浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月24日 星期六   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2020, Vol. 6 Issue (6): 30-    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2020.03.194
在线优先出版论文 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
超越生产主义——探析全球农业食物体系转型进程中的锁定效应
李静松
Beyond the Productivist Paradigm: Exploring the Lock-in Effect of Institutional Innovation in the Transformation of Global Agri-food System
Li Jingsong

全文: PDF (1732 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

全球农业食物体系在二战后历经了生产主义、后生产主义及新生产主义的范式演进,在当前呈现的基本特征是:生产方式工业化、生产与供给全球化、治理模式公司化以及面向可持续的转型。来自环境、农业和食物方面的压力和紧张关系是该体系转型的重要驱动力。然而,主流制度系统产生的锁定效应却在很大程度上制约了该体系对困境的突破能力,致使转型始终未能超越生产主义。从该体系相关的七个主要问题被制度系统锁定的路径及其结构性根源中能够发现,依靠当前主流制度系统自身的调适难以从根本上解决问题,超越生产主义、化解制度系统锁定效应的关键是在认知反思的基础上确保“实践—制度”的有效对话。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李静松
Abstract

The paradigms of productivism, post-productivism, and neo-productivism dominated the global agri-food system in turn since 1945, and the current system is still in the making with the trends of industrialization, globalization, corporatization, and transition towards sustainability. For a long time, the impacts the system generated on the environmental, agrarian, and food domains unavoidably lead to the following seven key issues: (1) The contemporary mode of agricultural production is continuously generating environmental impacts, instead of eliminating them; (2) The process of putting the ideology of sustainability into practice is slow and less effective; (3) Although confronting pressures, agriculture is still profoundly influenced by the productivist paradigm; (4) As the modern agri-food sector can hardly be independent of the distant market and the global supply chain, the space for smallholder farmers’ in this sector has been massively narrowed down; (5) The ″food from nowhere″ regime has either apparent or potential impacts on food safety; (6) The quality turn in food consumption has offered market opportunities, and possibly develops new profit space for corporations; however, it could not guarantee food access for all consumers; (7) The privatization of food security is aggravating the vulnerability of agricultural production and the food supply system. The impacts generated from the above issues have weakened the legitimacy of the current system and have also been the driving forces for transformation. However, the lock-in effects generated by the mainstream institutional system have constrained the capability of the system in problem-solving; as a result, the productivist paradigm still dominates the agri-food sector. This research focuses on the lock-in effects concerning the seven issues alongside regime change in the agri-food system, and analyses how the ″lock-in″ happened and what the structural causes were. This research has discussed three lock-in trajectories identified during the transformation, which are: (1) The problem/conflict has become deepened in the process of change, such as agrarian and food security issues; (2)The alternative strategy for problem-solving has been limited or narrowly interpreted, such as environmental issues; (3) The alternative strategy has been conventionalized in terms of its core value and means when incorporated into the mainstream institutional system, such as food safety issues; (4) Based on lessons from the past, we cannot merely rely on systemic adjustment to the systemic problems; as this could even accomplish the very opposite. The evolving process of ″productivist - post-productivist -neo-productivist″ systems shows that the transformation has not successfully tackled the problems encountered at different stages, while deepening the structural conflicts. The existence of the lock-in effects is the consequence of institutional path dependency under neoliberal discourses, which sets up obstacles for system innovation. Given the fact that the current agri-food system is at a crossroads, to break through the lock-in effects and loosen the system for innovation, it is necessary to deepen the understanding of the agri-food system in a reflexive manner, provide protected space for problem solving-oriented novel practices, and ensure useful feedback from niche-regime interactions.

    
引用本文:   
李静松. 超越生产主义——探析全球农业食物体系转型进程中的锁定效应[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2020, 6(6): 30-. Li Jingsong. Beyond the Productivist Paradigm: Exploring the Lock-in Effect of Institutional Innovation in the Transformation of Global Agri-food System. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2020, 6(6): 30-.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2020.03.194      或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2020/V6/I6/30
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn