Abstract：Against the backdrop of exchanges and mutual learning among Buddhist civilizations, Buddhist textual research has increasingly been based on comparative research on parallel texts representing different schools of Buddhism and preserved in various languages, including Pāli, Chinese, Sanskrit, Tibetan, and others. The Satipa??hāna Sutta (or Sm?tyupasthāna Sūtra in Sanskrit) is an important parallel text that has always been regarded as one of the most important meditation manuals. Meditation techniques taught by popular meditation masters from different lineages today are normally developed based on this scripture. Both the Satipa??hāna Sutta, the 10th discourse of the Majjhima Nikāya in Theravada Tipitaka, and the Sm?tyupasthāna Sūtra, the 98th discourse of the Madhyama ?gama in Chinese Tripitaka, focus on Satipa??hāna practice, but there are some differences in their contents. However, scholars pay insufficient attention to these differences, especially the unique meditation techniques in the Chinese version translated by Sa?ghadeva from the Sarvāstivāda school in 397. This is worth analyzing from the perspective of the historical context of the translation and the cultural heritage of Chinese translator Devadatta.The difference between the Pāli and Chinese versions mainly lies in the mindfulness of the body. Besides, if we investigate the prevalent meditation techniques taught by the main meditation lineages in modern society, they also differ in their choice of meditation subjects for the mindfulness of the body. Before the mindfulness of the body, the Chinese Sm?tyupasthāna Sūtra first simplified the conditions to attract more practitioners, for example, it does not impose specific requirements on the place, posture, etc. It also adjusts the order of meditation techniques to make them more in line with the progressive model of the Satipa??hāna practice. The Pāli Satipa??hāna Sutta recorded six meditation techniques for the mindfulness of the body, while the Chinese version added eight extra meditation techniques, such as the four jhanas and the perception of light (āloka-sa??ā), and replaced the reflections of the four elements of the body with the reflection of six elements. From the perspective of meditation techniques, the adjustments in the Chinese version are not appropriate. Strictly speaking, the fourth jhānas are an internal realization attainable through the practice of mindfulness, whereas the internal space element among the six elements of the body has no arising or passing away and is therefore unsuitable as an object of meditation. However, after studying the Theravada and Mahayana Buddhist scriptures, we find that there are already many precedents for listing the four jhanas and other items—which appear in excess in the Chinese translation—as methods of meditation, and such scriptures are not few in number.The Chinese Sm?tyupasthāna Sūtra should be the result of assimilating other practice techniques under the title of Satipa??hāna. As an important meditation guidebook, the Chinese Sm?tyupasthāna Sūtra takes into account the integrity and balance of meditation subjects and thus absorbs important meditation techniques mentioned in other scriptures, especially those prevalent in China at that time. In addition, borrowing good meditation techniques from other scriptures to expand the content is closely related to the characteristics of the dissemination and development of early Chinese Buddhism. For example, in early Chinese Buddhism, the four jhanas were often regarded as a method of meditation, and deep meditation could help to obtain supernatural power (abhi??ā). In the early days of Buddhism’s introduction to China, supernatural power was an important tool for attracting new followers and won support from rulers. Moreover, the society at that time also attached great importance to supernatural talents. During the Wei and Jin dynasties when Sa?ghadeva translated the Sm?tyupasthāna Sūtra into Chinese, the practice of immortals, holy people, and the idea of the ultimate human were prevalent, and in Buddhism, we could only find the idea of abhi??ā to meet the needs of the mainstream. Finally, although the Sm?tyupasthāna Sūtra provides a wealth of meditation subjects and techniques, practitioners generally do not need to practice the techniques mentioned in this scripture one by one, but may choose one or freely combine several ones according to their capacities and practice habits
雷晓丽. 南北传佛教藏经中的《念处经》对比研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2026, 56(9): 174-184.
Lei Xiaoli. A Comparative Study on the Satipa??hāna Sutta in Pāli and Chinese Canon: Centered on the Mindfulness of the Body. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2026, 56(9): 174-184.
