浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月21日 星期三   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
主题栏目:休闲文化研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
论列宁、毛泽东社会主义文艺政策之特色——基于社会调查的视角
石然
Features of the Socialist Literature-and-Art Policies of Lenin and Mao Zedong: A Social Investigation
Shi Ran

全文: PDF (1839 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

社会的审美文化建构作为人类社会发展的题中应有之义,必然合乎普遍性与多样性统一的发展规律。文化政策特别是文艺政策是当代审美文化建构的基本方式。社会调查是马克思主义政党形成路线、方针、政策的重要基础,文艺政策同样需要建立在通过社会调查以取得对国情的准确理解的基础之上。列宁从生产实践的角度考察了苏俄的国情,制定了“包容吸收”的建构策略;社会调查是毛泽东最为强调的研究方式,他得出了与列宁有差异的结论,制定了“破旧立新”的建构策略。即使同样是社会主义国家的审美文化建构,每个民族也会有自己的特点。列宁和毛泽东的社会调查研究及其政策实践启示我们:文艺政策应在遵循普遍规律的同时凸显本土特色,力求形成中国特色美学风格;文艺政策应准确把握文艺意识形态属性的正当性及其适用范围;注意调查者主观认知的影响。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
石然
Abstract

The construction of aesthetic culture, owing to its significance for the development of the human society, is inevitably consistent with the law of the unity of universality and diversity. Basically speaking, the construction of aesthetic culture in a society depends on the contradictory movement of the production mode of material goods, while following the development law of culture and the inevitable logic of aesthetics. Meanwhile, modes of production and life, cultural traditions, daily habits, structures of feelings and values vary widely from nation to nation. Only when aesthetic culture is based on local conditions, will it achieve its effectiveness and sustainable stability. In the contemporary society, cultural policy, especially literature and art policies, is a basic means of aesthetic culture construction. Social investigation is the key foundation on which the Marxist political Party forms its route, guideline and policy. On the basis of plenty of social investigation, Lenin and Mao Zedong obtained an accurate understanding of their respective national conditions and drew a set of blueprints of aesthetic culture, namely literature-and-art policies, suitable for their own countries. Lenin focused on the mode of production, investigated the social structure and cultural conditions of the Soviet Russia and ultimately formulated the literature-and-art policy of ″Inclusive Absorption″. Mao Zedong focused on field work, investigated China's social classes, especially the peasant class, and developed the literature-and-art policy of ″Destroying the Old, Establishing the New″. Faced with similar national conditions, Lenin and Mao Zedong made policies with a huge difference, which shed light on Chinese Socialist Construction. To start with, the construction of aesthetic culture, also called the literature-and-art policy, should follow the universal rule on the one hand, while it should highlight the local characteristics on the other hand. China needed to develop an aesthetic style with its own characteristics. The fact that New China grew out of a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society and the Soviet Russia from an imperialist society is the key factor leading to different policies made by Lenin and Mao Zedong. Furthermore, it is significant to properly handle the dialectical relation between the legitimacy and the proper use of literary ideology when making literature-and-art policies. In the post-colonial context, the core focus of contemporary China is an accurate understanding and appropriate treatment of the nature of literary ideology. In this era featured with culture-economy integration, great importance needs to be attached to the emphasis on the legitimacy of literary ideology and its proper use. Finally, subjective perception has certain influence on objective investigation. Lenin and Mao Zedong, as pure Marxists, shared a similar worldview and methodology. However, there is nuance slight difference: Lenin emphasized the process of natural history while Mao Zedong proposed individual endeavors. The subtle differences in subjective perception led to their different attitudes towards similar findings and the formation of distinctive policies.

    
引用本文:   
石然. 论列宁、毛泽东社会主义文艺政策之特色——基于社会调查的视角[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2019, 5(3): 172-. Shi Ran. Features of the Socialist Literature-and-Art Policies of Lenin and Mao Zedong: A Social Investigation. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2019, 5(3): 172-.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2019/V5/I3/172
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn