浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月23日 星期五   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2021, Vol. 51 Issue (2): 111-125    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN.33-6000/C.2019.12.163
□法学研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
中国式加重犯未遂问题研究
陈洪兵
东南大学 法学院,江苏 南京 211189
A Study on Aggravated Offense of Attempted Crime in China
Chen Hongbing
School of Law, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

全文: PDF (1288 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 主张区分加重构成与量刑规则,进而认为前者存在未遂而后者不存在未遂的观点,因与客观未遂论相冲突而不具有合理性。应该说,只要行为人主观上以侵害加重犯的保护法益为目标,客观上也对加重犯的保护法益形成了具体、现实、紧迫的危险,就应肯定加重犯未遂的成立。只要承认故意的结果加重犯概念,就难以否认结果加重犯未遂的成立;发生了加重结果而基本犯未遂的,成立结果加重犯未遂;“杀害被绑架人”以及“奸淫被拐卖的妇女”等结合犯,有成立加重犯未遂的余地;行为人主观上以数额(特别)巨大的财物为盗窃、诈骗目标,客观上也已经对数额(特别)巨大的财物造成具体、现实、紧迫的危险的,成立数额加重犯未遂,适用加重法定刑,同时适用未遂犯从轻减轻处罚规定;数人企图轮奸而未得逞的,不成立“二人以上轮奸”未遂;应区分情节“严重”与“情节”严重,不能完全排除情节加重犯成立未遂的可能性。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈洪兵
关键词 加重犯未遂结果加重犯结合犯数额加重犯    
Abstract:Aggravated crime is a crime in which aggravating circumstances (factors) and aggravating legal penalty are stipulated on the basis of essential offense in the specific provisions of criminal law. For a long time, whether there is attempted crime of the offense aggravated, how to identify it and how to choose legal punishment has been puzzling the theory of criminal law and judicial practice. According to the traditional theory and practice of criminal law in China, aggravated offense has the form of attempted crime. At the same time, the legal punishment of aggravated offense is applicable and the punishment of lighter punishment for attempted crime. However, some scholars have questioned this. They think that the aggravating crime in China should be distinguished between constitutive elements calling for heavier punishment and rules of sentencing. The former has attempted, while the latter has not, as defined in the so-called “sentencing rule theory”. In this paper, this view conflicts with the theory of the objective attempted and is biased.In fact, whether we can reasonably identify attempted offense directly affects the severity of sentence. Therefore, this paper attempts to solve the attempted problem of aggravated offense in a package, systematically and completely analyze the types of aggravated offense, and extract common rules to deal with the attempted recognition of aggravated offense, which is also the innovation of this paper.First of all, aggregated consequential offense, it is no denying on the establishment of attempted aggregated consequential offense as long as it admits the intentional aggregated consequential offense. If there is aggravating result with basic attempted offense, no matter the perpetrator is intentional or negligent, the legal punishment of aggravated offense and the punishment of lighter punishment for attempted crime is applicable. However, if there is no aggravating result for the causes beyond volition, and the basic criminal act forms a specific, realistic and urgent danger to the legal interests of the aggravated offense, and the actor has intention to the aggravating result, although the above sentencing rules are also applicable, there should be some differences in sentencing whether the basic result occurs or not. Secondly, in the case of combined offense, the attempt of a subsequent crime shall be deemed in principle as an attempt of a joint crime. The legal punishment of aggravated offense and the punishment of lighter punishment for attempted crime is then applicable. The exception is when it is difficult to adapt to crime and punishment, the basic crime and the attempted crime of the subsequent crime can be considered as combined punishment. Thirdly, there is no room for the attempted establishment of consequential aggravated offense, aggravated offense with the role (status) of “primacy” as typical and aggravated offense with multiple persons (times). Fourthly, the definitions of “serious” and “serious circumstances” cannot be confused when determining the aggravating circumstances. The latter is an objective fact, which may not succeed for the causes beyond volition. Therefore, the possibility of establishing aggravating circumstances cannot excluded. Finally, we should make a concrete analysis of the aggravated offense by amount, the object aggravated offense, the place aggravated offense, and the means aggravated offense. When the act has formed a concrete, realistic and urgent danger to the legal interests protected by the aggravated offense, the attempt of aggravated crime can be determined and the legal punishment of aggravated offense and the punishment of lighter punishment for attempted crime are applicable.To summarize, whether the attempted aggravated offense is established or not should be judged according to the objective attempt theory. As long as the perpetrator’s subjective goal is to infringe on the legal interests of the aggravated offense, and objectively also forms a concrete, realistic and urgent danger to the legal interests of the aggravated offense, the establishment of the attempted aggravated offense should be affirmed.
Key wordsoffense aggravated    attempt of crime    offense aggravated by consequence    combined offense    offense aggravated by amount   
收稿日期: 2019-12-16     
基金资助:国家社会科学基金一般项目(18BFX104);江苏省社区矫正损害修复项目研究基地专项资金资助项目;江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地项目(2015ZSJD002)
作者简介: 陈洪兵(https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3473-3475),男,东南大学法学院教授,博士生导师,法学博士,主要从事刑法解释学研;
引用本文:   
陈洪兵. 中国式加重犯未遂问题研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 51(2): 111-125. Chen Hongbing. A Study on Aggravated Offense of Attempted Crime in China. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2021, 51(2): 111-125.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN.33-6000/C.2019.12.163     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2021/V51/I2/111
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn