浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年6月9日 星期一   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2012, Vol. 42 Issue (4): 201-216    DOI:
栏目 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
中西方学术期刊审稿制度比较研究
尹玉吉
A Comparative Study on Peer Reviewing System of Academic Periodicals between China and the West
Yin Yuji

全文: PDF (1354 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

审稿攸关学术和学术期刊的存亡。学术期刊和同行审稿制度首先产生于西方|我国清代中期《吴医汇讲》的性质属于传统图书,不是学术期刊,其审稿性质不具有真正意义同行审稿的性质|中国真正的学术期刊的起点是1815年的《察世俗每月统记传》。由于近代中国学术期刊主要由传教士创办,以传教为主,同时普及、介绍西方文化和科学,所以审稿以著、审、编''三位一体''为主要特点,无须同行审稿|解放前中国学术期刊还处在探索期,加之社会动荡不已,无法实行同行审稿制度|解放后中国学术期刊实行了计划经济色彩很浓的''三审制'',其渊源是列宁和毛泽东战争年代的出版思想。中西方学术期刊审稿的比较研究表明,''三审制''与同行审稿制度均有利弊,但同行审稿制度利大于弊,''三审制''弊大于利。因此,中国学术期刊应当积极吸收、借鉴现代国际社会通行的同行审稿制度,努力实现学术期刊审稿制度的国际化。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 学术期刊同行审稿''三审制''《学者杂志》《哲学汇刊》《吴医汇讲》    
Abstract

Peer reviewing is of vital importance to the academics and academic periodicals.The emergency of academic periodicals should have the following four prerequisites: firstly,the feudal system is weak and is almost been dispelled|the technology is relatively advanced and the system of attracting and encouraging academic research is basically formed|secondly,academic research has already been a stable occupation which the academics can live by|thirdly,the publication is not accidental but regular|fourthly,there is a party of editors engaging in the publication of academic periodicals.The four prerequisites were initially developed and matured in the west.The first four academic periodicals in the west were: Heuristic Discussion Monthly in Germany,1663, Scholar’s Journal in January,1665, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society in March,1665, Oxford Communique in England,1665.It is generally believed that Scholar Journal is the first genuinely academic periodical in the world because it adopted ''Journal'' as its name.The system of peer reviewing also first appeared in the west.There are two reasons: one is that a quantity of academic periodicals have already existed|the other is that the system of peer reviewing in patent application which the system of peer reviewing in academic periodicals is based on and referred to has existed in the west for a long time. Wuyi Huijiang in the middle period of Qing Dynasty,by its nature,is a traditional book.The reviewing system of Wuyi Huijiangwas not the same as the peer reviewing in real sense. Chinese Monthly Magazine ,which was started by Morrison in 1815 and then managed by Miline and Medhurst (both of the three were Scorch missionaries),is an academic periodical.The following four reasons contribute to its nature: firstly,the editor,Marrison,was a great scholar.It was easy for him to edit such an academic magazine|secondly,Medhurst,the successor to Marrison,believeed that ''it mainly elaborates diversified theories''|thirdly,it took ''elucidating Christian doctrines as a core''fourthly,it publicized a range of articles on science and culture apart from elucidating some doctrines.Chinese Modern Academic Periodical is characterized by the trinity of writing,examining and compiling.Because most of the articles were those translated from the western,there was no need to peer review the introductive scientific knowledge.Later,academic periodicals in China were in a turbulent stage,having no time to carry out peer reviewing.A system of ''triple reviewing'' was implemented in China after liberation,which had the characteristics of planned economy and ''internal system''.It was originated from the publication thoughts proposed by Lenin and Chairman Mao Zedong in the wartime. A comparative study on peer reviewing systems of academic periodicals between China and the West shows that peer reviewing is far superior to triple reviewing.China should make great efforts to reform the current triple reviewing system,and to advance the internationalization of academic periodicals,that is,writer internationalization,peer reviewing internationalization and reader internationalization.

Key wordsacademic periodicals    a comparative study of China and the West    peer review    triple reviewing    Scholar's Journal    Philosophical Transactions    Wuyi Huijiang   
    
引用本文:   
尹玉吉. 中西方学术期刊审稿制度比较研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2012, 42(4): 201-216. Yin Yuji. A Comparative Study on Peer Reviewing System of Academic Periodicals between China and the West. , 2012, 42(4): 201-216.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2012/V42/I4/201
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn