Please wait a minute...
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering)  2016, Vol. 17 Issue (1): 45-53    DOI: 10.1631/jzus.A1500244
    
Supersonic mixing augmentation mechanism induced by a wall-mounted cavity configuration
Wei Huang1,(),Ming-hui Li2,Feng Ding1,Jun Liu1
1Science and Technology on Scramjet Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
2China Aerodynamics R&D Center, Mianyang 621000, China
Download: HTML     PDF(1486KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

An efficient mixing process is very important for the engineering implementation of an airbreathing propulsion system. The air and injectant should be mixed sufficiently before entering the combustor. Two new wall-mounted cavity configurations were proposed to enhance the mixing process in a conventional transverse injection flow field. Their flow field properties were compared with those of a system with only transverse injection ports. Grid independency analysis was used to choose a suitable grid scale, and the mixing efficiencies at four cross-sectional planes (namely x=20, 40, 60, and 80 mm, which are just downstream of the jet orifice) were compared for the configurations considered in this study. The results showed that hydrogen penetrated deeper when a cavity was mounted upstream of the transverse injection ports. This is beneficial to the mixing process in supersonic flows. The mixing efficiency of the configuration with the wall-mounted cavity was better than that of the conventional physical model, and the mixing efficiency of the proposed novel physical model I (98.71% at x=20 mm) was the highest of all. In the case with only transverse injection ports, the vortex was broken up by the strong interaction between the shear layer over the cavity and the jet.



Key wordsScramjet engine      Mixing enhancement      Vortex generator      Transverse injection      Cavity      Supersonic flow     
Received: 05 September 2015      Published: 06 January 2016
Fund:  the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 11502291);the Fund for Owner of Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation from the Ministry of Education of China(No. 201460)
Corresponding Authors: Wei Huang     E-mail: gladrain2001@163.com
Cite this article:

Wei Huang,Ming-hui Li,Feng Ding,Jun Liu. Supersonic mixing augmentation mechanism induced by a wall-mounted cavity configuration. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 2016, 17(1): 45-53.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/zjus-a/10.1631/jzus.A1500244     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/zjus-a/Y2016/V17/I1/45

Fig. 1 Plan and symmetric views of the three physical models employed in this study: (a) conventional physical model; (b) novel physical model I; (c) novel physical model II (unit: mm)
Fig. 2 Convergence history for novel physical model II
Fig. 3 Grid system for novel physical model I
Fig. 4 Close-up view of the grid system around the cavity in novel physical model I
Fig. 5 Close-up view of the grid system at the bottom wall of the cavity in novel physical model I
Fig. 6 Comparison of wall static pressure (Pw) resulting from different grid scales used in the conventional physical model
Fig. 7 Comparison of Mach number contours on the symmetric and four cross-sectional planes resulting from different grid scales used in the conventional physical model (a) Coarse grid; (b) Moderate grid; (c) Refined grid
Fig. 8 Comparison of Mach number contours on the symmetric and four cross-sectional planes for three physical models with a moderate grid scale (a) Conventional physical model; (b) Novel physical model I; (c) Novel physical model II
Fig. 9 Comparison of vortex structure at the cross-sectional plane x=20 mm (a) Conventional physical model; (b) Novel physical model I; (c) Novel physical model II
Fig. 10 Comparison of hydrogen mole fraction contours on the symmetric and four cross-sectional planes for three physical models with a moderate grid scale (a) Conventional physical model; (b) Novel physical model I; (c) Novel physical model II
Fig. 11 Comparison of hydrogen mole fraction contours on the lower wall for three physical models with a moderate grid scale (a) Conventional physical model; (b) Novel physical model I; (c) Novel physical model II
Fig. 12 Comparison of the mixing efficiency of the physical models employed in this study
[1]   Alexander DC, Sislian JP, Parent B . Hypervelocity fuel/air mixing in mixed-compression inlets of shcramejts. AIAA Journal. 2006, 44(10): 2145-2155 doi: 10.2514/1.12630
doi: 10.2514/1.12630
[2]   Das R, Kim JS, Kim HD . Supersonic cavity based combustion with kerosene/hydrogen fuel. Journal of Thermal Science. 2015, 24(2): 164-172 doi: 10.1007/s11630-015-0769-z
doi: 10.1007/s11630-015-0769-z
[3]   Fluent Inc. Fluent 6.3 User’s Guide. 2006, Lebanon, NH, USA: Fluent Inc
[4]   Freeborn AB, King PI, Gruber MR . Swept-leading-edge pylon effects on a scramjet pylon-cavity flameholder flowfield. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2009, 25(3): 571-582 doi: 10.2514/1.39546
doi: 10.2514/1.39546
[5]   Grady NR, Pitz RW, Carter CD et al. Supersonic flow over a ramped-wall cavity flame holder with an upstream strut. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2012, 28(5): 982-990 doi: 10.2514/1.B34394
doi: 10.2514/1.B34394
[6]   Gruber MR, Carter CD, Montes DR et al. Experimental studies of pylon-aided fuel injection into a supersonic crossflow. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2008, 24(3): 460-470 doi: 10.2514/1.32231
doi: 10.2514/1.32231
[7]   Gruenig C, Avrashkov V, Mayinger F . Fuel injection into a supersonic airflow by means of pylons. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2000, 16(1): 29-34 doi: 10.2514/2.5560
doi: 10.2514/2.5560
[8]   Handa T, Nakano A, Tanigawa K et al. Supersonic mixing enhanced by cavity-induced three-dimensional oscillatory flow. Experiments in Fluids. 2014, 55: 1711 doi: 10.1007/s00348-014-1711-y
doi: 10.1007/s00348-014-1711-y
[9]   Hsu KY, Carter CD, Gruber MR et al. Experimental study of cavity-strut combustion in supersonic flow. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2010, 26(6): 1237-1246 doi: 10.2514/1.45767
doi: 10.2514/1.45767
[10]   Huang W . Design exploration of three-dimensional transverse jet in a supersonic crossflow based on data mining and multi-objective design optimization approaches. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014, 39(8): 3914-3925 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.129
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.129
[11]   Huang W . Effect of jet-to-crossflow pressure ratio arrangement on turbulent mixing in a flowpath with square staged injectors. Fuel. 2015, 144: 164-170 doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.051
doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.051
[12]   Huang W, Yan L . Progress in research on mixing techniques for transverse injection flow fields in supersonic crossflows. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering). 2013, 14(8): 554-564 doi: 10.1631/jzus.A1300096
doi: 10.1631/jzus.A1300096
[13]   Huang W, Pourkashanian M, Ma L et al. Investigation on the flameholding mechanisms in supersonic flows: backward-facing step and cavity flameholder. Journal of Visualization. 2011, 14(1): 63-74 doi: 10.1007/s12650-010-0064-8
doi: 10.1007/s12650-010-0064-8
[14]   Huang W, Wang ZG, Jin L et al. Effect of cavity location on combustion flow field of integrated hypersonic vehicle in near space. Journal of Visualization. 2011, 14(4): 339-351 doi: 10.1007/s12650-011-0100-3
doi: 10.1007/s12650-011-0100-3
[15]   Huang W, Wang ZG, Luo SB et al. Parametric effects on the combustion flow field of a typical strut-based scramjet combustor. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2011, 56(35): 3871-3877 doi: 10.1007/s11434-011-4823-2
doi: 10.1007/s11434-011-4823-2
[16]   Huang W, Pourkashanian M, Ma L et al. Effect of geometric parameters on the drag of the cavity flameholder based on the variance analysis method. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2012, 21(1): 24-30 doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2011.04.009
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2011.04.009
[17]   Huang W, Liu WD, Li SB et al. Influences of the turbulence model and the slot width on the transverse slot injection flow field in supersonic flows. Acta Astronautica. 2012, 73: 1-9 doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.12.003
doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.12.003
[18]   Huang W, Ma L, Pourkashanian M et al. Parametric effects in a scramjet engine on the interaction between the air stream and the injection. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2012, 226(3): 294-309 doi: 10.1177/0954410011408512
