|
|
|
| Essential Properties and Functions of Academic Conferences: A Field Theory-based Perspective |
| Huang Juchen1, Zhao Qiang2 |
1.Institute of Higher Education, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2.Institute of Science and Technology Education, Hubei University, Xianning 437000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Based on the ideas and perspectives of Bourdieu’s “field theory”, this paper focuses on the essential properties and functions of academic conferences from the core concepts and perspectives of capital, inherent habits, actors and their strategies. The analysis reveals that: (1) academic conferences are rich in connotation and form. Academic conferences are not only a concept of physical space in daily existence, a product of social life, a medium and means of exchanging academic ideas and producing knowledge, but also an aggregated network of relationships formed by individual scholars or academic organizations and other actors in different positions and the academic resources and even academic power they occupy, while their operation relies on the academic reputation, academic values, academic attitudes, academic resources and other specific capital recognized by peers. At the same time, its operation depends on the existence and supply of specific capital such as peer-recognized academic reputation, academic values, academic attitudes, and academic resources, while academic responsibilities and academic norms maintain and regulate the structure and order of academic activities as unique forms of habits, and together make academic conferences always maintain a dynamic tension. (2) Under the extension of the above meaning, academic conferences have multiple functions. ①Academic discipline and control. The academic conference is a microcosmic place for constructing various kinds of order and relationships related to academic activities. Academic conferences initiated by academic communities can provide professional discourse, technical and theoretical norms and methods for individual academic activities; ②Linking and exchanging resources. Academic conferences are essentially a kind of “resource link,” adhering to the principle of mutual benefit and complementarity of resources, in which resource demanders and resource providers exchange resources to achieve a win-win situation; ③Knowledge production and innovation. The academic conference takes the activities related to knowledge production, dissemination and service as its responsibility, and assumes the role of “knowledge gatekeeper”. (3) Academic conferences have their own unique operation logic and mechanism in specific disciplines, but they also reveal some of their current problems: the “alienation” of academic norms induced by the intervention of external administrative forces, the “polarization” of resource distribution caused by the monopoly of a few academic elites, and the utilitarianism of the assessment and evaluation system. However, it also reveals some of its current problems: the “alienation” of academic norms induced by the intervention of external administrative forces, the “polarization” of resource distribution caused by the monopoly of a few academic elites, and the “weakening” of intellectual innovation brought by the utilitarian orientation of the assessment and evaluation system. (4) In order to better play the role of academic conferences, the academic quality and communication effects of academic conferences should be improved by introducing institutional regulatory documents, regulating the participation behavior of administrative leaders, optimizing the management system of academic conferences, promoting diversity and inclusion of participants and establishing a reasonable assessment and evaluation system of academic conferences. Finally, the contribution and value of this paper lies in the theoretical interpretation and analysis of an important academic phenomenon that is often overlooked in the academic world from the perspective of “field theory”, which is the first time to clarify the essential attributes and functions of academic conferences in domestic research, and to use it as a “window” to guide people to pay attention to deeper issues, including: where are the academic tribes and their groups going in their overall value pursuit in the academic system? What is the real-life situation of scholars? How to build a healthy academic ecological landscape in a country? And so on.
|
|
Received: 01 March 2022
|
|
|
|
1 周旭洲、欧阳斌： 《会议文化透视——一个跨越时间和空间的课题》，《管理世界》1990年第6期，第197-199页。
2 庞明礼、陈念平： 《科层运作何以需要开会：一个政策执行过程的分析视角》，《中国行政管理》2021年第8期，第100-106页。
3 黄明睿： 《论学术会议与期刊的关系》，《编辑学报》2016年第1期，第18-20页。
4 郎友兴、何包钢： 《村民会议和村民代表会议——村级民主完善之尝试》，《政治学研究》2000年第3期，第54-60页。
5 法］皮埃尔·布迪厄、［美］华康德： 《实践与反思：反思社会学导引》，李猛、李康译，北京：中央编译出版社，1998年。
6 刘小珉、刘诗谣： 《乡村精英带动扶贫的实践逻辑——一个基于场域理论解释湘西Z村脱贫经验的尝试》，《中央民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第2期，第74-85页。
7 Bourdieu P.， Outline of a Theory of Practice， Cambridge： Cambridge University Press， 1977.
8 法］皮埃尔·布尔迪厄： 《科学之科学与反观性：法兰西学院专题讲座（2000—2001学年）》，陈圣生、涂释文、梁亚红等译，桂林：广西师范大学出版社，2006年。
9 Bourdieu P.， “The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason，” Social Science Information， Vol. 14， No. 6 （1975）， pp. 19-47.
10 法］皮埃尔·布尔迪厄： 《科学的社会用途》，刘成富、张艳译，南京：南京大学出版社，2005年。
11 McClellan J.， Science Reorganized： Scientific Societies in the Eighteenth Century， New York： Columbia University Press， 1985.
12 刘兴平： 《学术会议的兴起与发展》，《科技导报》2010年第6期，第19-24页。
13 法］莫里斯·迪韦尔热： 《政治社会学：政治学要素》，杨祖功、王大东译，北京：东方出版社，2007年。
14 阎光才： 《精神的牧放与规训：学术活动的制度化与学术人的生态》，北京：教育科学出版社，2011年。
15 法］米歇尔·福柯： 《规训与惩罚》，刘北成、杨远婴译，北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，2003年。
16 阎光才： 《学术系统的分化结构与学术精英的生成机制》，《高等教育研究》2010年第3期，第1-11页。
17 陈伟东、张继军： 《“开放空间会议+”：一套社会治理的系统机制》，《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2016年第4期，第34-41页。
18 丁大尉： 《场域理论视角下数字知识资源的垄断与反垄断——基于对Elsevier在中国涨价事件的分析》，《自然辩证法研究》2019年第1期，第66-71页。
19 法］皮埃尔·布尔迪厄： 《区分：判断力的社会批判》（上册），刘晖译，北京：商务印书馆，2005年。
20 美］兰德尔·科林斯： 《互动仪式链》，林聚任、王鹏、宋丽君译，北京：商务印书馆，2009年。
21 美］伊曼纽·华勒斯坦等： 《学科·知识·权力》，刘健芝等编译，北京：生活·读书·新知三联书店，1999年。
22 英］托尼·比彻、［英］保罗·特罗勒尔： 《学术部落及其领地：知识探索与学科文化》，唐跃勤、蒲茂华、陈洪捷译，北京：北京大学出版社，2008年。
23 赵英男： 《离学术渐远的学术圈会议》，《科教新报》2020年1月8日，第12版。
24 司昶：《中国学界岁末遭遇“会海”：有些高校资源太多，拼命开会》，2015年12月23日，https：//m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1412340，2022年1月1日。
25 冯丽妃： 《学术会议的井喷与乱象》，《中国科学报》2020年11月19日，第5版。
26 陈洪捷： 《学术研讨会为何会沦为“表演”？》，《中国科学报》2021年5月18日，第7版。
27 美］约瑟夫·劳斯： 《知识与权力》，盛晓明、邱慧、孟强译，北京：北京大学出版社，2004年。
28 法］皮埃尔·布尔迪厄： 《国家精英：名牌大学与群体精神》，杨亚平译，北京：商务印书馆，2004年。 |
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 52 
