|
|
|
| Legal Foundation, Model Selection and Implementation Path of Audit Supervision Empowering the Development of New Quality Productive Forces |
| Xu Kui1, Zou Mengqi2 |
1.Beijing Urban Governance Research Base, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China
2.School of Accounting, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Audit shoulders a crucial mission in the new journey of building a strong country and achieving national rejuvenation. It must take proactive steps to advance the development of new quality productive forces, as this represents both the duty bestowed by our times and an inherent requirement of serving national strategies. This study attempts to establish theoretical and practical linkages between audit oversight and the advancement of new quality productive forces, with the aim of providing theoretical support and methodological guidance for audit practice. The potential marginal contributions may manifest in the following three aspects.Firstly, it expounds the legal basis for the empowerment of new quality productive forces by audit supervision. In terms of formal legitimacy, the national constitution and relevant laws and regulations clearly grant the audit institutions the statutory mandate to supervise the implementation of economic policies and the authenticity, legality and efficiency of fiscal and financial revenues and expenditures. Supervising the development of new quality productive forces is a natural extension and inherent requirement of this statutory mandate. In terms of substantive legitimacy, it is rooted in the Party’s centralized and unified leadership over audit work, serving the fundamental requirements of modernizing China’s system and capacity for governance. At the same time, it also stems from the high degree of alignment between the audit’s duty to supervise the government’s fulfillment of public fiduciary economic responsibilities and the intrinsic demands of developing new quality productive forces. In terms of institutional distinctiveness, audit is a broad-scope, deep-level and forward-looking economic supervision, and a key governance tool for driving the formation of a closed loop in the innovation chain. The development of new quality productive forces involves complex chains and resource inputs, and its efficiency realization and risk control highly depend on the effective supervision loop formed by audit supervision, thereby ensuring the smooth achievement of development goals.Secondly, it constructs specific models through which audit supervision empowers new productive forces. The “policy tracking model” focuses on tracking the implementation of policies related to new quality productive forces, assessing the degree of target achievement, resource effectiveness, and implementation obstacles, thereby serving the optimization of macro-level decision-making. The “independent business model” establishes new quality productive forces audit as an independent, regular specialized audit activity, systematically covering core areas such as technological innovation, industrial upgrading, factor allocation, and green transformation. The “element embedding mode” incorporates key development elements of new quality productive forces as significant audit items into existing audit activities, such as budget execution audit, policy tracking audit, and economic responsibility audit. In practice, the selection of modes should comprehensively consider factors such as audit objectives, audit resources, development stage, and risk areas, allowing for the flexible adoption of either a single mode or a combination of modes.Thirdly, it clarifies the core mechanisms for the pathway through which audit oversight empowers the development of new quality productive forces. The constraint mechanism focuses on forging a highly professionalized audit corps. By strengthening professional competence and ethical conduct, it consolidates the defense line of economic supervision and provides a solid guarantee for development. The inclusiveness mechanism strives to improve the long-term mechanism for audit rectification. While seriously correcting errors, it scientifically establishes a fault-tolerance space to stimulate innovation vitality and balances the rigidity of supervision and the resilience of development. The transformation mechanism aims at promoting in-depth integration and positive interaction between the theory and practice of new productive forces auditing. It effectively transforms the experiences and problems identified in audit into theoretical guidance and practical optimization, driving the continuous improvement of the new productive forces audit system.
|
|
Received: 09 May 2025
|
|
|
|
1 柳学信、曹成梓、孔晓旭：《大国竞争背景下新质生产力形成的理论逻辑与实现路径》，《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第1期，第145-155页。
2 郑国洪、赵磊磊：《新时代审计法治思维的理论内涵与实践运用》，《审计与经济研究》2025年第1期，第16-23页。
3 王建芹、周鹏龙：《审计监督赋能党的自我革命的理与路》，《理论与改革》2025年第2期，第56-73页。
4 江必新、刘诗豪：《习近平法治思想中的行政法治重要论述研究》，《行政法学研究》2024年第4期，第3-18页。
5 习近平：《在中央审计委员会第二次会议上的讲话（2019年5月27日）》，见中共中央纪律检查委员会、中华人民共和国国家监察委员会、中共中央党史和文献研究院编：《习近平关于坚持和完善党和国家监督体系论述摘编》，北京：中央文献出版社，2022年，第168页。
6 姜江华：《不断深化对中国特色社会主义审计事业的规律性认识》，《审计研究》2024年第4期，第3-11页。
7 蔡春、李江涛、唐凯桃等：《中国特色社会主义国家审计理论研究（第五卷 国家治理审计论）》，上海：立信会计出版社，2022年。
8 黄文艺：《法治领域改革论纲》，《政治与法律》2025年第5期，第2-20页。
9 郑石桥：《审计基础理论》，北京：中国人民大学出版社，2021年。
10 王世涛：《审计权独立性的宪法规范分析》，《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2023年第2期，第102-113页。
11 刘家义：《中国特色社会主义审计理论研究》（修订版），北京：商务印书馆，2015年。
12 刘家义：《国家治理现代化进程中的国家审计：制度保障与实践逻辑》，《中国社会科学》2015年第9期，第64-83，204-205页。
13 余应敏、孙钰鹏、黄静等：《国家治理现代化视角下政策措施落实情况跟踪审计研究》，《审计研究》2022年第2期，第11-18页。
14 胡磊：《发展新质生产力的双重驱动、双面效应与双维制度》，《当代经济研究》2025年第3期，第41-50页。
15 许奎、冷艳梅：《新时代中国特色国家审计项目组织管理影响因素研究——基于访谈和问卷的调查分析》，《审计研究》2022年第5期，第49-55页。
16 米加宁、李大宇、董昌其：《新质生产力引致生产力要素质态重构的理论纵深——基于马克思主义视角的理论阐释》，《华东经济管理》2025年第5期，第1-12页。
17 郭鹏飞：《党的十八大以来国家审计事业的重大成就、基本经验与未来展望》，《当代财经》2023年第2期，第132-143页。
18 欧阳康：《马克思主义认识论研究》，北京：北京师范大学出版社，2017年。 |
|
|
|
2025, Vol. 55 
