Please wait a minute...
工程设计学报  2017, Vol. 24 Issue (3): 264-272    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2017.03.004
保质设计     
机械结构相似度评价及可靠性预计研究
张根保1,2, 徐付伟1, 冉琰1,2, 章小刚1
1. 重庆大学 机械工程学院, 重庆 400044;
2. 重庆大学 机械传动国家重点实验室, 重庆 400044
Research on similarity evaluation and reliability prediction of mechanical structure
ZHANG Gen-bao1,2, XU Fu-wei1, RAN Yan1,2, ZHANG Xiao-gang1
1. College of Mechanical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
 全文: PDF(1317 KB)   HTML
摘要:

在用传统的相似产品法进行可靠性预计时,所选取的相似产品与评价对象之间差异较大,会造成预计结果的偏差较大。为解决这一问题,提出了一种基于“功能-运动-动作”结构化分解的可靠性预计新方法。通过明确产品的各大运动功能建立功能层,分析完成各功能的机械部件运动建立运动层,确定实现各机械部件运动的元动作运动单元建立元动作层,建立了可靠性预计的“功能-运动-元动作运动单元”层次模型。引入区间层次分析法,确定了“功能-运动-元动作运动单元”层次模型中各子代运动单元对父代运动单元的可靠性影响权重,并构建了由子代运动单元预计父代运动单元可靠性的数学模型。确定影响评价机械结构相似度的因素,构建了区间数综合评判云模型并选取与元动作运动单元相似的参考结构,以区间数综合评价云模型得出的相似度值修正参考结构的可靠性数据来预计元动作运动单元的可靠性。将元动作运动单元的可靠性预计值代入数学模型,层层预计父代运动单元的可靠性,从而得出整个产品的可靠性水平。最后以数控转台为例进行了分析,得出了可靠性预计值,并将该方法与传统方法进行了比较。结果表明,新的可靠性预计方法具有较好的可行性和较高的准确性。

关键词: 相似度评价可靠性预计云模型区间层次分析法    
Abstract:

The differences between the selected similar products and evaluation object will lead to the deviation of the expected results when the reliability prediction is carried out by the traditional similar comparison method. In order to solve this problem, a new method of reliability prediction based on “function-movement-action” structural decomposition was proposed. A “function-movement-meta-action units” hierarchical model was established for reliability prediction with steps by the means of establishing function layer by analysing the product's all functions, establishing movement layer by analysing components' movements that completed corresponding functions of function layer, and establishing meta-units layer by analysing meta-actions that completed corresponding components' movements of movement layer. The interval analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was introduced to determine the weights that reflected the influence degree of offspring motion units to parent motion units. And a mathematical model was constructed to predict parental motion units' reliability from offspring motion units. The factors were determined that affected similarity evaluation process, so as to construct interval comprehensive evaluation cloud model to evaluate similarity between meta-action units and mechanical structures, and the most similar mechanical structures were chosen as referential structures. And the similarity value was used that concluded from interval comprehensive evaluation cloud model to correct the reliability data of referential structures. Then the corrected reliability data were used to predict every meta-action units' reliability of the meta-units layer. The reliability prediction value of the unit of motion was substituted into the mathematical model, so the parental motion units' reliability were predicted from offspring motion units layer by layer, so as to obtain the whole product's reliability prediction value. At last, numerical control rotary table was taken as a case to illustrate the feasibility and accuracy by using the proposed method. The reliability prediction value was obtained and compared with the traditional method. The result shows that this new reliability prediction method has better feasibility and higher accuracy.

Key words: similarity evaluation    reliability prediction    cloud model    interval analytic hierarchy process
收稿日期: 2016-09-19 出版日期: 2017-06-28
CLC:  TB114.3  
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51575070,51305418);国家科技重大专项(2014ZX04001-031,2015ZX04003003-07,2015ZX04003003)

作者简介: 张根保(1953-),男,山西新绛人,教授,博士生导师,博士,从事现代质量管理、可靠性工程等研究,E-mail: Gen.bao.zhang@263.net;徐付伟(1990-),男,山东临沂人,硕士生,从事故障诊断、可靠性工程等研究,E-mail: xfwei_2010@163.com,http://orcid.org//0000-0003-3515-3472
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
张根保
徐付伟
冉琰
章小刚

引用本文:

张根保, 徐付伟, 冉琰, 章小刚. 机械结构相似度评价及可靠性预计研究[J]. 工程设计学报, 2017, 24(3): 264-272.

ZHANG Gen-bao, XU Fu-wei, RAN Yan, ZHANG Xiao-gang. Research on similarity evaluation and reliability prediction of mechanical structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Design, 2017, 24(3): 264-272.

链接本文:

https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/10.3785/j.issn.1006-754X.2017.03.004        https://www.zjujournals.com/gcsjxb/CN/Y2017/V24/I3/264

