Abstract：Derived from the Marriage Law and judicial interpretations related to adoption, China’s adoption system was developed in the Adoption Law, and has been incorporated into the Marriage and Family Book, a part of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China. In the process of improvement, the rules of the adoption system have evolved in two dimensions. One is to establish close associations with the Marriage and Family Book, and the other is to introduce the rationale of private law underlying the Civil Code. This fact urges one to change the way of interpreting the rules set out in the Chapter V “Adoption” of the Civil Code from interpreting specific articles independently to following “the principle of serving the best interests of the adoptee”. It requires rule interpretation to be conducted from triple perspectives, namely the micro system of Chapter V “Adoption”, the medium system of the Marriage and Family Book and the macro system of the Civil Code, which constitutes the basic framework for the systematic interpretation of the adoption rules.In terms of the micro system, it is of vital importance to define the scope of adoptees. In order to classify the adoptees as defined in Subparagraphs (1) and (2) of Article 1093 in the Civil Code, such factors as the types of bereaved “parents” and the willingness of parents to abandon their children are worth careful consideration. To understand the adoptees stipulated in Subparagraph (3) of Article 1093, the “unusual difficulties” should be identified in both broad and narrow terms. In a broad sense, “unusual difficulties” include situations where the parents of a minor are both persons without full capacity for civil conduct and may do serious harm to the minor. The identification of these “unusual difficulties” should be connected with the loss of capacity for guardianship.With respect to the medium system of the Marriage and Family Book, the selection of family names for minors should be examined from this perspective. Besides Article 1112 of Chapter V “Adoption” in the Civil Code, Article 1015 is also applicable to the selection of family names for adopted children. However, in the specific process of application, it is necessary to distinguish between whether the adoptive parents determine or they change the family names of their adopted children. In the case of changing the family name of an adopted child, judgement should be made on whether the selected family name is appropriate in accordance with “the principle of serving the best interests of the adoptee”, which is a necessity to realize the mutual applicability of the rules of natural and artificial consanguinity in the Marriage and Family Book.From the perspective of the macro system of the Civil Code, the core issue lies in the effectiveness of adoption and the termination of adoptive relationship. Rules of general juridical acts have limited applicability in adoption. The four forms of general juridical acts, namely “valid”, “invalid”, “validity to be determined”, and “revocable”, are simplified into valid and invalid in adoption. This is due to the last two forms, which violate “the principle of serving the best interests of the adoptee”. This should be evaluated as “invalid”. Similar to the dissolution of contract, the types of termination of adoptive relationship also include dissolution by law, agreement, and appointment. However, to satisfy the need of identity attributes of adoptive relationship and maximizing children’s interests, the causes and procedures for different types of dissolution are strictly limited. The legal effect of termination of adoptive relationship is not exactly identical to the general effect of dissolution of contract. The former has no retroactive effect, in which the related property obligations are mainly manifested as the “compensation” to adoptive parents. On the one hand, this “compensation” has the attribute of fair responsibility and, on the other hand, it also shows the meaning of “damages” according to the scope of compensation and whether the obligor or obligee of the compensation can be blamed for the termination.
朱晶晶. 《民法典》收养规则体系解释的三重视野[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 53(2): 155-168.
Zhu Jingjing. A Systematic Interpretation of Adoption Rules in the Civil Code from Triple Perspectives. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY, 2023, 53(2): 155-168.
2023, Vol. 53 
