Please wait a minute...
Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences)  2020, Vol. 46 Issue (2): 243-253    DOI: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2019.02.211
Animal sciences & veterinary medicine     
Evaluation on nutritional components and nutritive quality in body of young fish Alosa sapidissima cultured in two different patterns
Yongshi LIU(),Fei JIANG,Yonghai SHI()
Shanghai Fisheries Research Institute/Shanghai Fisheries Technical Extension Station, Shanghai 200433, China
Download: HTML   HTML (   PDF(900KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

In order to understand the effects of different culture patterns on the nutritional components of fish body, young fish Alosa sapidissima cultured in outdoor and shaded ponds were analyzed by biochemical analysis method, and the nutritive quality was analyzed and compared. The results showed that the body water content of shaded pond group (69.22%) was significantly lower than that of the outdoor pond group (70.68%) (P<0.05), while the body crude fat content of shaded pond group (10.79%) was significantly higher than that of the outdoor pond group (7.48%) (P<0.05). No significant differences in the contents of crude protein and ash in body were found between the two groups (P>0.05). A total of 18 kinds of amino acids were found, and there were no significant differences in the contents of 11 kinds of amino acids (threonine, glycine, valine, methionine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, histidine, arginine, proline, tryptophane, cystine) between the two groups (P>0.05), while in other seven kinds of amino acids (aspartate, serine, glutamic acid, alanine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine), the contents of outdoor pond group were significantly higher than those in shaded pond group (P<0.05). The percentage contents of total amino acid (TAA), non-essential amino acid (NEAA) and delicious amino acid (DAA) in dry body of outdoor pond group were significantly higher than those of shaded pond group (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences in the percentage contents of essential amino acid (EAA) and half-essential amino acid (HEAA) in dry body between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the ratios of EAA/TAA, EAA/NEAA and DAA/TAA, and the body essential amino acid indexes (EAAI) of shaded pond group and outdoor pond group were 76.49 and 76.46, respectively. The total content of saturated fatty acid (SFA) of outdoor pond group (35.91%) was significantly higher than that of shaded pond group (27.70%) (P<0.05), while the total content of poly-unsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) of outdoor pond group (13.66%) was significantly lower than that of shaded pond group (21.35%) (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the total contents of mono-unsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) and eicosapentaenoic acid+docosahexaenoic acid (EPA+DHA) between the two groups. The results indicated that the body protein quality of young fish A. sapidissima cultured in the outdoor pond was slightly better than that of young fish cultured in the shaded pond, but the body fatty acid quality of young fish A. sapidissima cultured in the shaded pond was much better. So, we suggest the composition of fatty acids in formulated feed should be optimized to increase the content of PUFA, especially the content of EPA and DHA.



Key wordsAlosa sapidissima      young fish      amino acid      fatty acid     
Received: 21 February 2019      Published: 22 May 2020
CLC:  S 964.3  
Corresponding Authors: Yonghai SHI     E-mail: liuys101@163.com;yonghais@163.com
Cite this article:

Yongshi LIU,Fei JIANG,Yonghai SHI. Evaluation on nutritional components and nutritive quality in body of young fish Alosa sapidissima cultured in two different patterns. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2020, 46(2): 243-253.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2019.02.211     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/agr/Y2020/V46/I2/243


2种养殖模式下美洲鲥当年鱼种营养成分比较及品质评价

为了解敞口池塘(敞池组)和遮阴池塘(遮阴组)养殖的美洲鲥当年鱼种鱼体营养成分的差异,采用生化分析方法对2种养殖模式的美洲鲥当年鱼种鱼体进行营养成分分析,并对其营养品质进行分析和比较。结果显示:遮阴组美洲鲥当年鱼种鱼体水分含量(69.22%)显著低于敞池组(70.68%)(P<0.05),粗脂肪含量(10.79%)显著高于敞池组(7.48%)(P<0.05),粗蛋白和粗灰分含量在2组间未有显著差异(P>0.05)。在检测到的18中氨基酸中,有7种氨基酸(天门冬氨酸、丝氨酸、谷氨酸、丙氨酸、异亮氨酸、亮氨酸、赖氨酸)的含量为敞池组显著高于遮阴组(P<0.05),其余11种氨基酸(苏氨酸、甘氨酸、缬氨酸、蛋氨酸、酪氨酸、苯丙氨酸、组氨酸、精氨酸、脯氨酸、色氨酸、胱氨酸)的含量在2组间差异不显著(P>0.05);敞池组的氨基酸总量(total amino acid, TAA)、非必需氨基酸(non-essential amino acid, NEAA)和鲜味氨基酸(delicious amino acid, DAA)占鱼体干质量百分比均显著高于遮阴组(P<0.05);2组的必需氨基酸(essential amino acid, EAA)、半必需氨基酸(half-essential amino acid, HEAA)占鱼体干质量百分比及EAA/TAA、EAA/NEAA、DAA/TAA未有显著差异(P>0.05),遮阴组和敞池组的鱼体必需氨基酸指数(essential amino acid indexes, EAAI)分别为76.49和76.46。敞池组鱼体饱和脂肪酸(saturated fatty acid, SFA)总量(35.91%)显著高于遮阴组(27.70%)(P<0.05),而多不饱和脂肪酸(poly-unsaturated fatty acid, PUFA)总量(13.66%)显著低于遮阴组(21.35%)(P<0.05);单不饱和脂肪酸(mono-unsaturated fatty acid, MUFA)和二十碳五烯酸(eicosapentaenoic acid, EPA)+二十二碳六烯酸(docosahexaenoic acid, DHA)总量在2组间未有显著差异 (P>0.05)。研究表明,敞口池塘养殖的美洲鲥当年鱼种鱼体蛋白质品质略优于遮阴养殖,而遮阴池塘养殖的美洲鲥当年鱼种鱼体的脂肪酸品质更优,建议优化配合饲料脂肪酸结构,提高PUFA含量,尤其是EPA和DHA的含量。


关键词: 美洲鲥,  鱼种,  氨基酸,  脂肪酸 

氨基酸

Amino acid (AA)

w/%

脂肪酸

Fatty acid

w/%

天门冬氨酸

Aspartic acid (Asp)

3.96C14:00.84

苏氨酸

Threonine (Thr)

1.63C15:00.17

丝氨酸

Serine (Ser)

1.75C16:013.50

谷氨酸

Glutamine (Glu)

6.99C17:00.11

甘氨酸

Glycine (Gly)

2.60C17:10.06

丙氨酸

Alanine (Ala)

2.49C18:04.56

缬氨酸

Valine (Val)

1.87C18:1n9c23.92

蛋氨酸

Methionine (Met)

0.84C18:2n6t0.61

异亮氨酸

Isoleucine (Ile)

2.01C18:2n6c45.52

亮氨酸

Leucine (Leu)

3.90C18:3n60.36

酪氨酸

Tyrosine (Tyr)

0.92C18:3n30.73

苯丙氨酸

Phenylalanine (Phe)

1.95C20:00.70

组氨酸

Histidine (His)

1.08C20:1n93.96

赖氨酸

Lysine (Lys)

2.98C20:20.30

精氨酸

Argnine (Arg)

2.06C20:3n60.37

脯氨酸

Proline (Pro)

2.06C20:4n60.25

胱氨酸

Cysteine (Cys)

0.34C20:5n3 EPA0.21
C22:00.16
C22:20.89
C22:6n3 DHA1.79
Table 1 Composition and content of amino acid and fatty acid in formulated feed
处理 Treatment水分 Water粗蛋白 Crude protein粗脂肪 Crude fat粗灰分 Crude ash
遮阴组 Shaded pond group69.22±0.35b16.34±0.28a10.79±0.49a2.88±0.12a
敞池组 Outdoor pond group70.68±0.43a16.61±0.40a7.48±1.38b3.41±0.30a
Table 2 Effects of different culture patterns on common nutrient components in body of young fish Alosa sapidissima (fresh mass basis)

氨基酸

Amino acid

遮阴组

Shaded pond group

敞池组

Outdoor pond group

天门冬氨酸 Asp4.74±0.14b5.21±0.19a
苏氨酸 Thr*2.13±0.05a2.31±0.11a
丝氨酸 Ser2.14±0.06b2.28±0.06a
谷氨酸 Glu7.15±0.26b7.91±0.18a
甘氨酸 Gly4.07±0.12a4.26±0.20a
丙氨酸 Ala3.52±0.10b3.79±0.06a
缬氨酸 Val*2.35±0.07a2.44±0.19a
蛋氨酸 Met*1.58±0.03a1.64±0.20a
异亮氨酸 Ile*2.09±0.06b2.28±0.07a
亮氨酸 Leu*3.73±0.10b4.09±0.10a
酪氨酸 Tyr1.45±0.14a1.58±0.05a
苯丙氨酸 Phe*2.27±0.08a2.45±0.28a
组氨酸 His**1.29±0.03a1.45±0.13a
赖氨酸 Lys*4.40±0.07b4.74±0.12a
精氨酸 Arg**3.08±0.28a3.17±0.32a
脯氨酸 Pro2.13±0.03a2.31±0.33a
色氨酸 Tryptophane (Trp)*0.43±0.03a0.45±0.01a
胱氨酸 Cys0.71±0.02a0.72±0.03a
氨基酸总量 TAA49.28±0.70b53.07±1.69a
必需氨基酸 EAA19.00±0.22a20.39±1.01a
半必需氨基酸 HEAA4.38±0.26a4.62±0.45a
非必需氨基酸 NEAA25.91±0.77b28.06±0.47a
鲜味氨基酸 DAA19.48±0.60b21.17±0.32a

必需氨基酸与氨基酸总量比

Ratio of EAA/TAA

38.55±0.29a38.41±0.87a

必需氨基酸与非必需氨基酸比

Ratio of EAA/NEAA

73.36±1.82a72.66±3.38a

鲜味氨基酸与氨基酸总量比

Ratio of DAA/TAA

39.52±0.72a39.91±0.74a
Table 3 Effects of different culture patterns on amino acid composition and content in body of young fish A. sapidissima (dry mass basis)

必需氨基酸

Essential amino acid

w(氨基酸)

Amino acid content/(mg/g)

FAO/WHO

标准模式

FAO/WHO

standard pattern

全鸡蛋

蛋白模式

Whole egg protein pattern

遮阴组

Shaded pond group

敞池组

Outdoor pond group

遮阴组

Shaded pond group

敞池组

Outdoor pond group

氨基酸

评分

AAS

化学

评分

CS

氨基酸

评分

AAS

化学

评分

CS

异亮氨酸 Ile246.08251.212503310.980.741.000.76
亮氨酸 Leu439.58451.334405341.000.821.030.85
赖氨酸 Lys518.43522.663404411.521.181.541.19
苏氨酸 Thr251.18254.842502921.000.861.020.87
缬氨酸 Val276.68268.833104110.89*0.67*0.87*0.65*
色氨酸 Trp51.0149.3160990.850.520.820.50
蛋氨酸+胱氨酸 Met+Cys270.40260.862203861.230.701.190.68
苯丙氨酸+酪氨酸 Phe+Tyr437.99444.513805651.150.781.170.79
必需氨基酸指数 EAAI76.4976.46
FF-value2.202.19
Table 4 Effects of different culture patterns on nutritional quality in body of young fish A. sapidissima

脂肪酸

Fatty acid

遮阴组

Shaded pond group

敞池组

Outdoor pond group

月桂酸 C12:00.04±0.00b0.10±0.01a
豆蔻酸 C14:01.64±0.06a3.11±0.72a
棕榈酸 C16:019.50±0.40b25.30±1.57a
硬脂酸 C18:06.23±0.17a7.01±0.75a
花生酸 C20:00.31±0.00a0.39±0.04a
棕榈烯酸 C16:11.89±0.07b3.76±0.73a
油酸 C18:1n934.70±0.72a29.80±4.76a
二十碳一烯酸 C20:11.51±0.02b1.63±0.04a
二十二碳一烯酸 C22:10.40±0.06a0.79±0.38a
亚油酸 C18:2n618.50±0.50a11.33±2.50b
亚麻酸 C18:3n61.59±0.06a1.63±0.70a
二十碳五烯酸 EPA C20:5n30.33±0.31
二十二碳六烯酸 DHA C22:6n31.26±0.20a1.46±0.00a
其他脂肪酸 Others12.43±0.51a14.47±1.68a
∑SFA27.70±0.38b35.91±3.06a
∑MUFA38.49±0.82a35.98±4.15a
∑PUFA21.35±0.75a13.66±1.24b
EPA+DHA1.26±0.20a1.06±1.34a
∑SFA/∑UFA0.46±0.01a0.73±0.14a
Table 5 Effects of different culture patterns on fatty acid composition and content in body of young fish A. sapidissima

种类

Kinds

水分

Water

粗蛋白

Crude protein

粗脂肪

Crude fat

粗灰分

Crude ash

池塘养殖美洲鲥幼鱼鱼体(本研究)

Body of young fish A. sapidissima cultured in ponds (in this study)

69.22~70.6816.34~16.617.48~10.792.88~3.41

天津美洲鲥成鱼肌肉[8]

Muscle of adult fish A. sapidissima from Tianjin[8]

75.5020.583.681.64

江阴市美洲鲥亚成鱼肌肉[9]