[1] 曾声奎. 可靠性设计与分析[M].北京: 国防工业出版社, 2013: 96-97. ZENG Sheng-kui. Reliability design and analysis [M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2013: 96-97.
[2] 龚庆祥.型号可靠性工程手册[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2007: 94-96. GONG Qing-xiang. Model reliability engineering handbook[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2007: 94-96.
[3] 康锐. 可靠性维修性保障性工程基础[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2013: 82-84. KANG Rui. Fundamentals of reliability & maintainability & supportability engineering[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2013: 82-84.
[4] 刘品, 刘岚岚. 可靠性工程基础[M]. 北京: 中国计量出版社, 2009: 42-51. LIU Pin, LIU Lan-lan. Reliability engineering foundation[M]. Beijing: China Metrology Publishing House, 2009: 42-51.
[5] WALTER B Bergmann. Military handbook: reliability prediction of electronic equipment: MIL-HDBK-217F, Notice 2[S]. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 1995: (3-1)-(3-2).
[6] TYRONE L Jones. Handbook of reliability prediction procedures for mechanical equipment: NSWC-06/LE10[S]. Maryland: National Surface Warfare Center, Department of Defense, 2006: (1-1)-(1-5).
[7] XU Dan, WEI Qing-dong, CHEN Yun-xia. Reliability prediction using physics-statistics-based degradation model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, 2015, 5(11): 1573-1575.
[8] 张文俊, 聂国健, 郑丽香. 国外最新可靠性预计方法综述[J]. 电子产品可靠性与环境试验, 2009, 27(2): 25-28. ZHANG Wen-jun, NIE Guo-jian, ZHENG Li-xiang. Overview of the latest reliability prediction method[J]. Electronic Product Reliability and Environment Testing, 2009, 27(2): 25-28.
[9] 王远达, 宋笔锋. 系统可靠性预计方法综述[J]. 飞机设计, 2008, 28(1): 37-40. WANG Yuan-da, SONG Bi-feng. Overview of system reliability prediction method[J]. Aircraft Design, 2008, 28(1): 37-40.
[10] 郝庆波, 杨兆军, 陈传海, 等. 基于区间层次分析法的数控机床可靠性预计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(4): 845-850. HAO Qing-bo, YANG Zhao-jun, CHEN Chuan-hai, et al. Reliability prediction for NC machine tool based on interval AHP [J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2012, 42(4): 845-850.
[11] 陈云霞, 谢汶姝, 曾声奎. 功能分析与失效机理结合的可靠性预计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(5): 1133-1138. CHEN Yun-xia, XIE Wen-shu, ZENG Sheng-kui. Functional analysis and physics of failure associated reliability prediction [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(5): 1133-1138.
[12] 王树清. 高复杂度综合系统的可靠性预计[J]. 光机电信息, 2011, 28(3): 47-51. WANG Shu-qing. Reliability prediction of high complexity synthesis systems [J]. OME Information, 2011, 28(3): 47-51.
[13] 杜丽, 张晗亮, 黄洪钟, 等. 模糊相似产品法与综合评判法结合的柴油机可靠性预计[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2010, 39(4): 629-633. DU Li, ZHANG Han-liang, HUANG Hong-zhong, et al. Combining fuzzy similar product and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for reliability prediction of diesel engine [J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2010, 39(4): 629-633.
[14] 周真, 侯长剑, 王芳, 等. 基于BP 神经网络的开关电源可靠性预计[J]. 电测与仪表, 2009, 46(1): 64-68. ZHOU Zhen, HOU Chang-jian, WANG Fang, et al. The reliability prediction of SMPS based on BP neural network [J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2009, 46(1): 64-68.
[15] 严博, 吴晓平, 付钰. 应用随机进程代数的网络系统可靠性预计方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2011, 45(6): 40-45. YAN Bo, WU Xiao-ping, FU Yu. Reliability prediction for network systems using stochastic process algebra [J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2011, 45(6): 40-45.
[16] 张根保, 葛红玉, 刘佳. 可靠性驱动的装配过程建模及预测方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2012, 18(2): 349-355. ZHANG Gen-bao, GE Hong-yu, LIU Jia. Assembly process modeling and prediction method of reliability-driven[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2012, 18(2): 349-355.
[17] 张根保, 葛红玉, 王国强, 等. 可靠性驱动装配过程建模方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2011, 42(10): 192-196. ZHANG Gen-bao, GE Hong-yu, WANG Guo-qiang, et al. Reliability-driven modeling approach of assembly process[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2011, 42(10): 192-196.
[18] 张根保, 刘佳, 葛红玉. 装配可靠性的动态贝叶斯网络建模与分析[J]. 中国机械工程, 2012, 23(2): 211-215. ZHANG Gen-bao, LIU Jia, GE Hong-yu. Modeling and analysis for assembly reliability based on dynamic Bayesian networks[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 23(2): 211-215.
[19] 于少伟, 史忠科. 基于正态分布区间数的逆向云新算法[J]. 系统理论与实践, 2011, 31(10): 2021-2025. YU Shao-wei, SHI Zhong-ke. New algorithm of backward cloud based on normal interval number [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2011, 31(10): 2021-2025.
[20] SHI Y B, ZHANG A, GAO X J. Cloud model and its application in effectiveness evaluation[C]. 2008 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 15th Annual Conference Proceedings. Long Beach, CA, Sept.10-12, 2008.
[1] 高翔, 王林军, 杜义贤, 李响, 徐柳. 基于云模型人工鱼群算法的模糊优化设计[J]. 工程设计学报, 2021, 28(4): 433-442.
[2] 周智勇, 韩章程. 基于物元分析与云模型的地下工程围岩稳定性评价[J]. 工程设计学报, 2017, 24(1): 57-63.
[3] 罗 圆, 姚令侃. 基于云模型的山区铁路选线设计方案评价模型[J]. 工程设计学报, 2015, 22(5): 372-380.
[4] 罗 圆, 姚令侃. 基于云模型的山区铁路选线设计方案评价模型[J]. 工程设计学报, 2015, 22(4): 372-380.
[5] 高松, 王洪佩, 谭德荣, 王晓原, 孟华. 基于云模型的汽车前照灯弯道自适应系统建模与仿真[J]. 工程设计学报, 2011, 18(5): 359-364.