杨川.峨边黑竹沟景区野生观赏植物资源调查及其观赏性评价研究.四川,雅安:四川农业大学,2015.
YANG C. Study on the investigation and evaluation of the wild ornamental plant resource from Heizhugou scenic spot in Ebian. Ya’an, Sichuan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]   张春花,刀丽平,李恒,等.攀枝花金丝梅观赏性的综合评价.四川林业科技,2018,39(5):110-113. DOI:10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2018.05.025
ZHANG C H, DAO L P, LI H, et al. The comprehensive evaluation on the ornamental nature of the Hypericum patulum Thunb. ex Murray in Panzhihua. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2018,39(5):110-113. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2018.05.025
[18]   刘兴跃,文才臻,代色平.5种观赏植物在广州地区引种适应性与观赏性评价.广东园林,2018,40(3):69-73.
LIU X Y, WEN C Z, DAI S P. Evaluation on adaptability and ornamental characteristics of five ornamental plants introduced in Guangzhou. Guangdong Landscape Architecture, 2018,40(3):69-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]   金含阳.沈阳市居住区宿根花卉观赏性评价研究.沈阳:沈阳建筑大学,2018:21-50.
JIN H Y. Ornamental evaluation of perennial flowers in residential areas in shenyang. Shenyang: Shenyang Jianzhu University, 2018:21-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]   李伟.昆明主城区花卉植物的观赏性及适应性研究.昆明:云南大学,2017:62-85.
LI W. Ornamental and adaptability of flower plants in main urban areas of Kunming: a case study of land plants. Kunming: Yunnan University, 2017:62-85. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]   李云洲,闫见敏,须文,等.番茄种质资源主要植物学性状的遗传多样性及相关性.贵州农业科学,2019,47(2):68-74. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2019.02.017
LI Y Z, YAN J M, XU W, et al. Genetic diversity and correlation analysis of main botanical traits in tomato germplasm resources. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2019,47(2):68-74. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2019.02.017
[22]   徐睿,张雅楠,林子翔,等.观赏辣椒种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性关联分析.浙江农业学报,2018,30(11):1886-1892. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.11.11
XU R, ZHANG Y N, LIN Z X, et al. Analysis in agronomic characters of ornamental pepper germplasm resources. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018,30(11):1886-1892. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2018.11.11
[23]   李宁,王飞,姚明华,等.国内外辣椒种质资源表型性状多样性及相关性分析.辣椒杂志,2015,13(1):8-13. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4542.2015.01.002
LI N, WANG F, YAO M H, et al. Genetic diversity and correlation analysis of phenotype traits in Capsicum spp. germplasms from China and abroad. Journal of China Capsicum, 2015,13(1):8-13. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4542.2015.01.002
[24]   芮文婧,张倩男,王晓敏,等.47份大果番茄种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性.江苏农业科学,2017,45(12):92-95. DOI:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.12.024
RUI W J, ZHANG Q N, WANG X M, et al. Genetic diversity of phenotypic traits in 47 large-fruit tomato germplasm resources. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017,45(12):92-95. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.12.024
[25]   张静,常培培,梁燕,等.樱桃番茄主要品质性状的主成分分析与综合评价.北方园艺,2014(21):1-7.
ZHANG J, CHANG P P, LIANG Y, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of quality traits in cherry tomato. Northern Horticulture, 2014(21):1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]   欧巧明,崔文娟,叶春雷,等.油用紫苏种质主要农艺性状及品质特征鉴定与评价.核农学报,2018,32(9):1721-1739. DOI:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.09.1721
OU Q M, CUI W J, YE C L, et al. Identification and evaluation of agronomic and quality traits of oil Perilla frutescens germplasms. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018,32(9):1721-1739. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2018.09.1721
[27]   刘胤,陈涛,张静,等.中国樱桃地方种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析.园艺学报,2016,43(11):2119-2132. DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0092
LIU Y, CHEN T, ZHANG J, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of Chinese cherry landraces (Prunus pseudocerasus) based on phenotypic traits. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2016,43(11):2119-2132. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0092
[28]   王镭,张英杰,张京伟,等.53个月季品种资源分析及观赏性综合评价.分子植物育种,2019,17(15):5154-5162. DOI:10.13271/j.mpb.017.005154
WANG L, ZHANG Y J, ZHANG J W, et al. Analysis of variety resources and comprehensive evaluation of ornamental value in 53 Chinese rose. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019,17(15):5154-5162. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.017.005154
[29]   王炜勇,俞少华,詹书侠,等.彩叶凤梨种质资源观赏性评价.分子植物育种,2017,15(4):1506-1514. DOI:10.13271/j.mpb.015.001506
WANG W Y, YU S H, ZHAN S X, et al. Evaluation of ornamental characteristics of Neoreglia germplasm resources. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2017,15(4):1506-1514. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13271/j.mpb.015.001506
[1] Fushun ZHENG,Xiaomin WANG,Guohua LI,Honglei LI,Pengze ZHOU,Lin WANG,Shengyi BAI,Peijun LIU,Xueyan ZHANG,Xinhua HU,Jinjun FU,Yanming GAO,Jianshe LI. Core collection construction of Ningxia tomato germplasm resources based on phenotypic traits[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2021, 47(2): 171-181.
