Please wait a minute...
FITEE
Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng.  2016, Vol. 17 Issue (8): 750-765    DOI: 10.1631/FITEE.1500162
    
RePizer：一种软件需求排序架构
Saif Ur Rehman Khan, Sai Peck Lee, Mohammad Dabbagh, Muhammad Tahir, Muzafar Khan, Muhammad Arif
Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia; Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia; College of Computer and Information Sciences (Muzahmiyah Branch), King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia; Department of Computer Science, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan
RePizer: a framework for prioritization of software requirements
Saif Ur Rehman Khan, Sai Peck Lee, Mohammad Dabbagh, Muhammad Tahir, Muzafar Khan, Muhammad Arif
Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia; Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia; College of Computer and Information Sciences (Muzahmiyah Branch), King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia; Department of Computer Science, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan
 全文: PDF 
摘要： 概要：标准的软件开发周期很大程度上取决于利益相关方的需求。软件开发全程围绕需求设计和管理。考虑到时间和资源的限制，必须分清哪些是必须首先考虑的高优先级需求。已有的需求排序架构缺少对历史数据的记录，而这些历史数据有助于从类似项目中方便地选取最适合的需求排序技术。本文中，我们提出一种名为RePizer的软件需求排序架构，该架构与一种选定的需求排序技术联合使用，可以基于给定标准(如开发成本)，为软件需求优先级排序。RePizer通过从需求库提取历史数据，为软件需求工程师决策提供协助。此外，RePizer提供了对整个项目的全景式视角，以确保对资源的审慎使用。基于RePizer架构，采用已有的两种需求排序技术：计划博弈(planning game, PG)和层级分析(analytical hierarchy process, AHP)，分别比较各自的预期准确度和易用程度。结果表明，采用计划博弈时，RePizer性能更佳。
关键词： 软件需求;  需求排序技术;  排序架构;  计划博弈;  层级分析    
Abstract: The standard software development life cycle heavily depends on requirements elicited from stakeholders. Based on those requirements, software development is planned and managed from its inception phase to closure. Due to time and resource constraints, it is imperative to identify the high-priority requirements that need to be considered first during the software development process. Moreover, existing prioritization frameworks lack a store of historical data useful for selecting the most suitable prioritization technique of any similar project domain. In this paper, we propose a framework for prioritization of software requirements, called RePizer, to be used in conjunction with a selected prioritization technique to rank software requirements based on defined criteria such as implementation cost. RePizer assists requirements engineers in a decision-making process by retrieving historical data from a requirements repository. RePizer also provides a panoramic view of the entire project to ensure the judicious use of software development resources. We compared the performance of RePizer in terms of expected accuracy and ease of use while separately adopting two different prioritization techniques, planning game (PG) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The results showed that RePizer performed better when used in conjunction with the PG technique.
Key words: Software requirements    Requirements prioritization techniques    Prioritization framework    Planning game    Analytical hierarchy process
收稿日期: 2015-05-18 出版日期: 2016-08-05
CLC:  TP311  
服务　　
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章　　
Saif Ur Rehman Khan
Sai Peck Lee
Mohammad Dabbagh
Muhammad Tahir
Muzafar Khan
Muhammad Arif

引用本文:

Saif Ur Rehman Khan, Sai Peck Lee, Mohammad Dabbagh, Muhammad Tahir, Muzafar Khan, Muhammad Arif. RePizer: a framework for prioritization of software requirements. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(8): 750-765.

链接本文:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/fitee/CN/10.1631/FITEE.1500162    或    http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/fitee/CN/Y2016/V17/I8/750

[1] Deng Chen, Yan-duo Zhang, Wei Wei, Shi-xun Wang, Ru-bing Huang, Xiao-lin Li, Bin-bin Qu, Sheng Jiang. 基于改进规则检查静态分析技术的高效脆弱性检测方法[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2017, 18(3): 332-345.
[2] Long-xiang Wang, Xiao-she Dong, Xing-jun Zhang, Yin-feng Wang, Tao Ju, Guo-fu Feng. TextGen：用于新型存储系统基准测试的真实文本数据集生成方法[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(10): 982-993.
[3] Shahab Pourtalebi, Imre Horváth. 用于定义系统表现特征的基因型与表型仓库数据库的信息图式构造方法[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(9): 862-884.
[4] Hui-zong Li, Xue-gang Hu, Yao-jin Lin, Wei He, Jian-han Pan. 基于共同共现群体相似度的社会化标签聚类方法[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(2): 122-134.
[5] Mohammad Alshayeb, Nasser Khashan, Sajjad Mahmood. 一种集成的统一建模语言框架[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2016, 17(2): 143-159.
[6] . Dr. Hadoop: an infinite scalable metadata management for Hadoop—How the baby elephant becomes immortal[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2016, 17(1): 15-31.
[7] Ignacio Marin, Francisco Ortin, German Pedrosa, Javier Rodriguez. 使用模型变换为多种终端生成原生用户界面[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2015, 16(12): 995-1017.
[8] Hong Yin, Shu-qiang Yang, Xiao-qian Zhu, Shao-dong Ma, Lu-min Zhang. 基于趋势特征的时间序列符号化方法[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2015, 16(9): 744-758.
[9] Ping Xie, Jian-zhong Huang, Er-wei Dai, Qiang Cao, Chang-sheng Xie. 一种负载平衡的RAID-6存储方案[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2015, 16(5): 335-345.
[10] Xiao-xia Zhang, Qiang-hua Xiao, Bin Li, Sai Hu, Hui-jun Xiong, Bi-hai Zhao. OMMR:一种关键模块重叠部分评价指标[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2015, 16(4): 293-300.
[11] Yu-xiang Li, Yin-liang Zhao, Bin Liu, Shuo Ji. 基于人工免疫算法的推测多线程线程划分参数的优化[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2015, 16(3): 205-216.
[12] László Lengyel, Hassan Charaf. 测试驱动的模式转换检验/认证[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2015, 16(2): 85-97.
[13] Alireza Parvizi-Mosaed, Shahrouz Moaven, Jafar Habibi, Ghazaleh Beigi, Mahdieh Naser-Shariat. 基于扩展型服务导向建模与应用（SOMA）的一种自适应服务导向方法[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2015, 16(1): 43-69.
[14] Zi-ying Dai, Xiao-guang Mao, Li-qian Chen, Yan Lei. Automatic recovery from resource exhaustion exceptions by collecting leaked resources[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(8): 622-635.
[15] Juan J. Cuadrado-Gallego, Alain Abran, Pablo Rodriguez-Soria, Miguel A. Lara. An experimental study on the conversion between IFPUG and UCP functional size measurement units[J]. Front. Inform. Technol. Electron. Eng., 2014, 15(3): 161-173.