|
|
|
| How Can We Commemorate Duan Yucai? |
| Wang Yunlu |
| Research Institute for Ancient Books, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In 2025, we commemorate the 290th anniversary of the birth and the 210th anniversary of the death of the Qing Dynasty linguist Duan Yucai (1735-1815). As a master of traditional Chinese linguistics, Duan Yucai’s academic contributions are epitomized in his annotated work Shuowen Jiezi Zhu. This monumental work not only systematically elucidates the relationships between the form, sound, and meaning of Chinese characters but also constructs a theoretical framework for traditional philology and linguistics, marking a milestone in the theorization of ancient Chinese linguistics. This article advocates that the best way to honor Duan Yucai is to excavate and inherit his linguistic theories and scientific spirit, rather than blindly adhering to Western linguistic theories.The article summarizes Duan Yucai’s theoretical contributions in six aspects:1. Fundamental theoretical methods in linguistic research. Duan proposed the methodologies of “mutually seeking form, sound, and meaning” and “mutually seeking ancient and modern forms, sounds, and meanings”, emphasizing the dialectical relationship between synchronic and diachronic studies. This theory predates Saussure’s “synchronic and diachronic” theory by over a century but has long been overlooked.2. Distinction between language and speaking. In Shuowen Jiezi Zhu, Duan clearly distinguished between language (a socially conventionalized symbol system) and speaking (individual usage), which coincides remarkably with Saussure’s theory.3. Basic patterns of semantic evolution. By analyzing the core meanings (feature meanings) of Chinese characters, Duan revealed the logic behind semantic shifts. For example, chì (赤, red) originally denoted a color but extended to mean “utterly evident”; xí (习, birds fluttering frequently) evolved to signify “habit”.4. Theory of “form and function sharing the same name” (ti-yong tongcheng). Duan introduced the concept that a single word could denote both a tool and its associated action. For instance, shū (梳) refers to both a “comb” (tool) and “to comb” (action); zuān (钻) means both a “drill” and “to drill”. This theory aligns more closely with the realities of Chinese than modern “metonymy” explanations5. “Same term for agent and patient” (shi-shou tongci). Duan observed that certain words encompass both agentive and patient roles. For example, bǐng (稟) can mean “to bestow” or “to receive”; kào (靠) can signify “to lean against” or “to depend on”. Such dialectical analyses highlight the flexibility of Chinese semantics.6. Basic principles of commentary classification. Duan differentiated between “explaining characters” (dictionaries focus on original meanings based on form) and “explaining classics” (commentaries interpret meanings contextually), underscoring the fundamental distinctions between Shuowen Jiezi and other annotated texts. This laid the theoretical groundwork for later philological studies.The article critiques the century-long overreliance on Western theories in Chinese linguistic research, noting that the scientific and systematic theories of scholars like Duan Yucai have been long neglected. It calls for a return to indigenous linguistic traditions, advocating for the integration of foreign scholarship while grounding research in the unique characteristics of Chinese. By excavating the “latent theories” of past scholars, the article aims at advancing the development of Chinese linguistics.
|
|
Received: 13 July 2025
|
|
|
|
1 潘文国：《字本位与汉语研究》，上海：华东师范大学出版社，2002年。
2 段玉裁：《说文解字注》，上海：上海古籍出版社，1988年。
3 王念孙：《广雅疏证（附索引）》，钟宇讯点校，北京：中华书局，1983年。
4 瑞士］费尔迪南·德·索绪尔：《普通语言学教程》，高名凯译，北京：商务印书馆，1980年。
5 蒋礼鸿：《敦煌变文字义通释·序目》，见《蒋礼鸿集》第一册，杭州：浙江教育出版社，2001年。
6 胡适：《介绍我自己的思想——〈胡适文选〉自序》，见《胡适文集》第5卷，北京：北京大学出版社，1998年，第507-519页。
7 董秀芳：《词汇化：汉语双音词的衍生和发展》，北京：商务印书馆，2011年。
8 王云路、王诚：《汉语词汇核心义研究》，北京：北京大学出版社，2014年。
9 沈兼士：《右文说在训诂学上之沿革及其推阐》，太原：山西人民出版社，2014年。
10 黄侃述、黄焯编：《文字声韵训诂笔记》，武汉：武汉大学出版社，2013年。
11 赵振铎：《训诂学史略》，郑州：中州古籍出版社，1988年。
12 王力：《中国语言学史》，上海：复旦大学出版社，2006年。 |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 55 
