浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月23日 星期五   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2023, Vol. 53 Issue (7): 51-64    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2022.10.106
□ 公共管理研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
行政区划调整何以引发社会风险?
吴金群, 刘花花
浙江大学 公共管理学院,浙江 杭州 310058
Why Does Administrative Division Adjustment Cause Social Risk? A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 20 Cases
Wu Jinqun, Liu Huahua
School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

全文: PDF (2526 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 确保行政区划调整的社会稳定是有序推动区划改革的先决条件。在区划抗争事件中,存在高社会风险的“强调整—强降格”和“强调整—强迁移”的驱动路径以及“强参与—弱迁移”、弱调整和强互补的抑制路径。非意见征求是高社会风险的单因素路径,其他五个条件具有多重并发性,形成驱动高社会风险的不同路径;各条件对社会风险的影响存在差异,高/非高社会风险的因果机制存在非对称性。此研究结论对我国行政区划改革具有重要的政策价值和实践启示。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吴金群
刘花花
关键词 行政区划区划调整社会风险区划抗争模糊集定性比较    
Abstract:Ensuring social stability during administrative division adjustment is a prerequisite for advancing administrative division reform and a long-standing issue of concern in the academia. Focusing on the relationship between administrative division and social stability, we have analyzed the relevant literature on administrative division, social conflict, and maintaining social stability. Our review shows that this literature has overlooked the social risks associated with administrative division adjustment which can offer opportunities for further exploration of the mechanisms of these risks.Based on the analysis framework of “structure-process-result”, this paper constructs an analysis chain of “cultural conflict-power conflict-adjustment type-opinion seeking-scale downgrade-resident change” to analyze systematically the social risk problems of regional adjustment. Firstly, the cultural and power conflicts in the structural dimension have a far-reaching impact on the new regions’ social integration and regional stability. The differences in history, culture, and economic strength between regions lead to structural risks in regional adjustment. Secondly, the adjustment type and opinion solicitation of the process dimension involve procedural justice, information disclosure, and public participation in the process of regional adjustment. The satisfaction of the masses with the above situation determines their attitudes towards regional adjustment and further affects the region’s social stability. Finally, the distributive function of the resident change and the downgrading in the outcome dimension have produced differences in the economic interests and public services among groups, resulting in an uneven distribution of public power, shared resources, and development opportunities among regions, and formed a certain threat to the social stability between areas.Based on the pluralism and concurrency of the outbreak of social protests, we take cultural conflict, power conflict, adjustment type, opinion seeking, scale downgrade, and resident change as conditional variables, and “social risk” as the result variable, then we use the fuzzy set qualitative comparison research method with 20 cases to analyze regional protests in China. We identify the driving paths of “strong adjustment-strong degradation” and “strong adjustment-strong migration” with high social risks, as well as the inhibiting paths of “strong participation-weak migration”, weak adjustment, and strong complementarity. The findings are as follows: (1) Non-opinion solicitation is necessary for high social risk, forming a single-factor path of high social risk. (2) The effects of the six conditions on high/non-high social risk are different, and the causal mechanism of high/non-high social risk is asymmetrical. (3) Multiple paths exist in inducing high/non-high social risk.We further discuss the policy value and practical enlightenment of the above research findings to administrative division reform. Firstly, the single-factor path of high social risk highlights the importance of implementing opinion-soliciting work to orderly implement administrative division adjustment. Secondly, the two-driving paths of high social risk warn that the practice of administrative division should pay special attention to the type of “high level, strong demotion and strong migration” and respect the geographical, emotional identity and local people’s will. Finally, the three paths of non-high social risk provide the direction for optimizing the setting of administrative division and restraining social risk.
Key wordsadministrative division    administrative division adjustment    social risk    regional protest    Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis   
收稿日期: 2022-10-10     
基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目(18BGL204)
作者简介: 吴金群(https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3948-6269),男,浙江大学公共管理学院教授,博士生导师,经济学博士,主要从事地方政府管理与创新、城市与区域治理等方面研究;;刘花花(https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9815-024X)(通信作者),女,浙江大学公共管理学院博士研究生,主要从事地方政府管理与创新、城市与区域治理等方面研究;
引用本文:   
吴金群, 刘花花. 行政区划调整何以引发社会风险?[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 53(7): 51-64. Wu Jinqun, Liu Huahua. Why Does Administrative Division Adjustment Cause Social Risk? A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 20 Cases. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2023, 53(7): 51-64.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2022.10.106     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2023/V53/I7/51
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn