浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)
 
   2025年5月17日 星期六   首页 |  期刊介绍 |  编委会 |  投稿指南 |  信息服务 |  期刊订阅 |  联系我们 |  预印本过刊 |  浙江省高校学报研究会栏目 |  留言板 |  English Version
浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)  2023, Vol. 53 Issue (4): 38-48    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2022.10.101
主题栏目:宋学与宋韵文化研究 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
新巧之外:《东莱标注三苏文集》与朱熹、吕祖谦的文理之争
慈波
浙江师范大学 江南文化研究中心,浙江 金华 321004
Not Just So Exquisite: Disputes over Literature and Neo-Confucianism Between Zhu Xi and Lü Zuqian via Annotations of Sansu’s Collected Works Edited by Lü Zuqian
Ci Bo
Center for Jiangnan Culture Studies, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China

全文: PDF (868 KB)   RICH HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 吕祖谦任太学博士期间,对三苏论体文进行细致绎读而编选《东莱标注三苏文集》。这一文章选本创造性地使用标抹符号以揭明主旨、划分段落、勾勒大意,是评点第一书《古文关键》的形态滥觞。以三苏文章为中心,朱熹与程洵、汪应辰、芮烨、吕祖谦等人展开激烈争论,他秉持排他性道学立场,抨击苏氏学术驳杂、政治摇摆、人品浮华,却也无法忽视苏轼作为“科举之宗”的文章史地位存在。吕祖谦则坚持文理会融的思想,力图弥合性理与文章之间的罅隙。吕祖谦通过标注三苏论体文,推扬其积极修辞效用,抉发其格法意义,推动了科场论体文写作的规范与定型。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
慈波
关键词 《东莱标注三苏文集》苏轼朱熹吕祖谦道学文理会融    
Abstract:As a typical example of the “Song type culture”, Su Shi was highly valued in the Southern Song Dynasty. His imperial examination texts were so different that they had the effect of sensationalizing the audience. Therefore, the anthology of Sansu’s proses became popular, and Lü Zuqian even praised him as “the master of imperial examinations”. Lü Zuqian himself was a famous scholar in the field of imperial examination and was extremely fascinated by Su’s writing. He once tried to imitate and create proses on the style of Su Shi, proses compiled with the title Donglai Boyi. During his tenure as a supervisor of the imperial college, Lü Zuqian followed the method of annotating readings handed down by his family to analyze Sansu’s argumentative articles one by one. He creatively applied marks and symbols to quickly grasp the article structure by revealing the general idea, to understand the theme of the argumentative prose, and compiled the book Annotations of Sansu’s Collected Works. Although the form of this book is not as perfect as The Key to Ancient Chinese Prose, it is a preliminary attempt in the history of anthology review.Although Zhu Xi also found the value of Su Shi’s proses from the perspective of the imperial examination, he was more alert to the grand occasion that those proses would sweep the world. In view of the fact that Su’s writings were popular and widely accepted, Zhu Xi was worried that Su’s scholarship would occupy the ideological territory by virtue of the influence of proses and imperial examinations, which would degrade the learning of Zhou Dunyi and the Cheng brothers he advocated. For the sake of his strong appeal to respect Taoism, he rejected Su’s works as “exquisite”, belittled Su Shi’s proses as a decaying link in the evolution of the Northern Song literature, regarded Su’s scholarship as an ideological heresy other than Neo-Confucianism, and completely ignored the independence and essence of literature and Taoism respectively. This is undoubtedly a selective disregard of the value and significance of prose itself, so it is difficult to gain recognition in the debate with Cheng Xun, Wang Yingchen, Rui Ye, Lü Zuqian and other scholar bureaucrats. Lü Zuqian’s thought of reconciling literature with Neo-Confucianism reflects a strong eclecticism. In the early Southern Song Dynasty, when “Xin Xue” became forbidden, and the competitive landscape of “Luo Xue”, “Shu Xue” and “Xin Xue” in the Northern Song Dynasty changed into a situation in which “Cheng Xue” and “Su Xue” became increasingly popular. Lü Zuqian focused on bridging the gaps in the theories of various schools, so as to improve the relationship between literature and Neo-Confucianism.“Exquisite” as a formal feature of prose, is a positive rhetorical behavior that mobilizes all positive techniques in order to improve the effect of lexical expression. Literary writing needs to be refurbished, so as to be able to make various changes and bring forth new ideas. Zhu Xi judged literary expression based on the needs of Taoism and rejected the rhetorical behavior of paying attention to the skills of writing. This is the prejudice of the Taoists who value Taoism over writing. Lü Zuqian, under the guidance of the concept of studying Su Shi and with the help of Annotations of Sansu’s Collected Works, carefully analyzed Sansu’s articles, outlined the ideas, marked key points, summarized the general ideas chapter by chapter, and incorporated the ever-changing article skills into various patterns. In this way, the annotation of the anthology has the significance of textual construction. Lü Zuqian promoted the standardization and finalization of the writing in the imperial examination field through comprehensive prose activities, such as prose imitation, anthology criticism, and method inspiration. He himself thus became a central figure in the founding period of prose theory.
Key wordsAnnotation of Sansu’s Collected Works Edited by Lü Zuqian    Su Shi    Zhu Xi    Lü Zuqian    Neo-Confucianism    reconcile literature with Neo-Confucianism   
收稿日期: 2022-10-10     
基金资助:国家社会科学基金项目(17BZW094)
作者简介: 慈波(https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2404-014X),男,浙江师范大学人文学院江南文化研究中心教授,博士生导师,主要从事中国古代文章学与宋元文学研究;
引用本文:   
慈波. 新巧之外:《东莱标注三苏文集》与朱熹、吕祖谦的文理之争[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 53(4): 38-48. Ci Bo. Not Just So Exquisite: Disputes over Literature and Neo-Confucianism Between Zhu Xi and Lü Zuqian via Annotations of Sansu’s Collected Works Edited by Lü Zuqian. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2023, 53(4): 38-48.
链接本文:  
https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2022.10.101     或     https://www.zjujournals.com/soc/CN/Y2023/V53/I4/38
发表一流的成果,传播一流的发现,提供一流的新知

浙ICP备14002560号-5
版权所有 © 2009 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)    浙ICP备05074421号
地址:杭州市天目山路148号 邮编:310028 电话:0571-88273210 88925616 E-mail:zdxb_w@zju.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn