浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年6月23日 星期一   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2013, Vol. 43 Issue (3): 134-143    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2013.01.071
栏目 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
从道德抉择到德行合一----新闻传播中的道德伦理抉择模式比较研究
邱戈
Moral Development:A Comparative Study of the Moral Decision Models in Journalism
Qiu Ge

全文: PDF (4483 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

当代人面对越来越多的伦理观和德目表,但在行动时却往往盲目无措,一些传播与媒介伦理研究者推荐了“波特图式”和“博克模式”等实用的伦理推理模式,这些希望确定行为理由的推理模式实际上并不能为人们的行为提供有说服力的伦理依据。那什么是我们行动时可以依靠的东西?是随处可感的道德感吗?然而关于道德感的基因、神经生物和生物进化方面最新的科学研究明显打击了我们对道德感神话般的期待。不过,这类研究也提供了一些线索:行为的道德依据或者说道德感形成也许必须要从历史和社会实践的角度来探究,这样,美德伦理的研究传统进入了我们的视野。伦理学家麦金太尔提出的追寻美德的办法不仅仅是一种道德推理和判断的模型,还把我们引向一条德行合一的道德探询之路。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
邱戈
关键词 新闻传播伦理模型波特图式博克模式道德感美德伦理道德发展    
Abstract

The moral confusion in contemporary journalism sometimes makes people feel at a loss about ethical norms. Then what are the essential moral principles in our daily life? And how to deal with the ethical dilemmas in communication? Let us turn to ethical theories or models for the right moral judgment and ethical conduct.  Researchers in media ethics have introduced some practical moral modes, including the ″Potter Box″ and the ″Bok Model,″ as possible criteria of conduct. ″Potter Box″ comprises four main steps: first, definition/facts; second, values (the merits of different values); third, principles (the code of ethics applicable to the situation); and fourth, loyalties (loyalty to whom?). The core of this moral reasoning model is to whom and to what values and moral principles ones loyalty should deliver. ″Bok Model″ consists of three steps: first, to consult ones own conscience; second, to find alternative ways to avoid ethical conflicts, and third, to ask the views of the people involved. This mode is discussionoriented. The value of these two modes lies in cultivating acceptable behavior through constant reflection and dialogue. However, their major defect consists in their neglect of moral content in the decisionmaking process, which leads to the difficulty of knowing where the real moral basis is and the eventual lack of sufficient moral justification for behavior due to endless disputes. Therefore, we need to pursue the real moral basis. Is there any kind of moral intuition based in the human brain guiding us so that we dont need to think about it when we act? Though the answer offered by neurobiology about moral sense is elusive, it provides us with new insights that moral values have a definite neurological basis. That is to say, facts and experiences in social ethics and human morality are indeed translated into physical storage in the human brain in biological and genetic senses. Finally, the discussion of virtue ethics has led us to propose the ″Moral Inquiry Model of Practice, Life and Tradition (MIMPLT).″ In the course of exploration, we raised the following three questions: First, what kind of social practice are we engaged in? Second, what kind of life shall we lead? Third, what common traditional interests do we pursue? Those virtues that can help us find the best answers are what we are after. The ″Pursuit of Virtue″ of MIMPLT can help us make decisions in general ethical choices, and offers us an open inquiry system with rich moral content as well. The analysis and comparison of the same case shows that MIMPLT can not only help us make a right decision but also let us know the reasons why we should make such a decision. With this model in mind, peoples morality will be truly developed. This paper concludes that the aim of human moral development is to connect virtue with action and that the establishment of reliable moral principles is a dynamic inquiry process involving the individual, the history and the society.

Key wordsjournalism    model of ethics    Potter Box    Bok Model    moral sense    virtue ethics    moral development   
    
引用本文:   
邱戈. 从道德抉择到德行合一----新闻传播中的道德伦理抉择模式比较研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2013, 43(3): 134-143. Qiu Ge. Moral Development:A Comparative Study of the Moral Decision Models in Journalism. , 2013, 43(3): 134-143.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2013.01.071     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2013/V43/I3/134
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn