浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月29日 星期四   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2014, Vol. 44 Issue (6): 75-84    DOI:
栏目 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
网络服务提供者的规制模式
朱新力 魏小雨
The Regulatory System of Internet Service Providers
Zhu Xinli Wei Xiaoyu

全文: PDF (1391 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)       背景资料
摘要 

腾讯诉奇虎不正当竞争纠纷案作为互联网的“公地悲剧”事件,暗示了依据网络服务提供者的特点创新发展其规制模式十分必要。对网络服务提供者的规制主要涉及政府、行业协会、社会公众三类主体。现行的以政府为绝对主导、其他主体予以配合的自上而下的规制模式已产生了一系列问题,包括缺乏多方利害关系人的沟通协商、制定法本身存在缺陷、行业协会无法发挥作用、社会公众参与不足等。基于“多中心治理”等理论,应构建以平等信任、开放兼容、多向互动为特点的多中心协同规制网络服务提供者模式:政府放权给社会自组织进行公私协作;行业协会通过参与规制以发展个体需求并承担社会责任;拓宽社会公众的参与渠道,利用制度性安排与网络服务平台达到信息公开互通。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
朱新力 魏小雨
关键词 网络服务提供者政府规制社会自组织多中心治理行业协会社会公众    
Abstract

The Tencent Inc.’s lawsuit against Qihoo 360 Technology Co. Ltd. for unfair competition is a typical network event which epitomizes “the tragedy of the commons.” In the verdict, the court cited unprecedentedly the related provisions both issued by the government and the guild, indicating the function of major participants, especially those of social self-organization, on the regulation system of Internet service providers, based on whose characters, it is therefore necessary to innovate and develop its regulation system. The regulation on Internet service providers involves three major participants: the government, the public and Internet service providers including their guild. Currently in China, the Internet service providers are regulated from top to bottom, i.e., the government plays the role of the leader, the dominator and the supervisor while the other participants the follower. With the evolution of its definition and function as well as innovation in regulatory means, problems of the mode arise. The government relies heavily on self-judgment in decision-making, lacking in mutual communication, demonstration and negotiation with other main parts due to its complete dominance in the regulation model. However, Internet service provision deals with interest appeals from multiple subjects, which deserve equal opportunity to express their value standards. In the meantime, defects exist in the statute law on which the government is dependent, such as the absence of market incentive and self-regulation, the weak legal basis for the others in the controlling and the incoordination of the standard system. In addition, the guild lacks autonomy resulting from the strict control of the government and its strong directivity in member selection fails to promote self-development. As the pact for self-discipline in the industry, the “soft law” also has problems in quantity, operability and deterrent force. The public has little access to partake and the public rules are unorganized and dispersed. Besides, the value standard of public participation is affected by various factors, thus requiring measures to adjust personal preference developed in unreasonable conditions so as to promote scientific rationality. To solve the problems in the current pattern, we should set up a “Polycentric Governance” theory based Internet service providers system, which is stipulated by multicenter collaboratively and characterized by mutual trust, openness, compatibility and interactivity. As the key function shifts, the government should impel other participants to intervene in the regulation, keep a harmonious relationship among principal parts and actively leave the right to social self-organization. The guild serves as the bridge between the government and the public and develops itself by coordination and collaboration, thus improving the two-way communication between the internal Internet service providers and the external Internet users. Under the premise of more approaches to participate, the public gains full access to information and exchanges with other major bodies using the institutional arrangement and Internet service platform, which renders the suggestions more scientific and feasible. The new regulation system is in accordance with not only the tendency of social governance but also the features and requirements of the stipulated. It continuously exerts positive influences on the participants, which boosts the overall development of the industry chain and considerably increases the effectiveness of the regulation.

Key wordsInternet service provider    government regulation    social self-organization    polycentric governance    the guild    the public   
    
引用本文:   
朱新力 魏小雨. 网络服务提供者的规制模式[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2014, 44(6): 75-84. Zhu Xinli Wei Xiaoyu. The Regulatory System of Internet Service Providers. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2014, 44(6): 75-84.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2014/V44/I6/75
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn