21世纪英语国家伍尔夫研究之考察与分析（2000—2024）

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2025.02.122

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (812 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Virginia Woolf studies in English-speaking countries have flourished in the 21st century, achieving significant progress in five key areas. First, form and ideology studies have deepened, evolving from technical analysis to ideological exploration, moving from limited perspectives to diverse approaches, and expanding from the particular to the universal. Modernist studies have transcended mere formal technique analysis, forging interdisciplinary paths through explorations of lyrical style, mathematical form, and the cognitive aspects of technique. Philosophical studies, leveraging Woolf’s connections with philosophers, interpret her thought through diverse lenses including ethics, epistemology, philosophy of language, theories of the Other, hermeneutics, and historical materialism. Psychological studies have shifted from psychoanalysis towards the analysis of creative psychology, expanding into multi-angled examinations of trauma aesthetics, life writing, and artistic creativity. Second, social context studies reveal Woolf’s political thought, cultural leanings, and social critique through perspectives of gender, space, science/technology, economics, and war. Feminist studies employ a “feminist-plus” critical model, probing political thought and gender implications within multiple frameworks: women and political movements, women and everyday objects, women and cutting-edge theories, and female relationships. Spatial studies employ micro-spatial analysis and literary geography criticism to deeply elucidate Woolf’s political-cultural thought and critique of modernity. Scientific and technological studies demonstrate Woolf’s absorption of and response to the technological revolution, and the organic fusion of science and literature. Economic studies examine the connections, dialogues, and critiques between Woolf’s works and the public sphere, market economy, and cultural industries. War studies explore the elements of war and anti-war thought within her oeuvre. Third, historical and archival studies scrutinize Woolf’s inheritance and transcendence of the Euro-American literary legacy and historical consciousness, alongside the intellectual value of her manuscript archives. Historical researches focus on her innovative inheritance of the 19th-century literature and context, her transformative engagement with the Greek tradition, and her eclectic borrowing from historiography and historical views, revealing the deep roots of her literary innovation. Studies of diaries, manuscripts, and archives not only continue to evaluate their evidentiary roles but also elevate them as objects of study, opening up new research fields by exploring issues of style, theme, version, originality, and editing. Fourth, ecological, the non-human, and the Anthropocene studies investigate ecological forms and poetics, non-human animals, plants and materials, and climate writing and themes in Woolf’s works, revealing the prescient and futuristic nature of her thought. Aligning with cutting-edge environmental issues and Western literary theories, these studies reflect Woolf’s advanced foresight and speculative capacity regarding the human-nature relationship, signifying the contemporary value and future significance of Woolf scholarship. Fifth, transmedial and cross-cultural studies highlight Woolf’s openness, influence, and vitality from aesthetic, reception, adaptation, and comparative perspectives. Woolf’s interaction with transmedial arts and artists, the diverse global construction and contemporary reimagining of her image and works, and the trans-epochal and interdisciplinary nature of comparative literature studies of Woolf all demonstrate significant prospects for civilizational exchanges. Overall, Woolf studies in the Anglosphere in the 21st century are characterized by a systemic approach balancing text and context, integrating the dimensions of present, past, and future, and combining transmediality with cross-culturalism. They exhibit a strong interdisciplinarity, merging literary research with science/technology, economics, war, history, archives, ecology, animals, materiality, ethics, media, and communication. Furthermore, they demonstrate a significant intensification in depth and complexity. Collectively, these features mark the maturity and advancement of Woolf studies and point towards the potential directions for future researches. Thoroughly examining and analyzing the new findings, historical materials, and methodologies of the 21st-century Woolf studies will benefit the flourishing development of Woolf scholarship worldwide.

Key words： Virginia Woolf social context history archive nonhuman the Anthropocene interdisciplinary studies

Received: 12 February 2025

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Gao Fen
	Zhang Pengfei

Cite this article:

Gao Fen,Zhang Pengfei. Investigation and Analysis of Virginia Woolf Studies in English-Speaking Countries in the 21st Century (2000-2024)[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2026, 56(2): 112-125.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2025.02.122 OR https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/Y2026/V56/I2/112

1 Dalgarno E.， Virginia Woolf and the Migrations of Language， Cambridge： Cambridge University Press， 2012.
2 Hite M.， Woolf’s Ambiguities： Tonal Modernism， Narrative Strategy， Feminist Precursors， Ithaca： Cornell University Press， 2017.
3 Kopley E.， Virginia Woolf and Poetry， Oxford： Oxford University Press， 2021.
4 Rodal J.， “Patterned ambiguities： Virginia Woolf， mathematical variables， and form，” Configurations， Vol. 26， No. 1 （2018）， pp. 73-101.
5 Cuddy-Keane M.， “Storyminds and readingminds： cognitive plots in David Small’s Stitches and Virginia Woolf’s ‘In the Orchard’，” Narrative， Vol. 31， No. 1 （2023）， pp. 1-25.
6 Sherman D.， “A plot unraveling into ethics： Woolf， Levinas， and ‘Time Passes’，” Woolf Studies Annual， Vol. 13 （2007）， pp. 159-179.
7 Reynier C.， “Virginia Woolf’s ethics and Victorian moral philosophy，” Philosophy and Literature， Vol. 38， No. 1 （2014）， pp. 128-141.
8 Simone E.， Virginia Woolf and Being-in-the-world： A Heideggerian Study， Edinburgh： Edinburgh University Press， 2017.
9 Braidotti R.， “Virginia Woolf， immanence and ontological pacifism，” Comparative Critical Studies， Vol. 19， No. 2 （2022）， pp. 131-148.
10 Gay P.， “On not psychoanalyzing Virginia Woolf，” The American Scholar， Vol. 71， No. 2 （2002）， pp. 71-75.
11 Smith M. F.， “‘Suicidal mania’ and flawed psychobiography： two discussions of Virginia Woolf，” English Studies， Vol. 95， No. 5 （2014）， pp. 538-556.
12 Humm M.， “Psychobiography and Virginia Woolf，” English Studies， Vol. 96， No. 5 （2015）， pp. 596-600.
13 Utell J.， “View from the sickroom： Virginia Woolf， Dorothy Wordsworth， and writing women’s lives of illness，” Life Writing， Vol. 13， No. 1 （2016）， pp. 27-45.
14 Whitworth M. H.， “Historicising Woolf： context studies，” in Randall B. & Goldman J. （eds.）， Virginia Woolf in Context， New York： Cambridge University Press， 2012， pp. 3-12.
15 Black N.， Virginia Woolf as Feminist， Ithaca： Cornell University Press， 2004.
16 Angelella L.， “The meat of the movement： food and feminism in Woolf，” Woolf Studies Annual， Vol. 17 （2011）， pp. 173-195.
17 Ciobanu E. A.， “Food for thought： of tables， art and women in Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse，” American， British and Canadian Studies， Vol. 29 （2017）， pp. 147-168.
18 Ryan D.， “Orlando’s queer animals，” in Berman J. （ed.）， A Companion to Virginia Woolf， Chichester： John Wiley & Sons， 2016， pp. 109-120.
19 Thacker A.， Moving Through Modernity： Space and Geography in Modernism， Manchester： Manchester University Press， 2003.
20 Thacker A.， “Woolf and geography，” in Berman J. （ed.）， A Companion to Virginia Woolf， Chichester： John Wiley & Sons， 2016， pp. 411-425.
21 Larsson L.， Walking Virginia Woolf’s London： An Investigation in Literary Geography， London： Palgrave Macmillan， 2017.
22 Simpson K.， Gifts， Markets and Economies of Desire in Virginia Woolf， New York： Palgrave Macmillan， 2009.
23 Froula C.， Virginia Woolf and the Bloomsbury Avant-Garde： War， Civilization， Modernity， New York： Columbia University Press， 2005.
24 Whittier-Ferguson J.， “Repetition， remembering， repetition： Virginia Woolf’s late fiction and the return of war，” Modern Fiction Studies， Vol. 57， No. 2 （2011）， pp. 230-253.
25 Whitworth M. H.， “Traces of war in Virginia Woolf’s Night and Day，” Modernist Cultures， Vol. 16， No. 3 （2021）， pp. 408-429.
26 Ellmann M.， “Everyday war： Sylvia Townsend Warner and Virginia Woolf in World War Ⅱ，” Novel： A Forum on Fiction， Vol. 50， No. 1 （2017）， pp. 77-96.
27 Saunders M.， “Authors take a stand on the Irish War： Virginia Woolf， Ford Madox Ford， and the rediscovery of a significant document for the politics of modernism，” Literature & History， Vol. 32， No. 1 （2023）， pp. 63-77.
28 Blair E.， Virginia Woolf and the Nineteenth-Century Domestic Novel， Albany： State University of New York Press， 2007.
29 Reus A.， Virginia Woolf and Nineteenth-Century Women Writers： Victorian Legacies and Literary Afterlives， Edinburgh： Edinburgh University Press， 2022.
30 Ellis S.， Virginia Woolf and the Victorians， New York： Cambridge University Press， 2007.
31 Corbett M. J.， Behind the Times： Virginia Woolf in Late-Victorian Contexts， Ithaca： Cornell University Press， 2020.
32 Dell M.， Virginia Woolf’s Influential Forebears： Julia Margaret Cameron， Anny Thackeray Ritchie and Julia Prinsep Stephen， London： Palgrave Macmillan， 2015.
33 Koulouris T.， Hellenism and Loss in the Work of Virginia Woolf， Farnham： Ashgate， 2011.
34 Worman N.， Virginia Woolf’s Greek Tragedy， London： Bloomsbury Academic， 2019.
35 Smith A. C.， Virginia Woolf’s Mythic Method， Columbus： Ohio State University Press， 2022.
36 Zhang P. & Gao F.， “‘He’s the test（imony）’： Edward Gibbon and Virginia Woolf’s view of history，” English Studies， Vol. 105， No. 7 （2024）， pp. 1098-1122.
37 Besnault A.， Virginia Woolf’s Unwritten Histories： Conversations with the Nineteenth Century， New York： Routledge， 2022.
38 Spiropoulou A.， Virginia Woolf， Modernity and History： Constellations with Walter Benjamin， London： Palgrave Macmillan， 2010.
39 McVicker J.， “Archaeological Woolf： prehistory， heterotopias， and envisioning the future，” Woolf Studies Annual， Vol. 28 （2022）， pp. 69-97.
40 Tidwell J. C.， Politics and Aesthetics in The Diary of Virginia Woolf， New York： Routledge， 2008.
41 Gewirtz I.， “‘With anger and emphasis’： the proof copy of A Room of One’s Own，” Woolf Studies Annual， Vol. 17 （2011）， pp. 1-76.
42 Gabler H. W.， “Auto-palimpsests： Virginia Woolf’s late drafting of her early life，” in Text Genetics in Literary Modernism and Other Essays， Cambridge： Open Book Publishers， 2018， pp. 257-285.
43 Koulouris T.， “Virginia Woolf’s ‘Greek Notebook’ （VS Greek and Latin Studies） an annotated transcription，” Woolf Studies Annual， Vol. 25 （2019）， pp. 1-72.
44 Sorum E.， “Taking note： text and context in Virginia Woolf’s ‘Mr. Bennett and Mrs. Brown’，” Woolf Studies Annual， Vol. 13 （2007）， pp. 137-158.
45 Jenkins A.， “Drafting Mrs Ramsay and Lily Briscoe： feminist aesthetics in the manuscript of To the Lighthouse，” in Virginia Woolf， Literary Materiality， and Feminist Aesthetics： From Pen to Print， London： Palgrave Macmillan， 2023， pp. 121-150.
46 Southworth H. （ed.）， Leonard and Virginia Woolf， the Hogarth Press and the Networks of Modernism， Edinburgh： Edinburgh University Press， 2010.
47 Battershill C.， Modernist Lives： Biography and Autobiography at Leonard and Virginia Woolf’s Hogarth Press， London： Bloomsbury Academic， 2018.
48 Dubino J.， Lowe G. & Neverow V. et al. （eds.）， Virginia Woolf： Twenty-First-Century Approaches， Edinburgh： Edinburgh University Press， 2015.
49 Scott B. K.， In the Hollow of the Wave： Virginia Woolf and Modernist Uses of Nature， Charlottesville： University of Virginia Press， 2012.
50 Williams S.， “Woolf’s bioethics： animals and dependency in ‘The Widow and the Parrot’，” Woolf Studies Annual， Vol. 26 （2020）， pp. 105-120.
51 Goldman J.， “‘Ce chien est à moi’： Virginia Woolf and the signifying dog，” Woolf Studies Annual， Vol. 13 （2007）， pp. 49-86.
52 Dirschauer M.， Modernist Waterscapes： Water， Imagination and Materiality in the Works of Virginia Woolf， London： Palgrave Macmillan， 2023.
53 Swanson D. L.， “Woolf’s Copernican shift： nonhuman nature in Virginia Woolf’s short fiction，” Woolf Studies Annual， Vol. 18 （2012）， pp. 53-74.
54 Ryan D.， Virginia Woolf and the Materiality of Theory： Sex， Animal， Life， Edinburgh： Edinburgh University Press， 2013.
55 Taylor J. O.， The Sky of Our Manufacture： The London Fog in British Fiction from Dickens to Woolf， Charlottesville： University of Virginia Press， 2016.
56 Adkins P.， The Modernist Anthropocene： Nonhuman Life and Planetary Change in James Joyce， Virginia Woolf and Djuna Barnes， Edinburgh： Edinburgh University Press， 2022.
57 Sutton E.， Virginia Woolf and Classical Music： Politics， Aesthetics， Form， Edinburgh： Edinburgh University Press， 2013.
58 Varga A. （ed.）， Virginia Woolf and Music， Bloomington： Indiana University Press， 2014.
59 Latham M.， Virginia Woolf’s Afterlives： The Author as Character in Contemporary Fiction and Drama， New York： Routledge， 2021.
60 Latham M.， Marie C. & Rigeade A. （eds.）， Recycling Virginia Woolf in Contemporary Art and Literature， New York： Routledge， 2022.
61 Abel E.， Odd Affinities： Virginia Woolf’s Shadow Genealogies， Chicago： University of Chicago Press， 2024.