浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月28日 星期三   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2009, Vol. 39 Issue (6): 81-    DOI:
栏目 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
刑事审判书面印证的负效应
The Negative Effects of Verification by Overlapping Written Evidence in Criminal Trial

全文: PDF (978 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
林劲松
Abstract

The mode of adjudication based on files causes verification by overlapping written evidence in criminal trial . Verification has the function to find out the truth of a case . In the meanwhile,it has the effect of increasing errors on adjudication . As verification by overlapping written evidence infracts the rule which all evidence of a case shall only be overlapped after each piece of evidence has been examined independently,the effect of increasing errors on adjudication is difficult toavoid .Verification byoverlapping written evidencecan also bringabout theeffect of reverse encouragement that investigation organs are promptedor encouraged to makefalsefiles or records .At present,it is impossible to abandon verification by overlapping written evidence in a short period . The ways to decrease these negative effects lie in raising judges'consciousness and ability to examine each piece of evidence singly,and establishing the system of testifying in court on doubtful points,the priority of examining testimony in court,and the system of discovery of evidence before trial.

    
引用本文:   
林劲松. 刑事审判书面印证的负效应[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2009, 39(6): 81-.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2009/V39/I6/81
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn