Please wait a minute...
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology)  2009, Vol. 10 Issue (1): 46-51    DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B0820148
Biomedicine     
Effect of small bowel preparation with simethicone on capsule endoscopy
You-hong FANG, Chun-xiao CHEN, Bing-ling ZHANG
The Children’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China; Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
Download:     PDF (0 KB)     
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  Background: Capsule endoscopy is a novel non-invasive method for visualization of the entire small bowel. The diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy depends on the quality of visualization of the small bowel mucosa and its complete passage through the small bowel. To date, there is no standardized protocol for bowel preparation before capsule endoscopy. The addition of simethicone in the bowel preparation for the purpose of reducing air bubbles in the intestinal lumen had only been studied by a few investigators. Methods: Sixty-four participants were randomly divided into two groups to receive a bowel preparation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution (Group 1) and both PEG solution and simethicone (Group 2). The PEG solution and simethicone were taken the night before and 20 min prior to capsule endoscopy, respectively. Frames taken in the small intestine were examined and scored for luminal bubbles by two professional capsule endoscopists. Gastric emptying time and small bowel transit time were also recorded. Results: Simethicone significantly reduced luminal bubbles both in the proximal and distal small intestines. The mean time proportions with slight bubbles in the proximal and distal intestines in Group 2 were 97.1% and 99.0%, respectively, compared with 67.2% (P<0.001) and 68.8% (P<0.001) in Group 1. Simethicone had no effect on mean gastric emptying time, 32.08 min in Group 2 compared with 30.88 min in Group 1 (P=0.868), but it did increase mean small intestinal transit time from 227.28 to 281.84 min (P=0.003). Conclusion: Bowel preparation with both PEG and simethicone significantly reduced bubbles in the intestinal lumen and improved the visualization of the small bowel by capsule endoscopy without any side effects observed.

Key wordsCapsule endoscopy      Bowel preparation      Simethicone      Polyethylene glycol (PEG)      Visualization      Air bubbles     
Received: 04 May 2008     
CLC:  R5  
Cite this article:

You-hong FANG, Chun-xiao CHEN, Bing-ling ZHANG. Effect of small bowel preparation with simethicone on capsule endoscopy. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2009, 10(1): 46-51.

URL:

http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/zjus-b/10.1631/jzus.B0820148     OR     http://www.zjujournals.com/xueshu/zjus-b/Y2009/V10/I1/46

[1] Quan-sheng Du, Jie Cui, Chun-jie Zhang, Ke He. Visualization analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology studies[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2016, 17(10): 798-806.
[2] Wen-jun Zheng, Jian Yang, Jun Zhu. QTLNetworkR: an interactive R package for QTL visualization[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2010, 11(7): 512-515.
[3] Ling-ling JIANG, Bing-ling ZHANG, You-shi LIU. Is adult celiac disease really uncommon in Chinese?[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2009, 10(3): 168-171.
[4] Chen-yi LI, Bing-ling ZHANG, Chun-xiao CHEN, You-ming LI. OMOM capsule endoscopy in diagnosis of small bowel disease[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology), 2008, 9(11): 857-862.