浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月26日 星期一   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2021, Vol. 51 Issue (4): 187-198    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2020.01.143
□哲学研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
知与识:论知识与技术及其关联
郎友兴, 达央
浙江大学 公共管理学院,浙江 杭州 310058
Knowing and Knowledge: On Episteme and Techne
Lang Youxing, Da Yang
School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

全文: PDF (810 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 技术源于生命,而非基于知识的某种创新或属于知识的分支。物在认识论的层面即理论科学的层面,是经由“起诉”而被纳入“范畴”的存在物。由此,在范畴的序列中只要有物存在,它就是存在物,它不仅符合知识的秩序,而且服从于作为生产的技术将其带向在场的摆置与设定。在技术停摆之处,知识以科学研究的方式为技术打开新的生产视角与进程,而这一生产之完成又伴随着对知识的再创制、再生产。因此,如果将知识理解为存在物层面的知识,即科学知识,那么,技术与知识的关联便凸显为:作为“生产”的技术为存在物层面的理论科学奠基,而对知识的探求,实质上是对技术所擅长的“缘起—招致”的生产方法的探求,即对技术本身之探求。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
郎友兴
达央
关键词 知识技术理念理论形而上学    
Abstract:In the history of metaphysics, techne is far longer than episteme (usually known as scientific knowledge). In the connection between techne and episteme, if a theory consists in its insight into the being of a certain being, then techne’s control over theories must lie in its “productive” nature. This article tries to explore the connection and nature of episteme and techne, as based on Heidegger’s thoughts on “technology” and his deconstruction of metaphysics, combined with some contemporary thinkers’ views on technology.At the birth of philosophy, there was no clear distinction between episteme and techne, but with the creation (poeisis) of metaphysics the two gradually got separated. After this, Aristotle, on the one hand, criticized Plato’s “eidos”, and, on the other hand, uses the form of “category” which identifies ousia with “being” in the discursive structure of language, thus laying the foundations for the certainty required by “technoscience”. In the construction of this foundation, techne as a producing technique does not only become the guarantee for the “unconcealment” of produced things, but also provides scientific researches with a basis for production, being led and deduced by “mathematics” in the modern context of the “mass production of knowledge”.On talking about techne, Aristotle’s explanation of the “Four Causes” has to be reviewed, which is generally believed to include material cause (hylē), formal cause (eidos), efficient cause (causa efficiens) and final cause (telos). If the formal cause and the final cause (which can also be understood as perfection and completion in the sense of achievement) are taken as an “eidos” in the technical sense, then the completion of this “eidos” is to clearly interpret “production” to “what it is” through techne .Humans (home faber)have always been placed in an awkward position according to the traditional interpretation of “causa efficiens”. It seems that human is not merely a “causa efficiens”, but also a responsibility and an intermediary that brings together the four causes. Regarding human as a “causa efficiens” leads to a long-standing view in cultural anthropology which holds that techne does not belong to culture, but to the category of tools. At the same time, it has also led to the binary opposition of episteme and techne, where techne is only understood as a tool and means to achieve goals, and has never been raised to the level of ontology. Therefore, to apply a subject-object thinking, techne itself is in a dimension that needs to be explained because techne and human are in a binary opposition. Thus, in the metaphysics of techne, the interpretation of techne is elaborated from a variety of viewpoints and perspectives, resulting in a myriad of opinions on “about technology” or “what technology is”.This article argues that techne not only produces (herstellen) but also prescribes episteme for the reason that techne is itself a method of dominating knowledge and, more importantly, it is a way of know-how in the unfolding of metaphysics. With the development of metaphysics, this “know-how” techne gradually forms an absolute rule over episteme, turning philosophy into a technology which moves towards the idea of episteme. Thus, philosophy — the love of wisdom — has from its inception (arche) become a metaphysics of technology. Techne comes from life, but is not based on some type of innovation or branch of knowledge. “Things” at the epistemological level, i. e. at the level of theoretical science, are beings that have been put into the “category” through “accused”. As long as something is in the sequence of categories, it is an existent, which not only conforms to the order for scientific knowledge, but is subject to the presentation (vorstellen) arrangement by the production techne. Where techne stops, knowledge opens up new perspectives and processes of production for techne in the form of scientific research, and the completion of this production is accompanied by the recreation and reproduction of episteme. Thus, if the term of scientific knowledge is understood as referring to a kind of knowledge on the ontic level, the connection between techne and episteme is highlighted as: techne lays the foundation of theoretical science at the level of beings, while the search for so-called knowledge is essentially a search for the “inducing to go forward” (verschulden) method of production in which techne excels, that is, for techne itself.
Key wordsknowing    episteme    techne    eidos    theory    metaphysics   
收稿日期: 2020-01-14     
作者简介: 1.郎友兴(https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5690-1789),男,浙江大学公共管理学院教授,博士生导师,主要从事社会政治理论、政治社会学、地方政治与治理研究;;达央(https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5586-8219),男,浙江大学公共管理学院博士研究生,主要从事政治社会学理论、哲学研;
引用本文:   
郎友兴, 达央. 知与识:论知识与技术及其关联[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 51(4): 187-198. Lang Youxing, Da Yang. Knowing and Knowledge: On Episteme and Techne. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2021, 51(4): 187-198.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2020.01.143     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2021/V51/I4/187
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn