Abstract：The Daoguang reign period is not only the starting point of modern Chinese history but also a turning point at which the Qing Dynasty began to decline from its prosperity. Among the series of crises faced by the Qing court, issues related to official governance and finance were particularly prominent. However, previous case studies that explored the crises during the Daoguang reign mostly adopted the approach of specialized historical research on finance or politics. The previous studies have rarely regarded these crises as an integrated feature of the historical evolution of the Qing Dynasty. The experience of Ji Zhichang may serve as a case.The foundation for Ji Zhichang’s smooth early official career stemmed from Emperor Daoguang’s appreciation of his literary talents as well as favor from Mu Zhang’a, a Grand Councilor at that time. With these, Ji’s official career entered a rapid ascent, climbing swiftly through the ranks. In the late years of his reign, Emperor Daoguang followed the principle that governing the law should prioritize governing people. He pinned his hopes on promoting a group of “capable officials” to foster beneficial reforms, eliminate malpractices, and transform the prevailing social ethos. However, the main body of this group of “capable officials” selected by Emperor Daoguang were still the officials who had used literature as the steppingstone to their official careers, and these were precisely the kind of officials that he had preferred to appoint in the past. Judging from the practical actions and outcomes of the financial rectification carried out by these “literarily accomplished” officials in fiscal reorganization, the practical abilities of most of them are limited, which proved insufficient to resolve the fiscal predicaments of the Daoguang reign. This precisely reflects the civil bureaucracy of the Daoguang reign, which lacks capable personnel and is rife with institutional decay. However, they at least put forward plans for rectifying the official governance and finance, which fulfilled Emperor Daoguang’s aspiration to reverse the prevailing ethos. As a result, they won the favor and promotion from Emperor Daoguang. Ji Zhichang was a representative figure among them.During the transition from the Daoguang reign to the Xianfeng reign, significant adjustments took place in the power structure of the central government of the Qing Dynasty. Mu Zhang’a and Qi Ying were dismissed from their positions, while such figures as Qi Junzao and Du Shoutian became important ministers in the new regime. This adjustment not only involved the reckoning of the political responsibilities for the Opium War in the previous reign but also signified that the Qing Dynasty’s attitude towards foreign affairs began to change after the transition from the Daoguang reign to the Xianfeng reign. Like his father, Emperor Xianfeng also attributed the root cause of the difficulties to the problem of official governance. In the late years of the Daoguang reign, although the capable officials who were promoted and appointed to high-level positions had connections with Mu Zhang’a and others, Emperor Xianfeng’s fundamental strategy was not to deal with the so-called “Mu Zhang’a’s faction”. Instead, he aimed to establish a new diplomatic stance and officialdom atmosphere through personnel changes. Therefore, even Ji Zhichang, who had a close relationship with Mu Zhang’a, was not dismissed from his post by Emperor Xianfeng. Instead, he was appointed as a local governor—a move intended to observe his future performance.After ascending the throne, Emperor Xianfeng’s high-level personnel adjustments, which aimed to “employ the virtuous and expel the evil”, failed to address the root cause of corruption in the officialdom. With the outbreak of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom revolution, a new round of financial crisis thoroughly laid bare the institutional flaws within the Qing Dynasty to the ruling class. This group of “capable officials” who were renowned for their “diligence and prudence” as well as “literary talents” found themselves at a loss in the face of the new situation. The fundamental reason why Ji Zhichang retired from his post as the governor of Fujian and Zhejiang was that he failed to cope with the social and economic crisis in these areas.
牛贯杰, 冯浩然. 吏治与财政双重危机的因应：季芝昌与道咸政局[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2025, 55(12): 62-75.
Niu Guanjie, Feng Haoran. Response to the Dual Crises in Official Administration and Finance: Ji Zhichang and the Political Landscape of the Daoguang and Xianfeng Eras. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2025, 55(12): 62-75.
2025, Vol. 55 
