Please wait a minute...
Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences)  2019, Vol. 45 Issue (5): 563-573    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2019.03.081
Resource utilization & environmental protection     
Impact of short-term rest-grazing on vegetation and soil characteristics of family ranch in desert steppe area
Li FU1,2(),Ying LU1,Yingzhong XIE1(),Hongbin MA1,Ende XING3,Xiumin TIAN3,Minghe NIE1
1. College of Agriculture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
2. College of Xinhua, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
3. Institute of Water Resources for Pastoral Area, Ministry of Water Resources, Hohhot 010020, China
Download: HTML   HTML (   PDF(911KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

The experiment was conducted to analyze the impact of short-term rest-grazing on the vegetation and soil characteristics in a growing season, taking the family ranch in the desert steppe area of Etuokeqianqi, Inner Mongolia as the research carrier, and using the Nitraria tangutorum with the Artemisia scoparia community, Achnatherum splendens with A. scoparia community, and the Artemisia ordosica with A. scoparia community as the study objects. The experiment was divided into four zones, which included the rest-grazing zone 1 (the rest time and grazing time were both 7 days, RG1), the rest-gazing zone 2 (the rest time and grazing time were both 14 days, RG2), the rest-gazing zone 3 (the rest time and grazing time were both 21 days, RG3), and the free grazing zone (continuous grazing, CK). The results were as follows. For the aboveground biomass, RG3 took the top one. Apart from the distinction between RG1 and CK in A. ordosica with A. scoparia community was not significant (P>0.05), other zones were significant (P<0.05). For the Shannon-Wiener diversity index, the value in each community treated by the RG3 was much higher than that in the other three zones (P<0.05). For the Pielou index, the distinction among the three communities was not significant (P>0.05). For the richness index, the value in the N. tangutorum with the A. scoparia community treated by the RG3 was significantly higher than that in the RG1 and CK (P<0.05), but it was not significant as compared with the RG2 (P>0.05), and the values in the A. splendens with A. scoparia community and in the A. ordosica with A. scoparia community treated by the RG3 were significantly higher than those in the other communities (P<0.05). In the A. splendens with A. scoparia community, because of the allocation of rainfall in the different seasons and the distribution of the vegetation root system, different treatments did not show a very clear rule for the impact of the soil moisture. Meanwhile, the distinction of organic matter contents with different treatments at the same soil layer was significant, as well as the total nitrogen contents (P<0.01), and the RG3 was more favorable to accumulate the organic matters at the >10-40 cm soil layer. The total nitrogen content had a highly significant and significant correlations with the Shannon-Wiener index and the richness index at the 0.01 and 0.05 probability levels, respectively; while it had a negative correlation with the Pielou index. To sum up, among the four treatments, RG3 is more suitable for the practical graze management for the family ranches in the natural grassland of desert steppe, and it is more beneficial to restore the delicate grass ecosystem and keep sustainable graze.



Key wordsdesert steppe      family ranch      vegetation      rest-grazing      soil nutrient     
Received: 08 March 2019      Published: 05 December 2019
CLC:  S 812.8  
Corresponding Authors: Yingzhong XIE     E-mail: fuli39501793@163.com;xieyz@nxu.edu.cn
Cite this article:

Li FU,Ying LU,Yingzhong XIE,Hongbin MA,Ende XING,Xiumin TIAN,Minghe NIE. Impact of short-term rest-grazing on vegetation and soil characteristics of family ranch in desert steppe area. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(5): 563-573.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2019.03.081     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/Y2019/V45/I5/563


短期休牧对荒漠草原区家庭牧场植被及土壤性质的影响

以内蒙古鄂托克前旗荒漠草原区家庭牧场为研究载体,以白刺+猪毛蒿群落、芨芨草+猪毛蒿群落及黑沙蒿+猪毛蒿群落为研究对象,设休牧1区(休牧与放牧时间均为7 d,RG1)、休牧2区(休牧与放牧时间均为14 d,RG2)、休牧3区(休牧与放牧时间均为21 d,RG3)和自由放牧区(连续放牧,CK)4个处理,分析在一个生长季内短期休牧对植被及土壤性质的影响。结果表明:1)各群落地上生物量均以RG3最高,除黑沙蒿+猪毛蒿群落中RG1与CK间差异不显著(P>0.05),其他群落各处理间差异均显著(P<0.05)。2)各群落中RG3的香农-维纳多样性指数均显著高于其他3个处理(P<0.05);均匀度指数在3种群落的各处理间差异均不显著(P>0.05);在白刺+猪毛蒿群落中RG3的丰富度指数显著高于RG1和CK(P<0.05),但与RG2间差异不显著(P>0.05),在芨芨草+猪毛蒿群落和黑沙蒿+猪毛蒿群落中RG3的丰富度指数均显著高于其他处理(P<0.05)。3)在芨芨草+猪毛蒿群落中,受降水季节分配和植被根系分布深浅等因素影响,不同处理对土壤水分的影响规律不够明显。4)同一土层、不同处理的土壤有机质和全氮含量差异均显著(P<0.01),其中RG3更有利于>10~40 cm土层的有机质积累,全氮含量与多样性指数呈极显著相关(P<0.01),与丰富度指数呈显著相关(P<0.05),与均匀度指数呈负相关。综上,在4个处理中,RG3更符合荒漠草原区家庭牧场天然草地放牧管理实际,更有利于脆弱草地的生态系统恢复和可持续利用。


关键词: 荒漠草原,  家庭牧场,  植被,  休牧,  土壤养分 
Fig. 1 Annual precipitation in research area over the past 30 years

处理

Treatment

白刺+猪毛蒿

N. tangutorum+A. scoparia

芨芨草+猪毛蒿

A. splendens+A. scoparia

黑沙蒿+猪毛蒿

A. ordosica+A. scoparia

CK3 113.77±12.85d1 916.58±9.99d2 345.23±24.51c
RG15 164.39±32.52c2 017.68±9.41c2 406.71±6.74c
RG25 612.88±40.76b3 407.55±13.33b2 510.97±15.97b
RG36 363.78±75.20a4 123.69±25.51a2 598.62±5.64a
Table 1 Aboveground biomass of natural grassland vegetation community under short-term rest-grazingkg/hm2

处理

Treatment

白刺+猪毛蒿

N. tangutorum+A. scoparia

芨芨草+猪毛蒿

A. splendens+A. scoparia

黑沙蒿+猪毛蒿

A. ordosica+A. scoparia

CK0.67±0.01c0.93±0.02d1.18±0.02d
RG10.70±0.03c1.07±0.02c1.43±0.02c
RG20.97±0.01b1.24±0.01b1.57±0.01b
RG31.16±0.02a1.56±0.02a1.87±0.02a
Table 2 Shannon-Wiener diversity index of natural grassland vegetation community under short-term rest-grazing

处理

Treatment

白刺+猪毛蒿

N. tangutorum+A. scoparia

芨芨草+猪毛蒿

A. splendens+A. scoparia

黑沙蒿+猪毛蒿

A. ordosica+A. scoparia

CK0.77±0.16a0.70±0.09a0.67±0.05a
RG10.77±0.21a0.73±0.03a0.75±0.05a
RG20.73±0.11a0.74±0.06a0.76±0.03a
RG30.79±0.05a0.70±0.06a0.84±0.03a
Table 3 Pielou index of natural grassland vegetation community under short-term rest-grazing

处理

Treatment

白刺+猪毛蒿

N. tangutorum+A. scoparia

芨芨草+猪毛蒿

A. splendens+A. scoparia

黑沙蒿+猪毛蒿

A. ordosica+A. scoparia

CK2.75±0.16b4.17±0.24b6.11±0.20d
RG13.22±0.28b4.38±0.14b7.10±0.18c
RG24.17±0.24a4.38±0.14b8.08±0.17b
RG34.38±0.14a6.11±0.20a9.83±0.23a
Table 4 Richness index of natural grassland vegetation community under short-term rest-grazing

处理

Treatment

白刺+猪毛蒿

N. tangutorum+A. scoparia

芨芨草+猪毛蒿

A. splendens+A. scoparia

黑沙蒿+猪毛蒿

A. ordosica+A. scoparia

CK0.47±0.03A0.54±0.01A0.64±0.01B
RG10.47±0.03A0.58±0.03A0.66±0.01B
RG20.55±0.02A0.56±0.04A0.71±0.01A
RG30.63±0.00A0.64±0.02A0.77±0.02A
Table 5 Dominance index of natural grassland vegetation community under short-term rest-grazing

月份

Month

土层

Soil layer/cm

处理 Treatment
RG1RG2RG3CK
40~104.82±0.01bA4.35±0.01bC2.92±0.01eD4.42±0.01bB
>10~208.46±0.01aA6.99±0.00bB4.60±0.00cC3.90±0.00bD
>20~408.77±0.00aB10.18±0.00bA5.60±0.00aC3.32±0.01aD
>40~607.38±0.01aA6.64±0.00cB5.87±0.01dC2.47±0.01cD
50~104.35±0.01cB3.96±0.01cC5.08±0.00bA3.58±0.01cD
>10~206.89±0.00bC10.96±0.01aA8.34±0.01aB4.79±0.01aD
>20~405.86±0.00bB11.16±0.01aA5.35±0.01bC2.35±0.01bD
>40~604.46±0.01eC7.95±0.00aA6.82±0.00bB1.88±0.01eD
60~104.38±0.01cA1.91±0.01eB4.35±0.01cA1.74±0.01dC
>10~204.12±0.01dC5.43±0.01cA4.17±0.01dB1.82±0.01cD
>20~404.69±0.00cB4.98±0.00eA3.97±0.00dC2.25±0.01cD
>40~606.76±0.00bB5.97±0.00eC7.75±0.01aA3.73±0.00aD
70~101.22±0.01eC2.08±0.01dB4.16±0.01dA1.18±0.01eC
>10~203.63±0.01eC4.62±0.01dB4.93±0.01bA1.20±0.01fD
>20~403.45±0.01fC5.35±0.01dA4.16±0.01cB1.38±0.01fD
>40~602.98±0.01fC6.80±0.00bA6.63±0.01cB1.68±0.01fD
80~101.72±0.01dA1.12±0.01fD1.46±0.02fB1.23±0.01eC
>10~203.28±0.01fB4.08±0.01fA2.03±0.02fC1.71±0.02dD
>20~404.24±0.01eB6.08±0.00cA2.95±0.01eC1.54±0.01eD
>40~606.58±0.00cA6.04±0.01dB4.59±0.00eC2.67±0.01bD
90~106.40±0.00aA5.69±0.02aB5.38±0.01aC4.71±0.01aD
>10~205.22±0.01cA4.56±0.01eB2.38±0.01eC1.36±0.02eD
>20~404.58±0.01dA4.57±0.01fA2.99±0.01eB1.58±0.01dC
>40~606.21±0.01dA5.99±0.01eB3.68±0.01fC2.30±0.01dD
Table 6 Soil moisture content at A. splendens with A. scoparia communityof natural grassland under short-term rest-grazingw/%
Fig. 2 Organic matter content of different soil layers under short-term rest-grazingPlease see the footnote of Table 1 for the details of every treatment symbol. Different uppercase letters above the bars indicate highly significant differences among different treatments in the same soil layer at the 0.01 probability level.
Fig. 3 Total nitrogen content of different soil layers under short-term rest-grazingPlease see the footnote of Table 1 for the details of every treatment symbol. Different uppercase letters above the bars indicate highly significant differences among different treatments in the same soil layer at the 0.01 probability level.

参量

Parameter

有机质

Organic matter

(0~10 cm)

全氮

Total nitrogen

(0~10 cm)

香农-维纳多样性指数

Shannon-Wiener

diversity index

丰富度指数

Richness

index

均匀度指数

Pielou

index

优势度指数

Dominance

index

有机质

Organic matter (0~10 cm)

1.000

全氮

Total nitrogen (0~10 cm)

0.4871.000

香农-维纳多样性指数

Shannon-Wiener diversity index

0.3880.952**1.000

丰富度指数

Richness index

0.0370.658*0.775**1.000

均匀度指数

Pielou index

0.038-0.133-0.217-0.645*1.000

优势度指数

Dominance index

0.0200.647*0.760**0.622*-0.1981.000
Table 7 Pearson’s correlation analysis of vegetation index and soil nutrient in the A. splendens with A. scoparia community
[1]   沈海花,朱言坤,赵霞,等.中国草地资源的现状分析.科学通报,2016,61(2):139-154.
SHEN H H, ZHU Y K, ZHAO X, et al. Analysis of current grassland resources in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016,61(2):139-154. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]   鹿海员.牧区“水-土-草-畜”平衡调控模式与方法研究.北京:中国水利水电科学研究院,2017:1-2.
LU H Y. Study on regulation model and method for “water-land-forage-livestock” balance in pastoral area. Beijing: China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2017:1-2. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]   刘丽,李政海,鲍雅静,等.典型草原植物群落根系垂直分布与草原退化阶段的对应变化关系.中国草地学报,2018,40(1):93-98.
LIU L, LI Z H, BAO Y J, et al. The corresponding relationship between the vertical root distribution of grassland communities and steppe degradation stage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2018,40(1):93-98. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]   王永嘉.近30年库鲁斯台草原退化过程分析.新疆环境保护,2017,39(4):26-32.
WANG Y J. Analysis of Kulusitai grassland degradation process in recent 30 years. Environmental Protection of Xinjiang, 2017,39(4):26-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]   孟元,贾美清,李阳,等.内蒙古短花针茅荒漠草原土壤线虫物种多样性对水分调控的响应.河北农业科学,2017,21(6):67-72.
MENG Y, JIA M Q, LI Y, et al. Response of soil nematode species diversity to moisture regulation in Stipa breviflora desert steppe of Inner Mongolia. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2017,21(6):67-72. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]   高海燕,红梅,霍利霞,等.水氮耦合对荒漠草原植物物种多样性及生物量的影响.草业科学,2018,35(1):36-45.
GAO H Y, HONG M, HUO L X, et al. Effect of water and nitrogen interaction on plant species diversity and biomass in a desert grassland. Pratacultural Science, 2018,35(1):36-45. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]   中国气象数据网.地面气象资料..
China Meteorological Data Network. Surface meteorological data. (in Chinese)
[8]   李鑫,叶有华,王伊拉图,等.干旱半干旱地区草地资源价值评估研究:以鄂托克前旗草地资源资产负债表编制为例.干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(5):136-143.
LI X, YE Y H, WANG Yilatu, et al. Evaluation of grassland resource values in arid and semi-arid area: a case of Etuoke’s grassland resource balance sheet. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018,32(5):136-143. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]   吕世杰,吴艳玲,刘红梅,等.春季休牧后放牧强度变化对短花针茅草原植物种群种间关系的影响.草地学报,2016,24(2):302-308.
Lü S J, WU Y L, LIU H M, et al. Effect of grazing intensity changes on population inter-specific relationship of Stipa breviflora steppe after banning in spring. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016,24(2):302-308. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]   马玉寿,李世雄,王彦龙,等.返青期休牧对退化高寒草甸植被的影响.草地学报,2017,25(2):290-295.
MA Y S, LI S X, WANG Y L, et al. Effect of rest-grazing in the greenup period on degraded vegetation in alpine meadow. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017,25(2):290-295. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]   徐松鹤,陈宇浩.休牧对锡林郭勒典型草原土壤养分和植物群落特征的影响.水土保持研究,2018,25(4):15-21.
XU S H, CHEN Y H. Effect of stop grazing on characteristics of plant community and soil nutrients of typical grassland in Xilinguole. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,25(4):15-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]   褚文彬,卫智军,运向军,等.短花针茅荒漠草原土壤含水量和地上现存量对禁牧休牧的响应.中国草地学报,2008,30(3):106-109.
CHU W B, WEI Z J, YUN X J, et al. Response of soil water content and above ground standing crop to banning and deferral grazing in the Stipa breviflora desert grassland. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2008,30(3):106-109. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]   和平,褚文彬,运向军,等.短花针茅荒漠草原群落现存量和营养动态对禁牧休牧的影响.当代畜禽养殖业,2008(6):41-44.
HE P, CHU W B, YUN X J, et al. Impact of above ground standing crop and nutrition dynamics on banning and deferral grazing in the Stipa breviflora desert grassland. Modern Animal Husbandry, 2008(6):41-44. (in Chinese)
[14]   傅理,谢应忠,马红彬.基于文献计量分析的家庭牧场国内外研究进展.草业学报,2018,27(8):142-154.
FU L, XIE Y Z, MA H B. The research status quo of household ranch at home and abroad: a bibliometric analysis. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018,27(8):142-154. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]   《鄂托克前旗志》编纂委员会.鄂托克前旗志.呼和浩特:内蒙古人民出版社,1995:1-2.
Codification Committee of Etuokeqianqi Chronicles. Etuokeqianqi Chronicles. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia People’s Publishing House, 1995:1-2. (in Chinese)
[16]   张雪艳,聂松花,崔彩,等.鄂托克前旗地区近30年气候特征分析.农业灾害研究,2013,3(8):37-41.
ZHANG X Y, NIE S H, CUI C, et al. Analysis on climate characteristics of Etuokeqianqi in nearly 30 years. Journal of Agricultural Catastrophology, 2013,3(8):37-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]   任继周.草业科学研究方法.北京:中国农业出版社,1998:2-21.
REN J Z. Research Methods of Grassland Science. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998:2-21. (in Chinese)
[18]   沈艳,马红彬,谢应忠,等.宁夏典型草原土壤微生物特征对不同管理方式的响应.草业科学,2012,29(6):863-868.
SHEN Y, MA H B, XIE Y Z, et al. Responses of soil microbial prosperities to different management modes in typical steppe, Ningxia. Patacultural Science, 2012,29(6):863-868. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]   刘晓琴,张翔,张立锋,等.封育年限对高寒草甸群落组分和物种多样性的影响.生态学报,2016,36(16):5150-5162.
LIU X Q, ZHANG X, ZHANG L F, et al. Effects of exclosure duration on the community structure and species diversity of an alpine meadow in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(16):5150-5162. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]   鲍士旦.土壤农化分析.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:53-85.
BAO S D. Analysis of Soil Agrochemicals. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000:53-85. (in Chinese)
[21]   张韫.土壤·水·植物理化分析教程.北京:中国林业出版社,2011:40-81.
ZHANG Y. Physical and Chemical Analysis of Soil, Water and Plant. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2011:40-81. (in Chinese)
[22]   刘娜,白可喻,杨云卉,等.放牧对内蒙古荒漠草原草地植被及土壤养分的影响.草业科学,2018,35(6):1323-1331.
LIU N, BAI K Y, YANG Y H, et al. Effect of grazing on vegetation and soil nutrients of a desert steppe in Inner Mongolia. Patacultural Science, 2018,35(6):1323-1331. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]   李军保,刘东林,吐尔逊娜依·热依木江,等.伊犁河谷围封草地群落组成及植物多样性的变化.草业科学,2013,30(5):736-742.
LI J B, LIU D L, Reyimjan TURSUNAY, et al. Changes of community composition and plant diversity of enclosing grassland in Yili Valley. Patacultural Science, 2013,30(5):736-742. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]   秦建蓉,马红彬,沈艳,等.宁夏东部风沙区荒漠草原植物群落物种多样性研究.西北植物学报,2015,35(9):1891-1898.
QIN J R, MA H B, SHEN Y, et al. Plant community species diversity of desert steppe in sandy area of eastern Ningxia. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2015,35(9):1891-1898. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]   乌尼尔,海棠.放牧对典型草原羊草形态特征及土壤理化性质的影响.内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,36(4):71-76.
WUNIER, HAITANG. The effects of grazing on the morpho-logical characteristics of Leymus chinensis and soil physical and chemical properties in typical grassland. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2015,36(4):71-76. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]   张蒙,李晓兵.放牧对土壤有机碳的影响及相关过程研究进展.草地学报,2018,26(2):267-276.
ZHANG M, LI X B. A review: effects of grazing on soil organic carbon and the related processes. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018,26(2):267-276. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]   杜宝红,高翠萍,哈达朝鲁.不同放牧强度对锡林郭勒典型草原生产力及碳储量的影响.水土保持研究,2018,25(1):139-146, 152.
DU B H, GAO C P, HADACHAOLU. Effect of grazing on plant biomass and carbon storage of typical grassland in Xilinguole. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,25(1):139-146, 152. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]   董全民,赵新全,马玉寿,等.放牧对小蒿草草甸生物量及不同植物类群生长率和补偿效应的影响.生态学报,2012,32(9):2640-2650.