doi: 10.1177/0954410011408512
[19]   Huang W, Liu J, Yan L et al. Multiobjective design optimization of the performance for the cavity flameholder in supersonic flows. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2013, 30(1): 246-254 doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2013.08.009
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2013.08.009
[20]   Huang W, Li SB, Yan L et al. Performance evaluation and parametric analysis on cantilevered ramp injector in supersonic flows. Acta Astronautica. 2013, 84: 141-152 doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.11.011
doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.11.011
[21]   Huang W, Jin L, Yan L et al. Influence of jet-to-crossflow pressure ratio on nonreacting and reacting processes in a scramjet combustor with backward-facing steps. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014, 39(36): 21242-21250 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.073
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.073
[22]   Huang W, Wang ZG, Yan L et al. Variation of inlet boundary conditions on the combustion characteristics of a typical cavity-base scramjet combustor. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2014, 228(4): 627-638 doi: 10.1177/0954410013480076
doi: 10.1177/0954410013480076
[23]   Kim KM, Baek SW, Han CY . Numerical study on supersonic combustion with cavity-based fuel injection. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2004, 47(2): 271-286 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.07.004
doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.07.004
[24]   Lee SH . Mixing augmentation with cooled pylon injection in a scramjet combustor. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2012, 28(3): 477-485 doi: 10.2514/1.B34220
doi: 10.2514/1.B34220
[25]   Lee SH, Mitani T . Mixing augmentation of transverse injection in scramjet combustor. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2003, 19(1): 115-124 doi: 10.2514/2.6087
doi: 10.2514/2.6087
[26]   Pohlman MR, Greendyke RB . Parametric analysis of pylon-aided fuel injection in scramjet engines. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. 2013, 135(2): 024501 doi: 10.1115/1.4007735
doi: 10.1115/1.4007735
[27]   Pudsey AS, Boyce RR . Numerical investigation of transverse jets through multiport injector arrays in supersonic crossflow. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2010, 26(6): 1225-1236 doi: 10.2514/1.39603
doi: 10.2514/1.39603
[28]   Segal C . The Scramjet Engine: Processes and Characteristics. 2009, UK: Cambridge University Press
[29]   Smirnov NN, Nikitin VF . Modeling and simulation of hydrogen combustion in engines. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014, 39(2): 1122-1136 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.097
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.097
[30]   Smirnov NN, Betelin VB, Shagaliev RM et al. Hydrogen fuel rocket engines simulation using LOGOS code. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014, 39(20): 10748-10756 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.150
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.150
[31]   Sujith S, Muruganandam TM, Kurian J . Effect of trailing ramp angles in strut-based injection in supersonic flow. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2013, 29(1): 66-78 doi: 10.2514/1.B34532
doi: 10.2514/1.B34532
[32]   Takahashi H, Tu Q, Segal C . Effects of pylon-aided fuel injection on mixing in a supersonic flowfield. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2010, 26(5): 1092-1101 doi: 10.2514/1.48393
doi: 10.2514/1.48393
[33]   Vergine F, Crisanti M, Maddalena L . Supersonic combustion of pylon-injected hydrogen in high-enthalpy flow with imposed vortex dynamics. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2015, 31(1): 89-103 doi: 10.2514/1.B35330
doi: 10.2514/1.B35330
[34]   Vinogradov VA, Shikhman YM, Segal C . A review of fuel pre-injection in supersonic, chemically reacting flows. Applied Mechanics Reviews. 2007, 60(4): 139-148 doi: 10.1115/1.2750346
doi: 10.1115/1.2750346
[35]   Yu KH, Schadow KC . Cavity-actuated supersonic mixing and combustion control. Combustion and Flame. 1994, 99(2): 295-301 doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(94)90134-1
doi: 10.1016/0010-2180(94)90134-1
[1] Wei Huang. A survey of drag and heat reduction in supersonic flows by a counterflowing jet and its combinations[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 2015, 16(7): 551-561.
[2] Wei Huang, Li Yan. Progress in research on mixing techniques for transverse injection flow fields in supersonic crossflows[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 2013, 14(8): 554-564.
[3] Seyed Sahand Sebti, Mohammad Mastiani, Hooshyar Mirzaei, Abdolrahman Dadvand, Sina Kashani, Seyed Amir Hosseini. Numerical study of the melting of nano-enhanced phase change material in a square cavity[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 2013, 14(5): 307-316.
[4] Cheng Huang, Dai Zhou, Yan Bao. A semi-implicit three-step method based on SUPG finite element formulation for flow in lid driven cavities with different geometries[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 2011, 12(1): 33-45.
[5] LUO Zhan-you, ZHU Xiang-rong, GONG Xiao-nan. Expansion of spherical cavity of strain-softening materials with different elastic moduli of tension and compression[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 2007, 8(9): 1380-1387.
[6] LIU Jie, CHEN Wen-lu, LI Yu-quan. Rate-equation-based VCSEL thermal model and simulation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 2006, 7(12): 1968-1972.
[7] HE Sai-ling, RUAN Zhi-chao. A completely open cavity realized with photonic crystal wedges[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 2005, 6( 5): 1-.
[8] WU Li-dong, HAHNE H.J., HASSENPFLUG J.. The dimensional accuracy of preparation of femoral cavity in cementless total hip arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 2004, 5(10): 1270-1278.