|
|
|
| Integrated Coastal Zone Management: International Experience and Practice of China |
| Wang Xiaojun |
| College of Humanities and Law, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Coastal zones are the interface between land and sea. With a high degree of development, this area suffers from various challenges such as high population pressure, overuse of resources, ecological degradation and serious pollution problems. Integrated coastal zone management (ICZM), as opposed to the traditional management model segmented by different industries and administrative branches, is an adaptive, integrated, dynamic and coordinated approach, a result of the shift in our mindset toward the sea. Participated by multiple parties, ICZM is a governmental action that controls, regulates and influences the behavior of actors within the coastal area with an ultimate aim to achieve sustainable development. ICZM legislation in some countries had led to successful practices that helped balance the development and protection of coastal zones. The idea of ICZM was first put into practice by developed coastal countries since it was created in the 1930s. Later in the 1980s, the model was introduced into China and other developing countries. Based on the integration level among marine administrative bodies, ICZM can be divided into five development stages: Segmentation, Communication, Coordination, Synchronization and Integration. The first stage is characterized by the lack of communication among governmental bodies and the failure to consider the consequences of independent actions upon other institutions. In the second stage, different administrative bodies communicate with each other mainly via meetings. During the third phase, specific actions are taken to achieve interdepartmental coordination. The fourth stage witnesses a jointly drafted management plan that transcends institutional barriers and promotes cooperation. In the last stage, various government organizations work together to establish a long-term coordination mechanism to ensure the achievement of previously set objectives through the collaboration of different industrial sectors. Since the year 2000, the development of ICZM has shown new trends such as increasing emphasis on the ecosystem approach, more attention to the construction of public governance mechanisms, and the adoption of the land-sea integration principle. Since the 1990s, China has strengthened exchanges and cooperation with international organizations for marine conservation, and has accumulated valuable experience through pilot ICZM projects in its coastal areas. To further improve ICZM, China needs to increase its effort in the following aspects: accelerate legislation on ICZM and enact the Coastal Zone Management Act; establish a long-term interdepartmental coordination mechanism at the national level; follow the principle of land-sea integration, and re-plan the industrial development and layout on land fully considering its impact on the sea so as to achieve balanced movement and allocation of resources between sea and land; adopt the ecosystem approach, establish an ecosystem-based, integrated marine management system as well as a supervision and evaluation system, and promote marine management and restoration.This paper is innovative in the following aspects. Firstly, it draws on the experiences of developed countries and analyzes the development trends of ICZM including greater emphases on the application of the ecosystem approach, the participation of multiple parities in building public governance mechanisms, and the integration of land and sea. Secondly, based on the analysis of the pilot projects in Xiamen, Fujian Province, Beibu Gulf in the South China Sea and regions around the Bohai Sea (including Shandong, Liaoning and Hebei Provinces and Tianjin municipality), the paper proposes suggestions covering legislation, establishment of coordination mechanisms and land-sea integration to improve ICZM in China.
|
|
Received: 14 March 2022
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
澳］罗伯特·凯、［加］杰奎琳·奥德： 《海岸带规划与管理》，高健、张效莉译，上海：上海财经大学出版社，2010年。2 李百齐： 《海岸带综合管理研究》，北京：海洋出版社，2011年。3 鹿守本、艾万铸： 《海岸带综合管理——体制和运行机制研究》，北京：海洋出版社，2001年。4 郭振仁： 《海岸带空间规划与综合管理——面向潜在问题的创新方法》，北京：科学出版社，2013年。5 美］约翰·R.克拉克： 《海岸带管理手册》，吴克勤、杨德全、盖明举译，北京：海洋出版社，2000年。6 Kay R. & Alder J.， Coastal Planning and Management， London： Taylor & Francis Group， 1999.7 鹿守本： 《海洋管理通论》，北京：海洋出版社，1997年。8 许莉： 《国外海洋空间规划编制技术方法对海洋功能区划的启示》，《海洋开发与管理》2015年第9期，第28-31页。9 王琪： 《中国海洋管理：运行与变革》，北京：海洋出版社，2014年。10 赵明利、伍业锋、施平： 《从“综合”角度看我国海岸带综合管理存在的问题》，《海洋开发与管理》2005年第4期，第17-22页。11 徐祥民： 《渤海管理法的体制问题研究》，北京：人民出版社，2011年。12 毛仲荣： 《美国旧金山湾环境立法的执行体制对我国的启示》，《经济师》2012年第12期，第96-98页。13 马来西亚］蔡程瑛： 《海岸带综合管理的原动力》，周秋麟、温泉、杨圣云译，北京：海洋出版社，2010年。14 张璋： 《20世纪80年代以来的全球行政改革：背景、理论、举措与经验》，《北京行政学院学报》2002年第4期，第31-36页。15 刘中民： 《国际海洋政治专题研究》，青岛：中国海洋大学出版社，2007年。16 李宇、胡业翠、郭泽莲： 《我国海岸带管理冲突及国外经验借鉴》，《开发研究》2021年第5期，第112-117页。17 丁晖、曹铭昌、刘立等： 《立足生态系统完整性，改革生态环境保护管理体制：十八届三中全会“建立陆海统筹的生态系统保护修复区域联动机制”精神解读》，《生态与农村环境学报》2015年第5期，第647-651页。18 穆军全、霍冲： 《行政组织内部协调机制构建的路径探析》，《辽宁行政学院学报》2013年第3期，第38-40页。19 洪华生、薛雄志： 《厦门海岸带综合管理十年回眸》，厦门：厦门大学出版社，2006年。20 孟伟庆： 《基于生态系统的海洋管理：概念、原则、框架与实践途径》，《地球科学进展》2016年第5期，第461-470页。21 黄惠冰、胡业翠、张宇龙等： 《澳大利亚海岸带综合管理及其对中国的借鉴》，《海洋开发与管理》2021年第1期，第28-35页。22 李彦平、魏金龙、刘大海： 《英国海岸带综合管理体制改革及启示——以〈英格兰海岸带协议〉为例》，《中国土地》2021年第7期，第55-58页。23 周鲁闽、卢昌义： 《厦门第二轮海岸带综合管理战略行动计划研究》，《台湾海峡》2006年第2期，第302-308页。24 王琪、邵志刚： 《关于我国区域海洋管理现状及发展对策的思考》，《海洋信息》2012年第2期，第69-76页。25 张效莉、薛婷婷、陈林生等： 《我国海岸带管理中的关键问题及对策措施研究》，《海洋经济》2021年第4期，第97-105页。26 郑承忠： 《建立完善的厦门市海岸带综合管理与协调机制》，《海洋开发与管理》2004年第6期，第75-78页。27 张湘兰、叶泉： 《建设海洋强国的法律保障：中国海洋法体系的完善》，《武大国际法评论》2013年第1期，第22-42页。28 刘大海、纪瑞雪、邢文秀： 《海陆资源配置理论与方法研究》，北京：海洋出版社，2014年。29 刘大海、管松、邢文秀： 《基于陆海统筹的海岸带综合管理：从规划到立法》，《中国土地》2019年第22期，第8-11页。30 王斌、杨振姣： 《基于生态系统的海洋管理理论与实践分析》，《太平洋学报》2018年第6期，第87-98页。
|
|
|
|
2022, Vol. 52 
