科技成果转化困局中的政策破解：体系设计与实践审思

doi:10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2025.01.111

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (994 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Against the backdrop of a new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation, leading the development of new productive forces with scientific and technological innovation has become one of the important tasks of China’s economic work in 2025. As an important bridge between scientific and technological innovation and industrial innovation, the transformation of scientific and technological achievements is not only an important means to accelerate the development of new productive forces at present, but also an urgent need to enhance the overall efficiency of the national innovation system. However, China is facing some difficulties in the process of carrying out the transformation of scientific and technological achievements. For example, the output of scientific and technological achievements is large, but the transformation efficiency is low, and the paradigm of outcome transformation driven by scenarios is gradually replacing the traditional supply-oriented linear paradigm. Leading the new paradigm of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements with policies, breaking through the difficulties in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, and accelerating the innovative cycle of the closed loop of the transformation system of scientific and technological achievements have become urgent research tasks that need to be carried out.Based on this, this paper engages in a dialogue with institutional theory and innovation system theory. Combining the methods of theoretical deduction, policy research, and case analysis, it completes the system design of the policies for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements from five dimensions: policy content, policy inspection, policy coordination, policy effectiveness, and policy flywheel effect. It systematically responds to key questions such as “what to do”, “how to do it”, “how well it is done”, “what results are achieved”, and “how to accelerate” in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements. In terms of policy content design, it promotes the transformation of achievements by multiple action subjects throughout the entire life cycle. In terms of policy coordination design, it strengthens the efficient coordination among various policy tools and different departments, and improves the connectivity among all links of policy design. In terms of policy inspection design, it conducts incremental evaluations of policy effects in the short term, medium term, and long term, and promotes dynamic monitoring of effects and the rational allocation of resources. In terms of policy effectiveness design, it supports the high-quality transformation, incubation, and industrialization of achievements, and enhances the driving force of policy design for high-quality development. In terms of policy flywheel effect design, it forms a closed loop of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements led by enterprises and driven by scenarios, and enhances the endogenous driving force for innovative transformation. In addition, through policy research, this paper demonstrates how local policies support the A University Science Park in carrying out the practice of transforming scientific and technological achievements, and further elaborates on the important role of systematic policy design in promoting the work of transforming scientific and technological achievements and improving the effectiveness of such transformation. The innovations of this paper lie in the following aspects: In terms of academic content innovation, it breaks through the single level of policy research, systematically analyzes the practical problems of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in China, and proposes a policy system framework for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements covering five dimensions. The research responds to the new requirements of the changes in innovative paradigms such as scenario-driven transformation for the design of the policy system, and promotes the work of transforming scientific and technological achievements to break through the traditional path dependence and accelerate the innovative cycle. In terms of academic perspective innovation, it expands the research on innovation from the institutional perspective, fills the theoretical gap regarding how policies shape the innovation ecosystem and affect the development of innovative subjects, and provides useful theoretical inspiration for accelerating the innovation of multiple subjects in the application scenarios of complex technologies from the perspectives of institutions and innovation. In terms of research methods, by combining theoretical deduction, policy research, and case analysis, and adopting a research paradigm of cross-validation with multiple methods, it effectively bridges the gap between theoretical research and policy practice.

Key words： technology transfer policy system university science park context-driven new quality productive forces

Received: 11 January 2025

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Chu Ruhui
	Shen Yongdong
	Qi Chengshuang

Cite this article:

Chu Ruhui,Shen Yongdong,Qi Chengshuang. Policy Solutions in the Dilemma of Technology Transfer: System Design and Practical Reflection[J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2026, 56(1): 121-133.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2025.01.111 OR https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/EN/Y2026/V56/I1/121

1 靳瑞杰、江旭：《高校科技成果转化“路在何方”？——基于过程性视角的转化渠道研究》，《科学学与科学技术管理》2019年第12期，第35-57页。
2 尹西明、钱雅婷、武沛琦等：《场景驱动科技成果转化：理论逻辑与过程机理》，《科学学研究》2024年第11期，第2286-2294，2317页。
3 王志刚：《以高水平科技自立自强支撑引领高质量发展》，《求是》2023年第16期，第26-30页。
4 Fini R.， Rasmussen E. & Siegel D. et al.， “Rethinking the commercialization of public science： from entrepreneurial outcomes to societal impacts，” Academy of Management Perspectives， Vol. 32， No. 1 （2018）， pp. 4-20.
5 张二金：《高校科技成果转化：理论框架、现实困境与未来图景》，《江苏高教》2024年第1期，第58-63页。
6 冷静、王海燕：《解读制约科研人员创造力的制度性障碍——基于科技政策落实情况的分析》，《中国软科学》2020年第7期，第187-192页。
7 段永彪、郑烨、任由果：《科技创新政策的政府注意力演变与启示——基于1978—2021年中央政府工作报告的文本分析》，《中国科技论坛》2022年第7期，第1-11页。
8 贺德方：《对科技成果及科技成果转化若干基本概念的辨析与思考》，《中国软科学》2011年第11期，第1-7页。
9 蔡跃洲：《科技成果转化的内涵边界与统计测度》，《科学学研究》2015年第1期，第37-44页。
10 詹新宇、于明哲：《组合式财税政策何以有效推动中小企业科技成果转化》，《管理世界》2024年第8期，第191-207，11页。
11 段永彪、董新宇：《促进科技成果转化的核心要素与激励机制：基于“三项改革”的多案例研究》，《科研管理》2024年第5期，第143-152页。
12 徐海龙：《新时期优化科技成果转化政策的思考与建议》，《科技中国》2024年第7期，第5-9页。
13 陈强、沈天添：《中国科技创新政策体系演变研究——基于1978—2020年157份政策文本的量化分析》，《中国科技论坛》2022年第12期，第35-46页。
14 贺德方、陈涛、刘辉等：《科技活动全链条政策体系构建研究》，《中国软科学》2024年第6期，第1-14页。
15 葛劲峰、张南、袁志刚：《中国高校科技转化改革的异质性政策效应》，《经济研究》2024年第2期，第153-170页。
16 李胜会、夏敏：《中国科技成果转化政策变迁：制度驱动抑或市场导向》，《中国科技论坛》2021年第10期，第1-13页。
17 杜宝贵、张焕涛：《基于“三维”视角的中国科技成果转化政策体系分析》，《科学学与科学技术管理》2018年第9期，第36-49页。
18 North D. C.， Institutions， Institutional Change and Economic Performance， Cambridge： Cambridge University Press， 1990.
19 Oliver C.， “Sustainable competitive advantage： combining institutional and resource-based views，”Strategic Management Journal， Vol. 18， No. 9 （1997）， pp. 697-713.
20 Burgelman R. A. & Grove A. S.， “Toward electric cars and clean coal： a comparative analysis of strategies and strategy-making in the U.S. and China，” Research Paper in the 2009 Bass Seminar at the Graduate School of Business，Vol. 2 （2010）， pp. 55-56.
21 Helveston J. P.， Wang Y. & Karplus V. J. et al.， “Institutional complementarities： the origins of experimentation in China’s plug-in electric vehicle industry，” Research Policy， Vol. 48， No. 1 （2019）， pp. 206-222.
22 缑倩雯、蔡宁：《制度复杂性与企业环境战略选择：基于制度逻辑视角的解读》，《经济社会体制比较》2015年第1期，第125-138页。
23 Thornton P. H. & Ocasio W.， “Institutional logics，” in Greenwood R.， Oliver C. & Suddaby R. et al. （eds.）， The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism， vol. 1， London： Sage Publications， 2008， pp. 99-129.
24 Meyer J. W. & Rowan B.， “Institutionalized organizations： formal structure as myth and ceremony，” American Journal of Sociology， Vol. 83， No. 2 （1977）， pp. 340-363.
25 Adner R.， “Ecosystem as structure： an actionable construct for strategy，” Journal of Management， Vol. 43， No. 1 （2017）， pp. 39-58.
26 Jacobides M. G.， Cennamo C. & Gawer A.， “Towards a theory of ecosystems，” Strategic Management Journal， Vol. 39， No. 8 （2018）， pp. 2255-2276.
27 Tsujimoto M.， Kajikawa Y. & Tomita J. et al.， “A review of the ecosystem concept—towards coherent ecosystem design，” Technological Forecasting and Social Change， Vol. 136 （2018）， pp. 49-58.
28 Estrin J.， Closing the Innovation Gap： Reigniting the Spark of Creativity in a Global Economy， New York： McGraw-Hill， 2009.
29 刘和东、鲁晨曦：《创新生态系统韧性对经济高质量发展的影响》，《中国科技论坛》2023年第1期，第48-57页。
30 Adner R.， “Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem，” Harvard Business Review， Vol. 84， No. 4 （2006）， pp. 98-107.
31 武建龙、董阔、杨仲基等：《场景驱动企业颠覆性创新的作用机制研究：基于创新生态系统视角的双案例分析》，《中国软科学》2024年第10期，第164-174页。
32 陈丛波、陈娟、胡登峰：《场景驱动的跨区域创新系统：核心要素与未来发展》，《科研管理》2024年第5期，第85-93页。
33 李杨、许庆瑞：《不同制度理论流派对企业创新能力发展的解释差异与观点弥合——一个整合性综述框架》，《科技进步与对策》2025年第6期，第151-160页。
34 柳卸林、杨培培、丁雪辰：《央地产业政策协同与新能源汽车产业发展：基于创新生态系统视角》，《中国软科学》2023年第11期，第38-53页。
35 郝涛、林德明、丁堃等：《“双一流”高校科技成果转化激励政策评价研究》，《中国科技论坛》2023年第7期，第21-32页。
36 Wright M.， Clarysse B. & Lockett A. et al.， “Mid-range universities’ linkages with industry： knowledge types and the role of intermediaries，” Research Policy， Vol. 37， No. 8 （2008）， pp. 1205-1223.
37 马江娜、李华、王方：《中国科技成果转化政策文本分析——基于政策工具和创新价值链双重视角》，《科技管理研究》2017年第7期，第34-42页。
38 Kroll H. & Liefner I.，“Spin-off enterprises as a means of technology commercialisation in a transforming economy：evidence from three universities in China，” Technovation， Vol. 28， No. 5 （2008）， pp. 298-313.
39 Clayton P.，Feldman M. & Lowe N.，“Behind the scenes： intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship，” Academy of Management Perspectives， Vol. 32， No. 1 （2018）， pp. 104-124.
40 孙薇、叶初升：《政府采购何以牵动企业创新——兼论需求侧政策“拉力”与供给侧政策“推力”的协同》，《中国工业经济》2023年第1期，第95-113页。
41 童健、薛景：《“公平的起跑线”改革与基础教育公共服务均等化——以上海市“公民同招、民办摇号”政策为例》，《财经研究》2024年第8期，第124-138页。
42 李子婕、何玉成：《央地产业政策协同对农业企业专用性投资的影响》，《中国农业大学学报》2024年第7期，第259-271页。
43 张永安、周怡园：《新能源汽车补贴政策工具挖掘及量化评价》，《中国人口·资源与环境》2017年第10期，第188-197页。
44 孙亚男、刘燕伟、傅念豪等：《中国新质生产力的增长模式、区域差异与协调发展》，《财经研究》2024年第6期，第4-18，33页。
45 韩文龙、张瑞生、赵峰：《新质生产力水平测算与中国经济增长新动能》，《数量经济技术经济研究》2024年第6期，第5-25页。
46 粟立钟、张润达、王靖宇：《研发激励型产业政策具有两面性吗——来自研发费用加计扣除政策的经验证据》，《科技进步与对策》2022年第3期，第118-128页。
47 范佳颖、马艳艳：《企业主导产学研合作与关键共性技术创新——结构性权力的调节效应》，《中国科技论坛》2024年第2期，第61-70，93页。
48 李晓伟、李传明、管彩峰等：《政府引导基金政策的创新驱动效应——基于双重差分模型的实证检验》，《管理评论》2024年第2期，第54-65页。
49 尹西明、苏雅欣、陈劲等：《场景驱动的创新：内涵特征、理论逻辑与实践进路》，《科技进步与对策》2022年第15期，第1-10页。