[2] Senjie ZHOU,Chuangsheng HUANG,Chunlin LI,Shuying GONG,Haowei GUO,Yilin TONG,Fangyuan FAN. Aroma compositions and comparison of their related components of Longjing tea with different aroma types[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2021, 47(2): 203-211.
[3] Yanfeng DENG,Shuiping XIAO,Shaoqun YANG,Xinwen LIU,Xingsheng KE,Tao WANG,Xiu YANG. Identification of main agronomic characteristics and screening of elite germplasm resources of the cotton after rape cultivation in the Yangzte River Basin[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2020, 46(5): 551-561.
[4] Yiping LIU,Fangfang WU,Dan HE,Yuan ZHUANG,Dezheng KONG. Numerical classification of lotus cultivars based on flower color phenotype[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2020, 46(3): 319-326.
[5] Ying WANG,Yujuan LI,Feng TAN,Cong GUO. Evaluation of ornamental value and adaptability of eight varieties of crape myrtle with color leaves[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2020, 46(3): 327-333.
[6] Qiang ZHOU,Mengjia LIU,Baoshan ZHANG,Changgui LEI,Yuzhu MENG. Combined effect of cinnamon essential oil-chitosan coating and modified atmosphere packaging on the quality of chilled meat[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(6): 723-735.
[7] ZHANG Xiaowei, GONG Xuemei, LI Lin, ZHOU Zhixiang, LIU Dan. Comprehensive evaluation of the color-leaf plants introduced in Northern Anhui based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2018, 44(5): 580-587.
[8] TAN Bowen, ZHU Fanghuan, XU Jiaming, ZHANG Xinyuan, LI Duo.  Understanding motives for food choice of Chinese young people in mainland China[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2017, 43(2): 220-228.
[9] ZHAI Rongrong, YU Peng, YE Shenghai, WANG Junmei, WU Mingguo, LIN Jianrong, ZHU Guofu, ZHANG Xiaoming. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of low nitrogen tolerance of Zhejiang photosensitive japonica rice cultivars[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(5): 565-.
[10] Liu Xiaohui, Zou Manyu, Yin Liping, Guo Shuiliang. Seed identification between Sorghum halepense (a quarantine weed) and its closed species based on ultraviolet spectrum[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2015, 41(4): 421-427.
[11] Du Ruiqing, Lin Shanhai,Huang Siliang, Zhang Zhengtian, Qin Liping, Li Qiqin . Statistical analysis of carbon and nitrogen sources for growth and sporulation of Exserohilum rostratum causing banana leaf spot disease[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2015, 41(1): 64-74.
[12] Su Wenhao, Liu Guishan*, He Jianguo, Wang Songlei, He Xiaoguang, Wang Wei, Wu Longguo . Detection of external defects on potatoes by hyperspectral imaging technology and image processing method.[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2014, 40(2): 188-196.
[13] ZHU Yunchen1*, MAO Yiping2. Evaluation of plant landscape at east Zijingang area of Zhejiang University based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2013, 39(4): 452-459.
[14] XU Lihua1, LI Wei2, WU chunlin1, DONG Zaijie3, WANG Chenghui1. Genetic differentiation of domesticated and wild common carps detected by three genetic analysis methods[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2012, 38(4): 393-399.
[15] WU Yifei1, YAO Xiaohong1, SUN Hong2, WANG Xin1, TANG Jiangwu1. Optimization of solidstate fermentation conditions of rapeseed meal using response surface analysis combined with principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2012, 38(4): 490-496.