Please wait a minute...
Chinese Journal of Engineering Design  2017, Vol. 24 Issue (2): 134-140    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2017.02.002
    
Research on a two-stage iterative model of coupling design task with single input and multiple output
TIAN Qi-hua, WANG Tao, DU Yi-xian, MEI Yue-yuan
College of Mechanical and Power Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
Download: HTML     PDF(1071KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

In the process of product development, there is a complex information-dependent relation between coupling design tasks with single input and multiple output. Because of the large amount of executed tasks and transmitted information, the complicated relationship between these tasks is hard to be sorted out by using the single-stage task execution method, which may lead to problems such as the unreasonable allocation of tasks in the process of task execution, excessive iteration rework times between tasks and too long product development cycle. To solve these problems, an information processing strategy for the task iteration was put forward, and a two-stage iteration model and the mathematical model of calculating task execution time were built based on the deep analysis of a single-stage iteration model for the coupling design task with single input and multiple output. The best two-stage task allocation scheme was obtained by working out this mathematical model. The effectiveness of this method was proved through the example of an engine development project. The results showed that the iterative execution time of tasks was shorter than single-stage by using the two-stage iteration model and the shortest iterative execution time of the two-stage iteration model could be obtained by reasonably assigning tasks into two phases. The method selects the appropriate task iterative model according to the different information relations between tasks, which can effectively shorten the product development cycle and provide some theoretical reference for product designers to choose reasonable task execution way in the process of product development.



Key wordssingle input and multiple output      coupling design      task allocation scheme      two-stage iterative model     
Received: 16 September 2016      Published: 28 April 2017
CLC:  TB472  
  TH122  
Cite this article:

TIAN Qi-hua, WANG Tao, DU Yi-xian, MEI Yue-yuan. Research on a two-stage iterative model of coupling design task with single input and multiple output. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2017, 24(2): 134-140.

URL:

https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2017.02.002     OR     https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/Y2017/V24/I2/134


单输入多输出耦合设计任务二阶段迭代模型研究

产品开发过程中单输入多输出耦合设计任务间存在复杂的信息依赖关系。采用单阶段方法的任务执行方式时,因所执行的任务数量多并且需传递的信息量大,致使任务间存在的复杂信息关系难以被理清,从而导致任务执行过程中的方案分配不够合理,任务间的迭代返工次数过多,产品开发周期过长。针对这些问题,在深入分析单输入多输出耦合设计任务单阶段迭代模型的基础上,提出了一种任务迭代过程中的信息处理策略,并构建了一种单输入多输出耦合设计任务的二阶段迭代模型及其求解执行时间的数学模型。应用该数学模型,可以计算得到最佳二阶段设计任务分配方案。以某发动机开发项目为例,进行了该方法的应用分析。研究表明,采取二阶段迭代模型,任务迭代执行时间比单阶段短,并且通过合理分配在1,2两个阶段执行的任务,能够获得最短的二阶段任务迭代执行时间。该方法根据任务间不同的信息关系选择合适的任务迭代模型,能够有效缩短产品开发周期,可为产品设计人员在产品开发过程中选择合理的任务执行方式提供一定的理论参考。


