Abstract：As the focus of social governance gradually shifts towards the grassroots, the grassroots society has become a crucial field for the operation of the rule of law. The increase in the reverence of rule of law by the grassroots people has become an important issue in the construction of a society with rule of law. “Reverence for the rule of law” is an essential indicator in the evaluation of the project of “Yuhang Rule of Law Index”. Continuous and deep research on it may summarize the experience of the rule of law, objectively evaluate the status of the rule of law, analyze the dilemma of the rule of law practice, discover the pattern of the rule of law development, and effectively improve the level of rule of law and the efficiency of governance. This research is based on the first rule of law index in mainland China which is Yuhang Rule of Law Index. It is based on the data of its continuous survey in Yuhang County from 2007 to 2018. This study collected four-fold evaluation data and classified the research objects into four groups of people. They are the general public, direct participants in the political and legal system (internal group), indirect participants in the political or legal system (external group), and legal researchers (expert group). They evaluate and score the level of reverence for the rule of law by the grassroots, and use four sets of evaluation data to examine the status of the people’s reverence for the rule of law, and then, look for external and internal factors that hinder the promotion in reverence for the rule of law. It proposes to recast people’s trust in the rule of law with judicial authority, promote public’s recognition of the rule of law through administration according to law, arouse people’s awareness of the rule of law with a culture of “credibility”, and use the concept of “co-governance” to drive citizens to participate in the construction of a society under the rule of law. Among them, by administering according to law and improving judicial authority to enhance and optimize the public’s reverence for the rule of law, it can be used as an external force to strengthen the public’s recognition of the rule of law. Through the creation of a culture of “integrity” and the concept of “co-governance”, it can be used as an internal force to enhance and optimize the public’s reverence for the rule of law. The combined force of internal and external forces can produce a “superimposed effect”, which involves both the direction that can be improved (rule of law) and the magnitude of the effectiveness (quantification). Therefore, a quantitative analysis of the public’s reverence for the rule of law provides a way for further researches on the society of the rule of law in the future.
钱弘道, 窦海心. 基层民众的法治尊崇状况研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 51(2): 15-29.
Qian Hongdao, Dou Haixin. Grassroots Reverence for the Rule of Law: A Study Based on Twelve Years of Yuhang Rule of Law Index. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2021, 51(2): 15-29.
1 钱弘道： 《法治评估的实验》，北京：法律出版社，2013年。 2 伍德志： 《论法治评估的“伪精确”》，《法律科学》2020年第1期，第3-15页。 3 Moreau N.V.， “Civic piety： Plato and reverence for the rule of law，” History of Political Thought，Vol. 38， No.3 （2017）， pp. 387-409. 4 刘作翔： 《法治社会中的权力和权利定位》，《法学研究》1996年第4期，第71-81页。 5 严存生： 《法的多元性的哲理思考》，见何勤华主编： 《外国法制史研究》，北京：法律出版社，2006年，第13-36页。 6 江必新、王红霞： 《法治社会建设论纲》，《中国社会科学》2014年第1期，第142-159，209-210页。 7 张鸣起： 《论一体建设法治社会》，《中国法学》2016年第4期，第6-24页。 8 陈柏峰： 《中国法治社会的结构及其运行机制》，《中国社会科学》2019年第1期，第66-89，206-207页。 9 窦海心、殷娜： 《“依法治国”方略下的地方法治建设研究》，见周世中、钟林林编： 《依法治国与我国部分少数民族地区的治理》，北京：法律出版社，2019年，第14-24页。 10 王先明： 《近代绅士：一个封建阶层的历史命运》，天津：天津人民出版社，1997年。 11 费孝通： 《费孝通全集》，呼和浩特：内蒙古人民出版社，2009年。 12 曹正汉： 《中国上下分治的治理体制及其稳定机制》，《社会学研究》2011年第1期，第1-40，243页。 13 钱弘道、王朝霞： 《论中国法治评估的转型》，《中国社会科学》2015年第5期，第84-105页。 14 周恒： 《论互联网社交在法治社会建设中的功能》，《河北法学》2020年第4期，第103-115页。 15 钱弘道： 《余杭法治指数的实验》，《中国司法》2008年第9期，第60-65页。 16 杜维超： 《论新时代法治评估的区域化转向》，《法治现代化研究》2018年第6期，第38-54页。 17 Miller R. W.， “Might still distorts right： perils of the rule of law project，” in Flaming J. E. （ed.）， Getting to the Rule of Law， New York： New York University Press， 2011， pp. 265-292. 18 Stromseth J. E.， “Justice on the ground： can international criminal courts strengthen domestic rule of law in post-conflict societies？” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law，Vol. 1 （2009）， pp. 87-97. 19 周少华： 《刑事案件的差异化判决及其合理性》，《中国法学》2019年第4期，第145-164页。 20 陈福平： 《强市场中的“弱参与”：一个公民社会的考察路径》，《社会学研究》2009年第3期，第89-111，244页。 21 伍德志： 《文盲、法盲与司法权威的社会效力范围变迁》，《法学家》2019年第3期，第13-28，190-191页。 22 卓泽渊： 《国家治理现代化的法治解读》，《现代法学》2020年第1期，第3-14页。 23 [英］亚当·斯密： 《国富论》，高格译，北京：中国华侨出版社，2018年。 24 钱弘道、窦海心： 《论信用监管》，见公丕祥编： 《新发展理念与中国法治现代化》，北京：法律出版社，2017年，第368-386页。 25 陈广胜： 《走向善治：中国地方政府的模式创新》，杭州：浙江大学出版社，2007年。 26 廖奕： 《法治中国道路的价值逻辑问题》，《法治研究》2019年第4期，第118-126页。
2021, Vol. 51 