1 道宣：《续高僧传》，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第50册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年。 2 増永霊鳳：「原始仏教に於ける四念處の研究」，『駒沢大學仏教學會年報』1935年第6期，131-150頁。 3 田中教照：「有部の四念住について」，『印度學佛教學研究』1983年31巻2号，499-503頁。 4 ターナヴットービック：「ニカーヤにおける修行道の相互関係—四念処と七覚支および八聖道との比較研究」，『インド哲學仏教學研究』1998年第5期，3-17頁。 5 哈磊：《四念处研究》，成都：巴蜀书社，2006年。 6 德］无著比丘（Bhikkhu Analayo）：《念住：通往证悟的直接之道》，香光书乡编译组译，嘉义：香光书乡出版社，2013年。 7 温宗堃：《汉、巴〈念处经〉四念处禅修方法同异之研究》，见华严莲社、赵氏慈孝大专学生佛学奖学金会编：《大专学生佛学论文集》（十），台北：财团法人台北市华严莲社，2000年，第317-348页。 8 释一如等：《三藏法数》，杭州：浙江古籍出版社，1991年。 9 印］五百大阿罗汉等：《阿毘达磨大毗婆沙论》，玄奘译，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第27册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年。 10 印］觉音：《清净道论》，叶均译，北京：中国佛教文化研究所，1995年。 11 Nyanaponika Thera， “Though the lotus posture with fully crossed legs is preferable， it is not of absolute necessity，” in The Heart of Buddhist Meditation： A Handbook of Mental Training Based on the Buddha’s Way of Mindfulness with an Anthology of Relevant Texts Translated from the Pali and Sanskrit， Kandy： Buddhist Publication Society， 1996. 12 僧伽提婆译：《中阿含因品念处经第二》，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第1册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年，第582-584页。 13 通妙译：《尸利阿荼》，见元亨寺汉译南传大藏经编译委员会编译：《汉译南传大藏经》相应部五，高雄：元亨寺妙林出版社，1996年，第368-370页。 14 通妙译：《摩那提那》，见元亨寺汉译南传大藏经编译委员会编译：《汉译南传大藏经》相应部五，高雄：元亨寺妙林出版社，1996年，第370-371页。 15 释印顺：《原始佛教圣典之集成》，北京：中华书局，2011年。 16 印］龙树：《大智度论》，鸠摩罗什译，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第25册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年。 17 鸠摩罗什译：《大般若波罗蜜多经》，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第8册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年。 18 《身行念经》，见元亨寺汉译南传大藏经编译委员会编译：《南传大藏经》中部第119经，高雄：元亨寺妙林出版社，1996年，第73-88页。 19 安世高译：《佛说大安般守意经》，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第15册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年，第163-173页。 20 求那跋陀罗译：《杂阿含经》卷一八第494经，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第2册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年，第128-129页。 21 佛陀跋陀罗译：《达摩多罗禅经》，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第15册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年，第300-325页。 22 慧皎：《高僧传》，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第50册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年。 23 陈平、宣方：《佛教的神通观：以虚云法师为例》，《佛教文化》2010年第1期，第41-49页。 24 严耀中：《论六朝的神通禅》，《中国哲学史》1999年第2期，第73-79页。 25 《无碍解道》，见元亨寺汉译南传大藏经编译委员会编译：《南传大藏经》小部经典十九，高雄：元亨寺妙林出版社，1996年。 26 《睡意经》，见元亨寺汉译南传大藏经编译委员会编译：《南传大藏经》增支部经典四，高雄：元亨寺妙林出版社，1996年，第280-284页。 27 Sayadaw U Silananda， The Four Foundations of Mindfulness， https：//anumodana.org/documentos/The_Four_Foundations_of_Mindfulness_Sayadaw_Silananda.pdf， 2024-12-12. 28 求那跋陀罗译：《杂阿含经》，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第2册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年，第195-196页。 29 曼陀罗仙、僧伽婆罗译：《大乘宝云经》，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第16册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年，第265-272页。 30 舍利子：《阿毘达磨集异门足论》，玄奘译，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第26册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年，第367-370页。 31 僧伽提婆译：《中阿含长寿王品天经第二》，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第1册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年，第539-540页。 32 僧伽提婆译：《中阿含长寿王品念身经第十》，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第1册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年，第554-557页。 33 僧伽提婆译：《中阿含根本分别品分别六界经第一》，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第1册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年，第690-692页。 34 瞿沙：《阿毗昙甘露味论》卷下，见［日］高楠顺次郎等编：《大正新修大藏经》第28册，东京：大藏出版株式会社，1988年，第974-979页。 35 印顺：《说一切有部为主的论书与论师之研究》，北京：中华书局，2011年。 36 Hamilton S.， Identity and Experience： The Constitution of the Human Being According to Early Buddhism， London： Luzac Oriental， 1996. 37 Bronkhorst J.， The Two Traditions of Meditation in Ancient India， Delhi： Motilal Banarsidass， 2000. 38 关则富：《初期佛教之四念处》，《正观杂志》2001年第17期，第153-209页。 39 Scott R. M.， Nirvana for Sale： Buddhism， Wealth， and the Dhammakāya Temple in Contemporary Thailand， New York： State University of New York Press， 2009. 40 Chah A.， A Still Forest Pool： The Insight Meditation of Achaan Chah， ed. by Kornfield J. & Breiter P.， Wheaton： Theosophical Publishing House， 1985. 41 Jittasubho T.， To One That Feels， trans. by Puntarigvivat T. & Niirodho B.， Bangkok： Luangpor Teean Foundation， 2005.
2026, Vol. 56 
