|
|
|
| Interpretation Tactics of the Overall Value of Silk Roads in China Section |
| Shan Jixiang1,2, Zhou Jianhong1 |
1.School of Cultural Heritage, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
2.The Palace Museum, Beijing 100009, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The overall value presents the cultural characteristics of the cultural routes and embodies the spirit of the route, which is the core of the interpretation of the cultural route. A cultural route is a site and monument agglomeration with specific functions composed of “sites-routes-areas”. Each site not only has its inherent value but also supports the value of the specific function routes. And the routes form a network to constitute an area, and the area shows the overall value of the route, thus forming an overall value interpretation system of micro value based on individual sites, meso value related by routes, and macro value presented by area.The “Silk Roads: the Routes Network of Chang’an-Tianshan Corridor”, as a prominent proof of multicultural exchanges and an outstanding example of natural and cultural diversity, has been listed in the World Heritage List. Through on-the-spot investigation and research on the 22 sites already included in the Silk Roads in the China section, the following problems in the interpretation of the overall value of the Silk Roads have been found: (1) Too much emphasis is placed on the introduction of the inherent value information of individual elements, while the interpretation and explanation of the meso and macro values are ignored. (2) The content of the interpretation of the micro value information is simple and homogeneous, and the presentation methods are similar, which reduces the attractiveness of sites and weakens the dissemination ability of the overall value. (3) For a site that constitutes the relevance of the meso value, during the interpretation process, too much emphasis is placed on the inherent value of the individual elements, while the presentation and display of the relevance are ignored, making it difficult to show the meso value, resulting in the phenomenon of “only seeing the sites but not the routes”. (4) In the sites and routes that show specific functions, there is almost no interpretation of the macro value information, making it difficult to present the overall value and to manifest the Spirit of Silk Roads.In order to realize the holistic and systematic protection of the Silk Roads and promote the Spirit of Silk Roads, first of all, we should start from the analysis of the overall value of the Silk Roads, that is, the statement of the outstanding universal value of the Silk Roads is the macro value, the connections between sites and between sites and specific function routes are the meso value, and the inherent value of each site is the micro value.Secondly, in each site, the relevant clues showing the meso value should be presented through theme signs, so that the public can construct associated individual element groups through the signs when visiting the sites and understand the meso value of routes.Thirdly, through multiple special-line themed tour routes, the routes form a network, allowing the audience to appreciate and understand the macro value of them and experience the Spirit of Silk Roads through visiting and experiencing.Finally, with the Digital Silk Roads as a supplement, a three-dimensional and diversified interpretation system is formed to show the overall value of the Silk Roads. Through a series of strategies for applying for World Heritage status, in the future, more sites of different types and showing different levels of the overall value of the Silk Roads will successively join the “big family”. According to the overall value interpretation framework system, that is, showing characteristics, being harmonious while being different, and also embodying the systematicness and integrity of the Silk Roads, sharing beauty together, the effective dissemination of the Silk Roads value can be realized.
|
|
Received: 25 September 2024
|
|
|
|
1 王瑨：《“考古中国”不断探索未知——访国家文物局副局长宋新潮》，《人民日报》2021年1月9日，第5版。
2 王瑞、王镜：《世界遗产文化线路旅游的网络共现关系分析——以丝绸之路：长安—天山廊道的路网（中国段）为例》，《河南工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2019年第3期，第22-26页。
3 唐岳兴、朱逊、赵巍：《中东铁路遗产廊道全域旅游发展模式研究》，见中国风景园林学会编：《中国风景园林学会2020年会论文集》（下），北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2022年，第927-931页。
4 陈翚、曹冬、邹园等：《万里茶道湖南资水沿线建筑遗产廊道构建研究》，《建筑遗产》2018年第3期，第71-77页。
5 Riegl A.， “The modern cult of monuments： its essence and its development，” in Stanley-Price N.， Talley M. K. Jr. & Vaccaro A. M. （eds.）， Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage， Los Angeles： The J. Paul Getty Trust， 1996， pp. 69-83.
6 Hewison R.， Not a Sideshow： Leadership and Cultural Value， London： Demos， 2006.
7 Clark K.， “The shift toward values in UK heritage practice，” in Avrami E.， Macdonald S. & Mason R. et al. （eds.）， Values in Heritage Management： Emerging Approaches and Research Directions， Los Angeles： The Getty Conservation Institute， 2019， pp. 66-83.
8 黄琼、周剑虹：《大遗址阐释系统构建初步研究》，《江汉考古》2014年第2期，第118-123页。
9 如姬、木子桦：《悬泉置驿站中的大汉帝国》，《中华遗产》2018年第3期，第56-65页。
10 班晓悦、陆航：《丝路文化遗产谱写中国与中亚文明互鉴新乐章》，《中国社会科学报》2023年9月12日，第2版。 |
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 54 