Muscle of sub-adult fish A. sapidissima from Jiangyin City[9]

70.2318.886.801.96

广东美洲鲥雌鱼成鱼肌肉[10]

Muscle of adult female fish A. sapidissima from Guangdong[10]

75.0617.013.461.30
Table 6 Comparison of common nutrient components in A. sapidissima from different studies (fresh mass basis)
[1]   王志铮,杨磊,朱卫东.三种养殖模式下日本鳗鲡养成品的形质差异.应用生态学报,2012,23(5):1385-1392.
WANG Z Z, YANG L, ZHU W D. Morphological and quality difference of adult Anguilla japonica under three aquaculture models.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012,23(5):1385-1392. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]   钟爱华,储张杰,戴露怡,等.3种养殖模式下大黄鱼肌肉营养成分比较及品质评价.安徽农业科学,2014,42(20):6629-6631, 6649.
ZHONG A H, CHU Z J, DAI L Y, et al. Evaluation of nutrient components and nutritive quality of muscle of big yellow cracker (Larimichthys crocea) in different aquaculture model. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2014,42(20):6629-6631, 6649. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]   钟鸿干,马军,姜芳燕,等.2种养殖模式下斑石鲷肌肉营养成分及品质的比较.江苏农业科学,2017,45(1):155-158. DOI:10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.01.044
ZHONG H G, MA J, JIANG F Y, et al. Comparative study on nutritive components and flesh quality of muscles of Oplegnathus punctatus cultivated under two different culture models. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017,45(1):155-158. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.01.044
[4]   阮成旭,袁重桂,陶翠丽,等.不同养殖模式对大黄鱼肉质的影响.水产科学,2017,36(5):623-627. DOI:10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.2017.05.014
RUAN C X, YUAN C G, TAO C L, et al. Influence of culture patterns on flesh quality of large yellow croaker Pseudosciaena crocea. Fisheries Science, 2017,36(5):623-627. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.16378/j.cnki.1003-1111.2017.05.014
[5]   原居林,刘梅,倪蒙,等.不同养殖模式对大口黑鲈生长性能、形体指标和肌肉营养成分影响研究.江西农业大学学报,2018,40(6):1276-1285. DOI:10.13836/j.jjau.2018161
YUAN J L, LIU M, NI M, et al. Effects of different culture models on growth performance, morphological traits and nutritional quality in muscles of Micropterus salmoides. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2018,40(6):1276-1285. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13836/j.jjau.2018161
[6]   张旭.不同养殖模式下珍珠龙胆石斑鱼的品质比较.河北渔业,2017(8):5-8, 17. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6755.2017.08.003
ZHANG X. Comparison of flesh quality of farmed grouper, ♀Epinephelus fuscoguttatus×♂Epinephelus lanceolatus from different culture models. Hebei Fisheries, 2017(8):5-8, 17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6755.2017.08.003
[7]   施永海,徐嘉波,陆根海,等.养殖美洲鲥的生长特性.动物学杂志,2017,52(4):638-645. DOI:10.13859/j.cjz.201704011
SHI Y H, XU J B, LU G H, et al. Growth characteristics of cultured American shad Alosa sapidissima. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 2017,52(4):638-645. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13859/j.cjz.201704011
[8]   郭永军,邢克智,杨广,等.美洲鲥鱼肌肉营养成分测定及分析.中国饲料,2010(8):39-41.
GUO Y J, XING K Z, YANG G, et al. Evaluation of nutritive quality and nutritional components in muscle of American shad. China Feed, 2010(8):39-41. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]   顾若波,张呈祥,徐钢春,等.美洲鲥肌肉营养成分分析与评价.水产学杂志,2007,20(2):40-46.
GU R B, ZHANG C X, XU G C, et al. Evaluation of nutritive quality and nutritional components in Alosa sapidissima muscle. Chinese Journal of Fisheries, 2007,20(2):40-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]   洪孝友,谢文平,朱新平,等.美洲鲥和孟加拉鲥肌肉营养成分比较.营养学报,2013,35(2):206-208. DOI:10.13325/j.cnki.acta.nutr.sin.2013.02.003
HONG X Y, XIE W P, ZHU X P, et al. Comparison of muscle nutrient composition between Alosa sapidissima and Tenualosa ilisha. Acta Nutrimenta Sinica, 2013,35(2):206-208. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13325/j.cnki.acta.nutr.sin.2013.02.003
[11]   缪晓燕,樊昌杰,朱爱琴,等.美洲鲥工厂化养殖技术初探.水产科技情报,2014,41(4):176-179. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1994.2014.04.003
MIAO X Y, FAN C J, ZHU A Q, et al. A preliminary study on the technology of Alosa sapidissima industrial aquaculture. Fisheries Science & Technology Information, 2014,41(4):176-179. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1994.2014.04.003