DONG Q M, ZHAO X Q, MA Y S, et al. Influence of grazing on biomass growth ratio and compensatory effect of different plant groups in Kobrecia parva meadow. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(9):2640-2650. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]   杨晶晶,吐尔逊娜依·热依木,张青青,等.放牧强度对伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地植物群落特征的影响.新疆农业科学,2018,55(8):1542-1550.
YANG J J, Reyimu TUERXUNNAYI, ZHANG Q Q, et al. Effects of grazing intensity on plant community characteristics of Seriphidium transiliense desert grassland. Xinjiang Agri-cultural Sciences, 2018,55(8):1542-1550. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]   张玉萍,宋乃平,王兴,等.不同放牧制度对荒漠草原植物多样性及土壤理化性状的影响.北方园艺,2018(19):109-115.
ZHANG Y P, SONG N P, WANG X, et al. Effects of different grazing systems on plant diversity and soil physical and chemical properties in desert steppe. Northern Horti-culture, 2018(19):109-115. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]   朱昊,柯梅,李学森,等.放牧对蒿类荒漠草地植物群落和土壤理化性质的影响.草原与草坪,2017,37(4):68-73.
ZHU H, KE M, LI X S, et al. Effect of grazing on plant communities and soil physical and chemical properties of artemisia desert grassland. Grassland and Turf, 2017,37(4):68-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] Haiying HU,Huixia LI,Biao NI,Bin SHI,Dongmei XU,Yingzhong XIE. Characteristic of typical vegetation community and water use efficiency of dominant plants in desert steppe of Ningxia[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(4): 460-471.
[2] Li FU,Yingzhong XIE,Hongbin MA,Ende XING,Xiumin TIAN. Allocation analysis of natural and cultivated grassland resources of eco-family pasture based on the theory of grassland agro-ecosystem discordance[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(3): 355-364.
[3] Yi XUE,Xing WANG,Naiping SONG,Jinming SUI,Juan CHEN. Fine-scale spatial point patterns of Stipa breviflora population at different “Soil Island” habitat sizes in desert steppe[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(2): 211-220.
[4] LI Xuqing, ZHANG Ya, TIAN Zhongling, WU Genliang. Difference analysis of soil nutrients, enzymatic activities and microbial community structure between eggplant continuous cropping and rotation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2017, 43(5): 561-569.
[5] WANG Xing, SONG Naiping, YANG Xinguo. Response of community distribution and biodiversity of grassland plants to environmental factors based on a “3circles” paradigm[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(6): 747-759.
[6] WAN Nianxin, ZHENG Shunlin, ZHOU Shaomeng, ZHANG Qin, PENG Bin, YUAN Jichao. Analysis of potato-maize rotation on rhizosphere soil nutrient and enzyme activity for potato[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(1): 74-80.
[7] Zhao Wei, Yang Mingxiu, Chen Lin, Wang Lei, Song Naiping, Yang Xinguo. Structure and dynamics of herbaceous layer vegetation of artificial Caragana intermedia shrublands in desert steppe.[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2015, 41(6): 723-731.
[8] Song Naiping, Wu Xudong, Pan Jun, Qu Wenjie, Zhou Juan, An Chaoping. Impacts of artificial Caragana intermedia stand on soil texture evolution in desert steppe.[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2015, 41(6): 703-711.
[9] Pan Jun, Song Naiping, Wu Xudong, Yang Xinguo, Chen Lin, Qu Wenjie, Zhai Deping. Effects of different planting-years of artificial Caragana intermedia shrubs on soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry characteristics in desert steppe.[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2015, 41(2): 160-168.
[10] Li Xuebin, Chen Lin, Fan Ruixia, Wu Xiuling, Xie Yingzhong . Effects of four typical plant community litter input on soil physical and chemical properties under the fenced condition in desert steppe[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2015, 41(1): 101-110.
[11] Li Rong, Hou Xianqing, Fan Xiaoyong, Sun Yaning, Liu Hongxun, Meng Xuting, Rao Tianqi. Effect of different mulching materials on soil properties and growth in the early stage of maize[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2015, 41(03): 331-339.
[12] Chen Lin, Yang Xinguo, Song Naiping*, Li Xuebin, Zhai Deping . Effects of planting alfalfa on soil quality in desert steppe of Ningxia[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2014, 40(5): 541-550.