关键词: 单输入多输出,  耦合设计,  任务分配方案,  二阶段迭代模型 
[[1]]   张广军, 唐敦兵, 戴胜. 基于公理化设计矩阵与设计结构矩阵集成的研究[J]. 机械设计与研究,2008, 24(5): 15-18. ZHANG Guang-jun, TANG Dun-bing, DAI Sheng. Product design based on the co-evolution of axiomatic design matrix and design structure matrix[J]. Machine Design & Research,2008,24(5): 15-18.
[[2]]   MOUSTAFA E,HESHAM K A. A dynamic programming algorithm for days-off scheduling with sequence dependent labor costs[J]. Journal of Scheduling,2008,11(2): 85-93.
[[3]]   张金标. 一种改进的产品设计耦合活动迭代模型[J].山东大学学报(工学版), 2008, 38(2): 37-41. ZHANG Jin-biao. An improved iteration model for coupled activities in product design[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science),2008,38(2): 37-41.
[[4]]   贾军, 张卓. 复杂产品研发时间和研发团队交流优化模型及其应用研究[J]. 中国机械工程,2013,24(15):2030-2035. JIA Jun, ZHANG Zhuo. Research on optimized model of development cycle and R & D team communication strategies and its application to complex product[J]. China Mechanical Engineering,2013,24(15):2030-2035.
[[5]]   刘伟, 曹国忠, 郭德斌, 等. 基于多元仿生的快速响应设计研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2015, 22(1): 1-10. LIU Wei, CAO Guo-zhong, GUO De-bin, et al. Research on rapid response design based on multiple bionic[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design,2015,22(1): 1-10.
[[6]]   陈卫明,陈庭贵,肖人彬. 动态环境下基于混合迭代的耦合集求解方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统,2010,16(2): 271-309. CHEN Wei-ming,CHEN Ting-gui, XIAO Ren-bin. Coupled sets solving method based on hybrid iteration under dynamic environment[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2010, 16(2): 271-309.
[[7]]   KRISHNAN V, EPPINGER S D, WHITNEY D E. Accelerating product development by the exchange of preliminary product design information[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1995, 117(4): 491-498.
[[8]]   AMARESH C, THOMAS P B. A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design[J]. Design Studies, 2001, 22(6): 493-517.
[[9]]   邢乐斌, 李君. 基于设计迭代的耦合任务动态分配策略研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2012, 48(23): 219-223. XING Le-bin, LI Jun. Dynamic assignment of coupled tasks based on design iteration[J]. Computer Engineering and Application, 2012, 48(23): 219-223.
[[10]]   包北方, 杨育, 李斐, 等. 产品定制协同开发任务分解模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2014, 20(7): 1537-1545. BAO Bei-fang, YANG Yu, LI Fei, et al. Decomposition model in product customization collaborative development task[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2014, 20(7): 1537-1545.
[[11]]   徐亮亮, 唐敦兵, 朱仁淼, 等. 设计需求与方案求解协同演化模型的形式化表达[J]. 工程设计学报, 2011, 18(1): 17-22. XU Liang-liang, TANG Dun-bing, ZHU Ren-miao, et al. Formalization of co-evolution model of design requirement and solution solving[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2011, 18(1): 17-22.
[[12]]   徐晓刚, 刘伟, 刘达斌, 等. 产品开发中的设计迭代及其解耦策略[J]. 组合机床与自动化加工技术, 2001,38(9): 29-31. XU Xiao-gang, LIU Wei, LIU Da-bin, et al. Design iteration and de-coupling method[J]. Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique, 2011, 38(9): 29-31.
[[13]]   包北方, 杨育, 李雷霆,等. 产品定制协同开发任务分配多目标优化[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2014, 20(4): 739-746. BAO Bei-fang, YANG Yu, LI Lei-ting, et al. Multi-objective optimization for task allocation of product customization collaborative development[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems,2014, 20(4):739-746.
[[14]]   YANG W,ZHANG W,WANG Y,et al. Ontology-based multi-perspective task decomposition to support composite manufacturing service discovery[J]. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Application,2011, 5(7): 290-296.
[[15]]   黄瑾, 金海, 谢夏, 等. 网格系统中的层次化资源分配与任务调度[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 34(10): 51-54. HUANG Jin, JIN Hai, XIE Xia, et al. Hierarchical resource allocation and task scheduling in grid environments[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition),2006, 34 (10): 51-54.
[[16]]   郭希娟, 李墨华. 基于多准则的动态任务分配算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2008, 28(10): 2507-2509. GUO Xi-juan, LI Mo-hua. Dynamic task assigment algoritum based on multi-criteria[J]. Computer Application, 2008, 28(10): 2507-2509.
[[17]]   叶菁,谢丽聪. 基于遗传算法的网格资源分配与调度研究[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2010, 17(10): 4-7. YE Jing, XIE Li-cong. Research on task allocation and scheduling in grid based on genetic algorithm[J]. Computer and Modernization, 2010, 17(10): 4-7.
[[18]]   苏财茂, 柯映林. 面向协同设计的任务规划与解耦策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2006, 12(1): 21-26. SU Cai-mao, KE Ying-lin. Task planning and decoupling strategy for collaborative design[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2006,12 (1):21-26.
[1] LI Zhao-bo, TAO Qing, KANG Jin-sheng, SUN Wen-lei, ZHANG Kai-tuo, WANG Shou-dong. Evaluation of human upper limb motion comfort based on motion capture technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2018, 25(3): 338-345,359.
[2] PAN Wei-jie, FAN Ling-xiu, LÜ Jian. Research on product design scheme evaluation for multi-dimensional imagery[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2017, 24(3): 250-255,302.
[3] HUO Xiao, SUN Wen-lei, TAO Qing, KANG Jin-sheng, LI Zhao-bo, WANG Shou-dong. Seat comfort test and evaluation based on sitting posture analyses[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2017, 24(3): 286-294.
[4] WU Qin, LÜ Jian, PAN Wei-jie, LIU Dan. Research on cultural and creative product design method based on case[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2017, 24(2): 121-133.
[5] JIN Ying-Lei, PAN Wei-jie, LÜ Jian, LIU Zheng-hong. Study on cultural and creative product design method based on extension semantics analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2017, 24(1): 27-33.
[6] CHENG You-ming, LI Fu-chang, GONG Ben-gang, WU Ying. The strategy of resources reuse and its selection of customized products based on genetic[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2016, 23(5): 401-408,436.
[7] TIAN Qi-hua, WANG Wei-wei, DU Yi-xian, DONG Qun-mei, WEN Xiao-yong. Research on influence of designers' learning ability and information communication ability to downstream design activity in concurrent product design[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2016, 23(5): 424-430.
[8] ZHANG Jun-lei, CAO Guo-zhong, XING Xi-jin. Application of substance-field & scenario decomposition method in industrial design[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2016, 23(4): 316-321.
[9] SU Jian-ning, CHEN Xiao, ZHANG Shu-tao, ZHANG Xin-xin. Product styling innovative design method based on evolutionary algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2016, 23(2): 136-142.
[10] XING Xi-jin, CAO Guo-zhong, LIU Wei, WU Zhong-fu. Research on the innovation method of product industrial design based on Matrix 2003 and effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2016, 23(1): 14-21.