[12]   游华斌,张惠芬,徐钢春,等.美洲鲥集约化养殖技术.科学养鱼,2012(7):36-37.
YOU H B, ZHANG H F, XU G C, et al. Technology of Alosa sapidissima intensive aquaculture. Scientific Fish Farming, 2012(7):36-37. (in Chinese)
[13]   潘德博,洪孝友,朱新平,等.美洲鲥工厂化养殖模式初探.广东农业科学,2010,37(8):183-184.
PAN D B, HONG X Y, ZHU X P, et al. A preliminary study on the industrial aquaculture mode of Alosa sapidissima. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2010,37(8):183-184. (in Chinese)
[14]   郭礼中,丁华东.美洲鲥鱼长江网箱养殖初探.科学养鱼,2010(8):30-31.
GUO L Z, DING H D. Preliminary study on cage culture of American shad in Yangtze River. Scientific Fish Farming, 2010(8):30-31. (in Chinese)
[15]   贾俊威.美洲鲥鱼水库网箱养殖试验.安徽农学通报,2016,22(14):133-134.
JIA J W. A cage aquaculture experiment of Alosa sapidissima in reservoir. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016,22(14):133-134. (in Chinese)
[16]   施永海,徐嘉波,刘永士,等.敞口池塘和遮阴池塘养殖美洲鲥当年鱼种的生长规律和差异.上海海洋大学学报,2019,28(2):161-170. DOI:10.12024/jsou.20180402263
SHI Y H, XU J B, LIU Y S, et al. Growth regularity and difference of young fish American shad Alosa sapidissim cultured in outdoor and shaded ponds. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 2019,28(2):161-170. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.12024/jsou.20180402263
[17]   徐嘉波,税春,施永海,等.池养美洲鲥1+龄鱼种生长特性的研究.上海海洋大学学报,2018,27(1):55-63. DOI:10.12024/jsou.20170301992
XU J B, SHUI C, SHI Y H, et al. Study of growth characteristics of pond-reared one-year-old Alosa sapidissima. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University, 2018,27(1):55-63. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.12024/jsou.20170301992
[18]   FAO/WHO. FAO Nutrition Meeting Report Series: Energy and Protein Requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1973:63.
[19]   桥本芳郎.养鱼饲料学.北京:农业出版社,1980:114-115.
YOSHIRO H. Fishery Feed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1980:114-115. (in Chinese)
[20]   庄平,宋超,章龙珍.长江口安氏白虾与日本沼虾营养成分比较.动物学报,2008,54(5):822-829.
ZHUANG P, SONG C, ZHANG L Z. Comparison of nutritive components of Exopalaemon annandalei and Macrobrachium nipponensis collected from the Yangtze Estuary. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 2008,54(5):822-829. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]   施永海,张根玉,刘永士,等.野生及养殖哈氏仿对虾肌肉营养成分的分析和比较.水产学报,2013,37(5):768-776. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1231.2013.38359
SHI Y H, ZHANG G Y, LIU Y S, et al. Comparison of muscle nutrient composition between wild and cultured sword prawn (Parapenaeopsis hardwickii). Journal of Fisheries of China, 2013,37(5):768-776. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1231.2013.38359
[22]   施永海,张根玉,张海明,等.配合饲料和活饵料喂养刀鲚肌肉营养品质分析与比较.动物营养学报,2014,26(2):427-436. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006.267x.2014.02.019
SHI Y H, ZHANG G Y, ZHANG H M, et al. Analysis and comparison of nutritional quality of muscle from Coilia nasus fed formulated feed and live feed. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2014,26(2):427-436. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006.267x.2014.02.019
[23]   唐雪,徐钢春,徐跑,等.野生与养殖刀鲚肌肉营养成分的比较分析.动物营养学报,2011,23(3):514-520. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2011.03.024
TANG X, XU G C, XU P, et al. A comparison of muscle nutrient composition between wild and cultured Coilia nasus. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2011,23(3):514-520. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2011.03.024
[24]   严安生,熊传喜,钱健旺,等.鳜鱼含肉率及鱼肉营养成分的研究.华中农业大学学报,1995,14(1):80-84.
YAN A S, XIONG C X, QIAN J W, et al. A study on the rate of flesh content of mandarinfish and nutritional quality of the flesh. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 1995,14(1):80-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]   黄钧,陈琴,陈意明,等.黄颡鱼的含肉率及肌肉营养价值研究.广西农业生物科学,2001,20(1):45-50.
HUANG J, CHEN Q, CHEN Y M, et al. Study on flesh content and its nutritive value of Pseudobagrus fulvidraco (Richardson). Journal of Guangxi Agricultural and Biological Science, 2001,20(1):45-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]   陈定福,何学福,周启贵.南方大口鲶和鲶鱼的含肉率及鱼肉的营养成分.动物学杂志,1990,25(1):7-9.
CHEN D F, HE X F, ZHOU Q G. Analysis on the ratio of flesh content and the nutritional composition in the muscle of Silurus meridionalis and Silurus asotus. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 1990,25(1):7-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]   樊海平,邱曼丽,钟全福,等.不同生长阶段野生和养殖大刺鳅营养成分的比较.安徽农业科学,2018,46(8):92-96. DOI:10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2018.08.027
FAN H P, QIU M L, ZHONG Q F, et al. Comparison of nutritional component of wild and cultured Mastacembelus armatus in different growth stages. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018,46(8):92-96. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2018.08.027
[28]   罗鸣钟,关瑞章,靳恒.五种鳗鲡的含肉率及肌肉营养成分分析.水生生物学报,2015,39(4):714-722. DOI:10.7541/2015.94
LUO M Z, GUAN R Z, JIN H. Analysis on the ratio of flesh content and the nutritional composition in the muscle of five species of eel. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2015,39(4):714-722. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.7541/2015.94
[29]   黄海,杨宁,张希.淡水石斑鱼含肉率和肌肉营养成分分析.水产科技情报,2012,39(2):87-91. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1994.2012.02.009
HUANG H, YANG N, ZHANG X. Analysis on the ratio of flesh content and the nutritional composition in the muscle of Cichlasoma managuense. Fisheries Science & Technology Information, 2012,39(2):87-91. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1994.2012.02.009
[30]   高露姣,楼宝,毛国民,等.不同饵料饲养的褐牙鲆肌肉营养成分的比较.海洋渔业,2009,31(3):293-299. DOI:10.13233/j.cnki.mar.fish.2009.03.011
GAO L J, LOU B, MAO G M, et al. Comparison of biochemical components in muscles of Paralichthys olivaceus fed with different diets. Marine Fisheries, 2009,31(3):293-299. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13233/j.cnki.mar.fish.2009.03.011
[31]   邵俊杰,张世勇,朱昱璇,等.不同养殖模式对斑点叉尾鮰生长和肌肉品质特性的影响.水产学报,2017,41(8):1256-1263. DOI:10.11964/jfc.20161210643
SHAO J J, ZHANG S Y, ZHU Y X, et al. Comparative study on growth performance and meat quality characteristics of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) cultured under different aquaculture modes. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2017,41(8):1256-1263. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11964/jfc.20161210643
[32]   林元烧,曹文清,郑爱榕,等.几种饵料浮游动物脂肪酸组成分析及营养效果评价.台湾海峡,2001,20(Suppl. 1):164-168.
LIN Y S, CAO W Q, ZHENG A R, et al. Fatty acid composition analysis and their nutrient effect evaluation of some pelagic food organisms. Journal of Oceanography in Taiwan Strait, 2001,20(Suppl. 1):164-168. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33]   崔丽莉,缪祥军,许存泽,等.高原地区不同养殖模式下罗非鱼肌肉营养成分的比较.现代农业科技,2018(22):234-237.
CUI L L, MIAO X J, XU C Z, et al. Comparison of muscle nutritional components of Tilapia in different breeding modes in Plateau Area. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018(22):234-237. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34]   王彬,李奇.亮氨酸的代谢及营养生理作用研究进展.饲料研究,2012(1):14-16.
WANG B, LI Q. Research progress on nutrition physiology role and metabolism of leucine. Feed Research, 2012(1):14-16. (in Chinese)
[35]   耿子蔚,张鑫宇,郑汉宇,等.池塘工业化养殖与传统池塘养殖模式对大口黑鲈肌肉品质特性的比较研究.食品工业科技,2018,39(23):95-98. DOI:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.23.017
GENG Z W, ZHANG X Y, ZHEGN H Y, et al. Comparative on muscle quality characteristics of Micropterus salmoides between in-pond raceway system and traditional pond system. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018,39(23):95-98. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.23.017
[36]   李正友,王艳艳,詹会祥,等.人工养殖与野生云南光唇鱼肌肉的营养成分测定及比较.贵州农业科学,2016,44(11):104-107.
LI Z Y, WANG Y Y, ZHAN H X, et al. Comparison of nutrient components in muscles of cultured and wild groups of Acrossocheilus yunnanensis. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2016,44(11):104-107. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37]   王雪锋,顾鸿鑫,郭倩琳,等.海水和淡水养殖锯缘青蟹的营养成分分析.食品科学,2010,31(23):386-390.
WANG X F, GU H X, GUO Q L, et al. Nutritional composition analysis of marine cultured and fresh-water cultured Scylla serrata. Food Science, 2010,31(23):386-390. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]   赵何勇,陈诏,徐鸿飞,等.海水和淡水养殖关岛红罗非鱼肌肉营养成分及品质特性分析.南方农业学报,2018,49(7):1396-1402. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2018.07.21
ZHAO H Y, CHEN Z, XU H F, et al. Muscular nutritional components and texture profile of marine cultured and fresh water cultured Guam red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.). Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2018,49(7):1396-1402. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2018.07.21
[39]   王秋菊,许丽,范明哲.谷氨酸和谷氨酰胺转运系统的研究进展.动物营养学报,2011,23(6):901-907. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2011.06.002
WANG Q J, XU L, FAN M Z. Recent advances in transport systems of glutamate and glutamine. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2011,23(6):901-907. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2011.06.002
[40]   OSER B L. Method for integrating essential amino acid content in the nutritional evaluation of protein. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 1951,27(5):396-402.
[41]   于久翔,高小强,韩岑,等.野生与养殖红鳍东方鲀营养品质的比较分析.动物营养学报,2016,28(9):2987-2997. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.09.039
YU J X, GAO X Q, HAN C, et al. Comparative analysis on nutritional quality between wild and cultured Takifugu rubripes. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2016,28(9):2987-2997. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.09.039
[42]   梁琍,冉辉,桂庆平,等.锦江河野生黄颡鱼与养殖黄颡鱼营养品质分析及比较.湖北农业科学,2015,54(18):4544-4547. DOI:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2015.18.038
LIANG L, RAN H, GUI Q P, et al. Analysis and comparison of nutritional quality between wild and cultured Pelteobagrus fulvidraco in Jinjiang River. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2015,54(18):4544-4547. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2015.18.038
[43]   于燕光,宓慧菁,逯云召,等.多养殖模式下黄姑鱼肌肉营养成分分析.河北渔业,2018(10):15-19. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6755.2018.10.004
YU Y G, MI H J, LU Y Z, et al. Analysis on the nutritional composition in the muscle of Nibea albiflora under different breeding modes. Hebei Fisheries, 2018(10):15-19. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6755.2018.10.004
[44]   柳学周,徐永江,李荣,等.黄条鰤(Seriola aureovittata)肌肉营养组成分析与评价.渔业科学进展,2017,38(1):128-135. DOI:10.11758/yykxjz.20160722001
LIU X Z, XU Y J, LI R, et al. Analysis and evaluation of nutritional composition of the muscle of yellow tail kingfish (Seriola aureovittata). Progress in Fishery Sciences, 2017,38(1):128-135. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11758/yykxjz.20160722001
[45]   刘跟生,徐贵发.单不饱和脂肪酸对心血管的保护作用.卫生研究,2006,35(3):357-359.
LIU G S, XU G F. Protective effect of dietary monounsaturated fatty acid on cardiovascular system. Journal of Hygiene Research, 2006,35(3):357-359. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[46]   许星鸿,刘翔,阎斌伦,等.日本对虾肌肉营养成分分析与品质评价.食品科学,2011,32(13):297-301.
XU X H, LIU X, YAN B L, et al. Nutritional component analysis and quality evaluation of Penaeus japonicus. Food Science, 2011,32(13):297-301. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[47]   王珊珊,李秋,徐田彬,等.N-3多不饱和脂肪酸的生理功能特性及应用.中国食物与营养,2009(10):51-54.
WANG S S, LI Q, XU T B, et al. Physiological function of N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and their application. Food and Nutrition in China, 2009(10):51-54. (in Chinese)
[48]   庄平,宋超,章龙珍.舌虾虎鱼肌肉营养成分与品质的评价.水产学报,2010,34(4):559-564. DOI:10.3724/sp.j.1231.2010.06740
ZHUANG P, SONG C, ZHANG L Z. Evaluation of nutritive quality and nutrient components in the muscle of Glossogobius giuris. Journal of Fisheries of China, 2010,34(4):559-564. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1231.2010.06740
[49]   张强,王永利.尖海龙与日本海马脂肪的提取分析.分析化学,1996,24(2):139-143.
ZHANG Q, WANG Y L. Extraction and analysis of fat of S. acus Linnaeus and H. japonicus Kaup. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 1996,24(2):139-143. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[50]   刘志东,陈雪忠,曲映红,等.南极冰鱼与南极磷虾营养成分分析及比较.现代食品科技,2014,30(2):228-233. DOI:10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2014.02.047
LIU Z D, CHEN X Z, QU Y H, et al. Comparison and evaluation of the nutritional components of Antarctic icefish and krill. Modern Food Science &Technology, 2014,30(2):228-233. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2014.02.047
[51]   封功能,韩光明,王爱民,等.4种常规养殖虾肌肉营养品质分析与评价.湖北农业科学,2011,30(5):1004-1007.
FENG G N, HAN G M, WANG A M, et al. Analysis and evaluation of nutrition components in the muscle of four kinds of shrimp. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2011,30(5):1004-1007. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] Li ZHANG,Weilun NONG,Jianxiong LU,Guohua ZHANG,Lixia LIU. Single nucleotide polymorphism screening and bioinformatics analysis of the main family genes of FABPs in Bamei pig[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(1): 109-118.
[2] YAN Tao, XUAN Lijie, JIANG Lixi. Effects of flavonoids on fatty acid accumulation and its molecular mechanisms in oilseed rape[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2018, 44(3): 253-258.
[3] WANG Haoyi, LI Yuling, ZHU Le, JIANG Lixi. Effect of seed dormancy on lipid accumulation and its molecular mechanism in oilseed rape[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2017, 43(4): 397-403.
[4] LIU Yu, WANG Fulin, LIU Renhu. Effects of yellow seed coat mutation on oil and protein contents in seeds of Brassica napus L.[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2017, 43(1): 37-44.
[5] WEI Changhui, LIU Yajun, YE Xiuxiang, LI Yue, MA Kun. Effects of intercropping potato with maize on soil and crop.[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2017, 43(1): 54-64.
[6] XU Guangli, LIU Jia, LIANG Chenggang, WANG Yan, DING Chunbang, LI Tian. Changes of nitrogen metabolism enzyme activities and protein content in response to low light during the seed filling stage in rice[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(1): 53-62.
[7] TAN Liangliang, SHEN Lirong. Determination of the metabolites, eicosanoids derived from polyunsaturated fatty acids in Drosophila tissue with high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(1): 8-16.
[8] LIU Li, ZENG Zhen, FANG Ping. Optimization of a culture medium for Bacillus subtilis based on monosodium glutamate wastewater[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 42(04): 485-494.
[9] Yang Jing, Zhou Ciqin, Zheng Jusheng, Li Duo* . Nutritional compositions in Trichosanthes kirilowii Maxim seeds and seed oils influenced by geographical environment[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2014, 40(6): 661-669.
[10] Sun Yingchao, Liu Wei, He Qiuling, Zhu Shuijin, Chen Jinhong*. Effects of different kinds and concentrations of fatty acids on differentiation and development of cotton fiber[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2014, 40(6): 621-626.
[11] Li Yongqiang1,2, Wu Meiling1,2, Ma Zhiqing1,2, Feng Juntao1,2, Zhang Xing1,2*. Construction, expression and activities of mutant carboxylesterases from Helicoverpa armigera[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2014, 40(1): 16-24.
[12] WANG Jibian1,2, CHEN Hongcheng2,3, CHEN Yubo2,4, ZHANG Xiaoyu2,4, XU Haiming1, ZHAO Jianyi2*. Molecular dissection of oil content with respect to fatty acid compositions by conditional QTL analysis in oilseed rape[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2013, 39(5): 504-5125.
[13] QUE Tingting1, XIE Yan1, ZHENG Jiawen1, HU Qinglan1,2, HU Yaqin1,2*, LUO Zisheng1*. Analysis of nutritional and odor components in muscle of Siam alligator (Crocodylus siamensis)[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2013, 39(2): 122-132.
[14] ZHANG Xi, YANG Ming, SONG Fei, ZHANG Hui*, FENG Fengqin*. Antimicrobial activity of selected fatty acids and their derivatives. Journal of Zhejiang University[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2013, 39(2): 155-160.
[15] . Dynamic changes of fatty acids and related physical & chemical parameters during deep frying in fish oil supplemented blend oil[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2012, 38(5): 614-622.